Startseite Experimental investigation on the effect of drill quality on the performance of bone drilling
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Experimental investigation on the effect of drill quality on the performance of bone drilling

  • Khurshid Alam EMAIL logo , Sujan Piya , Ahmed Al-Ghaithi und Vadim Silberschmidth
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 22. August 2019
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Bone drilling is a well-known process in operative fracture treatment and reconstructive surgery. The cutting ability of the drill is lost when used for multiple times. In this study, the effect of different levels of drill wear on bone temperature, drilling force, torque, delamination around the drilling region and surface roughness of the hole was investigated using a series of experiments. Experimental results demonstrated that the wear of the drill is strongly related to the drilling force, torque, temperature and surface roughness of the drilled hole. Statistical analysis was performed to find the effect of various factors on multiple response variables in the bone drilling process. The favorable conditions for bone drilling are obtained when feed rate, drill speed and the roughness of the cutting edge of the drill were fixed at 30 mm, 2000 rpm and up to 2 mm, respectively. Further, analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to determine the factor with a significant impact on the response variables. F-test and p-value indicated that the feed rate had the highest effect on grey relational grade followed by the roughness of the drill. This study suggests that the sharp drill along with controlled drilling speed and feed rate may be used for safe and efficient surgical drilling in bone.

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to Mr. Jagpal Singh for his support in drill surface roughness measurements.

  1. Author Statement

  2. Research funding: The research work was supported by the internal research grant (grant no.: IG/ENG/MIED/16/02) from Sultan Qaboos University. This support is gratefully acknowledged.

  3. Conflict of interest: None to declare.

  4. Informed consent: Informed consent is not applicable.

  5. Ethical approval: The conducted research is not related to either human or animal use.

References

[1] Augustin G, Zigman T, Davila S, Udilljak T, Staroveski T, Brezak D, et al. Cortical bone drilling and thermal osteonecrosis. Clin Biomech 2012;27:313–25.10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2011.10.010Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[2] Alam K. Experimental and numerical investigation of cracking behavior of cortical bone in cutting. Technol Health Care 2014;22:741–50.10.3233/THC-140848Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[3] Basiaga M, Paszenda Z, Szewczenko J, Kaczmarek MA. Influence of surgical drills wear on thermal process generated in bones. Acta Bioeng Biomech 2013;15:19–23.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[4] Matthews LS, Hirsch C. Temperatures measured in human cortical bone when drilling. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1972;54:297–308.10.2106/00004623-197254020-00008Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[5] Allan W, Williams ED, Kerawala CJ. Effects of repeated drill use on temperature of bone during preparation for osteosynthesis self-tapping screws. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005;43:314–9.10.1016/j.bjoms.2004.11.007Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[6] Oliveira N, Alaejos-Algarra F, Mareque-Bueno J, Ferrés-Padró E, Hernández-Alfaro F. Thermal changes and drill wear in bovine bone during implant site preparation. A comparative in vitro study: twisted stainless steel and ceramic drills. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23:963–9.10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02248.xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[7] Jochum RM, Reichart PA. Influence of multiple use of Timedur-titanium cannon drills: thermal response and scanning electron microscopic findings. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11:139–43.10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.110206.xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[8] Chacon GE, Bower DL, Larsen PE, McGlumphy EA, Beck FM. Heat production by 3 implant drill systems after repeated drilling and sterilization. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006;64:265–9.10.1016/j.joms.2005.10.011Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[9] Queiroz TP, Souza FÁ, Okamoto R, Margonar R, Pereira-Filho VA, Garcia IR, et al. Evaluation of immediate bone-cell viability and of drill wear after implant osteotomies: immunohistochemistry and scanning electron microscopy analysis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008;66:1233–40.10.1016/j.joms.2007.12.037Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[10] Koo KT, Kim MH, Kim HY, Wikesjö UM, Yang JH, Yeo IS. Effects of implant drill wear, irrigation, and drill materials on heat generation in osteotomy sites. J Oral Implantol 2015;41:19–23.10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-13-00151Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[11] Staroveski T, Brezak D, Grdan V, Bacek T. Medical drill wear classification using servomotor drive signals and neural networks. In: Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering, July 2–4, London, UK; 2014:599–603.Suche in Google Scholar

[12] Alajmo G, Schlegel U, Gueorguiev B, Matthys R, Gautier E. Plunging when drilling: effect of using blunt drill bits. J Orthop Trauma 2012;26:482–7.10.1097/BOT.0b013e3182336ec3Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[13] Bertollo N, Walsh WR. Drilling of bone: practicality, limitations and complications associated with surgical drill-bits. In: Klika V, editor. Biomechanics in Applications. London: Intechopen; 2011:53–83.10.5772/20931Suche in Google Scholar

[14] Staroveski T, Brezak D, Udiljak T. Drill wear monitoring in cortical bone drilling. Med Eng Phys 2015;37:560–6.10.1016/j.medengphy.2015.03.014Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[15] Karaca F, Aksakal B, Kom M. Influence of orthopaedic drilling parameters on temperature and histopathology of bovine tibia: an in vitro study. Med Eng Phys 2011;33:1221–7.10.1016/j.medengphy.2011.05.013Suche in Google Scholar

[16] Pandey RK, Panda SS. Drilling of bone: a comprehensive review. J Clin Orthop Trauma 2013;4:15–30.10.1016/j.jcot.2013.01.002Suche in Google Scholar

[17] Ortmaier T, Weiss H, Döbele S, Schreiber U. Experiments on robot-assisted navigated drilling and milling of bones for pedicle screw placement. Int J Med Robot Comput Ass Surg 2006;2:350–63.10.1002/rcs.114Suche in Google Scholar

[18] Singh PN, Raghukandan K, Pai BC. Optimization by grey relational analysis of EDM parameters on machining Al–10% SiC P composites. J Mat Process Technol 2004;155: 1658–61.10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.04.322Suche in Google Scholar

[19] Lin JL, Lin CL. The use of the orthogonal array with grey relational analysis to optimize the electrical discharge machining process with multiple performance characteristics. Int J Mach Tools Manu 2002;42:237–44.10.1016/S0890-6955(01)00107-9Suche in Google Scholar

[20] Cordey J, Borgeaud M, Perren SM. Force transfer between the plate and the bone: relative importance of the bending stiffness of the screw friction between the plate and bone. Injury 2000;31:21–8.10.1016/S0020-1383(00)80028-5Suche in Google Scholar

[21] Alam K, Mitrofanov A, Silberschmidt VV. Experimental investigations of forces and torque in conventional and ultrasonically-assisted drilling of cortical bone. Med Eng Phys 2011;33:234–9.10.1016/j.medengphy.2010.10.003Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[22] Alam K, Silberschmidt VV. Analysis of temperature in conventional and ultrasonically-assisted drilling of cortical bone with infrared thermography. Technol Health Care 2014;22:243–52.10.3233/THC-140813Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2018-09-19
Accepted: 2019-04-18
Published Online: 2019-08-22
Published in Print: 2020-01-28

©2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 18.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/bmt-2018-0184/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen