Home Light curve analysis of main belt asteroids 4747, 5255, 11411, 15433, 17866
Article Open Access

Light curve analysis of main belt asteroids 4747, 5255, 11411, 15433, 17866

  • Ilgmars Eglitis EMAIL logo and Nagainis Kristers
Published/Copyright: August 26, 2023

Abstract

The main belt asteroids 4747, 5255, 11411, 15433, and 17866 were studied at the Baldone Astrophysical Observatory in the time span range 2018–2022. The obtained light curve data together with published Minor Planet Center data are analyzed with Fourier series, Lomb-Scargle periodogram, and phase dispersion minimization methods. A plan of analysis is given. The results computed from different observatories’ data are compared, and mean-weighted periods are obtained.

1 Introduction

The investigation of asteroid properties is important for the development of the evolution theory of the solar system and the classification of small solar system objects. Because some of these objects can collide with the Earth, asteroids are also important for having significantly modified the Earth’s biosphere in the past. They will continue to do so in the future. This might sound surprising because asteroids are considered a nuisance due to their potential to impact Earth and trigger mass extinctions. But an emerging view proposes that asteroid collisions with planets may provide a boost to the birth and evolution of complex life (Castillo and Vance 2008) and (Houtkooper 2011). During the early solar system, the carbon-based molecules and some heavy elements that served as the building blocks of life may have been brought to the Earth via asteroid and comet impacts. Asteroid studies will allow us to answer the ambiguous question about the origins of life on Earth. On the other hand, the next step in the human exploration and exploitation of space will be highly dependent on extracting materials (primarily water and minerals) from space sources. It is highly probable that the success and viability of human expansion into space will depend on the ability to exploit asteroid resources. Therefore, a detailed physical and compositional assessment of the population will be required during the next decade before human missions are sent to these objects. The photometric study of light curves can obtain additional information about size, rotation period, the structure of objects, and the existence of craters and ice fields on the surface, which is very important data for space missions. Asteroids shine due to the Sun’s light reflecting on their surface and depend on surface albedo (from surface characteristics: chemical composition; regoliths which cover the object). If an asteroid is not spherical, its brightness might vary due to one or more of the following factors: the asteroid’s distance to the observer and to the Sun is changing; the asteroid’s phase is changing (just like the Moon’s). All of the above plus the shape of the asteroid and its periodic rotation as well as the precession of the axis of rotation are reflected in changes in brightness over time – which astronomers understand under the term light curve of an asteroid. The importance of light curve acquisition and the complexity of the analysis at the same time can be understood from this.

2 Observations

At the Baldone Astrophysical Observatory (IAU Code 069), astronomers operate with a Schmidt-type 1.2 m telescope installed with two STX-16803 charge-coupled devices (CCDs). The brightness limit in the visual range of the telescope without a filter is 22 magnitude at night with good transparency and calm images. CCD parameters are quantum effectivity of about 80%, the size of one pixel is 9 × 9 microns, and linear size 4,096 × 4,096 pixels, which corresponds to 53 × 53 arcmin of the field of view. Monitoring of asteroids in the Baldone observatory took place from 2008 mainly without a filter. Part of the clear nights in the last 3 years is devoted to the studying dynamics of main belt asteroids in the G(RP) passband. Observations also managed to use nights with a small phase of the Moon. The list of observable asteroids was compiled using the links of the Minor Planet Center NEO checker (MPC 2022) and MPC light curve database (ALCDEF 2022). The list included those NEO and main belt asteroids with a brightness greater than 18 magnitudes without period data. Observations of selected asteroids in Baldone Observatory are usually made on three to five following nights. Three- to five-hour long series of observations are dedicated to each asteroid at night. On average, it gives more than a hundred observations for each object. The particular asteroid observations were made in 2020–2021 mainly with exposures of 180 or 240 s, to achieve a signal-to-noise ratio greater than 20. The details of observational circumstances at Baldone observatory are given in Table 1. The table contains observation dates, exposition, asteroid phase, and distance from the observer (Delta) and Sun (R) in astronomical units (AU).

Table 1

Observation details at Baldone observatory

Asteroid Obs. date Expos. Phase Delta (AU) R (AU)
4747 Jujo 2022.01.25–26 240 7.9 2.001 2.928
2022.02.11–12 240 5.9 1.998 2.948
2022.02.26–27 240 8.8 2.049 2.964
2022.02.27–28 240 9.1 2.055 2.965
2022.02.28–03.01 240 9.4 2.062 2.966
5255 Jonsophie 2022 03.20–21 240 17.7 1.950 2.658
2022.03.21–22 240 17.9 1.961 2.658
2022.03.22–23 240 18.2 1.971 2.658
2022.04.26–27 240 22.3 2.388 2.652
2022.04.27–28 240 22.3 2.401 2.651
(11411) 1999 HK1 2022.08.11–12 240 21.7 0.842 1.747
2022.08.12–13 240 21.4 0.840 1.748
2022.08.13–14 240 21.1 0.838 1.748
2022.08.15–16 240 20.6 0.834 1.750
(15433) 1998 VQ7 2022.03.11–12 240 15.7 1.734 2.546
2022.03.16–17 180 17.2 1.776 2.542
2022.03.17–17 180 17.5 1.785 2.541
2022.04.01–02 240 20.9 1.934 2.529
2022.04.02–03 240 21.1 1.945 2.528
(17866) KV45 2022.03.31–04.01 240 12.1 1.955 2.823
2022.04.01–02 240 12.3 1.958 2.822
2022.04.02 240 12.4 1.962 2.822

3 Light curves analysis

The G(RP) magnitudes for reference stars were taken from the GAIA DR2 release (Brown et al. 2018). Usually, 5–6 reference stars: with colors close to the Sun, some brighter and some dimmer, than an asteroid, were selected for the processing of one series of observations. The images were calibrated and measured using Maxim DL software. Measurement of magnitudes of objects was made after the application of standard procedures of master flat and master dark images. For further processing, we selected only that series where the reference star’s brightness errors at an average are smaller than 0.03 magnitudes. It helps to discard observations with poor sky instant transparency. Each measurement of an asteroid consists of a time and apparent magnitude couple. Both values must be corrected for each measurement series because the distance of an asteroid relative to Earth and to the Sun changes:

(1) t i = t 0 + ( D 0 D i ) c ,

where D is the asteroid’s distance from the observer. The magnitudes of all series are corrected depending on the distance from the observer and from the Sun (Zeigler and Hanshaw 2016):

(2) Δ m = 2.5 log 10 ( ( D i 2 ) ( D 0 2 ) ( R i 2 ) ( R 0 2 ) ) ,

where D is the asteroid distance from the observer and R is the distance to the Sun and R 0 and D 0 is the same for the first observation in the first series. All subsequent series magnitude measurements are reduced to the magnitudes of the first series of observations by correction:

(3) Δ m = ( Ph i Ph 0 ) k ,

where k is the slope coefficient of the phase diagram for phases in intervals 10–30°, and Ph i and Ph 0 are i and the first phase series, respectively. We thus use linear regression to fit the lightcurve amplitude-corrected data. The individual, average phase slope for particular asteroids is given in Table 2. The error of the slope coefficient is obtained by comparing the phase diagrams of different observatories. After all, corrections, to derive asteroid periods from their lightcurves, we solved Eq. (4) by least squares with the assumed period P (Pravec and Harris 2000):

(4) V ( t ) = V a v + i = 1 n B n sin ( 2 π i ( t t 0 ) P ) + i = 1 n C n cos ( 2 π i ( t t 0 ) P ) ,

where V is the average brightness for a single light curve, Ak and Bk are the Fourier series coefficients, P is the synodic period, t is the time of observation (in Julian days), and t 0 is the time of the first observation. At each step, a r 2 value was derived and a global minimum was located. To estimate the uncertainty of the data points, we rescaled the smallest r 2 per degree of freedom to unity. A detailed description of the algorithm is presented by Kwiatkowski et al. (2009). Classic Fourier series (F) method gives usable results analyzing long series observation in multiple following nights when the rotation period is not longer than 7–10 h. Previous attempts to obtain asteroid rotation periods using only the F series method in the analysis did not always lead to convincing results, for example, for asteroid 1999 XC221 (Eglitis et al. 2022). The Fourier method is very sensitive to gaps in observations, especially when summarizing data from small series of observations, as well as data from different oppositions, where are large shifts in the brightness range. In this situation, the Lomb–Scargle (L–S) periodogram is a more reliable method used to analyze unevenly sampled time series data for periodic signals. It is especially valuable when dealing with nonuniformly spaced or sparsed data just like the rest of these methods (VanderPlas 2018). The Lomb-Scargle method takes the classic periodogram and generalizes it further and includes two coefficients in front of the trig function terms and adds a time-shifting term to allow for unevenly spaced data. In data processing with the L–S periodogram method, it is very important to correctly choose the frequency step width with which we pass the entire frequency range under study, too fine a grid can lead to unnecessarily long computation times that can add up quickly in the case of large surveys, while too coarse a grid risks entirely missing narrow peaks that fall between grid points. The step can be calculated by the following formula:

(5) Δ f = 1 n T ,

where recommended values of n are usually between 5 and 10; T is a common observation range in days. We used n = 10 in our study. The fitting quality in L–S method of the sinusoidal model is characterized by χ 2 . The closer χ 2 is to one, the better the agreement of the model with the observational data. One drawback of this method is that it only works if the white noise being sifted through is uncorrelated, and otherwise, the results will not be great. Θ is a term that compares the population variance against the data variance, and this is the term that is minimized. (VanderPlas 2018). The third-phase dispersion minimization (PDM) method is valuable when dealing with nonuniformly spaced data. The basic concept is that the observations are grouped into bins of roughly the same phase. The variance in each bin can now be calculated. The overall variance is the sum of the variance of the samples: data are cut for each test period until the total variance is minimized (specifically, it looks for local minima, not global minima). In our research, the bins from 5 to 10 were checked. Θ is a term that compares the population variance against the data variance, and this is the term that is minimized. The period is a good fit if it is close to 0, and if it is close to 1, it indicates a wrong period (Stellingwerf 1978). PDM has the biggest noticeable disadvantage, as comfortably more than 100 observations are needed in order for it to work well. Anything less can result in a wrong estimated period. The other two methods do not have this problem as much and so can be relied on for smaller samples of data. In cases where the results of F analysis indicated a period exceeding 7 h, published MPS Mauna Loa (IAU Code T08), Haleakala (IAU Code T05), and Ponte Uso (IAU Code L41) observatories and Catalina Sky Survey (IAU Code 703) brightness data were analyzed additionally. In addition, Punto Uso r and g brightness data as well as Mauna Loa and Haleakala o and c brightness data were analyzed separately. The true rotation period of the asteroid is considered to be the mean weighted period obtained by equation 8, using all calculated periods from data of different observatory measurements. When obtaining the rotation period in this way, the scatter around the mean light curve is taken into account by the following equation (using periodogram characteristics in Table 2: Θ for the PDM method and w = χ 2 or w = 1 r 2 in the cases of L–S and F methods, respectively).

(6) P 1 = 1 k P k Y k ( 1 i ( Θ i + W i ) ) .

The number ( N ) of measurements is taken into account by the following equation:

(7) P 2 = 1 k P k N k 1 i N i ,

The resulting mean weighted period is:

(8) P = P 1 + P 2 2 ,

where P k periods (see P(L–S) and P(PDM) in columns five and seven of Table 2, respectively) are obtained with different methods using data from different observatories, N i is the number of data and W i is a character of the power spectrum, which gives a measure of the scatter around the mean light curve. Θ i also is a measure of the scatter around the mean light curve in the case of the PDM method. Y k is the corresponding power spectrum characteristic ( W k or Θ k ) of the period under consideration. The codes of observatories with passband index are in the second column, and the number of magnitude measurements, obtained in the span range of time (column four), is in the third column of Table 2.

Table 2

Results of asteroids light curve data analyze

Asteroid Obs.code passband Numb. of obs. Obs. period P(L–S) (h) W P(PDM) (h) Theta
4747 Jujo (Phase slope 0.0429 ± 0.0006) T08o 301 2019.05–2022.06 10.593 0.61 10.593 0.57
T05o 150 2019.05–2022.03 10.584 0.56 10.594 0.68
T05c 166 2019.05–2022.06 10.584 0.52 10.594 0.68
703G 165 2020.10–2022.06 10.584 0.52 10.635: 0.43
L41r 179 2020.07–2022.05 10.068: 0.42 10.594 0.55
5255 Jonsophie (Phase slope 0.0430 ± 0.0009) T08o 247 2019.05-2022.06 57.744 0.64 57.744 0.64
T05o 81 2019.02-2022.03 57.748 0.65
T05c 126 2019.06-2022.03 57.748 0.68 57.600: 0.44
703G 143 2020.10-2022.06 57.768 0.58 57.744 0.53
L41r 144 2020.10-2022.06 57.744 0.63 57.741 0.59
L41g 74 2019.06-2022.04 57.744 0.76
(11411) 1999 HK1 (Phase slope 0.0209 ± 0.0006) T08o 230 2019.01–2022.08 9.024 0.68 9.017 0.77
T05o 74 2019.01–2022.08 9.159: 0.45 9.159 0.50
T05c 79 2019.01–2022.08 8.952: 0.39 9.356: 0.38
703G 94 2020.11–2022.07 9.024 0.65 9.022 0.77
L41r 79 2019.04–2022.07 9.024 0.61 9.016 0.70
(15433) 1998 VQ7 (Phase slope 0.0314 ± 0.0023) T08o 378 2019.01–2022.03 63.576 0.71 63.578 0.68
T05o 129 2018.12–2022.03 63.480 0.53 63.666 0.59
T05c 133 2019.01–2022.03 64.104 0.55 64.106 0.63
703G 133 2020.09–2022.06 58.656: 0.14 64.763 0.77
L41r 108 2018.11–2022.07 65.016: 0.29 64.987: 0.36
(17866) 1998 KV45 (Phase slope 0.0378 ± 0.0008) T08o 228 2019.07–2022.07 4.460 0.82 4.884 0.78
T05o 88 2019.07–2022.03 4.392: 0.44
T05c 117 2019.07–2022.06 4.416 0.67 4.884 0.75
703G 101 2021.10–2022.06 4.512 0.63 4.767 0.75
L41r 138 2019.08–2022.06 4.767 0.76 4.710 0.80
L41g 83 2019.08–2022.06 4.386: 0.28
069r 132 2022.03–2022.04 4.464 0.56 4.471 0.67

4 Rotation periods

From the beginning period, diapason from 0.5 h till 100 h are analyzed. Analysis by the whole three methods gives a power spectrum with many peaks (Figure 1) and the most on the most appropriate phase curve for the taken method. In some cases, this is not yet the desired rotation period and needs adding analysis in shorter ranges around peaks with a probability high than 40%. The separation of such possible periods is based on two more features. The first phase curve should have two complete peaks and two minimums (Figure 2). The second characteristic is that the shape of the power peak should resemble a Gaussian distribution (Figure 3). These features will be taken into account by analyzing observations obtained by different observatories. Small differences in period values can be combined using a mean-weighted method. Thus, it would be possible to take into account both the different number of observations in the data set and the probability values of the power spectrum peaks obtained in the analysis.

Figure 1 
               The L–S periodogram for asteroid 4747 Jujo in the range 0.01–40 from Mauna Loa Observatory data.
Figure 1

The L–S periodogram for asteroid 4747 Jujo in the range 0.01–40 from Mauna Loa Observatory data.

Figure 2 
               Calculated light curve for asteroid 4747 Jujo with L–S method from Mauna Loa Observatory data.
Figure 2

Calculated light curve for asteroid 4747 Jujo with L–S method from Mauna Loa Observatory data.

Figure 3 
               The L–S periodogram for asteroid 4747 Jujo.
Figure 3

The L–S periodogram for asteroid 4747 Jujo.

4.1 4747 Jujo

The main belt asteroid 4747 Jujo was discovered by Ueda and Kaneda at the Kushiro Observatory on November 19, 1989. The main obtained parameters of this K-type asteroid vary from 10.81 km detected from NEOWISE spacecraft 2013 year data (Nugent et al. 2016) to 13.82 km (Mainzer et al. 2016) detected from NEOWISE data compilation. The values of obtained phase slope G vary from 0.125 to 0.24; absolute magnitude from 12.1 to 12.6 and albedo from 0.13 to 0.14. It is close to Warner (2022) ALCDEF database values of G , H , and Al of 0.24, 12.31, and 0.13 respectively. But the diameter Warren gives the value of 12.72 km.

167 Baldone observatory observations using G(RP) filter were made in January and February 2022 at phases 5.8 9 . 5 . The analysis of the 4 h continuous monitoring of the asteroid with an exposure of 240 s on the nights of January 25, February 11, 26, and 28 in 2022 with the Fourier series method indicated that the rotation period of the object should be significantly longer than 6 h. The published brightness data in electronic format in MINOR PLANET CIRCULARS/MINOR PLANETS AND COMETS SUPPLEMENT (MPSs)[1] from Mauna Loa (Code T08), Haleakala (Code T05), and Ponte Uso (Code L41) observatories and from Catalina Sky Survey (Code 703) L–S and PDM analysis confirmed that the asteroid Jujo rotates with a period 10.591 ± 0.002  h. Brightness amplitude is 0.4 magnitudes in G(RP) passband.

4.2 5255 Jonsophie

The Main belt asteroid 5255 Jonsophie was discovered at the Palomar observatory by Helin on May 19, 1988. The main obtained parameters of the asteroid in the publications of various authors are very different. The diameter computation of this C- type asteroid varies from 18.14 km detected from the AKARI/IRC Mid-Infrared Asteroid Survey (Usui et al. 2011) catalog to 11.69 km (Massiero et al. 2020) detected from the Near-Earth Object Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (NEOWISE) spacecraft data. The values of obtained phase slope G vary from 0.12 to 0.15; absolute magnitude ( H ) from 12.1 to 13.3, and albedo (Al) from 0.03 to 0.09, while Warner in ALCDEF database has given values of G , H , and Al, 0.20, 13.33, and 0.10, respectively, and a smaller diameter of 9.07 km.

167 Baldone observatory observations using G(RP) filter were made in March–May 2022 at phases 17.7–22.3 degrees. The analysis of the 4 h series of the asteroid images with an exposure of 240 s on the nights of March 20, 21, and 22, 2022, and the additional observations of shorter series in April and May with the Fourier row method indicated that the rotation period of the object should be significantly longer than 4 h. The L–S and PDM analysis of data from Catalina Sky Survey, Mauna Loa, Haleakala, and Ponte Uso observatories published in electronic format in MINOR PLANET CIRCULARS/MINOR PLANETS AND COMETS SUPPLEMENT (MPSs) confirmed that the asteroid Jonsophie rotates with a large average period 57.747 ± 0.003  h. Brightness amplitude is close to 2 magnitudes in G(RP) passband (Figures 4 and 5).

Figure 4 
                  Calculated the light curve for asteroid 5255 Jonsophie with L–S method from Mauna Loa Observatory data.
Figure 4

Calculated the light curve for asteroid 5255 Jonsophie with L–S method from Mauna Loa Observatory data.

Figure 5 
                  The periodogram for asteroid 5255 Jonsophie.
Figure 5

The periodogram for asteroid 5255 Jonsophie.

4.3 (11411) 1999 HK1

The main belt asteroid (11411) 1999 HK1 was discovered during the realization project LINEAR at Lincoln Laboratory’s Experimental Test Site on April 16, 1999. This asteroid has significantly less eccentricity than other main belt objects, and therefore, from time to time, it approaches the Earth closer than the average Earth–Sun distance (closer than 1AU). The closest approach to Earth (Earth MOID) is 0.78600 AU (MPC 2023). The absolute magnitude ( H = 16.21 ) was obtained by (Veres et al. 2015) by analyzing the Pan-STARRS1 telescope 3-year all-sky survey mission data. This previously obtained value has been corrected by Warren (ALCDEF 2022). In the ALCDEF database, he gives the following main parameters for this SE-type asteroid: H = 15.34 , G = 0.30 , Al = 0.3, and a diameter of 2.07 km.

144 Baldone observatory observations using G(RP) filter were made on August 2022 at phases 20.6–21.7 degrees. The analysis of the 4 h continuous monitoring of the asteroid with an exposure of 240 s on the nights of August 11, 12, 13, and 15 in 2022 with the Fourier series method indicated that the rotation period of the object should be significantly longer than 7 h. The data of Mauna Loa observatory L–S and PDM analysis published in electronic format in MINOR PLANET CIRCULARS/MINOR PLANETS AND COMETS SUPPLEMENT (MPSs) brightness give rotation period for asteroid 1999 HK1 9.021 ± 0.002  h with brightness amplitude 0.8 magnitudes in G(RP) passband. Baldone observatory light curve analysis with L–S and PDM methods gives a close period only observed brightness amplitude is less large, 0.9 magnitudes. The amount of published brightness data from Haleakala (74 observ.), and Ponte Uso (79 observ.) observatories and from Catalina Sky Survey (94 observ.) are insufficient for analysis with the PDM method and give inaccurate results. For the same reason, the analysis of the data of the mentioned observatories with the L–S method does not give convincing results (Figures 6 and 7).

Figure 6 
                  Calculated the light curve for asteroid (11411) 1999 HK1 with L–S method from Mauna Loa observatory data.
Figure 6

Calculated the light curve for asteroid (11411) 1999 HK1 with L–S method from Mauna Loa observatory data.

Figure 7 
                  The periodogram for asteroid (11411) 1999 HK1.
Figure 7

The periodogram for asteroid (11411) 1999 HK1.

4.4 (15433) 1998 VQ7

The main belt asteroid (15433) 1998 VQ7 was discovered during the realization project LINEAR at Lincoln Laboratory’s Experimental Test Site in December 1998. The absolute magnitude of this V- type asteroid calculated by Veres et al. (2015) is 14.39. Warren 2022 in the ALCDEF database (ALCDEF 2022) gives H = 13.79 which is greater than that obtained by Colazo et al. (2021) from GAIA DR2 release data. Warren in ALCDEF also gives other parameters G = 0.43 , Al = 0.3 , and diameter 3.92 km.

189 Baldone observatory observations using G(RP) filter were made in March and April 2022 at phases 17.7–21.1 degrees. The analysis of the 3–5 h series of the asteroid with an exposure of 240 s on the nights of March 11, 16, 17, and April 01, 02 in 2022 with the F, L–S, and PDM methods gives an average rotation period 3.984 h. The analysis with L–S and PDM methods of the brightness data from The Mauna Loa, Haleakala, and Ponte Uso observatories and Catalina Sky Survey obtained in the time range 2019–2022 and are published in the MINOR PLANET CIRCULARS/MINOR PLANETS AND COMET SUPPLEMENT (MPSs) give a greater mean weighted rotation period 63.787 ± 0.071  h. Brightness amplitude is close to 1.3 magnitudes in G(RP) passband (Figures 8 and 9).

Figure 8 
                  Calculated the light curve for asteroid (15433) 1998 VQ7 with L–S method from Mauna Loa Observatory data.
Figure 8

Calculated the light curve for asteroid (15433) 1998 VQ7 with L–S method from Mauna Loa Observatory data.

Figure 9 
                  The periodogram for asteroid (15433) 1998 VQ7.
Figure 9

The periodogram for asteroid (15433) 1998 VQ7.

4.5 (17866) 1998 KV45

The main belt asteroid (17866) 1998 KV45 was discovered during the realization project LINEAR at Lincoln Laboratory’s Experimental Test Site in December 1998. The absolute magnitude of this C- type asteroid calculated by Veres et al. (2015) is 13.68 and by Colazo et al. (2021) is 13.33, while Mainzer et al. (2016) detected from NEOWISE data compilation is 13.00. Mainzer obtained G = 0.15 , l Al = 0.049 , and a diameter of the asteroid 15.15 km. Warren 2022 in ALCDEF gives H = 13.29 , G = 0.12 , Al = 0.057 , and a diameter of 12.23 km.

131 Baldone observatory observations using G(RP) filter were made in March and April 2022 at phases 12.1–12.4 degrees. The analysis of the 3–5 h series of the asteroid with an exposure of 240 s on the nights of March 31 and April 01, 02 in 2022 with the Fourier series, L–S, and PDM methods gives an average rotation period of the object 4.464 h. The analysis with L–S and PDM methods of brightness data from Mauna Loa, Haleakala, Ponte Uso observatories and from Catalina Sky Survey published in SPSs give a slightly smaller rotation period. The weighted period is 4.575 ± 0.005  h. Brightness amplitude is close to 0.6 magnitudes in G(RP) passband (Figures 10 and 11).

Figure 10 
                  Calculated the light curve for asteroid (17866) 1998 KV45 with L–S method from Baldone Observatory data.
Figure 10

Calculated the light curve for asteroid (17866) 1998 KV45 with L–S method from Baldone Observatory data.

Figure 11 
                  The periodogram for asteroid (17866) 1998 KV45.
Figure 11

The periodogram for asteroid (17866) 1998 KV45.

5 Conclusion

The Fourier series method gives usable results analyzing long series observation in multiple following nights when the rotation period is not longer than 7–10 h. In cases of small series of observations scattered over a large period of time, with uncertainties in brightness, the L–S and PDM methods work more reliably. All three methods can be safely used if the number of observations greatly exceeds a hundred. It should be noted that the PDM method is particularly sensitive to a small number of observations. If the number of observations is less than a hundred, the PDM method mostly does not give good results. The results of the main belt asteroids 4747 Jujo, 5255 Jonsophie, (11411) 1999 HK1, (15433) 1998 VQ7, and (17866) 1998 KV45 brightness analysis have been reported in the Astronomy section of the 81th Annual Scientific Conference of the University of Latvia and in the 5th Anniversary International Conference of NSP FOTONIKA-LV Quantum sciences, Space sciences and Technologies – Photonics 2023 (Eglitis 2023).

Acknowledgements

This work has made use of data from the European Space Agency (ESA) mission Gaia (https://www.cosmos.esa.int/gaia) processed by the Gaia Data Processing and Analysis Consortium (DPAC, https://www.cosmos.esa.int/web/gaia/dpac/consortium). Funding for the DPAC was provided by national institutions, in particular, the institutions participating in the Gaia Multilateral Agreement. This research was funded by the ERDF project No. 1.1.1.5/19/A/003.

  1. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  2. Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  3. Data availability statement: The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available in the repository.

References

ALCDEF. 2022. Asteroid Lightcurve Data Exchange Format. https://alcdef.org/php/alcdef-GenerateALCDEFPage.php. Search in Google Scholar

Brown AGA, Vallenari A, Prusti T, de Bruijne JHL, Babusiaux C, Bailer-Jones CAL, et al. 2018. Gaia data release 2-summary of the contents and survey properties. Astron Astrophys. 616;A1, 22. 10.1051/0004-6361/201832964Search in Google Scholar

Colazo M, Duffard R, Weidmann W. 2021. The determination of asteroid H and G phase function parameters using Gaia DR2. MNRAS. 504:761–768. 10.1093/mnras/stab726Search in Google Scholar

Castillo J, Vance S. 2008. Session 13. The deep cold biosphere? Interior processes of icy satellites and dwarf planets. Astrobiology. 8:344–346. 10.1089/ast.2008.1237Search in Google Scholar

Eglitis I. 2023. 5th Anniversary International Conference of NSP FOTONIKA-LV Quantum Sciences, Space sciences and Technologies, Photonics 2023. https://www.erachair.lu.lv/en/conference/. Search in Google Scholar

Eglitis I, Bule A, Sokolova A, Nagainis K. 2022. Observations of NEO and Main Belt asteroids in 2018–2021 using the Baldone Schmidt telescope. Astron Astrophys Trans. 33:123–138. 10.17184/eac.6475Search in Google Scholar

Houtkooper JM. 2011. Glaciopanspermia: Seeding the terrestrial planets with life? Planet Space Sci. 59:1107–1111. 10.1016/j.pss.2010.09.003Search in Google Scholar

Kwiatkowski T, Kryszczynska A, Polinska M, Buckley DA, O’Donoghue D, Charles PA, et al. 2009. Photometry of 2006 RH120: an asteroid temporary captured into a geocentric orbit. Astron Astrophys. 495:967–974. 10.1051/0004-6361:200810965Search in Google Scholar

Mainzer AK, Bauer JM, Cutri RM, Grav T, Kramer EA, Masiero JR, et al. 2016. NEOWISE diameters and albedos V1.0. NASA Planetary Data System id. EAR-A-COMPIL-5-NEOWISEDIAM-V1.0. 10.3847/PSJ/ab7820Search in Google Scholar

Massiero JR, Mainzer AK, Bauer JM, Cutri RM, Grav T, Krame E, et al. 2020. Physical properties of 299 NEOs manually recovered in over five years of NEOWISE survey data. Planet Sci J. 1(1):9.10.3847/PSJ/ab8638Search in Google Scholar

MPC. 2022. Minor Planet Center. https://cgi.minorplanetcenter.net/cgi-bin/checkneo.cgi. Search in Google Scholar

MPC. 2023. Minor Planet Center. https://cgi.minorplanetcenter.net/cgi-bin/mpeph2.cgi. Search in Google Scholar

Nugent CR, Mainzer A, Bauer J, Cutri RM, Kramer EA, Grav T, et al. 2016. NEOWISE reactivation mission year two: asteroid diameters and albedos. AJ. 152:63, 12. 10.3847/0004-6256/152/3/63Search in Google Scholar

Pravec P, Harris AW. 2000. Fast and slow rotation of asteroids. Icarus. 148:12–20. 10.1006/icar.2000.6482Search in Google Scholar

Stellingwerf RF. 1978. Period determination using phase dispersion minimization. AJ. 224:953–960. 10.1086/156444Search in Google Scholar

Usui F, Kuroda D, Mü ller TG, Hasegawa S, Ishiguro M, Ootsubo T, et al. 2011. Asteroid catalog using AKARI: AKARI/IRC mid-infrared asteroid survey. Publ Astron Soc Jpn. 63:1117–1138. 10.1093/pasj/63.5.1117Search in Google Scholar

VanderPlas JT. 2018. Understanding the lomb-scargle periodogram. ApJS. 236:id.16, 28. 10.3847/1538-4365/aab766Search in Google Scholar

Vereš P, Jedicke R, Fitzsimmons A, Denneau L, Granvik M, Bolin B, et al. 2015. Absolute magnitudes and slope parameters for 250,000 asteroids observed by Pan-STARRS PS1-Preliminary results. Icarus. 261:34–47. 10.1016/j.icarus.2015.08.007Search in Google Scholar

Warner BD. 2022. ALCDEF database. https://alcdef.org/. Search in Google Scholar

Zeigler K, Hanshaw B. 2016. Photometric Observations of Asteroids 3829 Gunma, 6173 Jimwestphal and (41588) 2000 SC46. Minor Planet Bull. 43:199–200. Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2023-04-13
Revised: 2023-07-19
Accepted: 2023-07-21
Published Online: 2023-08-26

© 2023 the author(s), published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Research Articles
  2. Deep learning applications for stellar parameter determination: II-application to the observed spectra of AFGK stars
  3. Braking and attitude control of lunar lander in active descent stage
  4. Ka/C dual frequency ranging system for ocean altimetry satellite and analysis of ionospheric error
  5. Necessary condition for temporary asteroid capture
  6. A holistic study of the systems V0487 Lac, V0566 Hya, and V0666 Lac
  7. Review Article
  8. Light curve analysis of main belt asteroids 4747, 5255, 11411, 15433, 17866
  9. Special Issue: New Technology for Space Environment Detection Based on Beidou Constellation
  10. Guest Editorial: Special Issue of New Technology for Space Environment Detection Based on Beidou Constellation
  11. Medium and high energy electron detectors onboard BeiDou navigation satellite in MEO
  12. An outlier detection method with CNN for BeiDou MEO moderate-energy electron data
  13. A low-energy ion spectrometer with large field of view and wide energy range onboard a Chinese GEO satellite
  14. High-energy proton detector based on semiconductor telescope
  15. Radiation dosimeter and charge detector onboard BeiDou navigation satellites in MEO
  16. Design and validation of a space plasma environment detector for BeiDou navigation satellite
  17. Surface charging and dose monitor on geosynchronous orbit satellite
  18. Monitor of the single event upsets and linear energy transfer of space radiation on the Beidou navigation satellites
  19. Radiation environment and effect detection based on global navigation constellation
  20. An ion beam system for calibration of space low-energy ion detectors
  21. Special Issue: Modern Stellar Astronomy 2022
  22. Crossmatching of high-proper motion L, T, and Y brown dwarfs with large photometric surveys
  23. Magnetic fields with random initial conditions in discs with Kepler rotation curve
  24. Far-IR emission from bright high-redshift quasars
  25. A new version of the binary star database BDB: Challenges and directions
  26. Dust and gas in star-forming complexes in NGC 3351, NGC 5055, and NGC 5457
  27. Investigation of the halo effect in the evolution of a nonstationary disk of spiral galaxies
  28. Special Issue: Astromineralogy and cosmochemistry of the Kaba meteorite
  29. Clay minerals and other hydrous alteration products in the Kaba meteorite: Review of the literature and new XRD investigations
  30. Special Issue: The Hubble Tension: Current Research and New Perspectives
  31. Late-time dark energy and Hubble tension
  32. The history of the Cosmos: Implications for the Hubble tension
Downloaded on 12.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/astro-2022-0227/html
Scroll to top button