Home Classical, Ancient Near Eastern & Egyptian Studies Construction and Transformation of a Sacred Urban Complex of Hardwar-Rishikesh, North India
Article Open Access

Construction and Transformation of a Sacred Urban Complex of Hardwar-Rishikesh, North India

  • Pralay Kanungo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: September 15, 2023
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Hardwar and Rishikesh, the twin sacred cities well known for Hindu pilgrimage, are located in close proximity on the foothills of the Himalayas; while the former primarily represents ritualistic Hinduism, the latter manifests spiritual Hinduism. In Hinduism, ritual and spiritual, though represent different philosophies, attributes, practices, manifestations and effects, yet both are integral components of the sacred. The topography of this Himalayan Hindu sacred urban complex is unique. The Ganges descends on the plains of Hardwar, which is also gateway (dwar) to the Himalayas, the abode of Gods and Rishis (sages). The river (Ganges) and the mountains (Himalayas) create a special sacred effect on the two cities. While the presence of the Ganges is overwhelming in Varanasi, in Hardwar-Rishikesh, it shares sacred power with the Himalayas; while Shiva is the supreme deity of Varanasi, Vishu/Lord Jagannath monopolizes Puri and Goddess Meenakshi reigns over Madurai, in Hardwar-Rishikesh, sacrality is shared among Shiva, Vishnu and Devi (goddess), reflecting accommodation and fusion of the three supreme deities of Hindu pantheon. Incidentally, Har (Shiva)dwar is also called Hari (Vishnu)dwar; in ancient times, it was also known as Ganga (Goddess Ganga)dwar. Hinduism has taken a spiritual turn in Rishikesh, making it an ideal destination for contemplation, meditation and yoga, besides being a gateway to the Himalayan sacred destinations. Thus, the Hardwar-Rishikesh urban complex represents a unique ritual-spiritual combination.

Traversing through the historiography of Hinduism in Hardwar-Rishikesh, and reflecting on mythical/historical texts, ritual/spiritual practices, symbols and institutions, priests and ascetics, community leaders and the state, this paper deconstructs the contour and character of the intertwining of Hinduism and urbanity in this sacred urban complex. The paper demonstrates that Hindu myths and texts constructed sacred spaces and sites, which subsequently constituted the urban pilgrimage complex and got transformed in different historical moments – precolonial, colonial and postcolonial. Dissecting the nature and manifestation of the two variants of Hinduism in the two cities – one ritual and other spiritual – the paper argues that religion and urbanity are constitutive of each other in Hardwar-Rishikesh demonstrating mutual reciprocity. The paper further demonstrates how new age movement and neoliberalism have transformed the urban religious milieu by reconfiguring pilgrimage, inventing ‘spiritual tourism’ and marketing religion and spiritualism to local and global clientele. Finally, reflecting upon the religion-identity conundrum, the paper shows concern at the emergence of Hindu exclusivism which may endanger the very inclusive and cosmopolitan ethos of the twin sacred cities.

Evolution of the sacred urban Hardwar and Rishikesh

Hardwar: Myths, texts and rituals

Hardwar is located on western bank of the Ganges on the southern fringe of the Shivalik mountains, the foothills of the Himalayas. Hardwar’s historiography consists of both atemporal/mythical as well as temporal/historical sources. Mythologically, Hardwar is a gateway between heaven and earth; the Ganges descended here to grant moksha (salvation) to King Sagar’s sixty thousand sons, who had been burned to ash by an ascetic’s curse. Thus, Hardwar became a tirtha (pilgrimage) and a sacred site (Bhardwaj 1973; Bhardwaj and Lochtefeld 2004) for the Hindu rituals like snana (bathing) or asthivisarjan (consigning the ashes of the dead to the Ganges). Another powerful myth has also made Hardwar one of the four sacred spots for Kumbh Mela, the world’s largest religious gathering, which occurs every 12 years. For many centuries, Kumbh Mela, besides being a religious festival, has also turned out to be a great spectacle in which millions of Hindus cutting across sects, sampradayas and regions, actively participate (Maclean 1996).

Kalidas, the great Sanskrit poet, in his Meghaduta (fifth century CE) mentions the descent of the Ganges and Kankhal (holy site of Hardwar). Chinese traveller Hsuan Tsang, (seventh century CE), calls Hardwar Mo-yu-lo (Mayapuri) and refers to it as Gangadvara (the gate of the Ganga river). Hsuan Tsang observed that hundreds and thousands of people assembled here for religious bathing and benevolent kings offered free food medicines to pilgrims and made charity to widows, orphans and destitute (Lochtefeld 2010, 51). Mahatmyas identify five sacred bathing sites in the Ganges: Gangadvara, Kushavarta, Bivaka, Nila Parvata, and Kankhal where holy bathing will bestow religious merit and wash away sin. Mahatmya texts, composed and produced in early and late medieval India in Sanskrit/vernacular languages, had a specific objective to promote the ‘greatness’ (mahatmya) of the sacred spaces/cities by narrating tales of origin of those particular sites. Mahatmyas also highlight the cultural, religious and regional history, local cults and religious institutions. Hardwar is no exception; Hardwara Mahatmya as well as several puranas, composed during this period, glorify the greatness of this sacred city.

The Autobiography of Timur, Mulfuzat-i-Timuri (fourteenth century CE), while boasting Emperor Timur’s victory at Hardwar, also provides a vivid account of Hardwar as a sacred site for Hindu pilgrimage, ritual bathing, immersion of ashes after death, where Brahmins and priests received large charity. The Mughul period (1526 – 1761), excepting Aurangzeb’s reign, recorded an increased flow of trade, traffic and pilgrims to Hardwar. Akbar’s lieutenant and ally Raja Mansingh laid the foundations of present-day Hardwar and revived its ancient glory; Mansingh constructed a temple at Har-Ki-Pauri, which is the most revered sacred site today. The seventeenth century English traveler Thomas Coryat recorded his visit to Hardwar’s spring bathing festival where he noted a large gathering of pilgrims. Khulasat-ut-Tawaraikh, a chronicle written by Sujan Rai Khattri in Persian in the late seventeenth century, mentions Baishakh festival and Kumbh Mela.

The chronicles of Hsuan Tsang, Timur, and Sujan Rai confirmed that the rituals prescribed in Puranas and Mahatmyas like Hardwar Mahatmya were being observed in Hardwar. Those rituals, such as bathing (snana), death rites (shraddha, tarpana, astivisarjana) and rites like shaving and immersing ashes of the dead (astivisarjan) and gift giving (dana) are performed today as well. A large number of Hindus flock to the city during the most auspicious Kumbh Mela (occurs every 12 years), Ardh Kumbh Mela (occurs every 6 years), Magh Mela and many other annual religious festivals to take a holy dip in the Ganges and perform other rituals to gain religious merit and fulfil their religious obligations. The rituals prescribed in the Mahatmyas, further legitimized in historical sources, have remained remarkably stable (Lochtefeld 2010, 52). However, ancient and medieval Hardwar has undergone phenomenal changes during the colonial and postcolonial period. Colonial and postcolonial state, priests and ascetics, pilgrims and tourists, politicians and entrepreneurs have been the key stakeholders in this transformation.

Construction of modern Hardwar: Pilgrim market, ascetics and colonialism

With the decline of the Mughals, Hardwar emerged as an important economic hub as a key entry point for goods from northern and western India and also as a primary distribution center for east and north (Bayly 1983, 156). By the mid-eighteenth century, the pilgrimage city had turned into a lucrative marketplace, particularly during the spring bathing festival. The festival stimulated the market, generating demand for gold, musk, dyes, dry fruits, shawls, ivory and brass goods and rock salt. In 1800s, the Hardwar fair became a market for livestock like horses, camels, cattle, elephants, dogs, monkeys etc. and turned into the largest horse fair in India; the East India company used to send their representatives for trading. Hundis, money lending bills of exchanges, were popular means of trade. A flourishing trade also propelled an increase of traffic; while more people visited Hardwar for pilgrimage, a significant number was attracted to the market.

A thriving market stimulated the marketing of the religious sites by highlighting their prominence, thus attracting more pilgrims to Hardwar. Trade flow from north and west opened avenues for Brahmins to look for patronage. Pandas, the local brahmins, acted as ritual specialists and pilgrim guides. Soon each panda family acquired exclusive hereditary rights over pilgrims from a particular geographical region/district. They devised an innovative method to protect this entitlement by creating and preserving meticulous pilgrim records, popularly called bahis (pilgrims’ register) which contained genealogy of pilgrim’s family (Goswamy 1966). Pilgrims, particularly coming from western and northern India, cultivated a close bonding with the Pandas. Whenever they came on pilgrimage, the Pandas provided them lodging, boarding and other logistics and became their tour guides. This relationship continued through successive generations till today; when pilgrims come to Hardwar to perform rituals, they connect to the present successor of their family Panda; the family members see their ancestor’s names and signatures as recorded in Panda’s bahis, feel gratified and donate liberally. Recently, the Pandas have started digitizing these age-old genealogy records (Kapoor 2016).

While Pandas benefited from the pilgrimage market by receiving patronage from pilgrims, in lieu of ritualistic service and guidance, another group of religious actors became powerful stake holder in Hardwar’s market economy. They were ascetics/sadhus/gosais/mahants, who received alms and donations from the pilgrims and visitors to the shrines. Unlike individual enterprises of the Pandas, these ascetics acted as organized corporations to control Hardwar’s booming pilgrimage market economy since the seventeenth century by taking over Hardwar’s key sites like Bvilekeshvar, Maya Devi, Bhairav Akhara and Daksheshvara. Akharas, organised ascetic bands, emerged as a potent economic, political and military force in Hardwar in the eighteenth century. An early nineteenth century report mentioned that that a mahant (abbot) spent 100,000 rupees as temple endowment, community dining and dakshina/charity to brahmins. A competition for resources and status among the abbots led to conflict, sometimes bloody, which occurred on the right to collect alms from pilgrims/visitors to shrines. Power and earning capacity were intertwined; Gosains, besides being an economically dominant group in Hardwar, had also virtually acted as rulers in their own right (Bayly 1983, 184; Cohn 1974). Thus, Hindu militant ascetics had substantial control over the city – from religion and economy to social and political life.

After taking control of the region in 1801, the British reduced bloody conflict and volatility, brought relative peace which boosted even greater traffic. This gave further prosperity to ascetics and other stake holders and property owners of Hardwar. Colonial government was keen to control the territory and trade without interfering with popular Hindu festivals and rituals like the Kumbh Mela. While conservative colonialists found the Mela a ‘nuisance’, pragmatic colonial administrators found it positive and thought it would be wise to promote the Mela to appease Hindu sentiment. Hence, they took the responsibility of managing Kumbh Mela; crowd control, public order and public health at the fair became the major concern. The deployment of British military units at the fair and visit of Company officials to the market led to streamlining and orderly conduct of festivals. After a bathing tragedy occurred in 1820 which killed 485 pilgrims, the colonial government constructed a new ghat at Har Ki Pauri, which triggered development of the city.

Development of the Hardwar city induced local moneyed interests to build new and bigger temples; trade flourished and Hardwar prospered. Hardwar, in the early 1800s, saw construction boom. The British government constructed projects like a new ghat at Brahmakund and a supply channel for the upper Ganges channel. The railroad arrived in 1886. Though it had an adverse impact on Hardwar’s fair and on traditional business trade networks, it stimulated Hardwar’s growth and dramatically increased pilgrim traffic. There was the occasional tussle between local business interest and the British government, too. In 1892, being fearful of a cholera outbreak, the government dispersed an important bathing festival in Hardwar, which saw protests by angry Pandas (Prior 1993). Another conflict occurred in 1916 over Bhim Goda weir; while the British found the weir essential for irrigation, the locals perceived that damming the Ganges was sacrilegious.

During colonial rule, pilgrim flow to Hardwar substantially increased, trade and pilgrimage market flourished, wealthy and powerful groups prospered, militant ascetic sects got prominence and the city’s landscape got transformed. Hindu business elites also contributed the city-building enterprise by opening Dharamshalas (guest houses) and charitable trusts. Raja Baldev Das Birla, an emerging capitalist and also a Hindu scholar, constructed a Clock Tower at Har Ki Pauri in 1938. The Clock tower, a four-sided structure with a clock on each side, demonstrating a fine architecture, has adorned the famous sacred ghat where thousands of pilgrims assemble every evening to participate in Ganga aarti (fire ritual).

Evolution of spiritual rishikesh

Rishikesh, a spiritual city, situated 24 kms upstream from Hardwar, has a scenic landscape – the Ganges in the middle surrounded by mountains on all sides. The mythological origins of Rishikesh/Hrishikesh go back to Rabhiya Rishi, who is believed to have made hard penance here. The section of the Skanda Purana called the Kedarkhanda deals with Rishikesh and Tapovan; as the text mentions, Rama and his brother Lakshmana, by the advice of sage Vasisth, came to do penance and to atone for slaying Ravana, who was a Brahmin. Both brothers lived in the wilderness apart from one another, Rama at Rishikesh and Lakshmana at Tapovan, until they had obtained remission of their sin (Walton 1929, 167). The presence of Bharata Pushkar temple, Shatrughan temple, and Lakshman temple makes a claim for the city’s authentic connection with Lord Rama. Besides, the rivers, forests, mountain, caves, deities and sages mentioned in Mahatmyas and Puranas made Rishikesh sacred to Hindus.

Interestingly, neither myths nor texts, while bestowing sacrality on Rishikesh, did mention performance of rituals at sacred sites for religious merit and salvation, unlike the ones in the case of Hardwar. Instead, they referred to meditation, penance and its special location as a physical gateway to the sacred spaces in the High Himalayas, symbolising spiritual transcendence to reach God. Thus, Hardwar’s traditional and ritualistic Hinduism took a ‘subjective turn’ and turned towards new forms of spirituality in Rishikesh in which personal experience became more important than conformity to oblations and obligations. Spiritual Rishikesh signified a turning away from externality and put the premium on consciousness, mind, inner feelings, emotions and bodily experiences. Knowing the self has been the core philosophy of Advaita Vedanta, which carries Hindu spiritual tradition; Hindu sages have been preaching this mantra of direct transcendental spiritualism for millennia. Rishikesh, being a quiet contemplative place adjacent to ritualistic Hardwar, ideally represented the idea and practice of spiritualism, attracting pilgrims and mystics who privileged spiritual experience.

Unlike Hardwar, Rishikesh was not developed until it came under British rule. The British defeated the Gurkhas and brought Dehra Dun, of which Rishikesh was a part, under their control in 1815. Besides building roads and canals, colonial administrators established hill stations in nearby Landaour and Mussooree. The Hardwar-Dehra Railway was opened in 1900 which increased traffic flow to the region. By 1915, colonial government constructed eight miles of road between Rishikesh Road Railway Station and Rishikesh Town and reinforced concrete bridge over the river Suswa, spending 150,000 rupees. The Rishikesh Improvement Scheme has paved and drained the streets of the town and laid out the roads for expansion, which stimulated the increase of traffic flow to Rishikesh remarkably (Walton 1929). In the early 1920s, Lakshman Jhoola, a suspension bridge was built on the Ganges for the movement of traffic; in popular belief, in the era of Ramayana, Lakshman came to Rishikesh and crossed over the Ganges on the same site; Lakshman Jhoola has become an icon in Rishikesh.

The development of the urban infrastructure in Rishikesh increased the flow of pilgrims to the city and it emerged as a gateway to the Himalayan pilgrimage. Some pilgrims, who came to Hardwar to perform rituals, extended their journey to perform the Himalayan Char Dham (Four Abodes) yatra (journey): Gangotri, Yamunotri, Kedarnath and Badrinath; Rishikesh became the starting point of this journey. This gave impetus to enterprising ascetics and gurus, including those who already had ashrams (hermitages) in Hardwar, to make new ashrams in Rishikesh with a changed focus as they realized that Rishikesh offered an ideal site to explore the spiritual form of religion. Thus, they chose an ideal location called Muni ki Reti (Sands of the Sages) for the ashram complex; mythologically, this area was believed to be the site of meditation of ancient Sages. In the late colonial period, Kailash Ashram, Swarg Ashram, Sivananda Ashram came up in this locality; subsequently, Muni Ki Reti became a spiritual hub with rows of Ashrams on the bank of the Ganges, attracting Indian and foreign pilgrims to live in these spiritual retreats and learn and practice Yoga and meditation.

Postcolonial transformation of Hardwar and Rishikesh

State-ascetic partnership in Hardwar’s transformation

The postcolonial Indian state developed Hardwar as a modern planned pilgrimage city and built infrastructure (Urban Development Department Government of Uttarakhand 2007). The city’s urban area expanded by incorporating the adjoining towns of Kankhal and Jwalapur with Hardwar city’s exclusively Hindu space in between; Hardwar and Kankhal remained almost exclusively Hindu. The state renovated and beautified bathing ghats, ritual sites and Hindu sacred spaces. Hardwar city was transformed with the renovation of old temples and monasteries and the construction of new temples, rest houses, roads, bridges and civic and Hindu institutions.

Kumbh Mela received top priority and the state followed colonial practices like creating infrastructure and logistics for the smooth management of Kumbh Mela, maintaining law and order and preventing the occurrence of epidemics. For example, the state government of Uttarakhand budgeted 3626 crores of rupees for the 2021 Maha Kumbh Mela in Hardwar, to build city infrastructure like roads, flyovers, bridges, buildings, toilet complexes for the convenience of a million pilgrims. City infrastructure was also augmented periodically during the Ardh Kumbh Mela, Magh Mela and other Hindu festivals. The construction of Ganga Path Marine Drive, the building and beautification of bathing ghats, refurbishment of the walking tracks, upgradation of public transport and communication, etc. made Hardwar a modern city. In 2018, the Indian federal government identified Hardwar as one of the ‘smart cities’ and sanctioned 1500 crores of rupees for city augmentation. Thus, the state has been continuously investing to make the sacred city modern.

As Hindu monastic orders have been key stakeholders of the Kumbh and also of the city, the state has continued its partnership with ascetics in conducting Kumbh and other religious festivals. The state is well aware of the social, religious and political clout of the Thirteen Akharas (Order of Hindu Ascetics) in Hardwar and beyond. Akharas became proactive in the postcolonial period; they created Akhil Bharatiya Akhara Parishad (ABAP) – an umbrella body in 1954 to enhance their clout further. The akharas organised pilgrimages to the 51 pan-Indian Shakti Peethas (shrines dedicated to Goddesses/Shakti) and took a leading role in the Kumbh Mela, Ardh Kumbh Mela and Magh Mela. They also performed a wide variety of rituals every day in Hardwar which draw people to the ghats and the temples, besides managing dharamshalas (guest houses), gaushalas (cow shelters), schools, health centres and other institutions.

Recognizing their clout, the state has allowed them to keep their dominance over the pilgrimage market as well as to carry on their commercial agenda. As a consequence, Akharas have acquired large assets like land, real-estate, revenue from residential and commercial areas, banquet halls, educational institutes and parking spaces in prime locations in Hardwar and across the country. They receive large donations from the rich and the poor, but do not declare their assets and revenues. Some akharas abuse the land grant by selling it to real estate developers; for instance, Nirmal Akhara has sold the land allotted for the residence of the ashram inmates to a builder for the construction of 150 apartments at Kankhal (The Times of India 2018). Despite such irregularities, the state continues to patronise them. When the ascetics demanded land for a burial site (sanyasis are buried, not cremated), the state government has agreed to provide 4.38 hectare of land near the Ganga in Hardwar for 'bhu-samadhi' (burial) though they already have large land in their possession.

In order to appease the ascetics and Gurus, the state has granted them prime land at nominal cost to build and expand their ashrams and institutions. Today, there are more than 300 ashrams and dharamshalas (guest houses) in Hardwar which can accommodate more than 20000 pilgrims during Kumbh, Ardh Kumbha and other auspicious occasions in Hardwar. Prominent among them are Prem Nagar Ashram, Umiya Dham, Pawan Dham and Patanjali Yog Peeth. Hardwar ashrams have sprawling complexes consisting of temples, satsang bhawans, dispensaries, libraries, schools, colleges, gardens; some even have research centers, herbal parks and universities. Ashrams have modern air-conditioned rooms for thousands of pilgrims. Major temples like Mansa Devi Temple, having a lucrative income, has remained under the control of Niranjani Akhara. Another prosperous temple, Chandi Devi Temple, is run by two families – the Giris and the Puris. Temple trusts only have nominal power, allowing powerful individual mahants/ascetics and their families to keep control on revenue, which ignites ugly competition and even violent conflict, to have access to resources and domination. Many charismatic gurus have set up well-known ashrams like the Gayatri Parivar’s sprawling Shantikunj (Heifetz 2018).

As Hardwar established itself as a prominent sacred city of Hindus during the colonial era, Hindu social reformers set up social and educational institutions in the city. In 1902, a prominent Arya Samaj leader, Swami Shraddhanand, founded Gurukul Kangri University with the objective of promoting ancient Vedic traditions and reviving the gurukul system of education. This university later received state recognition and expanded its scope to include a modern scientific education. Besides prioritizing teaching and research on the Vedas and Sanskrit, Ayurveda, and Indian philosophy, it imparts education on modern sciences and journalism as well. The university has a sprawling campus on the banks of the Ganges.

Transformation of postcolonial Rishikesh into a spiritual enterprise

Along with Hardwar, the state continued to develop infrastructure in Rishikesh as flows of pilgrims to the city started increasing steadily. However, urbanization picked up speed in the 1960s after the Beatles came to Rishikesh to meet their guru Maharishi Mahesh Yogi, the founder of the Transcendental Meditation Movement (Froystad 2011). Soon Rishikesh became a destination for international visitors and tourists and the city gradually turned into a cosmopolitan center of monastic life. Maharshi’s Swarg Ashram with Chaurasi Kutia (84 meditation chambers) became globally famous as the Beatles Ashram.

Spiritual entrepreneurs and new age gurus made a beeline to Rishikesh to build ashrams. Swami Dayananda started his ashram in the 1960s to teach Vedic chanting and Yoga. Swami Yogeshwaranand Paramahansa founded Yoga Niketan in 1964 to spread spiritual awakening focusing on the eightfold path of Patanjali yoga sutra; the ashram inmates adhered to the strict schedule of daily yoga, meditation and lectures. Swami Rama launched Sadhna Mandir and Swami Rama Sadhaka Grama Ashram in 1966. Acharya Rajneesh’s Osho Gangadham Ashram started mediation camps. A guru with his Canadian spouse started Anand Prakash Ashram to teach yoga. Swami Sivananda, the founder of the Divine Life Society (DLS), who already had received transnational recognition (Strauss 2002), opened an ashram in Rishikesh. His ashram emerged as a top yoga center offering free yoga and meditation classes with a focus on five aspects of yoga: postures, breathing, relaxation, meditation, and diet. Parmarth Niketan Ashram became a sprawling complex and offered daily yoga classes, Satsang and lectures, besides helping the detox of body and soul.

Spiritualism, meditation and yoga gave a new identity to Rishikesh and the city got the tag of ‘Yoga Capital of the World’. New age gurus marketed and patented their brands of yoga, commercialized and commodified Rishikesh’s spiritual milieu. Ashrams turned out to be spiritual enterprises and commercial ventures, from selling yoga and ayurveda products to modern accommodation and customized diet. Ashrams were institutionalized and started earning high revenues from offering courses and classes on yoga, meditation and Vedic heritage and yoga. Rishikesh produced yoga teachers for the world. Ashrams became resorts and retreats with modern luxury rooms and amenities.

If Hardwar has been identified as a sacred city for performing Hindu rituals, having thousands of maths/monasteries, priests, mahants/abbots, the sacred Rishikesh became a spiritual city for meditation and yoga with New Age gurus and Ashrams. A large number of spiritual seekers, both local and global, traveled to Rishikesh and spent months (Khandelwal 2007). While Hardwar attracted mainly Hindi speaking Hindu pilgrims belonging to diverse socio-economic classes, Rishikesh, in contrast, catered to pilgrims as well as ‘spiritual tourists’, both foreigners and rich and middle-class English-speaking Indians (Khandelwal 2012). Thus, a quiet Rishikesh of colonial era was transformed into a sacred hub of spiritualism and global yoga movement (Norman 2018, 162).

Religion and city in neoliberal Hardwar-Rishikesh

After embracing neoliberalism in the early 1990s, India experienced two major developments: rapid urbanization and greater assertion of religion in public and political sphere. Cities were conceived as springboards of neoliberal growth and urban renewal became coterminous with a greater visibility of religion in everyday life as well as in public spaces (Nanda 2011). Hardwar became politically important and was made a separate district in 1989. The new district received more state patronage and the city’s rapid urban development opened avenues for Hindu religious and political organisations to set up institutions and networks. In 2001, a separate state/province called Uttarakhand was carved out of Uttar Pradesh (UP); Hardwar-Rishikesh became its key constituent part of the new state.

Hindu nationalists came to power in this newly-created state/province. In public discourses, politicians and officials addressed and popularized the new Himalayan state as ‘Dev Bhoomi’ (God’s Land) as its territory contained a sacred landscape consisting of Hardwar, Rishikesh, Char Dham and many other holy sites with prominent gods and goddesses. Hardwar became a key district in the new state with 20 percent of the state’s population and 68 per cent of the state’s revenue. Hinduism became more pervasive and visible with more religious observances, public celebrations and identity assertion. Hindu symbols, iconographies, rituals, processions found extensive manifestation in Hardwar in the organization of time, space, status, place and life of the city, thus consolidating a Hindu Hardwar.

In Hardwar, a collective religious ritualistic practice like Ganga Aarti (Fire Ritual of the Ganges) became more institutionalized and performed every evening with much fanfare with high decibel devotional prayer and music being played on the background. Like the Ganga Aarti on the ghats of Varanasi, Ganga Aarti at Har Ki Pauri in Hardwar became a spectacular devotional event in the midst of the fire ritual on the ancient sacred site on the bank of the flowing Ganges, flower decorated floating diyas (lamps), devotional music, chanting, ringing bells, and thousands of immersed devotees. Ganga Arti drew devotees to Hardwar from far off places. Many pilgrims extended their stay in Hardwar to visualize and participate in this Aarti, thus bringing more business to the hotel industry. Ganga Arti has also become a regular event at Parmarth Niketan Ashram in Rishikesh; however, rituals take a new turn here by simultaneously becoming a rallying point for environment protection (Luthy 2019).

New kinds of Hindu congregational events were (re)invented or ‘transplanted’ into Hardwar. As large conventional festivals like Kumbh Mela and Ardh Kumbh Mela were not annual events, a new annual mass pilgrimage was introduced to bring millions of pilgrims every year. This pilgrimage, called Kanwar Yatra, originated in Baidyanath, in another province called Jharkhand, was ‘transplanted’ to Hardwar; transplantation may be speculative though (Singh 2011). Kanwar, is the structure which consists of a pole and sacred vessels, after which the pilgrimage (Kanwar Yatras) has been named. In the month of Savan (the fifth month in the Hindu calendar is considered auspicious for the worship of Shiva), Hindu pilgrims (Kanwars) started thronging to Hardwar to return with sacred water from the Ganges for oblations in various Shiva temples across north-west India (Singh 2011). Kanwar Yatra, within a couple of years, became the largest religious conglomeration in India in which more than 10 million people participate every year.

Most of the Kanwarias primarily come from a lower middleclass background (Singh 2017). In order to attract them to this pilgrimage, Hindu businessmen and philanthropists became sponsors by offering food and shelter during the long journey. Wearing saffron robes, playing devotional music, and chanting slogans, these pilgrims marched in processions, making a grand spectacle. The procession often turns violent too. Hindu nationalist organizations and networks coordinate this pilgrimage with the objective to Hinduize public space and bring in the pilgrims to their orbit of Hindu identity politics. Thus, Hindus processions like Kanwar Yatras have further consolidated Hindu identity. Kanwar processions have created sacral spectacles in Hardwar and reinforced the worship and identity of sacred spaces. Kanwar pilgrimage redefines public spaces in the city with a Hindu renewal; the city spaces turn saffron for months and certainly gave a boost to Hindu nationalist politics in the state and beyond.

Spiritualism, state and market in neoliberal Rishikesh

Neoliberal India dramatically increased the flow of both global pilgrims and tourists to Rishikesh. The Indian middle class grew substantially, taking a religious turn and demonstrating great propensity for travel and exploration (Waghorne 2019). Rishikesh became an ideal destination for the global and Indian travelers where they can combine pilgrimage and tourism. The state found immense potential in the tourism industry and developed modern infrastructure, communications and institutions focusing on ‘spiritual tourism’, thus combining spiritualism with leisure. The state showcased Rishikesh as a gateway to the Himalayas, a starting point for the Char Dham yatra to four Himalayan holy sites.

On the foundation of ancient myths and medieval mahatmyas, the state became the author and promoter of ‘modern mahatmya’ of ‘Dev Bhoomi’ (the state of Uttarakhand) and Char Dham (Pinkney 2014). The neoliberal state made a partnership with private stakeholders to disseminating Modern Mahatmya of Uttarakhand and Hardwar-Rishikesh. Thus, state officials and business owners innovatively distinguished between ‘pilgrimage’, primarily targeting domestic and diasporic Indians, and ‘spiritual tours’, highlighting yoga and meditation, attracting foreigners and elite Indians (Khandelwal 2012). Partnering with private travel agencies, the state repackaged the sacred geography of Hardwar and Rishikesh (Auckland 2018); the tourist guides, combining commercial and religious interests, started retailing religion during guided tours (Auckland 2016). The state government also started the International Yoga Festival in 1999 in collaboration with Parmarth Niketan Ashram; the ashram became the host of the event. This has become an annual event subsequently in which scores of participants come from foreign countries.

While orienting economy towards tourism, the state not only propagated and popularized ‘spiritual tourism’, it strategically expanded the idea of pilgrimage to include ‘adventure tourism’ (bungee jumping, hiking, trekking, river rafting) and also village tourism. To cater to global tourists, cafes, bakeries, restaurants sprang up across the city. Thus, Rishikesh was glamorized and commodified combining spiritualism and leisure as the core identity of the city. Significantly, Rishikesh made a marked departure; unlike short visits of pilgrims to Hardwar, the tourists stayed longer even for months in Rishikesh, for yoga courses, satsangs, camps and renewal of the self through spirituality and leisure. This opened up more avenues for the hospitality industry in the city.

Rishikesh, attracting national/international ‘pilgrim tourists’ became a cosmopolitan city. Ashrams became retreats for yoga, meditation, ayurveda and naturopathy. New Age gurus built big ashram complexes with modern facilities to attract a large number of rich Indian and global clients. Some enterprising gurus like Baba Ramdev’s Patanjali Yogpeeth, which had a modest beginning as a yoga center, grew exponentially diversifying into ayurveda and consumer products. It started mass production of thousands of consumer goods and ayurvedic medicines and marketed them through Patanjali outlets across India. Patanjali became a popular brand name in India; the middle-class consumers demonstrated a craze for Patanjali products believing that they were pure, authentic, natural, healthy and an indigenous alternative to the Western products. Baba Ramdev soon achieved a phenomenal corporate success and became a business tycoon with a multi-billion empire. The location of Ramdev’s spiritual-business empire in sacred Hardwar-Rishikesh gave mutual publicity to each other. Ramdev’s economic clout was further enhanced by his collaboration with the right-wing government (Kanungo 2019).

The neoliberal state also allowed corporate investors to explore the growing spiritual and wellness market of Rishikesh. They opened modern retreats which provided wholesome package: Vedic weddings, ayurveda, naturopathy, and even Covid rehabs. These retreats, amidst a rustic natural ambience on the bank of the Ganges, created walkways, gardens, fountains, amusement parks against the backdrop of Himalayan peaks. Naturoville is one such luxurious retreat, which provides packages of yoga, meditation, naturopathy, ayurveda and panchkarma treatment.

The media is an indispensable partner of the neoliberal project. Festivals like Kumbh Mela and Kanwar yatras remained in the media glare. The media also gave generous primetime coverage to Hindu sadhus, ashrams, or religious and spiritual enterprises on television, in newspapers and YouTube videos. For instance, national and global yatras (processions) during the 1986 centenary celebrations of Swami Sivananda, the founder of the Divine Life Society, received massive media coverage. There was advertisement of the celebration in all leading newspapers. Billboards flashed that ‘there is no path without a guru’; all hotels in Hardwar-Rishikesh displayed Sivananda’s quotes. Swami Chidananda, another globally acclaimed Hindu sanyasi, who was also associated with the Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP), received generous media coverage during Hardwar’s Kumbh Mela. Neoliberal India saw a proliferation of TV channels with religious content. Gurus like Ramdev had their own TV channels. These channels, while telecasting yoga, meditation and religious discourses, showcased sacred cities of India, and especially Hardwar and Rishikesh.

Religion, identity and politics

Since the 1980s, secular India had started losing ground to an assertive Hinduism in the public sphere and the emergence of Hindu identity politics. Hindu nationalist organizations, the Sangh Parivar (Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh and its affiliates) had launched the Ayodhya Movement, reclaiming the birthplace of Lord Ram which was demolished by the sixteenth century Mughal ruler Babur to build the Babri Mosque. The Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), the fountainhead of Hindu nationalism, activated its religious affiliate, the Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) which successfully brought in a large number of Hindu religious leaders and ascetics under its canopy. The VHP also received political and financial support from the Indian diaspora settled in America and Europe. Some of these diasporic Hindus used to frequent Hardwar and Rishikesh for pilgrimage, meditation and leisure. Thus, Hardwar-Rishikesh emerged as a hub of Vishwa Hindu Parishad activity (McKean 1996).

The intersection of Hinduism and identity became evident in Hardwar with the construction of a temple dedicated to Bharat Mata (Mother India) in Hardwar to showcase and promote Hindu nationalism. Satyamitrananda Giri, a Hindu ascetic, and a close associate of the Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP), was behind the conception and execution of this temple project. Bharat Mata Temple not only enshrined the divinities and heroes of Indian culture, but also deified Bharat Mata itself (McKean 1996). The nation was thus included in the Hindu pantheon and Bharat Mata Temple received sacrality by being located in Hardwar, the revered sacred city of Hindus. Pilgrims visited this temple to have a ‘darshan’ of ‘Bharat Mata’, the Nation God. Thus, Hinduism, taking an identity orientation, became more assertive and militant. Congregations like Kumbh Mela, which earlier engaged with diverse Hindu sects, leaders, institutions and practices, and represented diverse genres of nationalist ideas (Maclean 2008), tilted towards Hindu nationalist politics. The VHP successfully created a militant ecumenical Hinduism by bringing individual ascetics and ascetic groups (akharas) of Hardwar under its ideological and political wing.

With the resurgence of identity politics based on religion in neoliberal India, cities experienced frequent sectarian and communal violence. The city’s uneven development led to informality, inequality, segregation, insecurity and anxiety; religion became a convenient tool to unleash violence against the ‘other’. Hardwar followed the same trend too. The VHP started holding periodic Dharma Sansads (Hindu Religious Parliament) in Hardwar to polarize Hindus and Muslims (Hansen 1999; Katju 2003). Many Hindu nationalist processions during the Ayodhya movement either started or passed through the city. Thus, key religious spaces, places and institutions in Hardwar city were drawn into Hindu nationalist identity politics. The demolition of the Babri Mosque in 1992 by a Hindu nationalist signaled the ideological and political victory of Hindu nationalism.

Hindu nationalism continued to grow steadily and speedily; finally, it came to power in New Delhi in 2014, and subsequently in many states, including Uttarakhand. As Hindu nationalism has become hegemonic in India, some militant Hindu nationalist Sadhus have become intolerant, belligerent and violent against Muslims and Christians. On December 17 – 19, 2021, in a Dharam Sansad (Religious Parliament) in Hardwar, some Sadhus called for the genocide of Muslims. They also threatened hotel owners in Hardwar against holding Christmas celebrations on December 25th. Hardwar has a sizeable Muslim population; according to the 2011 census, Hindus and Muslims account for 82.66 per cent and 15.70 per cent of Hardwar city’s population, respectively. Muslims have been living in Hardwar for centuries; the district is also known for the tomb a thirteenth century Sufi saint Alauddin Ali Ahmed Sabir, popularly known as Sabir Kaliyari. But Hardwar Hindu militants would like the Muslims to have no stake in Hardwar city’s Hindu sacred space.

As the fever of majoritarian politics runs high in present-day India, communities in religious cities are increasingly polarized and communalized; everyday life is being threatened by physical and psychological violence against religious minorities (Chatterji, Hansen and Jaffrelot 2019). Hardwar’s ritual Hinduism is sanguine and Rishikesh’s spiritualism in somber. Religion and spiritualism abhor violence and courts peace and tolerance. The sacred urban complex of Hardwar-Rishikesh, with a unique ritual-spiritual combination, will be jeopardized if exclusivist communal politics is not restrained at the earliest.

Conclusion

Several stake holders contributed to the construction and transformation of the sacred urban space of Hardwar-Rishikesh, which traversed through a complex trajectory from ancient to the present. Myths identified and prescribed, mahatmyas/puranas/memoirs confirmed and authenticated, ascetics, priests and pilgrims followed and performed, colonial and postcolonial rulers governed and developed, neo liberalism glamorized and marketed, and the Hindu right polarized and disrupted. The formation of this unique urban Hindu complex demonstrates how different forms and practices of Hinduism in the two adjacent cities led to the construction of a ritual Hardwar and a spiritual Rishikesh. Simultaneously, the urban and spatial ethos and elements of each city have correspondingly contributed to the constitution and transformation of sacrality in Hardwar and Rishikesh differently. Despite experiencing different modes of construction and transformation, Hardwar-Rishikesh constitutes an integrated sacred urban complex.

References

Aukland, Knut. 2016. ‘Retailing Religion: Guided Tours and Guide Narratives in Religious Tourism in Hindu Pilgrimage’, Tourist Studies 16 (3): 237 – 257.10.1177/1468797615618038Search in Google Scholar

Aukland, Knut. 2018. ‘Repackaging India’s Sacred Geography: Travel Agencies and Pilgrimage Related Travel’, Numen 65 (2 – 3): 289 – 318.10.1163/15685276-12341498Search in Google Scholar

Bayly, C.A. 1983. Rulers, Townsmen and Bazars: North Indian Society in the Age of British Expansion 1770 – 1870. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bhardwaj, Surinder Mohan. 1973. ‘Pilgrim Interaction at Sacred Places: The Case of Hardwar’, in Surinder M. Bhardwaj, Hindu Places of Pilgrimage in India (A Study in Cultural geography). 216 – 224. Berkeley: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bhardwaj, Surinder M. and James Lochtefeld. 2004. ‘Tirtha’, in Gene Thursby and Sushil Mittal (eds.), The Hindu World. 478 – 501. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Chatterji, Angana, Thomas Blom Hansen and Christophe Jaffrelot (eds). 2019. Majoritarian State: How Hindu Nationalism is Changing India. London: Hurst.10.1093/oso/9780190078171.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Cohn, Bernard. 1974. ‘Role of the Gosains in the Economy of Eighteenth and Nineteenth Century Upper India’, Journal of Social Research 17: 88 – 95.Search in Google Scholar

Froystad, Kathinka. 2011. ‘Roping Outsiders In: Invoking Science in Contemporary Spiritual Movements in India’, Nova Religio: The Journal of Alternative and Emergent Religions, 14 (4): 77 – 98.10.1525/nr.2011.14.4.77Search in Google Scholar

Goswamy, B. N. 1966. ‘The Records Kept by Priests at Centres of Pilgrimage as a Source of Social and Economic History’, Indian Economic and Social History Review 3 (2): 174 – 184.10.1177/001946466600300206Search in Google Scholar

Hansen, Thomas Blom. 1999. The Saffron Wave: Democracy and Hindu Nationalism in Modern India. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400823055Search in Google Scholar

Heifetz, Daniel Philip. 2018. ‘From Gurudev to Doctor-Sahib: Religion, Science, and Charisma in the All World Gayatri Parivar’, Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 30 (3): 252 – 278. https://doi.org/10.1163/15700682-12341433.10.1163/15700682-12341433Search in Google Scholar

Hsuan Tsang. 1969. Si-Yu-Ki: Buddhist Records of the Western World. 2 vols. in one book. Trans. Samuel Beal. Delhi: Oriental Books Reprint. [1884]Search in Google Scholar

Kanungo, Pralay. 2019. ‘Gurus and Hindu Nationalist Politics: The Baba Ramdev-BJP Partnership in the 2014 Elections’, in Irfan Ahmad and Pralay Kanungo (eds.), The Algebra of Warfare-Welfare: A Long View of India’s 2014 Election. 119 – 142. Delhi: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199489626.003.0004Search in Google Scholar

Kapoor, Cheena. 2016. ‘Pandas of Haridwar Digitize Records of Death’, DNA, 25 October. https://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-pandas-digitise-records-of-death-2266907 [5. 7. 2023].Search in Google Scholar

Katju, Manjari. 2003. Vishva Hindu Parishad and Indian Politics. New Delhi: Orient Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Khandelwal, Meena 2012. ‘The Cosmopolitan Guru: Spiritual Tourism and Ashrams in Rishikesh’, in Jacob Copeman and Aya Ikegame (eds.), The Guru in South Asia: New interdisciplinary perspectives. 202 – 221. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203116258-10Search in Google Scholar

Khandelwal, Meena. 2007. ‘Foreign Swamis at Home in India: Transmigration to the Birthplace of Spirituality’, Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power, 14 (3): 313 – 340.10.1080/10702890601162799Search in Google Scholar

Lochtefeld, James. 2010. God’s Gateway: Identity and Meaning in a Hindu Pilgrimage Place. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/obo/9780195399318-0096Search in Google Scholar

Luthy, Tamara. 2019. ‘Bhajan on the Banks of the Ganga: Increasing Environmental Awareness via Devotional Practice’, Journal of Dharma Studies 1: 229 – 240.10.1007/s42240-019-00026-1Search in Google Scholar

Maclean, Kama. 2008. Pilgrimage and Power: The Kumbh Mela in Allahabad, 1765 – 1954. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195338942.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

McKean, Lise. 1996. Divine Enterprises: Gurus and Hindu Nationalist Movement. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Nanda, Meera. 2011. The God Market: How Globalization is Making India More Hindu. NY: Monthly Review PressSearch in Google Scholar

Norman, Alex. 2018. ‘Seeking the Self in a Land of Strangers New Religiosity and the Spiritual Marketplace of Rishikesh’, in Andrea Marion Pinkney and John Whalen-Bridge (eds), Religious Journeys in India: Pilgrims, Tourists, and Travelers. 143 – 166. Albany: SUNY Press.10.1515/9781438466040-008Search in Google Scholar

Pinkney, Andrea Marion. 2014. ‘An Ever-Present History in the Land of the Gods: Modern Mahatmya Writing on Uttarakhand’, International Journal of Hindu Studies 17 (3): 229 – 260.10.1007/s11407-014-9142-1Search in Google Scholar

Prior, Katherine. 1993. ‘Angry Pandas: Hindu Priests and the Colonial Government in the Dispersal of the Hardwar Mela in 1892’, South Asia XVI (1): 25 – 52.10.1080/00856409308723173Search in Google Scholar

Singh, Prithvraj. 2021. ‘“If Needed, We Can Kill Them” – Hindu seers issue call to arms against Muslims at Hardwar meet’, The Print, 23 December. https://theprint.in/india/if-needed-we-can-kill-them-hindu-seers-issue-call-to-arms-against-muslims-at-haridwar-meet/786583 [30. 11. 2022].Search in Google Scholar

Singh, Vikash. 2011. ‘Precarious Life and the Ethics of Care: Subjectivity in an Indian Religious Phenomenon’, Culture and Religion 12 (4): 419 – 440.10.1080/14755610.2011.633535Search in Google Scholar

Singh, Vikash. 2017. Uprising of the Fools: Pilgrimage as Moral Protest in Contemporary India. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Strauss, Sarah. 2002. ‘The Master’s Narrative: Swami Sivananda and the Transnational Production of Yoga’, Journal of Folklore Research 39 (2/3): 217 – 241.10.2979/JFR.2002.39.2-3.217Search in Google Scholar

The Times of India. 2018. ‘Akhara Builds Illegal Flats, 88 Units Sealed’. 28. 02. 2018. https://timesofindia.in diatimes.com/city/dehradun/akhara-builds-illegal-flats-88-units-sealed/articleshow/63100136.cms [12. 12. 2022].Search in Google Scholar

Urban Development Department Government of Uttarakhand. 2007. City Development Plan: Hardwar Revised Under Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission (JNNURM). https://udd.uk.gov.in/files/CDP_HRD.PDF [1. 9. 2022].Search in Google Scholar

Waghorne, Joanne Punzo. 2019. ‘Introduction to Special Issue – Where Class Meets Religion – Examining Middle-Class Religiosity in India’, International Journal of Hindu Studies 23: 1 – 9.10.1007/s11407-019-09247-2Search in Google Scholar

Walton, H.G. 1929. Dehra Dun: A Gazetteer, Being Volume I of the District Gazetteers of the United Provinces of Agra and Oudh. Allahabad: The Superintendent, Government Press, United Provinces.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2023-09-15
Published in Print: 2023-09-15

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Titlepages
  3. Contents
  4. Articles
  5. Entangling Urban and Religious History: A New Methodology
  6. The City in the History of Religion
  7. The City in the History of Religion
  8. The Role of the Urban in the History of Religion
  9. The Urban Factor: Hermeneutical Backgrounds to a Void in History of Religion
  10. The Morality of Urbanism: Managing Surplus vis-à-vis the Gods Between Etruria and Iberia
  11. Cities, Saints, Rome, and Religious Authority in the New World Spanish Empire
  12. Judaism and the City, Judaism in the City: A Historiographical Journey
  13. Making Religion, Making the City – Religion and Urban Formation in Modern China
  14. The Future Past of a ‘Religious Town’: Tenri City and Tenrikyō in Japan
  15. Construction and Transformation of a Sacred Urban Complex of Hardwar-Rishikesh, North India
  16. The Urbanity of Subtle Green Spirituality
  17. Urban Temporalities
  18. Urban Temporalities
  19. Temporality, Urbanity, and Religion: Reconsidering Sacred Time in Ancient and Modern Cities
  20. Argos: Across the Thin Surface of Time
  21. Temporality, Urbanity, and John’s Apocalypse
  22. Calendars, Clocks, and Crossings: Religious Temporalities in Medieval Middelburg
  23. Daily Life Spatialities and Temporalities of Religion in Ottoman Tunis: Reflections on the Complexity of Urban Religious Landscapes
  24. Varia
  25. Varia
  26. Ambiente, politica ed economia nella Roma del II secolo a.C.: Il caso dell’Aqua Marcia
  27. Religious Expansionism? Roman Priestly Activities Outside Republican Rome
  28. Der Briefwechsel Ludwig Deubners mit Martin Persson Nilsson, 1901 – 1944: Freundschaft und Wissenschaft
Downloaded on 24.1.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/arege-2023-0009/html
Scroll to top button