E-learning innovations for the education of general practitioners at the Bavarian Virtual University (BVU) – a model for other countries
-
Barbara Vogel
,
Christina Kormann
Abstract
Background: The Bavarian Virtual University (BVU) offers resources to develop and implement e-learning courses and allows open access to information and provides the capacity to share information. Students of Bavarian universities can participate easily in these courses. Thus, the barriers to enter a university are now much lower. E-learning will be supported by the use of the learning and authoring software CASUS®. It optimises the creation of virtual patients and guarantees a common standard and a high quality throughout the whole e-learning course.
Methods: This paper describes the application process of proposals at BVU and the development process of online courses with CASUS® using the example of “General Practice”. The conceptual structure of the program and its specific rationale is presented herein. In addition, the number of participating students is analysed when the online course is integrated in the curriculum or when it is not.
Results: The e-learning course General Practice includes a total of 48 scenarios. They focus on the heuristics in General Practice of prevention and primary care. If the online courses are integrated in the curriculum, the number of students participating in e-learning courses increases. The integration of virtual patients (VPs) into practical training may improve the perceived benefit. Probably, there is no need for examinations to prove students’ knowledge if they can apply contents in the practical training. To answer this question, an evaluation of students’ and teachers’ perspective is needed. In addition, it is challenging to define one level of education for students of different universities. Hence, new methods are needed to develop and evaluate generally accepted standards that fit all participating universities and their students.
Conclusions: The application of proposals at BVU and creating VPs with the learning and authoring system CASUS® can be highly recommended to other universities, as well as the establishment of organisations like BVU in other countries.
Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.
Research funding: None declared.
Employment or leadership: None declared.
Honorarium: None declared.
Competing interests: The funding organisation(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.
References
1. Asarbakhsh M, Sanders J. E-learning: the essential usability perspective. Clin Teach 2013;10:47–50.10.1111/j.1743-498X.2012.00627.xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed
2. Rühl P. Landesweite hochschulübergreifende Online-Lehre – die erfahrungen der virtuellen Hochschule Bayern, 2010.Suche in Google Scholar
3. Rühl P. Why (and how) traditional universities profit from cooperation in online-teaching. In: European Association of Distance Teaching Universities (EDATU), editor. Proceedings. The open and flexible higher education conference 2013. Transition to open and on-line education in European universities. Heerlen, Netherlands, 2013:336–49.Suche in Google Scholar
4. McKimm J, Jollie C, Cantillon P. ABC of learning and teaching. Web based learning. Br Med J 2003;326:870–3.10.1136/bmj.326.7394.870Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
5. Shyu FM, Liang YF, Hsu WT, Luh JJ, Chen HS. A problem-based e-learning prototype system for clinical medical education. Stud Health Technol Inform 2004;107:983–7.Suche in Google Scholar
6. Davis D, Thomson MA, Oxman AD, Haynes RB. Changing physical performance. A systematic review of the effect of continuing medical education strategies. J Am Med Assoc 1995;1043–51.Suche in Google Scholar
7. Davis D, Galbraith R. Continuing medical education effect on practice performance. Chest 2009;135:42S–8S.10.1378/chest.08-2517Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
8. Robson J. Web-based learning strategies in combination with published guidelines to change practice of primary care professionals. Br J Gen Pract 2009;59:104–9.10.3399/bjgp09X395102Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
9. Schneider AT, Albers P, Müller-Mattheis V. E-learning in urology: implementation of the learning and teaching platform CASUS® – Do virtual patients lead to improved learning outcomes? A randomised study among students. Urol Int 2015;94:412–8.10.1159/000368653Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
10. Wong G, Greenhalgh T, Pawson R. Internet-based medical education: a realist review of what works, for whom and in what circumstances. BMC Med Educ 2010;10:12.10.1186/1472-6920-10-12Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
11. Cook DA, Levinson AJ, Garside S. Instructional design variations in Internet-based learning for health professions education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acad Med 2010;85:909–22.10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181d6c319Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
12. Gormley GF, Collins K, Boohan M, Bickle I, Stevenson M. Is there place for e-learning in clinical skills? A survey of undergraduate medical students’ experience and attitudes. Med Teach 2009;31:e6–12.10.1080/01421590802334317Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
13. Cook DA, Levinson AJ, Garside S. Internet-based learning in the health profession: a meta-analysis. J Am Med Assoc 2008;300:1181–96.10.1001/jama.300.10.1181Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
14. Fischer MR, Schauer S, Gräsel C, Baehring T, Mandl H, Gärtner R, et al. Modellversuch CASUS: ein computergestütztes autorensystem für die problemorientierte lehre in der medizin. Z Arzti Fortbild 1996;90:385–9.Suche in Google Scholar
15. Fischer MR. CASUS – an authoring and learning tool supporting diagnostic reasoning. In: Dartwyler Ch, editor. Use of computers in medical education (part II). (Zeitschrift für Hochschuldidaktik 1/2000), 2000:87–98.Suche in Google Scholar
16. CASUS® In.struct. http://www.instruct.de/?q=en. Accessed: 28 Month, 2015.Suche in Google Scholar
17. Law P, Perryman LA, Law A. Open educational resources for all? Comparing user motivations and characteristics across the Open University’s iTunes U channel and Open-Learn platform. In: Open and Flexible Higher Education Conference 2013, 23–25 October 2013, Paris: European Association of Distance Teaching Universities (EADTU), 2013:204–19.Suche in Google Scholar
18. Cook DA. The research we still are not doing: an agenda for the study of computer-based-learning. Acad Med 2005;80:541–8.10.1097/00001888-200506000-00005Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
19. Hege I, Ropp V, Adler M, Radon K, Mäsch G, Lyon H, et al. Experiences with different integration strategies of case-based e-learning. Med Teach 2007;29:791–7.10.1080/01421590701589193Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
20. Edelbring S, Broström O, Henriksson P, Vassilou D, Spaak J, Dahlgren LO, et al. Integrating virtual patients into courses: follow-up seminars and perceived benefit. Med Educ 2012;46:417–25.10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04219.xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed
21. Berman N, Fall LH, Smith S, Levine DA, Maloney CG, Potts M, et al. Integration strategies for using virtual patients in clinical clerkships. Acad Med 2009;84:942–9.10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181a8c668Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
©2015 by De Gruyter
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Editorial
- Breaking down barriers to medical e-learning
- Reviews
- Authoring, deploying, and managing dynamic Virtual Patients in Virtual Clinical Environments
- Building an audio/video-feedback system for simulation training in medical education
- Research Articles
- Development and evaluation of a virtual patient-based exam in occupational medicine
- E-learning innovations for the education of general practitioners at the Bavarian Virtual University (BVU) – a model for other countries
- Evaluation of three educational use cases for using Virtual Patients in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs): a Delphi study
- Creation of an iBook aimed at medical students – a student’s perspective
- Congress Abstracts
- International Conference Cybernetic Modelling of Biological Systems MCSB 2015
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Editorial
- Breaking down barriers to medical e-learning
- Reviews
- Authoring, deploying, and managing dynamic Virtual Patients in Virtual Clinical Environments
- Building an audio/video-feedback system for simulation training in medical education
- Research Articles
- Development and evaluation of a virtual patient-based exam in occupational medicine
- E-learning innovations for the education of general practitioners at the Bavarian Virtual University (BVU) – a model for other countries
- Evaluation of three educational use cases for using Virtual Patients in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs): a Delphi study
- Creation of an iBook aimed at medical students – a student’s perspective
- Congress Abstracts
- International Conference Cybernetic Modelling of Biological Systems MCSB 2015
