Policing language in the world of new work: the commodification of workplace communication in organizational consulting

References

Abell, Ellen & Shoshana Simons. 2000. How much can you bend before you break: An experience of using constructionist consulting as a tool for organizational learning in the corporate world. European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology 9(2). 159–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/135943200397923.Suche in Google Scholar

Cameron, Deborah. 2000. Styling the worker: Gender and the commodification of language in the globalized service economy. Journal of SocioLinguistics 4(3). 323–347. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00119.Suche in Google Scholar

Cameron, Deborah. 2002. Globalization and the teaching of ‘communications skills’. In David Block & Deborah Cameron (eds.), Globalization and language teaching, 67–82. London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Clayman, Steven E. & John Heritage. 2014. Benefactors and beneficiaries: Benefactive status and stance in the management of offers and requests. In Paul Drew & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (eds.), Requesting in social interaction, 51–82. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/slsi.26.03claSuche in Google Scholar

Cunliffe, Ann L. & Matthew Eriksen. 2011. Relational leadership. Human Relations 64(11). 1425–1449. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726711418388.Suche in Google Scholar

Czarniawska, Barbara. 2001. Is it possible to be a constructionist consultant? Management Learning 32(2). 253–266. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507601322006.Suche in Google Scholar

Czarniawska, Barbara & Carmelo Massa. 2003. Consulting as a liminal space. Human Relations 56(3). 267–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726703056003612.Suche in Google Scholar

Czarniawska, Barbara & Carmelo Massa. 2013. Consulting university: A reflection from inside. Financial Accountability and Management 29(2). 124–139. https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12010.Suche in Google Scholar

Djonov, Emilia & Theo van Leeuwen. 2014. Bullet points, new writing, and the marketization of public discourse: A critical multimodal perspective. In Emilia Djonow & Sumin Zhao (eds.), Critical multimodal studies of popular discourse, 232–250. London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Fairclough, Norman. 1996. Technologisation of discourse. In Malcolm Coulthard & Carmen Rosa Caldas-Coulthard (eds.), Texts and practices, 71–83. London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Gee, James Paul, Glynda Hull & Colin Lankshear. 1996. The new work order: Behind the language of the new capitalism. Boulder: Westview.Suche in Google Scholar

Hakulinen, Auli, Maria Vilkuna, Riitta Korhonen, Vesa Koivisto, Tarja Riitta Heinonen & Irja Alho. 2004. Iso suomen kielioppi [A comprehensive Finnish grammar]. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society. 978-952-5446-35-7 Electronic version: http://scripta.kotus.fi/visk (accessed 4 March 2021).Suche in Google Scholar

Heller, Monica. 2010. The commodification of language. Annual Review of Anthropology 39. 101–114. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.012809.104951.Suche in Google Scholar

Heller, Monica & Alexandre Duchêne. 2012. Pride and profit: Changing discourses of language, capital and nation-state. In Alexandre Duchêne & Monica Heller (eds.), Language in late capitalism: Pride and profit, 1–21. New York: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Holt, Elizabeth. 2000. Reporting and reacting: Concurrent responses to reported speech. Research on Language and Social Interaction 33(4). 425–454. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3304_04.Suche in Google Scholar

Hosking, Dian Marie. 1988. Organizing, leadership and skilful process. Journal of Management Studies 25(2). 148–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1988.tb00029.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Housley, William & Richard Fitzgerald. 2015. Introduction to membership categorization analysis. In William Housley & Richard Fitzgerald (eds.), Advances in membership categorization analysis, 1–22. London: Sage.10.4135/9781473917873.n1Suche in Google Scholar

Jokinen, Arja. 2016. Vakuuttelevan ja suostuttelevan retoriikan analysoiminen [Analyzing argumentative and persuasive rhetoric]. In Arja Jokinen, Kirsi Juhila & Eero Suoninen (eds.), Diskurssianalyysi: Teoriat, peruskäsitteet ja käyttö [Discourse analysis: Theories, basic concepts and practice], 337–368. Tampere, Finland: Vastapaino.Suche in Google Scholar

Juhila, Kirsi. 2016. Miten tarinasta tulee tosi? Faktuaalistamisstrategiat viranomaispuheessa [How does a story become true? Factualization strategies in talk of public authorities]. In Arja Jokinen, Kirsi Juhila & Eero Suoninen (eds.), Diskurssianalyysi: Teoriat, peruskäsitteet ja käyttö [Discourse analysis: Theories, basic concepts and practice], 145–178. Tampere, Finland: Vastapaino.Suche in Google Scholar

Kykyri, Virpi-Liisa, Risto Puutio & Jarl Wahlström. 2007. Calling in a witness: Negotiating and factualizing preferred outcomes in management consultation. Text & Talk 27(2). 201–224. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2007.008.Suche in Google Scholar

Ledin, Per & David Machin. 2015. How lists, bullet points and tables recontextualize social practice: A multimodal study of management language in Swedish universities. Critical Discourse Studies 12(4). 463–481. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2015.1039556.Suche in Google Scholar

Levinson, Stephen C. 1992. Activity types and language. In Paul Drew & John Heritage (eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings, 66–100. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Levinson, Stephen C. 2012. Action formation and ascription. In Jack Sidnell & Tanya Stivers (eds.), Handbook of conversation analysis, 103–130. Boston, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781118325001.ch6Suche in Google Scholar

Mannevuo, Mona. 2015. Affektitehdas. Työn rationalisoinnin historiallisia jatkumoita [Affect factory: Rationalisation of labour in historical continuums]. Finland: University of Turku Doctoral dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Mueller, Frank & Andrea Whittle. 2011. Translating management ideas: A discursive devices analysis. Organization Studies 32(2). 187–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840610394308.Suche in Google Scholar

Nissi, Riikka. 2016. Spelling out consequences: Conditional constructions as a means to resist proposals in organisational planning process. Discourse Studies 18(3). 311–329. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445616634556.Suche in Google Scholar

Nissi, Riikka & Esa Lehtinen. 2016. Negotiation of expertise and multifunctionality: PowerPoint presentations as interactional activity types in workplace meetings. Language & Communication 48. 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2016.01.003.Suche in Google Scholar

Nissi, Riikka & Kati Dlaske. 2020. Empowerment as an affective-discursive technology in contemporary capitalism: Insights from a play. Critical Discourse Studies 17(4). 447–467. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2019.1649161.Suche in Google Scholar

Pollner, Melvin. 1975. “The very coinage of your brain”: The anatomy of reality disjunctures. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 5(3). 411–430. https://doi.org/10.1177/004839317500500304.Suche in Google Scholar

Potter, Jonathan. 1996. Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric and social construction. London: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446222119.Suche in Google Scholar

Rendle-Short, Johanna. 2006. The academic presentation: Situated talk in action. Aldershot, England: Ashgate.Suche in Google Scholar

Röttger, Ulrike & Joachim Preusse. 2013. External consulting in strategic communication: Functions and roles within systems theory. International Journal of Strategic Communication 7(2). 99–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118x.2013.765437.Suche in Google Scholar

Sturdy, Andrew. 2009. Popular critiques of consultancy and politics of management learning? Management Learning 40(4). 457–463. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507609339686.Suche in Google Scholar

Svinhufvud, Kimmo, Liisa Voutilainen & Elina Weiste. 2017. Normalizing in student counseling: Counselors’ responses to students’ problem descriptions. Discourse Studies 19(2). 196–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445617691704.Suche in Google Scholar

Thurlow, Crispin (ed.). 2019. The business of words: Wordsmiths, linguists, and other language workers. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781351041782Suche in Google Scholar

Uhl-Bien, Mary. 2006. Relational leadership theory: Exploring the social processes of leadership and organizing. The Leadership Quarterly 17(6). 654–676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.10.007.Suche in Google Scholar

Von Platen, Sara. 2015. The communication consultant: An important translator for communication management. Journal of Communication Management 19(2). 150–166. https://doi.org/10.1108/jcom-06-2013-0049.Suche in Google Scholar

Von Platen, Sara. 2018. Communication consulting and consultancies. In Robert L. Heath & Winni Johansen (eds.), The international encyclopedia of strategic communication. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.10.1002/9781119010722.iesc0026Suche in Google Scholar

Whittle, Andrea, Frank Mueller & Anita Mangan. 2008. In search of subtlety: Discursive devices and rhetorical competence. Management Communication Quarterly 22(1). 99–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318908318515.Suche in Google Scholar

Yates, JoAnne & Wanda Orlikowski. 2007. The PowerPoint presentation and its corollaries: How genres shape communicative action in organizations. In Mark Zachry & Charlotte Thralls (eds.), Communicative practices in workplaces and the professions: Cultural perspectives on the regulation of discourse and organizations, 67–92. Amityville, NY: Baywood Publishing.10.2190/CPIC4Suche in Google Scholar