A serious game – a new training addressing particularly prospective memory in the elderly
-
Ilona Laskowska
, Ludmiła Zając-Lamparska
, Monika Wiłkość , Michał Malicki , Agnieszka Szałkowska , Anna Jurgielewicz , Paweł Lewandowski , Paweł Węgrzyn , Irena Roterman-Konieczna und Paweł Izdebski
Abstract
A training in the form of a computer game that aims at improving five cognitive functions in the elderly has been developed: visuospatial memory, attention, memory for prose, working memory and prospective memory. It was devised as a collaboration among the Department of Cognitive Psychology in Warsaw, Department of Individual Differences Psychology in Bydgoszcz, Faculty of Physics, Astronomy and Applied Computer Science – Game Academy in Cracow, and Department of Human Psychology and Department of Psychiatry of Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz. This software is an example of the so-called serious games. To the best of our knowledge it is the first one to focus particularly on prospective memory. This is the first report concerning the present training, which is currently being elaborated. The next step in its development will be testing its validity.
The writing of this manuscript was financially supported by a postdoctoral internship from the National Science Center in Cracow, Poland (NCN) (UMO-2012/04/S/HS6/00575).
References
1. Pąchalska M. Rehabilitacja neuropsychologiczna. Procesy poznawcze i emocjonalne. Lublin: Wydawnictwo UMCS, 2008.Suche in Google Scholar
2. Papathanasiou I. Nervous system mechanisms of recovery and plasticity following injury. Acta Neuropsychol 2003;1: 345–54.Suche in Google Scholar
3. Robertson IR, Murre JM. Rehabilitation of brain damage: brain plasticity and principles of guided recovery. Psychol Bull 1999;125:544–75.10.1037/0033-2909.125.5.544Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
4. Baltes PB. Theoretical propositions of life-span developmental psychology: on the dynamics between growth and decline. Dev Psycho 1987;23:611–26.10.1037/0012-1649.23.5.611Suche in Google Scholar
5. Baltes PB, Baltes MM. Psychological perspectives on successful aging: the model of selective optimization with compensation. In: Baltes PB, Baltes MM, editors. Successful aging: perspectives from the behavioral sciences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1993:1–34.Suche in Google Scholar
6. Schaie KW. The course of adult intellectual development. Am Psychol 1994;49:304–13.10.1037/0003-066X.49.4.304Suche in Google Scholar
7. Ball K, Berch DB, Helmers KF, Jobe JB, Leveck MD, Marsiske M, et al. Effects of cognitive training interventions with older adults: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Med Assoc 2002;288:2271–81.10.1001/jama.288.18.2271Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
8. Ball K, Edwards JD, Ross LA. The impact of speed of processing training on cognitive and everyday functions. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2007;62:19–31.10.1093/geronb/62.special_issue_1.19Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
9. Park DC, Gutchess AH, Meade ML, Stine-Morrow EA. Improving cognitive function in older adults: nontraditional approaches. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2007;62B:45–52.10.1093/geronb/62.special_issue_1.45Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
10. McDougall GJ. Cognitive interventions among older adults. Annu Rev Nurs Res 1999;17:219–40.10.1891/0739-6686.17.1.219Suche in Google Scholar
11. Willis SL, Tennstedt SL, Marsiske M, Ball K, Elias J, Koepke KM, et al. Long-term effects of cognitive training on everyday functional outcomes in older adults. J Am Med Assoc 2006;296:2805–14.10.1001/jama.296.23.2805Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
12. Jodzio K, Wieczorek D. Metody terapii zaburzeń pamięci w przypadkach ogniskowych uszkodzeń mózgu. Przegląd Psychologiczny 1996;39:41–63.Suche in Google Scholar
13. Kueider AM, Parisi JM, Gross AL, Rebok GW. Computerized cognitive training with older adults: a systematic review. PLoS One 2012;7:e40588.10.1371/journal.pone.0040588Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
14. Souchay C, Isingrini M. Age related differences in metacognitive control: role of executive functioning. Brain Cogn 2004;56:89–99.10.1016/j.bandc.2004.06.002Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
15. Jodzio K. Neuropoznawcze mechanizmy funkcjonowania pamięci operacyjnej. Kolokwia Psychologiczne 2006;14:25–42.Suche in Google Scholar
16. West R, Bowry R. Starzenie się kontroli poznawczej. In: Engle RW, Sędek G, von Hecker U, McIntosh DN, editors. Ograniczenia poznawcze. Starzenie się i psychopatologia. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, 2006:111–134.Suche in Google Scholar
17. Stuart-Hamilton I. Psychologia starzenia się. Poznań: Zysk i S-ka, 2006.Suche in Google Scholar
18. Old SR, Naveh-Benjamin M. Age-related changes in memory. Experimental approaches. In: Hofer SM, Alwin DF, editors. Handbook of cognitive ageing. Interdisciplinary perspectives. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications, 2008:151–67.Suche in Google Scholar
19. Meade ML, Park DC. Enhancing cognitive function in older adults. In: Chodzko-Zajko W, Kramer AF, editors. Enhancing cognitive and brain plasticity in older adults: 2004 Illinois Physical Activity and Cognitive Functioning Conference, 2005. Retrieved January 12, 2012, from http://www.pal.utdallas.edu/pubs/publication/download/250.Suche in Google Scholar
20. Cherry KE, Simmons-D’Gerolamo SS. Long term effectiveness of spaced-retrieval memory training for older adults with probably Alzheimer’s disease. Exp Aging Res 2005;31:261–89.10.1080/03610730590948186Suche in Google Scholar
21. Niedźwieńska A. Pamięć prospektywna – poznawcze podstawy realizacji zamiarów. In: Niedźwieńska A, editor. Samoregulacja w poznaniu i działaniu. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, 2008:73–101.Suche in Google Scholar
22. Uttl B. Transparent meta-analysis of prospective memory and aging. PLoS One 2008;3:e1568.10.1371/journal.pone.0001568Suche in Google Scholar
23. Witkowska M. Pamięć prospektywna: od teorii do praktyki. In: Jodzio K, Szepietowska EM, editors. Neuronalne ścieżki poznania i zachowania. Lublin: Wydawnictwo UMCS, 2010: 29–42.Suche in Google Scholar
24. Maruszewski T. Pamięć autobiograficzna – nowe dane. Neuropsychiatr Neuropsychol 2011;5:122–9.Suche in Google Scholar
25. Wiłkość M, Izdebski P, Zając-Lamparska L. Pamięć prospektywna – pojęcia, metody badania, podłoże neuroanatomiczne oraz jej deficyty w chorobach psychicznych. Psychiatria Polska 2013;XLVII:313–24.Suche in Google Scholar
26. Graf P. Prospective memory: faulty brain, flaky person. Can Psychol 2012;53:7–13.10.1037/a0026516Suche in Google Scholar
27. Herrmann D, Brubaker B, Yoder C, Sheets V, Tio A. Devices that remind. In: Durso FT, editor. Handbook of applied cognition. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1999:377–407.Suche in Google Scholar
28. McCauley SR, Levin HS. Prospective memory in pediatric traumatic brain injury: a preliminary study. Dev Neuropsychol 2004;25:5–20.10.1207/s15326942dn2501&2_2Suche in Google Scholar
29. McCauley SR, McDaniel MA, Pedroza C, Chapman SB, Levin HS. Incentive effects on event-based prospective memory performance in children and adolescents with traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychology 2009;23:201–9.10.1037/a0014192Suche in Google Scholar
30. Kondo K, Marusishi M, Ueno H, Sawada K, Hashimoto Y, Ohshita T, et al. The pathophysiology of prospective memory failure after diffuse axonal injury – lesion symptom analysis using diffusion tensor imaging. BMC Neurosci 2010;11:147.10.1186/1471-2202-11-147Suche in Google Scholar
31. Einstein GO, McDaniel MA. Retrieval processes in prospective memory: theoretical approaches and some new empirical findings. In: Brandimonte MA, Einstein GO, McDaniel MA, editors. Prospective memory: theory and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1996:115–42.Suche in Google Scholar
32. Graf P, Uttl B. Prospective memory: a new focus for research. Conscious Cogn Int J 2001;10:437–50.10.1006/ccog.2001.0504Suche in Google Scholar
33. Burgess PW, Veitch E, de Lacy Costello A, Shallice T. The cognitive and neuroanatomical correlates of multitasking. Neuropsychologia 2000;38:848–63.10.1016/S0028-3932(99)00134-7Suche in Google Scholar
34. Kliegel M, Eschen A, Thöne-Otto AI. Planning and realization of complex intentions in traumatic brain injury and normal aging. Brain Cogn 2004;56:43–54.10.1016/j.bandc.2004.05.005Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
35. McDaniel MA, Einstein GO. Prospective memory: a new research enterprise. In: McDaniel MA, Einstein GO, editors. Prospective memory. An overview and synthesis of an emerging field. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications, 2007:1–12.Suche in Google Scholar
36. Jodzio K. Neuropsychologia intencjonalnego działania. Koncepcje funkcji wykonawczych. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe SCHOLAR, 2008.Suche in Google Scholar
37. Niedźwieńska A. Pamięć prospektywna. Geneza, mechanizmy, deficyty. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Akademickie Sedno, 2013.Suche in Google Scholar
38. Nęcka E, Orzechowski J, Szymura B. Psychologia poznawcza. Warszawa: Academica/PWN, 2007.Suche in Google Scholar
39. Mroziak J. Rehabilitacja neuropsychologiczna osób z zaburzeniami pamięci. In: Łojek E, Bolewska A, editors. Wybrane zagadnienia rehabilitacji neuropsychologicznej. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar, 2008:96–122.Suche in Google Scholar
40. Cohen G. Memory and aging. In: Davies GM, Logie RH, editors. Memory in everyday life. North Holland: Elsevier, 1993:419–38.Suche in Google Scholar
41. Henry JD, MacLeod MS, Phillips LH, Crawford JR. A meta-analytic review of prospective memory and aging. Psychol Aging 2004;19:27–39.10.1037/0882-7974.19.1.27Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
42. Jagodzińska M. Psychologia pamięci. Badania, teorie, zastosowania. Gliwice: Wydawnictwo HELION, 2008.Suche in Google Scholar
43. Maylor EA. Age and prospective memory. Q J Exp Psychol 1990;42A:471–93.10.1080/14640749008401233Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
44. Anderson ND, Craik FI. Memory and the aging brain. In: Tulving E, Craik FIM, editors. The Oxford handbook of memory. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000:411–25.Suche in Google Scholar
45. McDaniel MA, Bugg JM. Memory training interventions: What has been forgotten? J Appl Res Mem Cogn 2012;1:45–50.10.1016/j.jarmac.2011.11.002Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
46. Ozgis S, Rendell PG, Henry JD. Spaced retrieval significantly improves prospective memory performance of cognitively impaired older adults. Gerontology 2009;55:229–32.10.1159/000163446Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
47. Camp CJ, Foss JW, Stevens AB, O’Hanlon A. Improving prospective memory task performance in persons with Alzheimer’s disease. In: Brandimonte M, Einstein GO, McDaniel MA, editors. Prospective memory: theory and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1996:351–7.Suche in Google Scholar
48. Kixmiller JS. Evaluation of prospective memory training for individuals with mild Alzheimer’s disease. Brain Cogn 2002;49:237–41.Suche in Google Scholar
49. Schmidt IW, Berg IJ, Deelman BG. Prospective memory training in older adults. Educ Gerontol 2001;27:455–78.10.1080/036012701316894162Suche in Google Scholar
50. Villa KK, Abeles N. Broad spectrum intervention and the remediation of prospective memory declines in the able elderly. Aging Ment Health 2000;4:21–9.10.1080/13607860055937Suche in Google Scholar
51. Willis SL, Schaie KW. Training the elderly on the ability factors of spatial orientation and inductive reasoning. Psychol Aging 1986;1:239–47.10.1037/0882-7974.1.3.239Suche in Google Scholar
52. Zając-Lamparska L. Możliwości wspomagania pamięci osób starszych poprzez trening. In: Sobczak-Michałowska M, Kozubska A, editors. Budowanie systemu wsparcia dla rodziny. Możliwości i ograniczenia. Bydgoszcz: Wydawnictwo Uczelniane WSG w Bydgoszczy, 2010:63–76.Suche in Google Scholar
53. Zając-Lamparska L. Wspomaganie funkcjonowania ludzi starzejących się. In: Trempała J, editor. Psychologia rozwoju człowieka. Podręcznik akademicki. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, 2011:419–31.Suche in Google Scholar
54. Adobe Systems Incorporated. ActionScript 3.0, 2013. Available from: http://help.adobe.com/en_US/FlashPlatform/reference/actionscript/3/index.html. Accessed 10 June, 2013.Suche in Google Scholar
55. Ypenburg D. ActionScript 3.0. Szybki start. Gliwice: Wydawnictwo Helion, 2009.Suche in Google Scholar
56. Refsnes Data 1999–2013. SQL. Available from: http://www.w3schools.com/sql/default.asp. Accessed 10 June, 2013.Suche in Google Scholar
57. The PHP Group 2001–2013. PHP. Available from: http://www.php.net/. Accessed 10 June, 2013.Suche in Google Scholar
58. Folstein MF, Folstein SE McHugh PR. Mini-mental state: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975;12:189–98.Suche in Google Scholar
59. Reitan RM. Validity of the Trail Making Test as an indicator of organic brain damage. Percept Motor Skills 1958;8:271–6.10.2466/pms.1958.8.3.271Suche in Google Scholar
60. Wilson BA, Emslie H, Foley J, Shiel A, Watson P, Hawkins K, et al. The Cambridge Prospective Memory Test (CAMPROMPT). London, UK: Harcourt Assessment, 2005.Suche in Google Scholar
©2013 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Masthead
- Masthead
- Structural role of exon-coded fragments in proteins
- Conventional and neuro-fuzzy framework for diagnosis and therapy of cardiovascular disease
- An analysis of cardiomyocytes’ electrophysiology in the presence of the hERG gene mutations
- Visualization and simulation of the human heart based on ECG
- Computer-based system to capture, collect, process and analyze data in psychomotor tests
- A serious game – a new training addressing particularly prospective memory in the elderly
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Masthead
- Masthead
- Structural role of exon-coded fragments in proteins
- Conventional and neuro-fuzzy framework for diagnosis and therapy of cardiovascular disease
- An analysis of cardiomyocytes’ electrophysiology in the presence of the hERG gene mutations
- Visualization and simulation of the human heart based on ECG
- Computer-based system to capture, collect, process and analyze data in psychomotor tests
- A serious game – a new training addressing particularly prospective memory in the elderly