Zum Hauptinhalt springen
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Biomechanical investigations of the secondary stability of commercial short dental implants in porcine ribs

  • , EMAIL logo , , , und
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 5. August 2014
Biomedical Engineering / Biomedizinische Technik
Aus der Zeitschrift Biomedical Engineering / Biomedizinische Technik Band 59 Heft 6

Abstract

The use of short implants has increased widely within the last years. However, the stability of these implants has not yet been comprehensively investigated, in particular the difference in geometry and dimension of short implants. The aim of the present study was to investigate experimentally the difference of the secondary stability of different commercial short implants by measuring their displacements. Eleven implant geometries were investigated in this study. A total of 22 implants were inserted in porcine rib segments, two implants for each system. Implant displacements were measured using a self-developed biomechanical hexapod measurement system (HexMeS). The highest displacement was observed with Straumann BL NC 3.3×8.0 mm (266 μm), followed by Straumann Standard 4.1×6.0 mm (156 μm), while the lowest displacement of 61 μm was shown by Dentaurum type 1 implant (4.2×5.0 mm). No obvious difference of displacements was observed between hammered and screw-shaped implants with relevant dimensions. The experimental results were in good agreement with the numerical ones (19–42%) for Dentaurum implants. However, a difference of 70–80% was obtained for the Astra implant (4.0×6.0 mm) and Bicon implant (6.0×5.7 mm). The geometry of short implants directly affects their stability within the bone.

Keywords: displacement; porcine ribs; short dental implants
Corresponding author: Dr.rer.nat. Istabrak Hasan, Endowed Chair of Oral Technology, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms University, Welschnonnenstr. 17, 53111 Bonn, Germany, Phone: +49 228 2872 2332 2388, E-mail:
aEqual authorship.

References

[1] Anitua E, Piñas L, Begoña L, Orive G. Long-term retrospective evaluation of short implants in the posterior areas: clinical results after 10–12 years. J Clin Periodont 2014; 41: 404–411.10.1111/jcpe.12222Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[2] Bernard JP, Belser UC, Martinet JP, Borgis SA. Osseointegration of Brånemark fixtures using a single-step operating technique. A preliminary prospective one-year study in the edentulous mandible. Clin Oral Implants Res 1995; 6: 122–129.10.1034/j.1600-0501.1995.060208.xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[3] Blaszczyszyn A, Heinemann F, Gedrange T, Kawala B, Gerber H, Dominiak M. Immediate loading of an implant with fine threaded neck – bone resorption and clinical outcome of single tooth restorations in the maxilla. Biomed. Eng.-Biomed. Tech. 2012; 57: 3–9.Suche in Google Scholar

[4] Bourauel C, Aitlahrach M, Heinemann F, Hasan I. Biomechanical finite element analysis of small diameter and short dental implants: extensional study of commercial implants. Biomed. Eng.-Biomed. Tech. 2012; 57: 21–32.Suche in Google Scholar

[5] Chan MF, Nähri TO, de Baat C, Kalk W. Treatment of the atrophic edentulous maxilla with implant-supported overdentures: a review of the literature. Int J Prosthodon 1998; 11: 7–15.Suche in Google Scholar

[6] Frost HM. Bone “mass” and the “mechanostat”: a proposal. Anat Rec 1987; 219: 1–9.10.1002/ar.1092190104Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[7] Fugazzotto PA. Shorter implants in clinical practice: rationale and treatment results. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008; 23: 487–496.Suche in Google Scholar

[8] Götz W, Gedrange T, Bourauel C, Hasan I. Clinical, biomechanical and biological aspects of immediately loaded dental implants: a critical review of the literature. Biomed. Eng.-Biomed. Tech. 2010; 55: 311–315.Suche in Google Scholar

[9] Griffin TJ, Cheung WS. The use of short, wide implants in posterior areas with reduced bone height: a retrospective investigation. J Prosthet Dent 2004; 92: 139–144.10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.05.010Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[10] Han HJ, Kim S, Han DH. Multifactorial evaluation of implant failure: a 19-year retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014; 29: 303–310.10.11607/jomi.2869Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[11] Hasan I, Heinemann F, Aitlahrach M, Bourauel C. Biomechanical finite element analysis of small diameter and short dental implants. Biomed. Eng.-Biomed. Tech. 2010; 55: 341–350.Suche in Google Scholar

[12] ISO 14801. Fatigue test for endosseous dental implants 2003.Suche in Google Scholar

[13] Jaffin RA, Berman CL. The excessive loss of Brånemark fixtures in type IV bone: a 5-year analysis. J Periodont 1991; 62: 2–4.10.1902/jop.1991.62.1.2Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[14] Jemt T, Lekholm U. Oral implant treatment in posterior partially edentulous jaws: a 5-year follow-up report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993; 8: 635–640.Suche in Google Scholar

[15] Keilig L, Bourauel C, Grüner M, et al. Design and testing of a novel measuring set-up for use in dental biomechanics – measuring principle and exemplary measurements with the hexapod measuring system. Biomed. Eng.-Biomed. Tech. 2004; 49: 208–215.Suche in Google Scholar

[16] Kim YK, Yun PY, Yi YJ, Bae JH, Sung SB, Ahn GJ. One-year prospective study of 7 mm long implants in mandible: installation technique and crown/implant ratio of 1.5 or less. J Oral Implantol 2013 [Epub ahead of print].Suche in Google Scholar

[17] Lekholm U, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T. Patient selection and preparation. Tissue integrated prostheses. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co. Inc. 1985: 199–209.Suche in Google Scholar

[18] Mardas N, Dereka X, Donos N, Dard M. Experimental model for bone regeneration in oral and cranio-maxillo-facial surgery. J Invest Surg 2014; 27: 32–49.10.3109/08941939.2013.817628Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[19] Naert I, Koutsikakis G, Duyck J, Quirynen M, Jacobs R, van Steenberghe D. Biologic outcome of implant-supported restorations in the treatment of partial edentulism. Part I: a longitudinal clinical evaluation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002; 13: 381–389.10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130406.xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[20] Naert I, Koutsikakis G, Quirynen M, Duyck J, van Steenberghe D, Jacobs R. Biologic outcome of implant-supported restorations in the treatment of partial edentulism. Part 2: a longitudinal radiographic study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002; 13: 390–395.10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130407.xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[21] Nedir R, Bischof M, Briaux JM, Beyer S, Szmukler-Moncler S, Bernard JP. A 7-year life table analysis from a prospective study on ITI implants with special emphasis on the use of short implants. Results from a private practice. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004; 15: 150–157.10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.00978.xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[22] Parithimarkalaignan S, Padmanabhan TV. Osseointegration: an update. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2013; 13: 2–6.10.1007/s13191-013-0252-zSuche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[23] Rahimi A, Bourauel C, Jager A, Gedrange T, Heinemann F. Load transfer by fine threading the implant neck – a FEM study. J Physiol Pharmacol 2009; 60(Suppl 8): 107–112.Suche in Google Scholar

[24] Renouard F, Nisand D. Short implants in the severely resorbed maxilla: a 2-year retrospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Rel Res 2005; 7: 104–110.10.1111/j.1708-8208.2005.tb00082.xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[25] Sharan A, Madjar D. Maxillary sinus pneumatisation following extractions: a radiographic study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008; 23: 48–56.Suche in Google Scholar

[26] Telleman G, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A, den Hartog L, Huddleston Slater JJ, Meijer HJ. A systematic review of the prognosis of short (<10 mm) dental implants placed in the partially edentulous patient. J Clin Periodontol 2011; 38: 667–676.10.1111/j.1600-051X.2011.01736.xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[27] van Assche N, Michels S, Quirynen M, Naert I. Extra short dental implants supporting an overdenture in the edentulous maxilla: a proof of concept. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23: 567–576.10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02235.xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[28] Venuleo C, Chuang SK, Weed M, Dibart S. Long term bone level stability on short implants: a radiographic follow up study. J Maxillofac Oral Surgery 2008; 7: 340–345.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2014-1-23
Accepted: 2014-7-7
Published Online: 2014-8-5
Published in Print: 2014-12-1

©2014 by De Gruyter

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Research articles
  3. Analysis of emboli and blood flow in the ophthalmic artery to understand retinal artery occlusion
  4. Material properties in unconfined compression of gelatin hydrogel for skin tissue engineering applications
  5. Red light as a 12-oxo-leukotriene B4 antagonist: an explanation for the efficacy of intensive red light in the therapy of peripheral inflammatory diseases
  6. Tightening of healing abutments: influence of torque on bacterial proliferation risk, an in vitro investigation
  7. Influence of superstructure geometry on the mechanical behavior of zirconia implant abutments: a finite element analysis
  8. Biomechanical investigations of the secondary stability of commercial short dental implants in porcine ribs
  9. Automatic camera-based identification and 3-D reconstruction of electrode positions in electrocardiographic imaging
  10. An automatic saccadic eye movement detection in an optokinetic nystagmus signal
  11. Case Report
  12. Monitoring of lobectomy in cystic fibrosis with electrical impedance tomography – a new diagnostic tool
  13. Letters to the Editor
  14. Accelerometer-based goniometer for smartphone and manual measurement on photographs: do they agree?
  15. Reply to: Accelerometer-based goniometer for smartphone and manual measurement on photographs: do they agree?
https://doi.org/10.1515/bmt-2014-0008
Schlagwörter für diesen Artikel
displacement; porcine ribs; short dental implants

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Research articles
  3. Analysis of emboli and blood flow in the ophthalmic artery to understand retinal artery occlusion
  4. Material properties in unconfined compression of gelatin hydrogel for skin tissue engineering applications
  5. Red light as a 12-oxo-leukotriene B4 antagonist: an explanation for the efficacy of intensive red light in the therapy of peripheral inflammatory diseases
  6. Tightening of healing abutments: influence of torque on bacterial proliferation risk, an in vitro investigation
  7. Influence of superstructure geometry on the mechanical behavior of zirconia implant abutments: a finite element analysis
  8. Biomechanical investigations of the secondary stability of commercial short dental implants in porcine ribs
  9. Automatic camera-based identification and 3-D reconstruction of electrode positions in electrocardiographic imaging
  10. An automatic saccadic eye movement detection in an optokinetic nystagmus signal
  11. Case Report
  12. Monitoring of lobectomy in cystic fibrosis with electrical impedance tomography – a new diagnostic tool
  13. Letters to the Editor
  14. Accelerometer-based goniometer for smartphone and manual measurement on photographs: do they agree?
  15. Reply to: Accelerometer-based goniometer for smartphone and manual measurement on photographs: do they agree?
Heruntergeladen am 18.4.2026 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/bmt-2014-0008/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen