Startseite The Effects of the State Prepaid Tuition Program on College Attainment
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

The Effects of the State Prepaid Tuition Program on College Attainment

  • Ying Shen EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 17. November 2020

Abstract

By locking in today’s tuition rate for future college attendance, the prepaid tuition program (PTP) is designed to encourage parents to invest in their children’s human capital. The purpose of this paper is to examine the effects of the state PTP on college attainment by using data from the 2011–2013 American Community Survey. By exploiting cross-state variation in the timing of the implementation of the state PTP, I found that the program adoption was associated with a 0.7–1.0 percentage point increase in college enrollment rates and a 0.5–0.7 percentage point increase in college completion rates.


Corresponding author: Ying Shen, Department of Economics, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, USA, E-mail:

Acknowledgment

I amgrateful to Kirk Doran, Abigail Wozniak, Joseph Kaboski, William Evans, Terence Johnson and seminar participants at Notre Dame for their valuable conversations and comments. Any errors are my own responsibility.

Appendix

Table A1:

Summary statistics.

Whole sampleStates with prepaid tuition programStates without prepaid tuition program
Male0.49980.49910.5004
(0.0005)(0.0008)(0.0007)
White0.77560.78060.7721
(0.0004)(0.0007)(0.0006)
College enrollment0.61340.59940.6231
(0.0005)(0.0008)(0.0007)
College completion0.43350.42280.4410
(0.0005)(0.0008)(0.0007)
Unemployment rate5.55135.69035.4540
(0.0016)(0.0023)(0.0021)
Number of states441232
Number of observations1,394,145573,638820,507
  1. Data from 2011 to 2013 IPUMS-ACS. Means weighted by IPUMS-ACS weights. Standard errors are reported in parentheses. I exclude seven states that had the prepaid tuition program before but closed the program to new participants by the end of 2008. I only include the U.S.-born population who are born between 1969 and 1986. The unemployment rate variables are used of the year when a person is 18 years old.

Table A2:

Account usage and 12th grade students information.

State# account usedSourceYears# of 12th grade studentsSourceYears
FL163,264Florida Prepaid College 2005/2006 Annual Report1988–20062,138,470Florida Department of Education1988–2006
IL19,1382012 College Illinois Annual Report2003–20131,425,242Illinois State Board of Education’s Public District/School Fall Enrollment and Housing Report Data2003–2013
MI27,400Prepaid Tuition Program 2012–2013 Annual Report2002–20131,307,514MI School Data2002–2013
TX263,191Texas Prepaid Higher Education Tuition Program Annual Report 20131996–20134,387,045Texas Education Agency1996–2013
  1. Florida: the program 2005/2006 annual report does not have account usage information by birth year, but only has aggregate data, showing that since the program started, 163,264 Prepaid College Plan students have attended college. The 12th grade student data stem from 1996, and I assume the number of 12th grade students in Florida is 100,000 in each year from 1988 to 2005. Illinois: the 12th grade student data in Illinois only contains students in public schools. Texas: the 12th grade student data in Texas only contains students in public schools. The data stem from 1997, and I assume the number of 12th grade students in Texas in 1996 is 200,000.

Table A3:

Effects on college attainment (four states).

College enrollment (1)College completion (2)College enrollment (3)College completion (4)
Program0.0087***0.0073**0.0125***0.0080***
(0.0032)(0.0029)(0.0031)(0.0024)
State fixed effectsYYYY
Cohort fixed effectsYYYY
CovariatesYYYY
State-cohort trendsNNYY
n1,136,0421,136,0421,136,0421,136,042
  1. See notes for Table 2. I only include the states without the prepaid tuition program and four states with the prepaid tuition program (FL, IL, MI, TX).

Table A4:

Control for state tuition.

College enrollment (1)College completion (2)College enrollment (3)College completion (4)
Program0.0090***0.0069**0.0074**0.0048*
(0.0031)(0.0030)(0.0032)(0.0027)
State fixed effectsYYYY
Cohort fixed effectsYYYY
CovariatesYYYY
Control for tuitionYYYY
State-cohort trendsNNYY
n1,394,1451,394,1451,394,1451,394,145
  1. See notes for Table 2. In this table, I control for state-year tuition.

Table A5:

State 529 college savings plans information.

StatePlan nameYearStatePlan nameYear
ALCollegeCounts 529 Fund2002MTAchieve Montana2002
CollegeCounts 529 Fund Advisor Plan2002Montana Family Education Savings Program – Bank Plan1998
AKT. Rowe Price College Savings Plan2001NENebraska Education Savings Trust – Direct College Savings Plan2001
University of Alaska College Savings Plan1991TD Ameritrade 529 College Savings Plan2010
John Hancock Freedom 5292001Nebraska Education Savings Trust – Advisor College Savings Plan2001
AZArizona Family College Savings Program1999NVUSAA 529 College Savings Plan2002
Fidelity Arizona College Savings Plan2005SSGA Upromise 529 Plan2002
Ivy Funds InvestEd Plan2001The Vanguard 529 Savings Plan2002
ARGIFT College Investing Plan1999Putnam 529 for America2010
iShares 529 Plan2007NHUNIQUE College Investing Plan1998
CAThe ScholarShare College Savings Plan1999Fidelity Advisor 529 Plan2001
CODirect Portfolio College Savings Plan2004NJNJBEST 529 College Savings Plan1998
Smart Choice College Savings Plan2009Franklin Templeton 529 College Savings Plan2003
Stable Value Plus College Savings Program2003NMScholar’sEdge2001
Scholars Choice College Savings Program1999The Education Plan’s College Savings Program2000
CTConnecticut Higher Education Trust (CHET)1997NYNew York’s 529 College Savings Program – Direct Plan1998
Connecticut Higher Education Trust (CHET) – Advisor Plan2010New York’s 529 Advisor-Guided College Savings Plan2003
Delaware College Investment Plan1998NCNational College Savings Program2001
DCDC 529 College Savings Program (Direct-sold)2002NDCollege SAVE2001
DC 529 College Savings Program (Advisor-sold)2002OHOhio CollegeAdvantage Direct 529 Savings Plan2000
FLFlorida 529 Savings Plan2002BlackRock CollegeAdvantage Advisor 529 Savings Plan2009
GAPath2College 529 Plan2002OKOklahoma College Savings Plan2000
HIHawaii’s College Savings Program2002Oklahoma Dream 529 Plan2009
IDIdaho College Savings Program (IDeal)2001OROregon College Savings Plan2001
ILBright Start College Savings Program – Direct-sold Plan2000MFS 529 Savings Plan2002
Bright Directions College Savings Program2005PAPennsylvania 529 Investment Plan2002
Bright Directions College Savings Program2007RICollegeBoundfund (Direct-sold, Alternative RI)1998
INCollegeChoice 529 Direct Savings Plan1997CollegeBoundfund (Advisor-sold)1998
CollegeChoice CD 529 Savings Plan2011SCFuture Scholar 529 College Savings Plan (Direct-sold)2002
CollegeChoice Advisor 529 Savings Plan1997Future Scholar 529 College Savings Plan (Advisor-sold)2002
IACollege Savings Iowa1998SDCollegeAccess 529 (Direct-sold)2002
IAdvisor 529 Plan2006CollegeAccess 529 (Advisor-sold)2002
KSLearning Quest 529 Education Savings Program (Direct-sold)2000TNTNStars College Savings 529 Program2012
Schwab 529 College Savings Plan2003TXTexas College Savings Plan2002
KYKentucky Education Savings Plan Trust1990Lonestar 529 Plan2002
LASTART Saving Program1997UTUtah Educational Savings Plan (UESP)1996
MENextGen College Investing Plan – Client Direct Series1999VTVermont Higher Education Investment Plan1999
NextGen College Investing Plan – Client Select Series1999VICollegeWealth2007
MDCollege Savings Plans of Maryland – College Investment Plan2001Virginia529 inVEST1999
MAU. Fund College Investing Plan1999CollegeAmerica2002
MIMichigan Education Savings Program2000WVSMART529 Select2004
MI 529 Advisor Plan2009SMART529 WV Direct College Savings Plan2002
MNMinnesota College Savings Plan2001The Hartford SMART5292002
MSMississippi Affordable College Savings (MACS) Program2001WIEdvest1997
MOMOST - Missouri’s 529 College Savings Plan (Direct-sold)1999Tomorrow’s Scholar 529 Plan2001
MOST - Missouri’s 529 Advisor Plan2006
  1. Source can be retrieved from: http://www.savingforcollege.com/.

References

Abadie, A. 2019. “Using Synthetic Controls: Feasibility, Data Requirements, and Methodological Aspects.” Journal of Economic Literature.10.1257/jel.20191450Suche in Google Scholar

Abadie, A., A. Diamond, and J. Hainmueller. 2010. “Synthetic Control Methods for Comparative Case Studies: Estimating the Effect of Californias Tobacco Control Program.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 105 (490): 493–505.10.1198/jasa.2009.ap08746Suche in Google Scholar

Cavallo, E., S. Galiani, I. Noy, and J. Pantano. 2013. “Catastrophic Natural Disasters and Economic Growth.” Review of Economics and Statistics 95 (5): 1549–61, https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00413.Suche in Google Scholar

Conley, T. G., and C. R. Taber. 2011. “Inference with “Difference in Differences” with a Small Number of Policy Changes.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 93 (1): 113–25, https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00049.Suche in Google Scholar

Cornwell, C., D. B. Mustard, and D. J. Sridhar. 2006. “The Enrollment Effects of Merit-Based Financial Aid: Evidence from Georgia’s Hope Program.” Journal of Labor Economics 24 (4): 761–86, https://doi.org/10.1086/506485.Suche in Google Scholar

Delaney, J. A., and T. D. Kearney. 2015. “The Impact of Guaranteed Tuition Policies on Postsecondary Tuition Levels: A Difference-In-Difference Approach.” Economics of Education Review 47: 80–99.10.1016/j.econedurev.2015.04.003Suche in Google Scholar

Dube, A., and B. Zipperer. 2015. Pooling Multiple Case Studies Using Synthetic Controls: An Application to Minimum Wage Policies. Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA). Also available at https://ideas. repec. org/p/iza/izadps/dp8944. html.10.2139/ssrn.2589786Suche in Google Scholar

Fitzpatrick, M. D., and D. Jones. 2016. “Post-baccalaureate Migration and Merit-Based Scholarships.” Economics of Education Review 54: 155–72, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2016.07.002.Suche in Google Scholar

Hickman, D. C. 2009. “The Effects of Higher Education Policy on the Location Decision of Individuals: Evidence from Florida’s Bright Futures Scholarship Program.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 39 (5): 553–62, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2009.04.002.Suche in Google Scholar

Hungerman, D. M., and K. Rinz. 2016. “Where Does Voucher Funding Go? How Large-Scale Subsidy Programs Affect Private-School Revenue, Enrollment, and Prices.” Journal of Public Economics 136: 62–85.10.3386/w21687Suche in Google Scholar

Kane, T. J. 1994a. The Causes and Consequences of Recent Public Tuition Increases. Cambridge, MA: Kennedy School of Government.Suche in Google Scholar

Kane, T. J. 1994b. “College Entry by Blacks since 1970: The Role of College Costs, Family Background, and the Returns to Education.” Journal of Political Economy 878–911, https://doi.org/10.1086/261958.Suche in Google Scholar

Kane, T. J. 1995. Rising Public College Tuition and College Entry: How Well Do Public Subsidies Promote Access to College? No. w5164. National Bureau of Economic Research.10.3386/w5164Suche in Google Scholar

Kane, T. J. 2003. A Quasi-Experimental Estimate of the Impact of Financial Aid on College-Going. Technical Report. National Bureau of Economic Research.10.3386/w9703Suche in Google Scholar

Lavecchia, A. M., H. Liu, and P. Oreopoulos. 2014. Behavioral Economics of Education: Progress and Possibilities.10.3386/w20609Suche in Google Scholar

Leslie, L. L., and P. T. Brinkman. 1987. “Student Price Response in Higher Education: The Student Demand Studies.” The Journal of Higher Education 181–204, https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.1987.11778239.Suche in Google Scholar

Oreopoulos, P. 2007. “Do dropouts Drop Out Too Soon? Wealth, Health and Happiness from Compulsory Schooling.” Journal of Public Economics 91 (11): 2213–29, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.02.002.Suche in Google Scholar

Savoca, E. 1990. “Another Look at the Demand for Higher Education: Measuring the Price Sensitivity of the Decision to Apply to College.” Economics of Education Review 9 (2): 123–34, https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-7757(90)90040-c.Suche in Google Scholar

Sjoquist, D. L., and J. V. Winters. 2012. “Building the Stock of College-Educated Labor Revisited.” Journal of Human Resources 47 (1): 270–85, https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.47.1.270.Suche in Google Scholar

Sjoquist, D. L., and J. V. Winters. 2015. “State Merit-Based Financial Aid Programs and College Attainment.” Journal of Regional Science 55 (3): 364–90, https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12161.Suche in Google Scholar

Thomson, S. C. 2005. ““Truth in Tuition”: Illinois’ Novel Answer to Skyrocketing Rate.” National Cross Talk.Suche in Google Scholar

Van der Klaauw, W. 2002. “Estimating the Effect of Financial Aid Offers on College Enrollment: A Regression–Discontinuity Approach.” International Economic Review 43 (4): 1249–87, https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2354.t01-1-00055.Suche in Google Scholar

Xu, Y. 2017. “Generalized Synthetic Control Method: Causal Inference with Interactive Fixed Effects Models.” Political Analysis 25 (1): 57–76, https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2016.2.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2020-02-20
Accepted: 2020-10-26
Published Online: 2020-11-17

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 22.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/bejeap-2020-0058/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen