Does one size fit all? The scope and type of error in direct feedback effectiveness

References

Benson, Susan & Robert DeKeyser. 2019. Effects of written corrective feedback and language aptitude on verb tense accuracy. Language Teaching Research 23. 702–726. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168818770921.Search in Google Scholar

Bitchener, John. 2008. Evidence in support of written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing 17. 102–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.11.004.Search in Google Scholar

Bitchener, John & Dana Ferris. 2012. Written corrective feedback in second language acquisition and writing. UK: Taylor & Francis.10.4324/9780203832400Search in Google Scholar

Bitchener, John, Stuart Young & Denise Cameron. 2005. The effect of different types of feedback on ESL student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 14. 191–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2005.08.001.Search in Google Scholar

Corder, Stephen Pit. 1967. The significance of learner’s errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 4. 161–170.10.1515/iral.1967.5.1-4.161Search in Google Scholar

Ding, Chen & Barry Lee Reynolds. 2019. The effects of L1 congruency, L2 proficiency, and the collocate-node relationship on the processing of L2 English collocations by L1-Chinese EFL learners. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 17. 331–357. https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00038.din.Search in Google Scholar

Ellis, Rod. 2003. Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ellis, Rod, Younghee Sheen, Mihoko Murakami & Hide Takashima. 2008. The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language context. System 36. 353–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2008.02.001.Search in Google Scholar

Farrokhi, Farahman & Simin Sattarpour. 2011. The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback on grammatical accuracy of Iranian EFL learners. Theory and Practice in Language Studies 1. 1797–1803. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.1.12.1797-1803.Search in Google Scholar

Ferris, Dana. 1999. The case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes: A response to Truscott. Journal of Second Language Writing 8. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80110-6.Search in Google Scholar

Ferris, Dana. 2004. The “grammar correction” debate in L2 writing: Where are we, and where do we go from here? (and what do we do in the meantime…?). Journal of Second Language Writing 13. 49–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2004.04.005.Search in Google Scholar

Ferris, Dana. 2010. Second language writing research and written corrective feedback in SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 32. 181–210. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990490.Search in Google Scholar

Ferris, Dana. 2011. Treatment of error in second language student writing. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.10.3998/mpub.2173290Search in Google Scholar

Ferris, Dana & Barrie Roberts. 2001. Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be? Journal of Second Language Writing 10. 161–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00039-X.Search in Google Scholar

Frear, David. 2010. The effect of focused and unfocused direct written corrective feedback on a new piece of writing. In S.C. Huang (ed.), Selected Papers from the Third Conference on College English, Taipei, Taiwan, 57–71. Foreign Languages Center, National Chengchi University.Search in Google Scholar

Frear, David & Yi-Hui Chiu. 2015. The effect of focused and unfocused indirect written corrective feedback on EFL learners’ accuracy in new pieces of writing. System 53. 24–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.06.006.Search in Google Scholar

Guénette, Danielle. 2007. Is feedback pedagogically correct? Research design issues in studies of feedback on writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 16. 40–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.01.001.Search in Google Scholar

Han, Zhaohong. 2002. A study of the impact of recasts on tense consistency in L2 output. TESOL Quarterly 36. 543–572. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588240.Search in Google Scholar

Hill, Jimmie. 1999. Collocational competence. In English teaching professional, vol. 11, 3–6. West Sussex: Pavilion Publishing and Media Ltd.Search in Google Scholar

Kang, Eun-Young & Zhaohong Han. 2015. The efficacy of written corrective feedback in improving L2 written accuracy: A meta-analysis. The Modern Language Journal 99. 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12189.Search in Google Scholar

Kao, Chian-Wen. 2019. Developing second language literacy: Taiwanese college students’ error types in focused feedback effectiveness. In Barry Lee Reynolds & Mark Feng Teng (eds.), English literacy instruction for Chinese speakers, 245–264. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-981-13-6653-6_15Search in Google Scholar

Kao, Chian-Wen & Barry Lee Reynolds. 2020. High school writing teacher feedback on word choice errors. Language Learning & Technology 24. 19–29.Search in Google Scholar

Kao, Chian-Wen & David Wible. 2014. A meta-analysis on the effectiveness of grammar correction in second language writing. English Teaching & Learning 38. 29–69. https://doi.org/10.6330/ETL.2014.38.3.02.Search in Google Scholar

Karimi, Masoome & Zahra Fotovatnia. 2012. The effects of focused vs. unfocused written teacher correction on the grammatical accuracy of Iranian EFL undergraduates. Asian EFL Journal 62. 42–59.Search in Google Scholar

Krashen, Stephen D. 1981. Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Pergamon.Search in Google Scholar

Krashen, Stephen D. 1985. The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Laufer, Batia & Tina Waldman. 2011. Verb–noun collocations in second language writing: A corpus analysis of learners’ English. Language Learning 61. 647–672. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00621.x.Search in Google Scholar

Lee, Icy. 2020. Utility of focused/comprehensive written corrective feedback research for authentic L2 writing classroom. Journal of Second Language Writing 49. 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100734.Search in Google Scholar

Lewis, Michael. 2000. Language in the Lexical Approach. In Michael Lewis (ed.), Teaching collocation: Further development in the Lexical Approach. London: Language Teaching Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Liu, Li-Er. 2002. A corpus-based lexical semantic investigation of verb–noun miscollocations in Taiwan learners’ English. Unpublished MA thesis. Tamkang University.Search in Google Scholar

Lyster, Roy, Kazuya Saito & Masatoshi Sato. 2013. Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms. Language Teaching 46. 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444812000365.Search in Google Scholar

Mackey, Alison & Jaemyung Goo. 2007. Interaction research in SLA: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. In Alison Mackey (ed.), Conversational interaction in SLA: A collection of empirical studies, 408–452. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Mohebbi, Hassan. 2021. 25 years on, the written error correction debate continues: an interview with John Truscott. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education 6. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-021-00110-9.Search in Google Scholar

Parreno, Arlan. 2015. Written corrective feedback impact on grammatical accuracy in L2 writing: A quantitative and qualitative look. Writing and Pedagogy 7. 279–303. https://doi.org/10.1558/wap.v7i2-3.25991.Search in Google Scholar

Pienemann, Manfred. 1989. Is language teachable? Psycholinguistic experiments and hypotheses. Applied Linguistics 10. 52–79.10.1093/applin/10.1.52Search in Google Scholar

Pienemann, Manfred. 1998. Language processing and second language acquisition: Processability theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/sibil.15Search in Google Scholar

Reynolds, Barry Lee. 2015. Action research: Applying a bilingual parallel corpus collocational concordancer to Taiwanese medical school EFL academic writing. RELC Journal 47. 213–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688215619518.Search in Google Scholar

Reynolds, Barry Lee & Mark Feng Teng. 2020. Online first. Involving native speakers in oral corrective focused grammar feedback while conversing: An Activity Theory perspective. The Language Learning Journal. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2020.1845225.Search in Google Scholar

Reynolds, Barry Lee & Mark Feng Teng. 2021. Innovating teacher feedback with writing activities aimed at raising secondary school students’ awareness of collocation errors. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching 11. 423–444. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2021.11.3.6.Search in Google Scholar

Sato, Masatoshi & Shawn Loewen. 2018. Metacognitive instruction enhances the effectiveness of corrective feedback: Variable effects of feedback types and linguistic targets. Language Learning 68. 507–545. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12283.Search in Google Scholar

Saussure, Ferdinand. 1959 [1916]. Course in general linguistics. (trans. Wade Baskin). New York: Philosophical Library.Search in Google Scholar

Schmidt, Richard. 1990. The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics 11. 129–158. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/11.2.129.Search in Google Scholar

Schmidt, Richard. 2001. Attention. In Peter Robinson (ed.), Cognition and second language instruction, 3–32. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139524780.003Search in Google Scholar

Selinker, Larry. 1972. Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 10. 209–232.10.1515/iral.1972.10.1-4.209Search in Google Scholar

Shao, Jinshi & Yongcan Liu. 2020. Online first. Written corrective feedback, learner-internal cognitive processes, and the acquisition of regular past tense by Chinese L2 learners of English. Applied Linguistics Review. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2019-0131.Search in Google Scholar

Sheen, Younghee. 2007. The effect of focused written corrective feedback and language aptitude on ESL learners’ acquisition of articles. TESOL Quarterly 41. 255–283. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2007.tb00059.x.Search in Google Scholar

Sheen, Younghee, David Wright & Anna Moldawa. 2009. Differential effects of focused and unfocused written correction on the accurate use of grammatical forms by adult ESL learners. System 37. 556–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2009.09.002.Search in Google Scholar

Shintani, Natsuko. 2015. The incidental grammar acquisition in focus on form and focus on forms instruction for young beginner learners. TESOL Quarterly 49. 115–140. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.166.Search in Google Scholar

Shintani, Natsuko & Rod Ellis. 2013. The comparative effect of direct written corrective feedback and metalinguistic explanation on learners’ explicit and implicit knowledge of the English indefinite article. Journal of Second Language Writing 22. 286–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2013.03.011.Search in Google Scholar

Stefanou, Charis & Andrea Revesz. 2015. Direct written corrective feedback, learner differences, and the acquisition of second language article use for generic and specific plural reference. The Modern Language Journal 99. 263–282. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12212.Search in Google Scholar

Szudarski, Paweł & Kathy Conklin. 2014. Short- and long-term effects of rote rehearsal on ESL learners’ processing of L2 collocations. TESOL Quarterly 48. 833–842. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.201.Search in Google Scholar

Truscott, John. 1996. The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning 46. 327–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1996.tb01238.x.Search in Google Scholar

Truscott, John. 1998. Noticing in second language acquisition: A critical review. Second Language Research 14. 104–135. https://doi.org/10.1191/026765898674803209.Search in Google Scholar

Truscott, John. 2001. Selecting errors for selective error correction. Concentric: Studies in English Literature and Linguistics 27. 225–240.Search in Google Scholar

Truscott, John. 2007. The effect of error correction on learners’ ability to write accurately. Journal of Second Language Writing 16. 255–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.06.003.Search in Google Scholar

Wang, Wan-Ju. 2005. The effects of degrees of explicitness of automated feedback on English learners’ acquisition of collocations. Unpublished MA thesis. Tamkang University.Search in Google Scholar