Gaussian Mixture Regression Model with Sparsity for Clustering of Territory Risk in Auto Insurance
-
Shengkun Xie
,
Chong Gan
Abstract
Insurance rating territory design and accurate estimation of territory risk relativities are fundamental aspects of auto insurance rate regulation. It is crucial to develop methodologies that can facilitate the effective design of rating territories and their risk relativities estimate, as they directly impact the rate filing and the decision support of the rate change review process. This article proposes a Gaussian Mixture Regression model clustering approach for territory design. The proposed method incorporates a linear regression model, taking spatial location as model covariates, which helps estimate the cluster mean more accurately. Also, to further enhance the estimation of territory risk relativities, we impose sparsity through sparse matrix decomposition of the membership coefficient matrix obtained from the Gaussian Mixture Regression model. By transitioning from the current hard clustering method to a soft approach, our methodology could improve the evaluation of territory risk for rate-making purposes. Moreover, using non-negative sparse matrix approximation ensures that the estimation of risk relativities for basic rating units remains smooth, effectively eliminating data noise from the territory risk relativity estimate. Overall, our novel methodology aims to significantly enhance the accuracy and reliability of risk analysis in auto insurance. Furthermore, the proposed method exhibits potential for extension to various other domains that involve spatial clustering of data, thereby broadening its applicability and expanding its usefulness beyond auto insurance rate regulation.
The first 40 rows of the FSA data, sorted in descending order by ‘exposures’. This data is given as an example of input data for Gaussian mixture regression clustering.
| FSA | Loss cost | Exposures | Latitude | Longitude |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| L5N | 1,519 | 46,127 | 43.58701 | −79.75656 |
| L5M | 2,070 | 45,842 | 43.56732 | −79.71608 |
| L4C | 1,801 | 36,837 | 43.87009 | −79.43920 |
| L4J | 2,110 | 36,284 | 43.81237 | −79.44938 |
| L3R | 1,591 | 34,114 | 43.84944 | −79.32583 |
| L6A | 2,423 | 33,640 | 43.85930 | −79.51554 |
| L4L | 1,678 | 33,347 | 43.79339 | −79.57974 |
| L6Y | 2,749 | 30,515 | 43.65887 | −79.75180 |
| L6R | 3,667 | 30,459 | 43.75530 | −79.75334 |
| L7A | 3,008 | 28,507 | 43.70264 | −79.82300 |
| L6S | 2,445 | 27,688 | 43.73340 | −79.73314 |
| L3T | 1,671 | 26,799 | 43.82198 | −79.39453 |
| M2N | 1,737 | 26,124 | 43.76766 | −79.40879 |
| L4H | 2,473 | 25,288 | 43.82593 | −79.58696 |
| L3S | 3,187 | 24,838 | 43.84275 | −79.27094 |
| L5L | 1,498 | 24,822 | 43.53743 | −79.69186 |
| L5B | 2,272 | 24,542 | 43.57746 | −79.63006 |
| M1B | 4,082 | 24,415 | 43.80588 | −79.20751 |
| M5C | 141 | 23,987 | 43.65710 | −79.38253 |
| L6X | 2,457 | 23,027 | 43.68150 | −79.78490 |
| L3P | 980 | 22,967 | 43.88057 | −79.26391 |
| L5V | 2,428 | 22,696 | 43.59532 | −79.69070 |
| L6P | 3,738 | 22,376 | 43.78321 | −79.70193 |
| M1V | 2,662 | 21,966 | 43.81752 | −79.28170 |
| L4E | 1,675 | 21,150 | 43.94182 | −79.45497 |
| L5A | 2,390 | 20,852 | 43.58620 | −79.61031 |
| M2J | 2,092 | 20,369 | 43.77962 | −79.34920 |
| M1W | 2,140 | 19,943 | 43.79816 | −79.32107 |
| L6C | 1,332 | 19,729 | 43.89046 | −79.33551 |
| L4B | 1,608 | 19,701 | 43.85529 | −79.40083 |
| L6V | 3,110 | 19,248 | 43.70306 | −79.76144 |
| M9C | 1,360 | 18,714 | 43.64486 | −79.57317 |
| L4Z | 2,046 | 18,168 | 43.61335 | −79.64676 |
| M1C | 1,242 | 18,057 | 43.78708 | −79.15529 |
| L5R | 2,546 | 17,854 | 43.60404 | −79.66888 |
| M1E | 2,568 | 17,669 | 43.76557 | −79.19081 |
| M9W | 3,123 | 17,441 | 43.71797 | −79.58034 |
| L6T | 2,677 | 17,042 | 43.71664 | −79.70027 |
| L6Z | 1,770 | 16,999 | 43.72642 | −79.79354 |
| L4S | 1,677 | 16,638 | 43.89404 | −79.42243 |
References
Adams, M. D., P. S. Kanaroglou, and P. Coulibaly. 2016. “Spatially Constrained Clustering of Ecological Units to Facilitate the Design of Integrated Water Monitoring Networks in the St. Lawrence Basin.” International Journal of Geographical Information Science 30 (2): 390–404. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2015.1089442.Suche in Google Scholar
An, P., Z. Wang, and C. Zhang. 2022. “Ensemble Unsupervised Autoencoders and Gaussian Mixture Model for Cyberattack Detection.” Information Processing & Management 59 (2): 102844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102844.Suche in Google Scholar
Aonishi, T., R. Maruyama, T. Ito, H. Miyakawa, M. Murayama, and K. Ota. 2022. “Imaging Data Analysis Using Non-Negative Matrix Factorization.” Neuroscience Research 179: 51–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neures.2021.12.001.Suche in Google Scholar
Asteris, M., D. Papailiopoulos, and A. Dimakis. 2014. “Nonnegative Sparse PCA with Provable Guarantees.” In International Conference on Machine Learning, 1728–36. PMLR.Suche in Google Scholar
Blier-Wong, C., H. Cossette, L. Lamontagne, and E. Marceau. 2022. “Geographic Ratemaking with Spatial Embeddings.” ASTIN Bulletin: The Journal of the IAA 52 (1): 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1017/asb.2021.25.Suche in Google Scholar
Boudreault, M., and A. Ojeda. 2022. “Ratemaking Territories and Adverse Selection for Flood Insurance.” Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 107: 349–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2022.09.005.Suche in Google Scholar
Dempster, A. P., N. M. Laird, and D. B. Rubin. 1977. “Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data via the EM Algorithm.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B 39 (1): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x.Suche in Google Scholar
Duong, T. D. 2009. “Non-Negative Sparse Principal Component Analysis.” Journal of Technical Education Science 4 (11): 31–8.Suche in Google Scholar
Gogebakan, M. 2021. “A Novel Approach for Gaussian Mixture Model Clustering Based on Soft Computing Method.” IEEE Access 9: 159987–60003. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2021.3130066.Suche in Google Scholar
Jandaghi, G., and Z. Moradpour. 2015. “Segmentation of Life Insurance Customers Based on Their Profile Using Fuzzy Clustering.” International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences 61: 17–24. https://doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/ilshs.61.17.Suche in Google Scholar
Jandaghi, G., H. Moazzez, and Z. Moradpour. 2015. “Life Insurance Customers Segmentation Using Fuzzy Clustering.” World Scientific News 21: 24–35.Suche in Google Scholar
Jia, W., Y. Tan, L. Liu, J. Li, H. Zhang, and K. Zhao. 2019. “Hierarchical Prediction Based on Two-Level Gaussian Mixture Model Clustering for Bike-Sharing System.” Knowledge-Based Systems 178: 84–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2019.04.020.Suche in Google Scholar
Kang, Y., K. Wu, S. Gao, I. Ng, J. Rao, S. Ye, F. Zhang, and T. Fei. 2022. “Sticc: A Multivariate Spatial Clustering Method for Repeated Geographic Pattern Discovery with Consideration of Spatial Contiguity.” International Journal of Geographical Information Science 36 (8): 1518–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2022.2053980.Suche in Google Scholar
Kaushik, M., and B. Mathur. 2014. “Comparative Study of K-Means and Hierarchical Clustering Techniques.” International Journal of Software & Hardware Research in Engineering 2 (6): 93–8.Suche in Google Scholar
Lee, D., and H. S. Seung. 2000. “Algorithms for Non-Negative Matrix Factorization.” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 13.Suche in Google Scholar
Lin, X., and P. C. Boutros. 2020. “Optimization and Expansion of Non-Negative Matrix Factorization.” BMC Bioinformatics 21 (1): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-019-3312-5.Suche in Google Scholar
Liu, Y., L. Ye, H. Qin, S. Ouyang, Z. Zhang, and J. Zhou. 2019. “Middle and Long-Term Runoff Probabilistic Forecasting Based on Gaussian Mixture Regression.” Water Resources Management 33: 1785–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-019-02221-y.Suche in Google Scholar
Majhi, S. K., S. Bhatachharya, R. Pradhan, and S. Biswal. 2019. “Fuzzy Clustering Using SALP Swarm Algorithm for Automobile Insurance Fraud Detection.” Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems 36 (3): 2333–44. https://doi.org/10.3233/jifs-169944.Suche in Google Scholar
McLachlan, G. J., and S. Rathnayake. 2014. “On the Number of Components in a Gaussian Mixture Model.” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 4 (5): 341–55. https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.1135.Suche in Google Scholar
Nicholson, D., O. A. Vanli, S. Jung, and E. E. Ozguven. 2019. “A Spatial Regression and Clustering Method for Developing Place-Specific Social Vulnerability Indices Using Census and Social Media Data.” International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 38: 101224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101224.Suche in Google Scholar
Piesio, M., M. Ganzha, and M. Paprzycki. 2020. “Applying Machine Learning to Anomaly Detection in Car Insurance Sales.” In Big Data Analytics: 8th International Conference, BDA 2020, Sonepat, India, December 15–18, 2020, Proceedings 8, 257–77. Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-66665-1_17Suche in Google Scholar
Reynolds, D. A. 2009. “Gaussian Mixture Models.” Encyclopedia of Biometrics 741: 659–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-73003-5_196.Suche in Google Scholar
Ruugia, S., and C. Moturi. 2017. “Application of GIS Spatial Interpolation Methods in Auto Insurance Risk Territory Segmentation and Rating.” ORSEA Journal 4 (1).Suche in Google Scholar
Shapiro, A. F. 2004. “Fuzzy Logic in Insurance.” Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 35 (2): 399–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2004.07.010.Suche in Google Scholar
Shen, X., Y. Zhang, K. Sata, and T. Shen. 2020. “Gaussian Mixture Model Clustering-Based Knock Threshold Learning in Automotive Engines.” IEEE 25 (6): 2981–91. https://doi.org/10.1109/tmech.2020.3000732.Suche in Google Scholar
Shi, P., and K. Shi. 2017. “Territorial Risk Classification Using Spatially Dependent Frequency-Severity Models.” ASTIN Bulletin: The Journal of the IAA 47 (2): 437–65. https://doi.org/10.1017/asb.2017.7.Suche in Google Scholar
Shi, P., and K. Shi. 2022. “Non-Life Insurance Risk Classification Using Categorical Embedding.” North American Actuarial Journal: 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/10920277.2022.2123361.Suche in Google Scholar
Shi, P., and K. Shi. 2023. “Non-Life Insurance Risk Classification Using Categorical Embedding.” North American Actuarial Journal 27 (3): 579–601. https://doi.org/10.1080/10920277.2022.2123361.Suche in Google Scholar
Shimizu, N., and H. Kaneko. 2020. “Direct Inverse Analysis Based on Gaussian Mixture Regression for Multiple Objective Variables in Material Design.” Materials & Design 196: 109168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2020.109168.Suche in Google Scholar
Sung, H. G. 2004. Gaussian Mixture Regression and Classification. Houston: Rice University.Suche in Google Scholar
Teodorescu, S. 2009. “Loss Distributions Modeling for Motor TPL Insurance Class Using Gaussian Mixture Method and EM Algorithm.” Communications of the IBIMA 10: 151–7.Suche in Google Scholar
Tsai, C. C.-L., and E. S. Cheng. 2021. “Incorporating Statistical Clustering Methods into Mortality Models to Improve Forecasting Performances.” Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 99: 42–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2021.03.005.Suche in Google Scholar
Wang, G., L. Qian, and Z. Guo. 2013. “Continuous Tool Wear Prediction Based on Gaussian Mixture Regression Model.” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 66: 1921–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4470-z.Suche in Google Scholar
Wang, Z., J. Wu, L. Cheng, K. Liu, and Y.-M. Wei. 2018. “Regional Flood Risk Assessment via Coupled Fuzzy C-Means Clustering Methods: An Empirical Analysis from China’s Huaihe River Basin.” Natural Hazards 93: 803–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3325-9.Suche in Google Scholar
Wang, F., F. Liao, Y. Li, and H. Wang. 2021. “A New Prediction Strategy for Dynamic Multi-Objective Optimization Using Gaussian Mixture Model.” Information Sciences 580: 331–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2021.08.065.Suche in Google Scholar
Wang, J., T. Li, B. Li, and M. Q.-H. Meng. 2022. “GMR-RRT*: Sampling-Based Path Planning Using Gaussian Mixture Regression.” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles 7 (3): 690–700. https://doi.org/10.1109/tiv.2022.3150748.Suche in Google Scholar
Wei, M., M. Ye, Q. Wang, and J. P. Twajamahoro. 2022. “Remaining Useful Life Prediction of Lithium-Ion Batteries Based on Stacked Autoencoder and Gaussian Mixture Regression.” Journal of Energy Storage 47: 103558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2021.103558.Suche in Google Scholar
Weibel, E. J., and J. P. Walsh. 2008. “Territory Analysis with Mixed Models and Clustering.” Applying Multivariate Statistical Models: 91.Suche in Google Scholar
Wu, D., P. Yan, Y. Guo, H. Zhou, and J. Chen. 2022. “A Gear Machining Error Prediction Method Based on Adaptive Gaussian Mixture Regression Considering Stochastic Disturbance.” Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 33 (8): 2321–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-021-01791-2.Suche in Google Scholar
Xie, S. 2019. “Defining Geographical Rating Territories in Auto Insurance Regulation by Spatially Constrained Clustering.” Risks 7 (2): 42. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks7020042.Suche in Google Scholar
Xie, S., and C. Gan. 2022. “Fuzzy Clustering and Non-Negative Sparse Matrix Approximation on Estimating Territory Risk Relativities.” In 2022 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE), 1–8. IEEE.10.1109/FUZZ-IEEE55066.2022.9882750Suche in Google Scholar
Xie, S., and C. Gan. 2023. “Estimating Territory Risk Relativity Using Generalized Linear Mixed Models and Fuzzy C-Means Clustering.” Risks 11 (6): 99. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks11060099.Suche in Google Scholar
Xie, S., A. T. Lawniczak, and Z. Wang. 2017. “Spatially Constrained Clustering to Define Geographical Rating Territories.” In ICPRAM, 82–8.10.5220/0006118100820088Suche in Google Scholar
Yazdi, A. K., Y. J. Wang, and A. Alirezaei. 2018. “Analytical Insights into Firm Performance: A Fuzzy Clustering Approach for Data Envelopment Analysis Classification.” International Journal of Operational Research 33 (3): 413–29. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijor.2018.095630.Suche in Google Scholar
Zhang, Y., M. Li, S. Wang, S. Dai, L. Luo, E. Zhu, H. Xu, X. Zhu, C. Yao, and H. Zhou. 2021. “Gaussian Mixture Model Clustering with Incomplete Data.” ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications 17 (1s): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3408318.Suche in Google Scholar
© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Featured Articles (Research Paper)
- Evaluating the Efficiency of Capital Enhancement and Investment Constraints in Life Insurance Supervision
- The Impact of the Social Insurance System on Chinese Adults’ Subjective Well-Being
- Financial Sustainability of Social Insurance: The Case of Korean Workers’ Compensation Insurance and Possibility of Triple Moral Hazard
- Gaussian Mixture Regression Model with Sparsity for Clustering of Territory Risk in Auto Insurance
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Featured Articles (Research Paper)
- Evaluating the Efficiency of Capital Enhancement and Investment Constraints in Life Insurance Supervision
- The Impact of the Social Insurance System on Chinese Adults’ Subjective Well-Being
- Financial Sustainability of Social Insurance: The Case of Korean Workers’ Compensation Insurance and Possibility of Triple Moral Hazard
- Gaussian Mixture Regression Model with Sparsity for Clustering of Territory Risk in Auto Insurance
