Home Medicine Stratification of risk of atherosclerotic plaque using Hu’s moment invariants of segmented ultrasonic images
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Stratification of risk of atherosclerotic plaque using Hu’s moment invariants of segmented ultrasonic images

  • Smitha Balakrishnan ORCID logo EMAIL logo and Paul K. Joseph EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: July 15, 2022

Abstract

Myocardial infarction is one of the major life-threatening diseases. The cause is atherosclerosis i.e. the occlusion of the coronary artery by deposition of plaque on its walls. The severity of plaque deposition in the artery depends on the characteristics of the plaque. Hence, the classification of the type of plaque is crucial for assessing the risk of atherosclerosis and predicting the chances of myocardial infarction. This paper proposes prediction of atherosclerotic risk by non-invasive ultrasound image segmentation and textural feature extraction. The intima-media complex is segmented using a snakes-based segmentation algorithm on the arterial wall in the ultrasound images. Then, the plaque is extracted from the segmented intima-media complex. The features of the plaque are obtained by computing Hu’s moment invariants. Visual pattern recognition independent of position, size, orientation and parallel projection could be done using these moment invariants. For the classification of the features of the plaque, an SVM classifier is used. The performance shows improvement in accuracy using lesser number of features than previous works. The reduction in feature size is achieved by incorporating segmentation in the pre-processing stage. Tenfold cross-validation protocol is used for training and testing the classifier. An accuracy of 97.9% is obtained with only two features. This proposed technique could work as an adjunct tool in quick decision-making for cardiologists and radiologists. The segmentation step introduced in the preprocessing stage improved the feature extraction technique. An improvement in performance is achieved with much less number of features.


Corresponding authors: Smitha Balakrishnan, Electrical and Electronics Engineering Department, NSS college of Engineering, Palakkad, Kerala 678008, India, E-mail: ; and Paul K. Joseph, Electrical Engineering Department, National Institute of Technology, Calicut, Kerala 673601, India, E-mail:

Acknowledgment

We would like to acknowledge the help provided by Cyprus Institute of Neurology and Genetics, in Nicosia, Cyprus, for providing the image database.

  1. Research funding: This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

  5. Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individuals included in this study.

  6. Ethical approval: Not applicable.

References

1. World Health Organization. World health statistics 2020. monitoring health for the SGs. Geneva: Sustainable Development Goals; 2020.Search in Google Scholar

2. Poole-Wilson, PA. Global differences in atherosclerosis. In: Cardiovascular medicine, 3rd ed. London: Springer; 2007.10.1007/978-1-84628-715-2_29Search in Google Scholar

3. Alpert, JS, Thygesen, K, Jaffe, AS, White, HD. A universal definition of myocardial infarction for the twenty-first century. New York: Access Medicine: McGraw-Hill; 2018.Search in Google Scholar

4. Ehara, S, Kobayashi, Y, Yoshiyama, M, Shimada, K, Shimada, Y, Fukuda, D, et al.. Spotty calcification typifies the culprit plaque in patients with acute myocardial infarction: an intravascular ultrasound study. Circulation 2004;110:3424–9. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000148131.41425.e9.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Toth, PP. Subclinical atherosclerosis: what it is, what it means and what we can do about it. Int J Clin Pract 2008;62:1246–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-1241.2008.01804.x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

6. Prati, F, Arbustini, E, Labellarte, A, Dal Bello, B, Sommariva, L, Mallus, MT, et al.. Correlation between high frequency intravascular ultrasound and histomorphology in human coronary arteries. Heart 2001;85:567–70. https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.85.5.567.Search in Google Scholar

7. Liang, Q, Wendelhag, I, Wikstrand, J, Gustavsson, T. A multiscale dynamic programming procedure for boundary detection in ultrasonic artery images. IEEE Trans Med Imag 2000;19:127–42. https://doi.org/10.1109/42.836372.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Brott, TG, Hobson, RW, Howard, G. Stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid-artery stenosis. J Vasc Surg 2010;52:799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2010.07.042.Search in Google Scholar

9. Acharya, UR, Faust, O, Sree, SV, Alvin, APC, Krishnamurthi, G, Seabra, JCR, et al.. Atheromatic???: symptomatic vs. asymptomatic classification of carotid ultrasound plaque using a combination of HOS, DWT & texture. Proc Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc EMBS 2011:4489–92. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.2011.6091113.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Tsiaparas, NN, Golemati, S, Andreadis, I, Stoitsis, J, Valavanis, I, Nikita, KS. Assessment of carotid atherosclerosis from B-mode ultrasound images using directional multiscale texture features. Meas Sci Technol 2012;23:114004. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/23/11/114004.Search in Google Scholar

11. Acharya, RU, Faust, O, Alvin, APC, Sree, SV, Molinari, F, Saba, L, et al.. Symptomatic vs. asymptomatic plaque classification in carotid ultrasound. J Med Syst 2012;36:1861–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-010-9645-2.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Acharya, UR, Faust, O, Sree, SV, Molinari, F, Saba, L, Nicolaides, A, et al.. An accurate and generalized approach to plaque characterization in 346 carotid ultrasound scans. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 2012;61:1045–53. https://doi.org/10.1109/tim.2011.2174897.Search in Google Scholar

13. Acharya, UR, Faust, O, VS, S, Alvin, APC, Krishnamurthi, G, Seabra, JCR, et al.. Understanding symptomatology of atherosclerotic plaque by image-based tissue characterization. Comput Methods Progr Biomed 2013;110:66–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2012.09.008.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Rajendra Acharya, U, Rama Krishnan, MM, Vinitha Sree, S, Sanches, J, Shafique, S, Nicolaides, A, et al.. Plaque tissue characterization and classification in ultrasound carotid scans: a paradigm for vascular feature amalgamation. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 2013;62:392–400. https://doi.org/10.1109/tim.2012.2217651.Search in Google Scholar

15. Acharya, UR, Mookiah, MRK, Vinitha Sree, S, Afonso, D, Sanches, J, Shafique, S, et al.. Atherosclerotic plaque tissue characterization in 2D ultrasound longitudinal carotid scans for automated classification: a paradigm for stroke risk assessment. Med Biol Eng Comput 2013;51:513–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-012-1019-0.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Afonso, D, Seabra, J, Pedro, LM, Fernandes E Fernandes, J, Sanches, JM. An ultrasonographic risk score for detecting symptomatic carotid atherosclerotic plaques. IEEE J Biomed Heal Informatics 2015;19:1505–13. https://doi.org/10.1109/jbhi.2014.2359236.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Vidya, KS, Ng, EYK, Acharya, UR, Chou, SM, Tan, RS, Ghista, DN. Computer-aided diagnosis of Myocardial Infarction using ultrasound images with DWT, GLCM and HOS methods: a comparative study. Comput Biol Med 2015;62:86–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2015.03.033.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Smitha, B, Joseph, KP. A new approach for classification of atherosclerosis of common carotid artery from ultrasound images. J Mech Med Biol 2019;19. https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219519419400013.Search in Google Scholar

19. Zhou, R, Luo, Y, Fenster, A, Spence, JD, Ding, M. Fractal dimension based carotid plaque characterization from three-dimensional ultrasound images; 2018.10.1007/s11517-018-1865-5Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Smitha, B, PJ, K. Fractal and multifractal analysis of atherosclerotic plaque in ultrasound images of the carotid artery. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2019;123.10.1016/j.chaos.2019.03.041Search in Google Scholar

21. Smitha, B, Paul Joseph, K. Analysis of carotid plaque using multifractal method in ultrasound images. Proc Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc EMBS 2019:943–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/embc.2019.8856759.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

22. Molinari, F, Raghavendra, U, Gudigar, A, Meiburger, KM, Rajendra Acharya, U. An efficient data mining framework for the characterization of symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid plaque using bidimensional empirical mode decomposition technique. Med Biol Eng Comput 2018;56:1579–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-018-1792-5.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

23. Saba, L, Sanagala, SS, Gupta, SK, Koppula, VK, Johri, AM, Khanna, NN, et al.. Multimodality carotid plaque tissue characterization and classification in the artificial intelligence paradigm: a narrative review for stroke application. Ann Transl Med 2021;9:1206. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-7676.Search in Google Scholar

24. Sanagala, SS, Nicolaides, A, Gupta, SK, Koppula, VK, Saba, L, Agarwal, S, et al.. Ten fast transfer learning models for carotid ultrasound plaque tissue characterization in augmentation framework embedded with heatmaps for stroke risk stratification. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021;11:2109. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11112109.Search in Google Scholar

25. Mao, F, Gill, J, Downey, D, Fenster, A. Segmentation of carotid artery in ultrasound images: method development and evaluation technique. Med Phys 2000;27:1961–70. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.1287111.Search in Google Scholar

26. Wendelhag, I, Liang, Q, Gustavsson, T, Wikstrand, J. A new automated computerized analyzing system simplifies reading and reduces the variability in ultrasound measurement of intima-media thickness. Stroke 1997;28:2195–200. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.28.11.2195.Search in Google Scholar

27. The Laboratory of eHealth. University of Cyprus, Database for IMT Segmentation, Copyright (c); 2012. Available from: http://www.medinfo.cs.ucy.ac.cy/index.php/downloads/datasets.Search in Google Scholar

28. Williams, DJ, Shah, M. A fast algorithm for active contours and curvature estimation. CVGIP: Image Understanding 1992;55:14–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/1049-9660(92)90003-l.Search in Google Scholar

29. Kass, M, Witkin, A, Terzopoulos, D. Snakes: active contour models. Int J Comput Vis 1988;1:321–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00133570.Search in Google Scholar

30. Loizou, CP, Pattichis, CS, Pantziaris, M, Tyllis, T, Nicolaides, A. Snakes based segmentation of the common carotid artery intima media. Med Biol Eng Comput 2007;45:35–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-006-0140-3.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

31. Loizou, CP, Pattichis, CS, Christodoulou, CI, Istepanian, RSH, Pantziaris, M, Nicolaides, A. Comparative evaluation of despeckle filtering in ultrasound imaging of the carotid artery. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectrics Freq Control 2005;52:1653–69. https://doi.org/10.1109/tuffc.2005.1561621.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

32. Abd-Elmoniem, KZ, Youssef, ABM, Kadah, YM. Real-time speckle reduction and coherence enhancement in ultrasound imaging via nonlinear anisotropic diffusion. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2002;49:997–1014. https://doi.org/10.1109/tbme.2002.1028423.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

33. Goodman, JW. Some fundamental properties of speckle. J Opt Soc Am 1976;66:1145. https://doi.org/10.1364/josa.66.001145.Search in Google Scholar

34. Tiilikainen, N. A comparative study of active contour snakes [Internet]. Copenhagen Univ Denmark; 2007. Available from: http://itchen.class.kmu.edu.tw/Vision/Slides/Reference/CV/nikolas.070901.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

35. Cheng, DC, Schmidt-Trucksäss, A, sheng, CK, Burkhardt, H. Using snakes to detect the intimal and adventitial layers of the common carotid artery wall in sonographic images. Comput Methods Progr Biomed 2002;67:27–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0169-2607(00)00149-8.Search in Google Scholar

36. Wang, J, Li, X. Guiding ziplock snakes with a priori information. IEEE Trans Image Process 2003;12:176–85. https://doi.org/10.1109/tip.2003.809019.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

37. Ming-Kuei, H. Visual pattern recognition by moment. IEEE Trans Inf Theor 1962;8:179–87. https://doi.org/10.1109/tit.1962.1057692.Search in Google Scholar

38. Zhang, Y, Wang, S, Sun, P, Phillips, P. Pathological brain detection based on wavelet entropy and Hu moment invariants. Bio Med Mater Eng 2015;26:S1283–90. https://doi.org/10.3233/bme-151426.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

39. Chang, C, Lin, C, Tieleman, T. LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines. ACM Trans Intell Syst Technol 2008;307:1–39.10.1145/1961189.1961199Search in Google Scholar

40. Keerthi, SS, Lin, CJ. Asymptotic behaviors of support vector machines with Gaussian kernel. Neural Comput 2003;15:1667–89. https://doi.org/10.1162/089976603321891855.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2021-02-24
Accepted: 2022-06-21
Published Online: 2022-07-15
Published in Print: 2022-10-26

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 6.3.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/bmt-2021-0044/html
Scroll to top button