Startseite Suspicious Minds in Basic Income and Conditional Cash Transfers
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Suspicious Minds in Basic Income and Conditional Cash Transfers

  • Facundo García Valverde ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 2. August 2022

Abstract

Anti-poverty policies and attitudes of distrust toward the needy share a long history. From the narratives of de Quevedo’s El Buscón, in which beggars are presented as able-bodied individuals making a concerted effort to take advantage of others, to the invasive physical tests and “workhouses” that were part of the English Poor Laws, the poor have long been regarded as deserving careful oversight. Although in increasingly subtle ways, this history continues as part of a popular set of policies in Latin America called “Conditional Cash Transfers,” which make income support conditional on certain behavioral changes. This paper argues that this resumption in recent times is normatively problematic because it harms the beneficiaries’ self-esteem, leading to stereotypes and sociological errors that reproduce social hierarchies. Alternatively, the paper advances a comparative defense of Basic Income on the basis of its lesser-known affinity with non-discriminatory attitudes.


Corresponding author: Facundo García Valverde, IICSAL - CONICET, Tucumán 1966, Ciudad de Buenos Aires, C1050AAN, Argentina, E-mail:

Funding source: Human Development Masters Program. Latin American Faculty of Social Sciences (FLACSO)

Funding source: Fulbright Association

Acknowledgments

A previous version of this paper was presented in a talk at the Department of Philosphy of the University of Michigan, and at the 2021 BIEN Conference. I thank all attendees for their comments and especially the support and detailed feedback provided by Elizabeth Anderson and Meena Krishnamurthy. I would also thank the suggestions and comments made by an anonymous referee of Basic Income Studies.

References

Adato, M., Morales Barahona, O., & Roopnaraine, T. (2016). Programming for citizenship: The conditional cash transfer programme in El Salvador. Journal of Development Studies, 52(8), 1177–1191. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2015.1134780.Suche in Google Scholar

Anderson, E. (2001). Optional freedom. In J. Cohen & J. Rogers (Eds.), What’s wrong with a free lunch? (pp. 70–74). Beacon Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Anderson, E. (2010). The imperative of integration. Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400836826Suche in Google Scholar

Baier, A. (1986). Trust and antitrust. Ethics, 96(2), 231–260. https://doi.org/10.1086/292745.Suche in Google Scholar

Baier, A. (1995). Moral prejudices: Essays on ethics. Harvard University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Barrientos, A. (2010). Just give money to the poor. Kumarian Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Barrientos, A., & Hinojosa, L. (2009). A review of social protection in Latin America. https://gsdrc.org/document-library/a-review-of-social-protection-in-latin-america/ Suche in Google Scholar

Bertranou, F., & Maurizio, R. (2012). Monetary Transfers for Children and Adolescents in Argentina: Characteristics and Coverage of a ‘System’ with Three Components. IPC-IG – Policy Research Brief, 30. https://ipcig.org/publication/26651?language_content_entity=en Suche in Google Scholar

Bobonis, G., & Finan, F. (2009). Neighborhood peer effects in secondary school enrollment decisions. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 91(4), 695–716. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest.91.4.695.Suche in Google Scholar

Brandão, A., Pereira, R. de C., & Dalt, S. da. (2013). Bolsa Família program: Percepções no cotidiano da escola. Política e Trabalho, 38, 215–232.Suche in Google Scholar

Cecchini, S., & Atuesta, B. (2017). Conditional cash transfer programmes in Latin America and the Caribbean. https://www.cepal.org/en/publications/42109-conditional-cash-transfer-programmes-latin-america-and-caribbean-coverage-and 10.2139/ssrn.3037640Suche in Google Scholar

Cecchini, S., & Madariaga, A. (2011). Conditional cash transfer programmes: The recent experience in Latin America and the Caribbean. ECLAC.10.2139/ssrn.1962666Suche in Google Scholar

Cecchini, S., & Martínez, R. (2012). Inclusive social protection in Latin America: A comprehensive, rights-based approach. UN - ECLAC.10.2139/ssrn.2009321Suche in Google Scholar

D’Cruz, J. (2019). Humble trust. Philosophical Studies, 176(4), 933–953. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-018-1220-6.Suche in Google Scholar

de Brauw, A., & Hoddinott, J. (2011). Must conditional cash transfer programs be conditioned to be effective? The impact of conditioning transfers on school enrollment in Mexico. Journal of Development Economics, 96(2), 359–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2010.08.014.Suche in Google Scholar

de Janvry, A., & Sadoulet, E. (2006). Making conditional cash transfer programs more efficient: Designing for maximum effect of the conditionality. The World Bank Economic Review, 20(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhj002.Suche in Google Scholar

de Oliveira de Castro, H. C., Walter, M. I. M. T., de Santana, C. M. B., & Stephanou, M. C. (2009). Percepções sobre o Programa Bolsa Família na sociedade Brasileira. Opinião Pública, 15(2), 333–355. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0104-62762009000200003.Suche in Google Scholar

ECLAC. (2020). Panorama Fiscal de América Latina y el Caribe La política fiscal ante la crisis derivada de la pandemia de la enfermedad por coronavirus (COVID-19). ECLAC. http://hdl.handle.net/11362/45730 Suche in Google Scholar

Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), & United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF). (2020). COVID-19 Social protection for families with children and adolescents in Latin America and the Caribbean An imperative to address the impact. https://www.cepal.org/en/publications/46490-social-protection-families-children-and-adolescents-latin-america-and-caribbean Suche in Google Scholar

Elford, G. (2012). Equality of status and distributive equality. The Journal of Value Inquiry, 46(3), 353–367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10790-012-9342-0.Suche in Google Scholar

Fiszbein, A., & Schady, N. (2009). Conditional cash transfers: Reducing present and future poverty. The World Bank.10.1596/978-0-8213-7352-1Suche in Google Scholar

Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic injustice: Power and the Ethics of knowing. Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198237907.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

González de la Rocha, M. (2007). Familias y política social en México. El caso del Programa Oportunidades. In I. Arriagada (Ed.), Familias y políticas públicas en América Latina: una historia de desencuentros (pp. 353–386). Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean.Suche in Google Scholar

González, M. S., & Tuñón, I. (2012). Efecto de las políticas de transferencias condicionadas en la inclusión educativa. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios Educativos, XLII(4), 33–53.Suche in Google Scholar

Goodin, R. E. (1992). Towards a minimally presumptuous social welfare policy. In P. Van Parijs (Ed.), Arguing for basic income. Ethical foundations for a radical reform (pp. 195–214). Verso Books.Suche in Google Scholar

Grant, R. W. (2006). Ethics and incentives: A political approach. American Political Science Review, 100(1), 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055406061983.Suche in Google Scholar

Hardin, R. (2002). Trust and trustworthiness. Russell Sage Foundation.Suche in Google Scholar

Hawley, K. (2014). Trust, distrust and commitment. Nous, 48(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12000.Suche in Google Scholar

Hunter, W., & Sugiyama, N. B. (2014). Transforming subjects into citizens: Insights from Brazil’s Bolsa Família. Perspectives on Politics, 12(4), 829–845. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592714002151.Suche in Google Scholar

Lavinas, L. (2013). Brazil: The lost road to citizen’s income. In R. Lo Vuolo (Ed.), Citizen’s income and welfare regimes in Latin America (pp. 29–50). Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137077547.0005Suche in Google Scholar

Lo Vuolo, R. (2012). Prospects and challenges for the basic income proposal in Latin America. Basic Income Studies, 7(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1515/1932-0183.1195.Suche in Google Scholar

Lo Vuolo, R. (2013). The Argentine “universal child allowance”: Not the poor but the unemployed and informal workers. In R. Lo Vuolo (Ed.), Citizen’s income and welfare regimes in Latin America. From cash transfers to rights (pp. 51–66). Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137077547Suche in Google Scholar

Maluccio, J., Adato, M., & Skoufias, E. (2010). Combining quantitative and qualitative research methods for evaluation of conditional cash transfer programs in Latin America. In M. Adato & J. Hoddinott (Eds.), Conditional cash transfers in Latin America (pp. 26–54). John Hopkins University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Molyneux, M. (2006). Mothers at the service of the new poverty agenda: Progresa/Oportunidades, Mexico’s conditional transfer programme. Social Policy and Administration, 40(4), 425–449. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9515.2006.00497.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Ochman, M. (2016). Políticas sociales y empoderamiento de las mujeres. Una promesa incumplida. Estudios Políticos, 48(1), 32–51. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.espo.n48a03.Suche in Google Scholar

Ostrom, E. (2003). Toward a behavioral theory linking trust, reciprocity, and reputation. In E. Ostrom & J. Walker (Eds.), Trust and reciprocity: Interdisciplinary lessons from experimental research (pp. 19–79). Russell Sage Foundation.Suche in Google Scholar

Pautassi, L., Arcidiácono, P., & Royo, L. (2010). Idas y vueltas en las políticas sociales: El protagonismo de la pobreza en la agenda política. In CELS (Ed.), Derechos Humanos en la Argentina. Informe 2010 (pp. 223–361). Siglo XXI Editores.Suche in Google Scholar

Pautassi, L., Arcidiácono, P., & Straschnoy, M. (2013). Asignación Universal por Hijo para la Protección Social de Argentina. Entre la satisfacción de necesidades y el reconocimiento de Derechos. https://repositorio.cepal.org/handle/11362/6193 10.17141/iconos.50.2014.1429Suche in Google Scholar

Pérez-Muñoz, C. (2017). What is wrong with conditional cash transfer programs? Journal of Social Philosophy, 48(4), 440–460. https://doi.org/10.1111/josp.12215.Suche in Google Scholar

Pettit, P. (1995). The cunning of trust. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 24(3), 202–225. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.1995.tb00029.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Pinzani, A., & Leão Rego, W. (2019). Money, autonomy and citizenship the experience of the Brazilian Bolsa Família. Springer Nature Switzerland.10.1007/978-3-030-01361-5Suche in Google Scholar

Ramírez, V. (2016). CCTs through a wellbeing lens: The importance of the relationship between front-line officers and participants in the Oportunidades/Prospera programme in Mexico. Social Policy and Society, 15(3), 451–464. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746416000129.Suche in Google Scholar

Raventós, D. (2007). The material conditions of freedom. Pluto Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Robles, C. (2012). Social protection systems in Latin America and the Caribbean: Chile. Santiago de Chile: ECLAC.Suche in Google Scholar

Rodríguez Enríquez, C. (2013). Should citizen’s income become a goal for feminism in Latin America. In R. Lo Vuolo (Ed.), Citizen’s income and welfare regimes in Latin America (pp. 187–210). Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137077547.0013Suche in Google Scholar

Schady, N., & Araujo, M. C. (2008). Cash transfers, conditions, and school enrollment in Ecuador. Economía, 8(2), 43–70. https://doi.org/10.1353/eco.0.0004.Suche in Google Scholar

Segall, S. (2005). Unconditional welfare benefits and the principle of reciprocity. Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 4(3), 331–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X05056607.Suche in Google Scholar

Smith, S. S. (2010). Race and trust. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 453–475. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102526.Suche in Google Scholar

Standing, G. (2011). Behavioural conditionality: Why the nudges must be stopped - an opinion piece. Journal of Poverty and Social Justice, 19(1), 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1332/175982711X559136.Suche in Google Scholar

Vargas, L. (2011). Chile Solidario: Pasado y futuro de la vía chilena a la protección social (2003–2011). Revista CIS, 14, 23–44.Suche in Google Scholar

Vera Soares, F., Pérez Ribas, R., & Issamu Hirata, G. (2008). The impact of CCTs. What we know and what we are not sure about. Poverty In Focus, 15, 12–13.Suche in Google Scholar

Veras Soares, F., Pérez Ribas, R., & Issamu Hirata, G. (2008). Los Logros y las Carencias de las Transferencias de Efectivo Condicionadass: Evaluación del Impacto del Programa Tekoporã del Paraguay. https://ideas.repec.org/p/ipc/pubesp/2529156.html Suche in Google Scholar

Watts, B., & Fitzpatrick, S. (2018). Welfare conditionality. Routledge.10.4324/9781315652047Suche in Google Scholar

Welch, S. (2013). Transparent trust and oppression. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 16(1), 45–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2011.597582.Suche in Google Scholar

White, S. (2003). The civic minimum. Oxford University Press.10.1093/0198295057.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

White, S. (2006). Reconsidering the exploitation objection to basic income. Basic Income Studies, 1(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.2202/1932-0183.1036.Suche in Google Scholar

White, S. (2018). Should a minimum income be unconditional? In S. Civitarese & S. Halliday (Eds.), Social rights in Europe in an age of austerity (pp. 181–196). Routledge.10.4324/9781315204574-8Suche in Google Scholar

World Without Poverty. (2017). Impacts of the Bolsa familia program. https://wwp.org.br/en/publication/impacts-of-the-bolsa-familia-program-bfp/ Suche in Google Scholar

Yanes, P. (2013). Targeting and conditionalities in Mexico: The end of a cash transfer model? In R. Lo Vuolo (Ed.), citizen’s income and welfare regimes in Latin America (pp. 67–85). Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137077547.0007Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-04-28
Accepted: 2022-07-06
Published Online: 2022-08-02

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 17.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/bis-2021-0014/pdf?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen