Home Literary Studies Introduction. Framing Contingency: History and Heterology
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Introduction. Framing Contingency: History and Heterology

  • The editors
Published/Copyright: February 20, 2008
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
arcadia
From the journal Volume 39 Issue 2

Abstract

Two years ago, on May 23–25, 2002, a regular annual colloquium of the International Comparative Literature Association (ICLA) Committee on Literary Theory took place at the Inter-University Centre in Dubrovnik, Croatia. Under the title Framing Contingency: History and Heterology the Committee members as well as prominent guests were invited to dwell upon the modes in which history is nowadays (if not always already?) forced to cope with contingency. The conference memorandum, circulated in advance, read as follows:

Though it has been shaped in order to frame contingency by laying down its “hidden law,” history appears nowadays to be framed (i. e., outwitted) by the same contingency. If contingency was expected to be turned into the subject matter of human history, it suddenly turns out to be the subject, the agency that secretly shapes this history. What was intended to be carefully worked through by the unrelenting, conscious activity of a historian appears to be compulsively acted out through his or her vulnerable body. Does not, after all, the inscription of an infinitely differentiated net of memory-traces into our senses necessarily exceed any attempt at their logically coherent narrative recollection? Is the past therefore not speaking through us before we become able to speak about it; is not its interpellation the enabling condition of our speech act? Being an empowered subject of “my” past, do I not incarnate a set of inherited constraints that give it a historical shape precisely by being constitutively placed out of my control? Finally, what would be the possible consequences of the outlined “an-archic” intervention into the heart of our domesticating historical activity for the position of the constitutive parts (i.e., events, figures, focalizer, narrator, etc.) of its narrative? These are some of the questions our conference is supposed to focus upon.

Published Online: 2008-02-20
Published in Print: 2004-11-19

© Walter de Gruyter

Downloaded on 26.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/arca.39.2.234/html
Scroll to top button