Skip to main content
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Valérys Namen: Der Status des Lesers in derpoésie pure

Published/Copyright: July 6, 2012
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Valéry’s dream of the creation of a poésie pure is determined by afundamental tension between two contradictory aspirations. On the one hand,he inherits French rationalism when he tries to develop a poetical praxis basedon a logical-mathematical calculus, in which anything vague and unclear shoulddisappear. On the other hand, this strictly formalized language revolves aroundthe notion of moi pur and therefore subscribes to a hypertrophied subjectivism.The paradoxical logic of personal pronouns described by Émile Benveniste is atthe origin of Valéry’s project: The moi pur is both, the personal pronoun thatidentifies the concrete speaker and the structural function of the universalinvariant. Ineluctably affected by this pronominal shifting, the reader is, aboveall, at stake in the poéésie pure. In an attempt to unfold the aporetical constructionsresulting from this paradox, this textual analysis focuses on some of themain rhetorical figures of Valpoéry’s work. A close reading of Narcisse parle revealsthe specific moments of permanent self-variation by which the popoésie pureconstantly subverts itself. Poeisis resists any kind of rigid formalism, any subjugationof its rhetorical potential and any attempt to escape the ever-sliding senseof the metaphor. We can thus affirm that the aporias revealed by the popoésie pureevidence hence the conditions of poetical representation itself.

Published Online: 2012-07-06
Published in Print: 2012-07-01

© 2012 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Masthead
  2. Euripides’ Medea und die stoischeAffektenlehre
  3. Die globale Dichtung des Orlando Furioso
  4. Negotiating Ethnic Difference in RestorationTravel Fiction
  5. Patriotism and Bellicism in German and Dutch Epics of the Enlightenment
  6. Singbarer Rest: Celans phänomenologische Poetologie
  7. Valérys Namen: Der Status des Lesers in derpoésie pure
  8. The Grand Narrative Revisited;Contemporary Flemish Novelists Take Up theChallenge to Create Plots of the Flat World
  9. Der neue Diamant: Verfremdungseffekte bei E. S. Özdamar
  10. Mario Domenichelli’s Lugemalé: Heart ofDarknesss revisited in Post-colonial Italy
  11. The Narrative Rhetoric in Léa Silhol’s La Tisseuse: Contes de Fées, contes de Failles
  12. Brian Boyd: On the Origin of Stories: Evolution, Cognition, and Fiction.Cambridge, MA and London: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2010,540 Seiten
  13. Simona Bartoli Kucher/Dorothea Böhme/Tatiana Floreancig (Hrsg.): Das Subjektin Literatur und Kunst. Festschrift für Peter V. Zidma. (Unter Mitwirkung v. BrigittePappler). Tübingen: Francke, 2011, 429 Seiten
  14. Sebastian Donat: Deskriptive Metrik. (Reihe Comparanda.Literaturwissenschaftliche Studien zu Antike und Moderne). Innsbruck/Wien/Bozen: StudienVerlag, 2010, Band 15, 180 Seiten
  15. Sabine Becker, Robert Krause (Hg.): Exil ohne Rückkehr, Literatur als Mediumder Akkulturation nach 1933. München: edition text+kritik 2010, 338 Seiten
  16. Achim Hölter (Hrsg.): Comparative Arts. Universelle Ästhetik im Fokus derVergleichenden Literaturwissenschaft. (Beiträge zur XIV. Tagung der DeutschenGesellschaft für Allgemeine und Vergleichende Literaturwissenschaft. Münster:26.–28. November 2008), Heidelberg: Synchron 2011, 433 Seiten
  17. Alvin H. Rosenfeld: The End of the Holocaust. Bloomington: Indiana UniversityPress 2011, 328 pages
  18. Liedeke Plate: Transforming Memories in Contemporary Women’s Rewriting.Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011, 239 pages
  19. Ginette Verstraete: Tracking Europe. Mobility, Diaspora, and the Politics ofLocation. Durham/London: Duke UP 2010, 224 pages
  20. L. Papadima, D. Damrosch, T. D’Haen (eds.): The Canonical Debate Today:Crossing Disciplinary and Cultural Boundaries. Amsterdam, New York: Rodopi,2011, 355 pages
Downloaded on 15.4.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/arcadia-2012-0004/html
Scroll to top button