Home Impact of crop residue retention and tillage on water infiltration into a water-repellent soil
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Impact of crop residue retention and tillage on water infiltration into a water-repellent soil

  • Philip R. Ward EMAIL logo , Margaret M. Roper , Ramona Jongepier and Shayne F. Micin
Published/Copyright: December 12, 2015
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Water repellence is a condition in which soils become hydrophobic and do not readily absorb water. The condition causes problems in agricultural production relating to water availability for seed germination and plant growth. In this research we assess the impact of disturbing the soil by a single annual soil tillage (compared with no-till) and crop residue retention (compared with residue removal by burning) on the severity of water repellency, and on water infiltration during and immediately after rainfall, for 5 discrete rainfall events over an 18-month period covering two crop growing seasons. Soil tillage and crop residue removal were associated with decreased severity of water repellency. Despite this, soil tillage resulted in less infiltration of rain water, especially in the crop inter-row spaces, one hour after the commencement of rainfall, and 6 hours after the conclusion of rainfall. Where a single soil tillage was performed, soil in the inter-row spaces absorbed 19-30% of incident rainfall, compared with 58-78% in undisturbed soils. This was observed for a rainfall event 11 months after soil tillage, indicating that soil tillage has a long-lasting impact on pathways of water entry into the soil.

References

Anderson W.K. 2009 Closing the gap between actual and potential yield of rainfed wheat. The impacts of environment, management and cultivar. Field Crops Res. 116: 14-22.Search in Google Scholar

Bachmann J., Goebel M.-O. & Woche S.K. 2013. Small-scale contact angle mapping on undisturbed soil surfaces. J. Hydrol. Hydromech. 61: 3-8.10.2478/johh-2013-0002Search in Google Scholar

Bauters T.W.J., DiCarlo D.A., Steenhuis T.S. & Parlange J.-Y. 1998. Preferential flow in water-repellent sands. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J. 62: 1185-1190.10.2136/sssaj1998.03615995006200050005xSearch in Google Scholar

Blackwell P. 2000. Management of water repellency in Australia, and risks associated with preferential flow, pesticide concentration and leaching. J. Hydrol.231: 384-395.Search in Google Scholar

Blanco-Canqui H. & Lal R. 2009. Extent of soil water repellency under long-term no-till soils. Geoderma 149: 171-180.10.1016/j.geoderma.2008.11.036Search in Google Scholar

Dekker L.W. & Ritsema C.J. 1994. How water moves in a water repellent sandy soil: 1. Potential and actual water repellency. Water Resour. Res. 30: 2507-2517.10.1029/94WR00749Search in Google Scholar

González-Peńaloza F.A., Cerdŕ A., Zavala L.M., Jordan A., Gimenez-Morera A. & Arcenegui V. 2012. Do conservative agriculture practices increase soil water repellency? A case study in citrus-cropped soils. Soil Tillage Res. 124: 233-239.10.1016/j.still.2012.06.015Search in Google Scholar

King P.M. 1981. Comparison of methods for measuring severity of water repellence of sandy soils and assessment of some factors that affect its measurement. Austr. J. Soil Res. 19: 275-285.10.1071/SR9810275Search in Google Scholar

Lichner L., Holko L., Zhukova N., Schacht K., Rajkai K., Fodor N. & Sandor R. 2012. Plants and biological soil crust influence the hydrophysical parameters and water flow in an aeolian sandy soil. J. Hydrol. Hydromech. 60: 309-318.10.2478/v10098-012-0027-ySearch in Google Scholar

Morales V.L., Parlange J.-Y. & Steenhuis T.S. 2010. Are preferential flow paths perpetuated by microbial activity in the soil matrix? A review. J. Hydrol. 393: 29-36.10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.12.048Search in Google Scholar

Müller K., Deurer M., Jeyakumar P. Mason K., van den Dijssel C., Green S. & Clothier B. 2014. Temporal dynamics of soil water repellency and its impact on pasture productivity. Agric. Water Manag. 143: 82-92.10.1016/j.agwat.2014.06.013Search in Google Scholar

Ritsema C.J. & Dekker L.W. 1996. Water repellency and its role in forming preferred flow paths in soils. Austr. J. Soil Res. 34: 475-487.10.1071/SR9960475Search in Google Scholar

Ritsema C.J., Dekker L.W. & Heijs A.W.J. 1997. Threedimensional fingered flow patterns in a water repellent sandy field soil. Soil Sci. 162: 79-90.10.1097/00010694-199702000-00001Search in Google Scholar

Roper M.M., Ward P.R., Keulen A.F. & Hill J.R. 2013. Under no-tillage and stubble retention, soil water content and crop growth are poorly related to soil water repellency. Soil Tillage Res. 126: 143-150.Search in Google Scholar

Ward P.R., Roper M.M., Jongepier R. & Fernandez M.A. 2013. Consistent plant residue removal causes decrease in minimum soil water content in a Mediterranean environment. Biologia 68: 1128-1131.10.2478/s11756-013-0253-8Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2015-3-31
Accepted: 2015-5-18
Published Online: 2015-12-12
Published in Print: 2015-11-1

© Institute of Molecular Biology, Slovak Academy of Sciences

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Hardpan in skeletal soils: Statistical approach to determine its depth in a cherry orchard plot
  2. Using dye tracer for visualizing roots impact on soil structure and soil porous system
  3. Alterations in soil aggregate stability of a tropical Ultisol as mediated by changes in land use
  4. A new method for estimating soil water repellency index
  5. Particle-size and organic matter effects on structure and water retention of soils
  6. Depth-dependent heterogeneity of water flow in sandy soil under grass
  7. Spatial variability of hydrophysical properties of fallow sandy soils
  8. Effects of vegetation at different succession stages on soil properties and water flow in sandy soil
  9. Impact of crop residue retention and tillage on water infiltration into a water-repellent soil
  10. Night-time leaf wetting process and its effect on the morning humidity gradient as a driving force of transpirational water loss in a semi-arid cornfield
  11. Hoplophthiracarus species (Acari: Oribatida: Phthiracaridae) from China with descriptions of two new species
  12. A new species of Trhypochthoniellus (Acari: Oribatida: Trhypochthoniidae) from Chile, with remarks on diagnosis of the genus
  13. New species of oribatid mites (Acari: Oribatida) of the genera Austrachipteria (Achipteriidae), Cultroribula (Astegistidae) and Microlamellarea (Lamellareidae) from New Zealand
  14. The genus Apterogyna in Saudi Arabia, with description of a new species and a new record (Hymenoptera: Bradynobaenidae: Apterogyninae)
  15. The effects of tree age and tree species composition on bird species richness in a Central European montane forest
  16. Me11b receptor mediated action of melatonin in regulation of lung associated immune system (LAIS) of Perdicula asiatica: An in vitro study
  17. Importance of urban trees and buildings as daytime roosts for bats
Downloaded on 21.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/biolog-2015-0170/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button