Changing participation in web conferencing: the shared computer screen as an online sales interaction resource

References

Aarikka-Stenroos, Leena & Elina Jaakkola. 2012. Value co-creation in knowledge intensive business services: A dyadic perspective on the joint problem solving process. Industrial Marketing Management 41(1). 15–26.10.1016/j.indmarman.2011.11.008Search in Google Scholar

Atkinson, J. Maxwell, John Heritage & Keith Oatley (eds.). 1984. Structures of social action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Baumann, Jasmin, Kenneth Le Meunier-FitzHugh & Hugh N. Wilson. 2017. The challenge of communicating reciprocal value promises: Buyer–seller value proposition disparity in professional services. Industrial Marketing Management 64. 107–121.10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.02.002Search in Google Scholar

Bowers, John & David Martin. 2000. Machinery in the new factories: Interaction and technology in a bank’s telephone call centre. In Proceedings of the 2000 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work, 49–58.10.1145/358916.358952Search in Google Scholar

Ballantyne, David & Richard J. Varey. 2006. Creating value-in-use through marketing interaction: The exchange logic of relating, communicating and knowing. Marketing Theory 6(3). 335–348.10.1177/1470593106066795Search in Google Scholar

Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth. 2014. What does grammar tell us about action? Pragmatics 24(3). 623–647.10.1075/prag.24.3.08couSearch in Google Scholar

Carlile, Paul R. 2004. Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organization Science 15(5). 555–568.10.1287/orsc.1040.0094Search in Google Scholar

Clift, Rebecca. 2016. Conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Deppermann, Arnulf. 2014. Multimodal participation in simultaneous joint projects. In Pentti Haddington, Tiina Keisanen, Lorenza Mondada & Maurice Nevile (eds.), Multiactivity in social interaction: Beyond multitasking, 247–281. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.187.09depSearch in Google Scholar

Dixon, Andrea L. & John, Jeff) F. Tanner, Jr. 2012. Transforming selling: Why it is time to think differently about sales research. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management 32(1). 9–13.10.2753/PSS0885-3134320102Search in Google Scholar

Etelämäki, Marja. 2009. The Finnish demonstrative pronouns in light of interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 41(1). 25–46.10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.005Search in Google Scholar

Geiger, Susi & John Finch. 2009. Industrial sales people as market actors. Industrial Marketing Management 38(6). 608–617.10.1016/j.indmarman.2009.04.003Search in Google Scholar

Goodwin, Charles. 2000. Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 32. 1489–1522.10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00096-XSearch in Google Scholar

Goodwin, Charles. 2007. Participation, stance and affect in the organization of activities. Discourse & Society 18(1). 53–73.10.1177/0957926507069457Search in Google Scholar

Haas, Alexander, Ivan Snehota & Daniela Corsaro. 2012. Creating value in business relationships: The role of sales. Industrial Marketing Management 41(1). 94–105.10.1016/j.indmarman.2011.11.004Search in Google Scholar

Haddington, Pentti, Tiina Keisanen, Lorenza Mondada & Maurice Nevile (eds.). 2014. Multiactivity in social interaction: Beyond multitasking. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.187Search in Google Scholar

Heath, Christian & Paul Luff. 1993. Disembodied conduct: Interactional asymmetries in video- mediated communication. In Graham Button (ed.), Technology in working order: Studies of work, interaction, and technology, 35–54. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Heath, Christian & Paul Luff. 2000. Technology in action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511489839Search in Google Scholar

Heath, Christian & Paul Luff. 2012. Embodied action and organizational activity. In Jack Sidnell & Tanya Stivers (eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis, 283–307. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781118325001.ch14Search in Google Scholar

Heritage, John. 2013. Epistemics in conversation. The handbook of conversation analysis, 370–394. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781118325001.ch18Search in Google Scholar

Heritage, John. 1984. A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In J. Maxwell Atkinson & John Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis, 299–345. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511665868.020Search in Google Scholar

Hindmarsh, John & Christian Heath. 2000. Embodied reference: A study of deixis in workplace interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 32(12). 1855–1878.10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00122-8Search in Google Scholar

Kaski, Timo, Jarkko Niemi & Ellen B. Pullins. 2018. Rapport building in authentic B2B sales interaction. Industrial Marketing Management 69. 235–252.10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.08.019Search in Google Scholar

Kaski, Timo, Ari Alamäki & Ellen B. Pullins. 2019. Fostering collaborative mind-sets among customers: A transformative learning approach. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management 39(1). 42–59.10.1080/08853134.2018.1489727Search in Google Scholar

Koole, Tom. 2010. Displays of epistemic access: Student responses to teacher explanations. Research on Language and Social Interaction 43(2). 183–209.10.1080/08351811003737846Search in Google Scholar

Koivisto, Aino. 2015. Displaying now-understanding: The Finnish change-of-state token aa. Discourse Processes 52(2). 111–148.10.1080/0163853X.2014.914357Search in Google Scholar

Laury, Ritva. 1997. Demonstratives in interaction: The emergence of a definite article in Finnish. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/sidag.7Search in Google Scholar

Levinson, Stephen C. 1992 [1979]. Activity types and language. In Paul Drew & John Heritage (eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional setting, 66–100. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Levy, Mike & Rod Gardner. 2012. Liminality in multitasking: Where talk and task collide in computer collaborations. Language in Society. 557–587.10.1017/S0047404512000656Search in Google Scholar

Luff, Paul, Jon Hindmarsh & Christian Heath (eds.). 2000. Workplace studies: Recovering work practice and informing system design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511628122Search in Google Scholar

Luff, Paul & Christian Heath. 2000. The collaborative production of computer commands in command and control. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 52(4). 669–699.10.1006/ijhc.1999.0354Search in Google Scholar

Makkonen-Craig, Henna. 2005. Toimittajan läsnäolo sanomalehtitekstissä: Näkökulmia suomen kielen dialogisiin passiivilauseisiin [The journalist’s presence/involvement in newspaper discourse: Perspectives to the Finnish dialogical passive]. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.Search in Google Scholar

Markman, Kris M. 2009. “So what shall we talk about”: Openings and closings in chat-based virtual meetings. The Journal of Business Communication, Vol. 46(1). 150–170.10.1177/0021943608325751Search in Google Scholar

Melander, Helen & Fritjof Sahlström. 2009. In tow of the blue whale: Learning as interactional changes in topical orientation. Journal of Pragmatics 41(8). 1519–1537.10.1016/j.pragma.2007.05.013Search in Google Scholar

Mikkola, Piia & Esa Lehtinen. 2014. Initiating activity shifts through use of appraisal forms as material objects during performance appraisal interviews. In Pentti Haddington, Maurice Nevile, Mirka Rauniomaa & Trine Heinemann (eds.), Interacting with objects: Language, materiality, and social activity, 57–78. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.186.03mikSearch in Google Scholar

Mondada, Lorenza. 2016. An interactionist perspective on the ecology of linguistic practices: The situated and embodied production of talk. In Ralph Ludwig, Steve Pagel & Peter Mühlhäusler (eds.), Linguistic ecology and language contact, 77–108. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781139649568.004Search in Google Scholar

Mondada, Lorenza. 2014a. The temporal orders of multiactivity: Operating and demonstrating the surgical theatre. In Pentti Haddington, Tiina Keisanen, Lorenza Mondada & Maurice Nevile (eds.), Multiactivity in social interaction: Beyond multitasking, 33–75. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.187.02monSearch in Google Scholar

Mondada, Lorenza. 2014b. Pointing, talk, and the bodies. In Mandana Seyfeddinipur & Marianne Gullberg (eds.), From gesture in conversation to visible action as utterance: Essays in honor of Adam Kendon, 95–124. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.188.06monSearch in Google Scholar

Mondada, Lorenza. 2008. Using video for a sequential and multimodal analysis of social interaction: Videotaping institutional telephone calls. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research 9(3). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-9.3.1161.Search in Google Scholar

Nevile, Maurice, Pentti Haddington, Trine Heinemann & Mirka Rauniomaa (eds.). 2014. Interacting with objects: Language, materiality, and social activity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.186Search in Google Scholar

Nielsen, Soren Bo. 2014. “I’ll just see what you had before”: Making computer use relevant while patients present their problems. In Pentti Haddington, Maurice Nevile, Mirka Rauniomaa & Trine Heinemann (eds.), Interacting with objects, 79–98. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.186.04becSearch in Google Scholar

Nielsen, Soren Bo. 2016. How doctors manage consulting computer records while interacting with patients. Research on Language and Social Interaction 49(1), 58–74.10.1080/08351813.2016.1126451Search in Google Scholar

Niemi, Jarkko & Ellen B. Pullins. 2021. Tell me more: How salespeople encourage customer disclosure. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing 36(5), 717–728.10.1108/JBIM-11-2019-0482Search in Google Scholar

Nishizaka, Aug. 2014. The sustained orientation to one activity in the multiactivity situation during prenatal ultrasound examinations. In Pentti Haddington, Tiina Keisanen, Lorenza Mondada & Maurice Nevile (eds.), Multiactivity in social interaction: Beyond multitasking, 79–108. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.187.03nisSearch in Google Scholar

Oittinen, Tuire & Arja Piirainen-Marsh. 2015. Openings in technology-mediated business meetings. Journal of Pragmatics 85. 47–66.10.1016/j.pragma.2015.06.001Search in Google Scholar

Raevaara, Liisa. 2006. Kysymykset virkailijan työkaluna [Questions as a tool of a clerk]. In Marja-Leena Sorjonen & Liisa Raevaara (eds.), Arjen asiointia: Keskusteluja Kelan tiskin äärellä [Everyday errands: Conversations in the Finnish Social Insurance Office], 86–116. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.Search in Google Scholar

Rapp, Adam, Daniel G. Bachrach, Nikolaos Panagopoulos & Jessica Ogilvie. 2014. Salespeople as knowledge brokers: A review and critique of the challenger sales model. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management 34(4). 245–259.10.1080/08853134.2014.908126Search in Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emanuel A. 2007. Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis I, Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511791208Search in Google Scholar

Sorjonen, Marja-Leena. 2001. Responding in conversation: A study of response particles in Finnish, Vol. 70. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.70Search in Google Scholar

Stivers, Tanya, Lorenza Mondada & John Steensig (eds.). 2011. The morality of knowledge in conversation, Vol. 29. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511921674Search in Google Scholar

Storbacka, Kaj, Roderick J. Brodie, Tilo Böhmann, Paul P. Maglio & Suvi Nenonen. 2016. Actor engagement as a microfoundation for value co-creation. Journal of Business Research 69(8). 3008–3017.10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.02.034Search in Google Scholar

Timonen, Hanna, Jarkko Niemi & Johanna Vuori. 2021. Kuka vie ja kuka seuraa? Toiminnallinen vetovastuu myyntineuvotteluissa [Who leads and who follows? Agency in business-to-business sales interaction]. In Jarkko Niemi & Johanna Vuori (eds.), Myyntityö vuorovaikutuksena [Sales work as interaction], 241–276. Tampere: Vastapaino.Search in Google Scholar

Vargo, Stephen L. & Robert F. Lusch. 2008. Service-dominant logic: Continuing the evolution. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 36(1). 1–10.10.1007/s11747-007-0069-6Search in Google Scholar

Zimmerman, Don H. 1992. The interactional organization of calls for emergency assistance. In Paul Drew & John Heritage (eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional setting, 418–469. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar