Startseite Editor Reputation and Journal Quality: The Case of Regional Economic Association Journals
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Editor Reputation and Journal Quality: The Case of Regional Economic Association Journals

  • João R Faria , Franklin G Mixon EMAIL logo und Kamal P Upadhyaya
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 23. Januar 2018

Abstract

This study provides a formal game that explores how editor reputation and rent seeking play a part in scholarly research that involves regional economic association journals. The game asserts that a regional economic association journal’s reputation is determined by the academic reputation of its editor, the academic reputation of the department wherein the journal is housed, and, among other things, rent seeking by scholars. Evidence from the two most prominent regional economic association journals in the United States, namely Economic Inquiry and the Southern Economic Journal, generally support these aspects of the formal game.

JEL Classification: A14; C60; C70

Appendix

A Derivation of the Reaction Functions

The Hamiltonians for the scholar and editor are,

(11)HA=aC0.5bS2+μ[αQ+βSRθC],

and

(12)HE=σQ+CR0.5xQ2+λ[αQ+βSRθC],

respectively. Maximizing the Hamiltonians with respect to the control variables yields,

(13)HAS=0bS+μβR=0bS=μβR,

and

(14)HEQ=σxQ+λα=0λα=xQσ.

The adjoint equations are,

(15)μρμ=HACμ=(ρ+θ)μa,

and

(16)λrλ=H2Cλ=(r+θ)λR,

wherein the usual transversality conditions apply. Differentiating (14) with respect to time, using (2) and substituting into (16) yields the editor’s dynamic reaction function,

(17)Q=(r+θ)(Qσx)αx[mE+nD+Y],

where (17) is equivalent to (5) in the main body of the study.

The scholar’s dynamic reaction function is obtained by differentiating (13) with respect to time, keeping R constant, using (2) and substituting into (15),

(18)S=(ρ+θ)Saβb[mE+nD+Y].

Here eq. (18) is equivalent to eq. (6) in the main body of the study.

B Stability of Equilibrium

The Jacobian of the dynamic system (1), (5) and (6) calculated at the steady-state equilibrium (in (7), (8) and (9)) is given by,

(19)J=[CCCQCSQCQQQSSCSQSS]=[θαβR0r+θ000ρ+θ].

As the determinant of the Jacobian, J, is negative,

(20)detJ=θ(r+θ)(ρ+θ)\lt;0.

The steady-state equilibrium is a saddle point (see Braun 1983, Chapter 4). The only path of the saddle point that satisfies the optimality and transversality conditions is the convergent path of the saddle point (see Blanchard and Fischer 1989: 75).

Acknowledgments

The authors thank two anonymous referees for many helpful comments, and Kaulene Gellerman of the Western Economic Association International for providing some of the data used in this study. The usual caveat applies.

References

Batista, P.D., M.G. Campiteli, O. Kinouchi, and A.S. Martinez. 2006. “Is It Possible to Compare Researchers with Different Scientific Interests?.” Scientometrics 68:179–189.10.1007/s11192-006-0090-4Suche in Google Scholar

Berg, N., and J.R. Faria. 2008. “Negatively Correlated Author Seniority and the Number of Acknowledged People: Name-Recognition as a Signal of Scientific Merit?” Journal of Socio-Economics 37:1234–1247.10.1016/j.socec.2007.03.012Suche in Google Scholar

Besancenot, D., J.R. Faria, and F.G. Mixon, Jr. 2017. “Academic Research and the Strategic Interaction of Scholars and Editors: A Two-Stage Game.” International Game Theory Review 19:1–16.10.1142/S0219198916500109Suche in Google Scholar

Besancenot, D., K. Huynh, and J.R. Faria. 2012. “Search and Research: The Influence of Editorial Boards on Journals’ Quality.” Theory and Decision 73:687–702.10.1007/s11238-012-9314-7Suche in Google Scholar

Besancenot, D., K. Huynh, and R. Vranceanu. 2011. “A Matching Model of the Academic Publication Market.” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 167:708–725.10.1628/jite-2011-0010Suche in Google Scholar

Besancenot, D., and R. Vranceanu. 2008. “Can Incentives for Research Harm Research? A Business Schools’ Tale.” Journal of Socio-Economics 37:1248–1265.10.1016/j.socec.2006.12.082Suche in Google Scholar

Blanchard, O., and S. Fischer. 1989. Lectures on Macroeconomics. Cambridge: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Braun, M. 1983. Differential Equations and Their Applications. New York: Springer-Verlag.10.1007/978-1-4684-0164-6Suche in Google Scholar

Byrnes, J.P. 1997. “Explaining Citation Counts of Senior Developmental Psychologists.” Developmental Review 17:62–77.10.1006/drev.1996.0433Suche in Google Scholar

Cherkashin, I., S. Demidova, S. Imai, and K. Krishna. 2009. “The inside Scoop: Acceptance and Rejection at the Journal of International Economics.” Journal of International Economics 77:120–132.10.1016/j.jinteco.2008.10.002Suche in Google Scholar

Chung, K., R. Cox, and A. Okunade. 1993. “Publishing Behavior of Individuals and Most Prolific Authors in the Economics Literature.” Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics 32:32–42.Suche in Google Scholar

Egghe, L. 2006. “Theory and Practice of the g-Index.” Scientometrics 69:131–152.10.1007/s11192-006-0144-7Suche in Google Scholar

Ellison, G. 2002. “The Slowdown of the Economics Publishing Process.” Journal of Political Economy 110:947–993.10.1086/341868Suche in Google Scholar

Faria, J.R. 2003. “What Type of Economist are You: R-Strategist or K-Strategist?.” Journal of Economic Studies 30:144–154.10.1108/01443580310465358Suche in Google Scholar

Faria, J.R. 2005a. “The Game Academics Play: Editors versus Authors.” Bulletin of Economic Research 57:1–12.10.1111/j.1467-8586.2005.00212.xSuche in Google Scholar

Faria, J.R. 2005b. “Is There a Trade-Off between Domestic and International Publications?.” Journal of Socio-Economics 34:269–280.10.1016/j.socec.2004.09.011Suche in Google Scholar

Frey, B.S., and R. Eichenberger. 1992. “Economics and Economists: A European Perspective.” American Economic Review 82:216–220.Suche in Google Scholar

Frey, B.S., and R. Eichenberger. 1993. “American and European Economics and Economists.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 7:185–193.10.1257/jep.7.4.185Suche in Google Scholar

Gerrity, D.M., and R.B. McKenzie. 1978. “The Ranking of Southern Economics Departments: New Criterion and Further Evidence.” Southern Economic Journal 45:608–614.10.2307/1057690Suche in Google Scholar

Goel, R.K. 2006. “The Games Academics Play: Comment.” Bulletin of Economic Research 58:19–23.10.1111/j.0307-3378.2006.00231.xSuche in Google Scholar

Hamermesh, D.S. 1992. “The Young Economist’s Guide to Professional Etiquette.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 6:169–179.10.1257/jep.6.1.169Suche in Google Scholar

Harzing, A.W. 2007. Publish or Perish, www.harzing.com/pop.htm.Suche in Google Scholar

Heintzelman, M., and D. Nocetti. 2009. “Where Should We Submit Our Manuscript? an Analysis of Journal Submission Strategies.” B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy 9:1–26.10.2202/1935-1682.2340Suche in Google Scholar

Hilmer, M.J., and C.E. Hilmer. 2011. “Do Editors Favor Their Students’ Work? A Test of Undue Favoritism in Top Economics Journals.” Economics Bulletin 31:53–65.Suche in Google Scholar

Hirsch, J.E. 2005. “An Index to Quantify an Individual’s Scientific Research Output.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States 102:16569–16572.10.1073/pnas.0507655102Suche in Google Scholar

Kalaitzidakis, P., T.P. Mamuneas, and T. Stengos. 2011. “An Updated Ranking of Academic Journals in Economics.” Canadian Economic Journal 44:1525–1538.10.1111/j.1540-5982.2011.01683.xSuche in Google Scholar

Kim, J., and K. Koh. 2014. “Incentives for Journal Editors.” Canadian Journal of Economics 47:348–371.10.1111/caje.12077Suche in Google Scholar

Laband, D.N. 1985. “Publishing Favoritism: A Critique of Department Rankings Based on Quantitative Publishing Performance.” Southern Economic Journal 52:510–515.10.2307/1059636Suche in Google Scholar

Laband, D.N., and S. Majumdar. 2012. “Who are the Giants on Whose Shoulders We Stand?.” Kyklos 65:236–244.10.1111/j.1467-6435.2012.00536.xSuche in Google Scholar

Laband, D.N., and M.J. Piette. 1994a. “The Relative Impacts of Economics Journals: 1970-1990.” Journal of Economic Literature 32:640–666.Suche in Google Scholar

Laband, D.N., and M.J. Piette. 1994b. “Favoritism versus Search for Good Papers: Empirical Evidence regarding the Behavior of Journal Editors.” Journal of Political Economy 102:194–203.10.1086/261927Suche in Google Scholar

Laband, D.N., and R.D. Tollison. 2003. “Dry Holes in Economic Research.” Kyklos 56:161–173.10.1111/1467-6435.00215Suche in Google Scholar

Laband, D.N., R.D. Tollison, and G.R. Karahan. 2002. “Quality Control in Economics.” Kyklos 55:315–334.10.1111/1467-6435.00189Suche in Google Scholar

Mason, P.M., J. Steagall, and M. Fabritius. 1992. “Publication Delays in Articles in Economics: What to Do about Them.” Applied Economics 24:859–874.10.1080/00036849200000054Suche in Google Scholar

Medhoff, M.H. 2003. “Editorial Favoritism in Economics?” Southern Economic Journal 70:425–435.10.2307/3648979Suche in Google Scholar

Mixon, F.G., Jr. 1998. “Favoritism or Showcasing High-Impact Papers? Modeling Editorial Placement of Journal Articles in Economics.” International Review of Economics 45:327–340.Suche in Google Scholar

Mixon, F.G., Jr, and W.C. Sawyer. 2005. “Contribution, Attribution and the Assignment of Intellectual Property Rights in Economics.” Journal of Economic Studies 32:382–386.10.1108/01443580510622379Suche in Google Scholar

Mixon, F.G., Jr, and K.P. Upadhyaya. 2012. “The Economics Olympics: Ranking U.S. Economics Departments Based on Prizes, Medals, and Other Awards.” Southern Economic Journal 79:90–96.10.4284/0038-4038-79.1.90Suche in Google Scholar

Olson, M. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674041660Suche in Google Scholar

Olson, M. 1982. The Rise and Decline of Nations. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Olson, M. 1983. “The South Will Fall Again: The South as Leader and Laggard in Economic Growth.” Southern Economic Journal 49:917–932.10.2307/1058096Suche in Google Scholar

Olson, M. 1988. “The Productivity Slowdown, the Oil Shocks, and the Real Cycle.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 2:43–69.10.1257/jep.2.4.43Suche in Google Scholar

Scott, L.C., and P.M. Mitias. 1996. “Trends in Rankings of Economics Departments in the U.S.: An Update.” Economic Inquiry 34:378–400.10.1111/j.1465-7295.1996.tb01383.xSuche in Google Scholar

Sievert, M., and M. Haughawout. 1989. “An Editor’s Influence on Citation Patterns: A Case Study of Elementary School Journal.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science 40:334.10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(198909)40:5<334::AID-ASI6>3.0.CO;2-SSuche in Google Scholar

Zsindely, S., A. Schubert, and T. Braun. 1982. “Citation Patterns of Editorial Gatekeepers in International Chemistry Journals.” Scientometrics 4:69–76.10.1007/BF02098007Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2018-1-23

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 11.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/bejeap-2017-0099/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen