Startseite How the Mechanism of Dynamic Representation Affects Policy Change and Stability
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

How the Mechanism of Dynamic Representation Affects Policy Change and Stability

  • Simon Tobias Franzmann und Johannes Schmitt
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 18. Mai 2016
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

In politics, we often observe stasis when, at first sight, no reason exists for such policy blockades. In contrast., we sometimes see policy change when one would expect blockades resulting from veto points or countervailing majorities. How can we explain these contradictory results concerning policy stability? In order to solve this theoretical puzzle, we develop an agent-based model (ABM). We combine established models of veto player theory (Tsebelis 2002: Ganghof-Bräuninger 2006) with the findings of political sociology and party competition. By aggregating previous party-level findings, we show that dynamic representation (Stimson et. al. 1995) provides an additional mechanism that can explain these macro-level outcomes. Parties behaving responsively to their electorate do not automatically guarantee perfect responsivity on the party system level. Further, if opposition parties also fear punishment by the electorate for government inaction, the opposition behaves more accommodatingly than previous approaches have predicted.

Published Online: 2016-05-18
Published in Print: 2016-05-01

© 2016 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin/Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Titelei
  2. Contents
  3. Explaining and Understanding by Answering ‘Why’ and ‘How’ Questions: A Programmatic Introduction to the Special Issue Social Mechanisms
  4. Part I. Explanatory and Analytical: Understanding the Contexts, Core, and Collective Outcomes of Action
  5. Social Mechanisms as Special Cases of Explanatory Sociology: Notes toward Systemizing and Expanding Mechanism-based Explanation within Sociology
  6. Social Mechanisms of Corruption: Analytical Sociology and Its Applicability to Corruption Research
  7. Neighbourhood Effects: Lost in Transition?
  8. Part II. Bridging the Gap with Quantitative Survey Research
  9. Social Mechanisms in Norm-relevant Situations: Explanations for Theft by Finding in High-cost, and Low-cost Situation
  10. Social Mechanisms and Empirical Research in the Field of Sociology of the Family: The Case of Separation and Divorce
  11. Contextualizing Cognitive Consonance by a Social Mechanisms Explanation: Moderators of Selective Exposure in Media Usage
  12. Part III. Experiments, Agent-Based Modeling, and Mixed Methods
  13. The Use of Field Experiments to Study Mechanisms of Discrimination
  14. Rational Laziness - When Time Is Limited, Supply Abundant, and Decisions Have to Be Made
  15. How the Mechanism of Dynamic Representation Affects Policy Change and Stability
  16. Opening the Black Box. How the Study of Social Mechanisms Can Benefit from the Use of Explanatory Mixed Methods
  17. A Methodological Outlook on Causal Identification and Empirical Methods for the Analysis of Social Mechanism
  18. Authors
Heruntergeladen am 27.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/auk-2016-0111/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen