Communicating across educational boundaries: accommodation patterns in adolescents’ online interactions

References

Adams, Aubrie, Jai Miles, Norah E. Dunbar & Howard Giles. 2018. Communication accommodation in text messages: Exploring liking, power, and sex as predictors of textisms. The Journal of Social Psychology 158(4). 474–490. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2017.1421895.Search in Google Scholar

Androutsopoulos, Jannis. 2011. Language change and digital media: A review of conceptions and evidence. In Tore Kristiansen & Nikolas Coupland (eds.), Standard languages and language standards in a changing Europe, 145–161. Oslo: Novus.Search in Google Scholar

Auer, Peter, Frans Hinskens & Paul Kerswill (eds.). 2005. Dialect changes. Convergence and divergence in European languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486623Search in Google Scholar

Bates, Douglas, Martin Maechler, Ben Bolker & Steven Walker. 2017. Package ‘lme4’. Available at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lme4/lme4.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Bunz, Ulla & Scott W. Campbell. 2004. Politeness accommodation in electronic mail. Communication Research Reports 21(1). 11–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824090409359963.Search in Google Scholar

Burgoon, Judee K., Norah E. Dunbar & Howard Giles. 2017. Interaction coordination and adaptation. In Alessandro Vinciarelli, Maja Pantic, Nadia Magnenat-Thalmann & Judee K. Burgoon (eds.), Social signal processing, 78–96. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316676202.008Search in Google Scholar

Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, Cristian, Michael Gamon & Susan Dumais. 2011. Mark my words! Linguistic style accommodation in social media. In Sadagopan Srinivasan, Krithi Ramamritham, Arun Kumar, M. P. Ravindra, Elisa Bertino & Ravi Kumar (eds.), Proceedings of the 20th international conference on world wide web, 745–754. New York: ACM.10.1145/1963405.1963509Search in Google Scholar

de Decker, Benny & Reinhild Vandekerckhove. 2017. Global features of online communication in local Flemish: Social and medium-related determinants. Folia Linguistica 51. 253–281. https://doi.org/10.1515/flin-2017-0007.Search in Google Scholar

de Jager, Hugo, Albert Louis Mok & G. Sipkema. 2009. Grondbeginselen der sociologie. [Fundamentals of sociology]. Groningen/Houten: Noordhoff.Search in Google Scholar

de Siqueira, Amaury & Susan C. Herring. 2009. Temporal patterns in student-advisor instant messaging exchanges: Individual variation and accommodation. Proceedings of the 42nd Hawaii international conference on system sciences. Big Island: IEEE.Search in Google Scholar

Dino, Amanda, Stephen Reysen & Nyla R. Branscombe. 2009. Online interactions between group members who differ in status. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 28(1). 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X08325916.Search in Google Scholar

Doyle, Gabriel. 2016. A robust framework for estimating linguistic alignment in social media conversations. In Jacqueline Bourdeau, Jim A. Hendler, Roger Nkambou, Ian Horrocks & Ben Y. Zhao (eds.), Proceedings of the 25th international conference on world wide web, 637–648. Montreal: ACM.10.1145/2872427.2883091Search in Google Scholar

Dragojevic, Marko, Jessica Gasiorek & Howard Giles. 2015. Communication accommodation theory. In Charles R. Berger & Michael E. Roloff (eds.), The international encyclopedia of interpersonal communication, Vol. 1, 1–21. Hoboken: Wiley Blackwell.10.1002/9781118540190.wbeic006Search in Google Scholar

Flemish Ministry of Education and Training [FMET]. 2018. Statistisch jaarboek van het Vlaams onderwijs. Schooljaar 2016–2017. Brussels, Belgium: Department of Education and Training.Search in Google Scholar

Giles, Howard & Tania Ogay. 2007. Communication accommodation theory. In Bryan B. Whaley & Wendy Samter (eds.), Explaining communication. Contemporary theories and exemplars, 293–310. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Goldthorpe, John H. & Richard Breen. 2007. Explaining educational differentials. Towards a formal rational action theory. In John H. Goldthorpe (ed.), On sociology. Second edition. Volume two: Illustration and retrospect, 45–72. Stanford: Stanford University Press.10.1515/9781503624801-003Search in Google Scholar

Gonzales, Amy L., Jeffrey T. Hancock & James W. Pennebaker. 2010. Language style matching as a predictor of social dynamics in small groups. Communication Research 37(1). 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650209351468.Search in Google Scholar

Harrison, Xavier A. 2014. Using observation-level random effects to model overdispersion in count data in ecology and evolution. PeerJ 2(1). e616. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.616.Search in Google Scholar

Herring, Susan C. & Sanja Kapidzic. 2015. Teens, gender, and self-presentation in social media. In James D. Wright (ed.), International encyclopedia of social and behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. 146–152. Oxford: Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.64108-9Search in Google Scholar

Hilte, Lisa. 2019. The social in social media writing: The impact of age, gender and social class indicators on adolescents’ informal online writing practices. Antwerp: University of Antwerp Doctoral Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Hilte, Lisa, Reinhild Vandekerckhove & Walter Daelemans. 2018a. Adolescents’ social background and non-standard writing in online communication. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics 7(1). 2–25. https://doi.org/10.1075/dujal.17018.hil.Search in Google Scholar

Hilte, Lisa, Reinhild Vandekerckhove & Walter Daelemans. 2018b. Social media writing and social class: A correlational analysis of adolescent CMC and social background. International Journal of Society, Culture & Language 6(2). 73–89.Search in Google Scholar

Hilte, Lisa, Reinhild Vandekerckhove & Walter Daelemans. 2018c. Expressive markers in online teenage talk: A correlational analysis. Nederlandse Taalkunde 23(3). 293–323. https://doi.org/10.5117/NEDTAA2018.3.003.HILT.Search in Google Scholar

Hilte, Lisa, Reinhild Vandekerckhove & Walter Daelemans. 2019. Adolescents’ perceptions of social media writing: Has non-standard become the new standard? European Journal of Applied Linguistics 7(2). 189–224. https://doi.org/10.1515/eujal-2019-0005.Search in Google Scholar

Hilte, Lisa, Reinhild Vandekerckhove & Walter Daelemans. 2020b. Modeling adolescents’ online writing practices: The sociolectometry of non-standard writing on social media. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik 87(2). 173–201. https://doi.org/10.25162/zdl-2020-0007.Search in Google Scholar

Hilte, Lisa, Reinhild Vandekerckhove & Walter Daelemans. 2020c. Linguistic accommodation in teenagers’ social media writing: Convergence patterns in mixed-gender conversations. Quantitative Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1080/09296174.2020.1807853.Search in Google Scholar

Hilte, Lisa, Walter Daelemans & Reinhild Vandekerckhove. 2018d. Predicting adolescents’ educational track from chat messages on Dutch social media. In Proceedings of the 9th workshop on computational approaches to subjectivity, sentiment and social media analysis, 328–334. Association for Computational Linguistics.10.18653/v1/W18-6248Search in Google Scholar

Hilte, Lisa, Walter Daelemans & Reinhild Vandekerckhove. 2020a. Lexical patterns in adolescents’ online writing: The impact of age, gender, and education. Written Communication 37(3). 365–400. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088320917921.Search in Google Scholar

Ismail, Noriszura & Abdul Aziz Jemain. 2007. Handling overdispersion with negative binomial and generalized Poisson regression models. Casualty actuarial society forum, 103–158. Citeseer.Search in Google Scholar

Jones, Simon, Rachel Cotterill, Nigel Dewdney, Kate Muir & Adam N. Joinson. 2014. Finding Zelig in text: A measure for normalising linguistic accommodation. In Jun’ichi Tsujii & Jan Hajic (eds.), Proceedings of COLING 2014, the 25th international conference on computational linguistics: Technical papers, 455–466. Dublin: ACL.Search in Google Scholar

Kroll, Tobias, Lee-Marie Braun & Stefan Stieglitz. 2018. Accommodated emoji usage: Influence of hierarchy on the adaption of pictogram usage in instant messaging. ACIS 2018 Proceedings 82. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.5130/acis2018.dm.Search in Google Scholar

Macionis, John J. 2011. Society. The basics. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education.Search in Google Scholar

Muir, Kate, Adam Joinson, Rachel Cotterill & Nigel Dewdney. 2016. Characterizing the linguistic chameleon: Personal and social correlates of linguistic style accommodation. Human Communication Research 42(3). 462–484. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12083.Search in Google Scholar

Muir, Kate, Adam Joinson, Rachel Cotterill & Nigel Dewdney. 2017. Linguistic style accommodation shapes impression formation and rapport in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 36(5). 525–548. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X17701327.Search in Google Scholar

Niederhoffer, Kate G. & James W. Pennebaker. 2002. Linguistic style matching in social interaction. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 21(4). 337–360. https://doi.org/10.1177/026192702237953.Search in Google Scholar

Pérez Sabater, Carmen. 2017. Linguistic accommodation in online communication: The role of language and gender. Revista Signos. Estudios de Lingüística 50(94). 265–286. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-09342017000200265.Search in Google Scholar

Riordan, Monica A., Kris M. Markman & Craig O. Stewart. 2013. Communication accommodation in instant messaging: An examination of temporal convergence. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 32(1). 84–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X12462695.Search in Google Scholar

Scissors, Lauren E., Alastair J. Gill & Darren Gergle. 2008. Linguistic mimicry and trust in text-based CMC. In Bo Begole & David W. McDonald (eds.), Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work, 277–280. New York: ACM.10.1145/1460563.1460608Search in Google Scholar

Scissors, Lauren E., Alastair J. Gill, Kathleen Geraghty & Darren Gergle. 2009. CMC we trust: The role of similarity. In Dan R. Olsen (ed.), Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, 527–536. New York: ACM.10.1145/1518701.1518783Search in Google Scholar

Tagliamonte, Sali A. & Derek Denis. 2008. Linguistic ruin? Lol! Instant messaging and teen language. American Speech 83(1). 3–34. https://doi.org/10.1215/00031283-2008-001.Search in Google Scholar

Taylor, Ronald L. 2001. Adolescent peer group language. In Rajend Mesthrie (ed.), Concise encyclopedia of sociolinguistics, 297–302. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Search in Google Scholar

Vandekerckhove, Reinhild & Dominiek Sandra. 2016. De potentiële impact van informele online communicatie op de spellingpraktijk van Vlaamse tieners in school context. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing 38(3). 201–234. https://doi.org/10.5117/TVT2016.3.VAND.Search in Google Scholar

Varnhagen, Connie K., G. Peggy McFall, Nicole Pugh, Lisa Routledge, Heather Sumida-MacDonald & Trudy E. Kwong. 2010. Lol: New language and spelling in instant messaging. Reading and Writing 23. 719–733. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9181-y.Search in Google Scholar

Verheijen, Lieke. 2018. Orthographic principles in computer-mediated communication: The SUPER-functions of textisms and their interaction with age and medium. Written Language & Literacy 21(1). 111–145. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00012.ver.Search in Google Scholar

Verheijen, Lieke & Wilbert Spooren. 2017. The impact of WhatsApp on Dutch youths’ school writing. In Egon W. Stemle & Ciara R. Wigham (eds.), Proceedings of the 5th conference on CMC and social media corpora for the humanities (cmccorpora17), 3–4 October 2017, 6–10. Bolzano, Italy: Eurac Research.Search in Google Scholar

Vranken, Jan, Geert Van Hootegem, Erik Henderickx & Luc Vanmarcke. 2017. Het speelveld, de spelregels en de spelers? Handboek sociologie [The field, the rules and the players? Handbook sociology]. Leuven/The Hague: Acco.Search in Google Scholar

Wolf, Alecia. 2000. Emotional expression online: Gender differences in emoticon use. Cyber Psychology and Behavior 3(5). 827–833. https://doi.org/10.1089/10949310050191809.Search in Google Scholar

Xu, Yang, Jeremy Cole & David Reitter. 2018. Not that much power: Linguistic alignment is influenced more by low-level linguistic feature rather than social power. In Iryna Gurevych & Yusuke Miyao (eds.), Proceedings of the 56th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (volume 1: Long papers), 601–610. Melbourne: ACL.10.18653/v1/P18-1056Search in Google Scholar

Xu, Yang & David Reitter. 2015. An evaluation and comparison of linguistic alignment measures. In Tim O’Donnell & Marten van Schijndel (eds.), Proceedings of the 6th workshop on cognitive modeling and computational linguistics, 58–67. Denver: ACL.10.3115/v1/W15-1107Search in Google Scholar

Zeileis, Achim, Christian Kleiber & Simon Jackman. 2008. Regression models for count data in R. Journal of Statistical Software 27(8). 1–25. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v027.i08.Search in Google Scholar