Home Effect of toe extension on EMG of triceps surae muscles during isometric dorsiflexion
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Effect of toe extension on EMG of triceps surae muscles during isometric dorsiflexion

  • Ariba Siddiqi , Sridhar P. Arjunan EMAIL logo and Dinesh Kumar
Published/Copyright: March 26, 2016

Abstract

The protocol for estimating force of contraction by triceps surae (TS) muscles requires the immobilization of the ankle during dorsiflexion and plantar flexion. However, large variability in the results has been observed. To identify the cause of this variability, experiments were conducted where ankle dorsiflexion force and electromyogram (EMG) of the TS were recorded under two conditions: (i) toes were strapped and (ii) toes were unstrapped, with all other conditions such as immobilization of the ankle remaining unchanged. The root mean square (RMS) of the EMG and the force were analyzed and one-tail Student’s t-test was performed for significance between the two conditions. The RMS of the EMG from TS muscles was found to be significantly higher (~55%) during dorsiflexion with toes unstrapped compared with when the toes were strapped. The torque corresponding to dorsiflexion was also higher with toes unstrapped. Our study has shown that it is important to strap the toes when measuring the torque at the ankle and EMG of the TS muscles.


Corresponding author: Sridhar P. Arjunan, Biosignals Lab, Electrical and Computer Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia, Phone: +61 3 9925 5234, E-mail:

  1. Conflict of interest statement: Authors have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest, or nonfinancial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this article.

References

[1] Anderson FC, Pandy MG. Static and dynamic optimization solutions for gait are practically equivalent. J Biomech 2001; 34: 153–161.10.1016/S0021-9290(00)00155-XSearch in Google Scholar

[2] Baratta R, Solomonow M, Zhou B, Letson D, Chuinard R, D’ambrosia R. Muscular coactivation. The role of the antagonist musculature in maintaining knee stability. Am J Sports Med 1988; 16: 113–122.10.1177/036354658801600205Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[3] Billot M, Simoneau E, Van Hoecke J, Martin A. Coactivation at the ankle joint is not sufficient to estimate agonist and antagonist mechanical contribution. Muscle Nerve 2010; 41: 511–518.10.1002/mus.21530Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[4] Connelly DM, Rice CL, Roos MR, Vandervoort AA. Motor unit firing rates and contractile properties in tibialis anterior of young and old men. J Appl Physiol 1999; 87: 843–852.10.1152/jappl.1999.87.2.843Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[5] Lanza, IR, Russ DW, Kent-Braun JA. Age-related enhancement of fatigue resistance is evident in men during both isometric and dynamic tasks. J Appl Physiol 2004; 97: 967–975.10.1152/japplphysiol.01351.2003Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[6] Lanza, IR, Towse TF, Caldwell GE, Wigmore D, Kent-Braun JA. Effects of age on human muscle torque, velocity, and power in two muscle groups. J Appl Physiol 2003; 95: 2361–2369.10.1152/japplphysiol.00724.2002Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[7] Maganaris CN. Force-length characteristics of in vivo human skeletal muscle. Acta Physiol Scand 2001; 172: 279–285.10.1046/j.1365-201x.2001.00799.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[8] Maganaris CN, Baltzopoulos V, Sargeant AJ. Differences in human antagonistic ankle dorsiflexor coactivation between legs; can they explain the moment deficit in the weaker plantarflexor leg? Exp Physiol 1988; 83: 843–855.10.1113/expphysiol.1998.sp004164Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[9] Magnusson SP, Aagaard P, Rosager S, Dyhre-Poulsen P, Kjaer M. Load–displacement properties of the human triceps surae aponeurosis in vivo. J Physiol 2001; 531: 277–288.10.1111/j.1469-7793.2001.0277j.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[10] Marsh E, Sale D, McComas AJ, Quinlan J. Influence of joint position on ankle dorsiflexion in humans. J Appl Physiol 1981; 51: 160–167.10.1152/jappl.1981.51.1.160Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[11] McNeil CJ, Doherty TJ, Stashuk DW, Rice C L. Motor unit number estimates in the tibialis anterior muscle of young, old, and very old men. Muscle Nerve 2005; 31: 461–467.10.1002/mus.20276Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[12] Muramatsu T, Muraoka T, Takeshita D, Kawakami Y, Hirano Y, Fukunaga T. Mechanical properties of tendon and aponeurosis of human gastrocnemius muscle in vivo. J Appl Physiol 2001; 90: 1671–1678.10.1152/jappl.2001.90.5.1671Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[13] Perry M, Carville S, Smith IC, Rutherford O, Newham D. Strength, power output and symmetry of leg muscles: effect of age and history of falling. Eur J Appl Physiol 2007; 100: 553–561.10.1007/s00421-006-0247-0Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[14] Razali NM, Wah YB. Power comparisons of shapiro-wilk, kolmogorov-smirnov, lilliefors and anderson-darling tests. J Stat Model Analytic 2, 2011; 1: 21–33.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Salmons S. Muscle. In: Williams PL, editor. Gray’s anatomy. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone 1995: 881–883.Search in Google Scholar

[16] SENIAM [Internet]. 2009. Surface electromyography for the non invasive assessment of muscles. Available from http://seniam.org/.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Siddiqi A, Arjunan SP, Kumar DK, Improvement of isometric dorsiflexion protocol for assessment of tibialis anterior muscle strength. MethodsX 2015, 2: 107–111.10.1016/j.mex.2015.02.006Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[18] Simoneau E, Billot M, Martin A, Van Hoecke J. Antagonist mechanical contribution to resultant maximal torque at the ankle joint in young and older men. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2009; 19: e123–e131.10.1016/j.jelekin.2007.11.006Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[19] Vandervoort, AA, McComas AJ. Contractile changes in opposing muscles of the human ankle joint with aging. J Appl Physiol 1986; 61: 361–367.10.1152/jappl.1986.61.1.361Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[20] Winegard KJ, Hicks AL, Sale DG, Vandervoort AA. A 12-year follow-up study of ankle muscle function in older adults. J Gerontol Biol Med Sci 1996; 51:B202–B207.10.1093/gerona/51A.3.B202Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2014-10-22
Accepted: 2016-2-20
Published Online: 2016-3-26
Published in Print: 2016-12-1

©2016 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 13.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/bmt-2014-0135/html
Scroll to top button