Home Medicine Influence of the skull bone and brain tissue on the sound field in transcranial extracorporeal shock wave therapy: an ex vivo study
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Influence of the skull bone and brain tissue on the sound field in transcranial extracorporeal shock wave therapy: an ex vivo study

  • Nina Reinhardt ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Christoph Schmitz , Stefan Milz and Matías de la Fuente ORCID logo
Published/Copyright: September 21, 2023

Abstract

Objectives

Focused ultrasound is mainly known for focal ablation and localized hyperthermia of tissue. During the last decade new treatment options were developed for neurological indications based on blood-brain-barrier opening or neuromodulation. Recently, the transcranial application of shock waves has been a subject of research. However, the mechanisms of action are not yet understood. Hence, it is necessary to know the energy that reaches the brain during the treatment and the focusing characteristics within the tissue.

Methods

The sound field of a therapeutic extracorporeal shock wave transducer was investigated after passing human skull bone (n=5) or skull bone with brain tissue (n=2) in this ex vivo study. The maximum and minimum pressure distribution and the focal pressure curves were measured at different intensity levels and penetration depths, and compared to measurements in water.

Results

Mean peak negative pressures of up to −4.97 MPa were reached behind the brain tissue. The positive peak pressure was attenuated by between 20.85 and 25.38 dB/cm by the skull bone. Additional damping by the brain tissue corresponded to between 0.29 and 0.83 dB/cm. Compared to the measurements in water, the pulse intensity integral in the focal spot was reduced by 84 % by the skull bone and by additional 2 % due to the brain tissue, resulting in a total damping of up to 86 %. The focal position was shifted up to 8 mm, whereas the basic shape of the pressure curves was preserved.

Conclusions

Positive effects may be stimulated by transcranial shock wave therapy but damage cannot be excluded.


Corresponding author: Nina Reinhardt, Chair of Medical Engineering, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany, Phone: +49 241 8023878, E-mail:

Funding source: Richard Wolf GmBH, Knittlingen, Germany

  1. Ethical approval: This manuscript is exempted from obtaining post mortem informed consent because all donors have donated their bodies to the Department of Anatomy of the LMU Munich for teaching and research purposes. According to German law the donation was legally documented in written form and signed by the donors during their lifetime. In such documented cases the ethical approval board at the medical faculty of the LMU has declared that no further ethical approval is necessary.

  2. Informed consent: Not applicable.

  3. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  4. Competing interests: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  5. Research funding: This work was supported by Richard Wolf GmbH, Knittlingen, Germany. The funding organization played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

References

1. Loske, AM. Medical and biomedical applications of shock waves. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2017.10.1007/978-3-319-47570-7Search in Google Scholar

2. Campbell, JD, Trock, BJ, Oppenheim, AR, Anusionwu, I, Gor, RA, Burnett, AL. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that assess the efficacy of low-intensity shockwave therapy for the treatment of erectile dysfunction. Ther Adv Urol 2019;11:1756287219838364. https://doi.org/10.1177/1756287219838364.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

3. Galiano, R, Snyder, R, Mayer, P, Rogers, LC, Alvarez, O. Focused shockwave therapy in diabetic foot ulcers: secondary endpoints of two multicentre randomised controlled trials. J Wound Care 2019;28:383–95. https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2019.28.6.383.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Lohse-Busch, H, Reime, U, Falland, R. Symptomatic treatment of unresponsive wakefulness syndrome with transcranially focused extracorporeal shock waves. NeuroRehabilitation 2014;35:235–44. https://doi.org/10.3233/nre-141115.Search in Google Scholar

5. Beisteiner, R, Matt, E, Fan, C, Baldysiak, H, Schönfeld, M, Philippi Novak, T, et al.. Transcranial pulse stimulation with ultrasound in Alzheimer’s Disease-a new navigated focal brain therapy. Adv Sci 2020;7:1902583. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.201902583.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

6. Fry, FJ, Barger, JE. Acoustical properties of the human skull. J Acoust Soc Am 1978;63:1576–90. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.381852.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Adams, C, Jones, RM, Yang, SD, Kan, WM, Leung, K, Zhou, Y, et al.. Implementation of a skull-conformal phased array for transcranial focused ultrasound therapy. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2021;68:3457–68. https://doi.org/10.1109/tbme.2021.3077802.Search in Google Scholar

8. Chupova, DD, Rosnitskiy, PB, Gavrilov, LR, Khokhlova, VA. Compensation for aberrations of focused ultrasound beams in transcranial sonications of brain at different depths. Acoust Phys 2022;68:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1134/s1063771022010018.Search in Google Scholar

9. Clement, GT, Sun, J, Giesecke, T, Hynynen, K. A hemisphere array for non-invasive ultrasound brain therapy and surgery. Phys Med Biol 2000;45:3707–19. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/45/12/314.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Marquet, F, Pernot, M, Aubry, J-F, Montaldo, G, Marsac, L, Tanter, M, et al.. Non-invasive transcranial ultrasound therapy based on a 3D CT scan: protocol validation and in vitro results. Phys Med Biol 2009;54:2597–613. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/54/9/001.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Maimbourg, G, Houdouin, A, Deffieux, T, Tanter, M, Aubry, J-F. 3D-printed adaptive acoustic lens as a disruptive technology for transcranial ultrasound therapy using single-element transducers. Phys Med Biol 2018;63:25026. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/aaa037.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Xu, Z, Carlson, C, Snell, J, Eames, M, Hananel, A, Lopes, MB, et al.. Intracranial inertial cavitation threshold and thermal ablation lesion creation using MRI-guided 220-kHz focused ultrasound surgery: preclinical investigation. J Neurosurg 2015;122:152–61. https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.9.jns14541.Search in Google Scholar

13. Huang, AP-H, Lai, D-M, Hsu, Y-H, Kung, Y, Lan, C, Yeh, C-S, et al.. Cavitation-induced traumatic cerebral contusion and intracerebral hemorrhage in the rat brain by using an off-the-shelf clinical shockwave device. Sci Rep 2019;9:15614. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-52117-5.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

14. Divani, AA, Salazar, P, Monga, M, Beilman, GJ, SantaCruz, KS. Inducing different brain injury levels using shock wave lithotripsy. J Ultrasound Med 2018;37:2925–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.14656.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Kim, Y, Hall, TL, Xu, Z, Cain, CA. Transcranial histotripsy therapy: a feasibility study. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectrics Freq Control 2014;61:582–93. https://doi.org/10.1109/tuffc.2014.2947.Search in Google Scholar

16. Lu, N, Hall, TL, Choi, D, Gupta, D, Daou, BJ, Sukovich, JR, et al.. Transcranial MR-guided histotripsy system. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectrics Freq Control 2021;68:2917–29. https://doi.org/10.1109/tuffc.2021.3068113.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

17. Darrow, DP. Focused ultrasound for neuromodulation. Neurotherapeutics 2019;16:88–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13311-018-00691-3.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

18. Meng, Y, Hynynen, K, Lipsman, N. Applications of focused ultrasound in the brain: from thermoablation to drug delivery. Nat Rev Neurol 2021;17:7–22. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41582-020-00418-z.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Xie, P, Zhou, S, Wang, X, Wang, Y, Yuan, Y. Effect of pulsed transcranial ultrasound stimulation at different number of tone-burst on cortico-muscular coupling. BMC Neurosci 2018;19:60. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12868-018-0462-8.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

20. Kubanek, J, Shukla, P, Das, A, Baccus, SA, Goodman, MB. Ultrasound elicits behavioral responses through mechanical effects on neurons and ion channels in a simple nervous system. J Neurosci 2018;38:3081–91. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.1458-17.2018.Search in Google Scholar

21. Lee, W, Croce, P, Margolin, RW, Cammalleri, A, Yoon, K, Yoo, S-S. Transcranial focused ultrasound stimulation of motor cortical areas in freely-moving awake rats. BMC Neurosci 2018;19:57. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12868-018-0459-3.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

22. Younan, Y, Deffieux, T, Larrat, B, Fink, M, Tanter, M, Aubry, J-F. Influence of the pressure field distribution in transcranial ultrasonic neurostimulation. Med Phys 2013;40:82902. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4812423.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

23. Gaur, P, Casey, KM, Kubanek, J, Li, N, Mohammadjavadi, M, Saenz, Y, et al.. Histologic safety of transcranial focused ultrasound neuromodulation and magnetic resonance acoustic radiation force imaging in rhesus macaques and sheep. Brain Stimul 2020;13:804–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2020.02.017.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

24. Legon, W, Adams, S, Bansal, P, Patel, PD, Hobbs, L, Ai, L, et al.. A retrospective qualitative report of symptoms and safety from transcranial focused ultrasound for neuromodulation in humans. Sci Rep 2020;10:5573. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-62265-8.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

25. Stern, JM, Spivak, NM, Becerra, SA, Kuhn, TP, Korb, AS, Kronemyer, D, et al.. Safety of focused ultrasound neuromodulation in humans with temporal lobe epilepsy. Brain Stimul 2021;14:1022–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2021.06.003.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

26. Blackmore, J, Shrivastava, S, Sallet, J, Butler, CR, Cleveland, RO. Ultrasound neuromodulation: a review of results, mechanisms and safety. Ultrasound Med Biol 2019;45:1509–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2018.12.015.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

27. Kung, Y, Lan, C, Hsiao, M-Y, Sun, M-K, Hsu, Y-H, Huang, AP-H, et al.. Focused shockwave induced blood-brain barrier opening and transfection. Sci Rep 2018;8:2218. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-20672-y.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

28. Reinhardt, N, Dietz-Laursonn, K, Janzen, M, Radermacher, K, Bach, C, de La Fuente, M, et al.. Experimental setup for evaluation of cavitation effects in ESWL. Curr Dir Biomed Eng 2018;4:191–4. https://doi.org/10.1515/cdbme-2018-0047.Search in Google Scholar

29. Duck, FA. Physical properties of tissue: a comprehensive reference book. New York: Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine; 2012.Search in Google Scholar

30. Marsh, JL, Bentil, SA. Cerebrospinal fluid cavitation as a mechanism of blast-induced traumatic brain injury: a review of current debates, methods, and findings. Front Neurol 2021;12:626393. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.626393.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

31. Deng, CX, Xu, Q, Apfel, RE, Holland, CK. In vitro measurements of inertial cavitation thresholds in human blood. Ultrasound Med Biol 1996;22:939–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-5629(96)00104-4.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

32. Gateau, J, Taccoen, N, Tanter, M, Aubry, J-F. Statistics of acoustically induced bubble-nucleation events in in vitro blood: a feasibility study. Ultrasound Med Biol 2013;39:1812–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2013.04.011.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

33. Kim, H, Chiu, A, Lee, SD, Fischer, K, Yoo, S-S. Focused ultrasound-mediated non-invasive brain stimulation: examination of sonication parameters. Brain Stimul 2014;7:748–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2014.06.011.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

34. Shetty, AK, Mishra, V, Kodali, M, Hattiangady, B. Blood brain barrier dysfunction and delayed neurological deficits in mild traumatic brain injury induced by blast shock waves. Front Cell Neurosci 2014;8:232. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2014.00232.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central


Supplementary Material

This article contains supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/bmt-2022-0332).


Received: 2022-08-25
Accepted: 2023-08-21
Published Online: 2023-09-21
Published in Print: 2024-02-26

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 16.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/bmt-2022-0332/html
Scroll to top button