Startseite Being and the Philosopher’s Object in Plato’s Sophist
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Being and the Philosopher’s Object in Plato’s Sophist

  • Roberto Granieri ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 20. Juli 2023
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill
Apeiron
Aus der Zeitschrift Apeiron Band 56 Heft 4

Abstract

In the Sophist, Plato claims that the philosopher is always engaged through reasonings with the idea tou ontos (254a4–b1). I argue that, contrary to appearances and to what various commentators believe, this phrase does not refer to the Kind Being singled out in the Sophist as one of the so-called ‘greatest’ or ‘most important’ Kinds, but to the whole intelligible realm. The proposed reading better accounts for Plato’s exact wording at Sophist 254a4–b1 and preserves the consistency of Plato’s view on the object of philosophical knowledge. I conclude with some broader considerations on the relationship between this passage, Platonic dialectic and Aristotle’s conception of a science of being qua being.


Corresponding author: Roberto Granieri, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium, E-mail:

Award Identifier / Grant number: 885273

References

Adam, J. 1902. (ed. and comm.), The Republic of Plato, 2 Vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Ackrill, J. 1957. “Plato and the Copula: Sophist 251-9.” Journal of Hellenic Studies 77: 1–16.10.2307/628625Suche in Google Scholar

Ast, F. 1835–8. Lexicon Platonicum, 3 Vols. Leipzig: Weidmann.Suche in Google Scholar

Baltes, M. 1999. ‘Idee (Ideenlehre)’ [1994], in Id., ΔΙΑΝΟΗΜΑΤΑ, 275–302. Stuttgart-Leipzig: Teubner.10.1515/9783110967883.275Suche in Google Scholar

Beierwaltes, W. 1957. Lux Intelligibilis. Diss. Munich.Suche in Google Scholar

Brandwood, L. 1990. The Chronology of Plato’s Dialogues. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511753572Suche in Google Scholar

Bury, R. G. 1897. (introd., ed. and comm.), The Philebus of Plato. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Campbell, L. 1867. (introd., ed. and notes), The Sophistes and the Politicus of Plato. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Campbell, L. 1894. “Essay III: On Plato’s Use of Language.” In Plato’s Republic, Vol. II, edited by B. Jowett, L. Campbell (ed., notes and essays), 165–340. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Centrone, B. 2008. (introd., Ital. transl. and notes). Platone. Sofista. Torino: Einaudi.Suche in Google Scholar

Cherniss, H. 1947. “Some War-Time Publications Concerning Plato. I.” American Journal of Philology 68: 113–46.10.2307/290949Suche in Google Scholar

Cordero, N.-L. 1993. (introd., French. transl. and notes), Platon. Sophiste. Paris: Flammarion.Suche in Google Scholar

Cornford, F. M. 1935. (introd., Engl. transl. and comm.), Plato’s Theory of Knowledge. London: Kegan Paul.Suche in Google Scholar

Crivelli, P. 2012. Plato’s Account of Falsehood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139015004Suche in Google Scholar

Delcomminette, S. 2014. “Odysseus and the Home of the Stranger from Elea.” Classical Quarterly 64: 533–41. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0009838814000111.Suche in Google Scholar

Des Places, É. 1964. Platon. Œuvres Complètes. XIV: Lexique de la langue philosophique et religieuse de Platon, 2 Vols. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Suche in Google Scholar

Diès, A. 1925. (introd., ed., French transl. and notes), Platon. Le Sophiste. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Suche in Google Scholar

Dixsaut, M. 2000. “Images du philosophe.” Kléos 4: 191–248.Suche in Google Scholar

Dixsaut, M. 2001a. Le Naturel Philosophe [1985]. Paris: Vrin.Suche in Google Scholar

Dixsaut, M. 2001b. Métamorphoses de la dialectique dans les dialogues de Platon. Paris: Vrin.Suche in Google Scholar

Dixsaut, M. 2022. (introd., French transl. and notes), Platon. Le Sophiste. Paris: Vrin.Suche in Google Scholar

Dörrie, H., and M. Baltes. 1996. (introd., ed., Germ. transl. and comm.), Der Platonismus in der Antike, IV. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog.Suche in Google Scholar

Ferrari, F. 2000. “Teoria delle idee e ontologia.” In Platone. La Repubblica, IV, edited by M. Vegetti, 365–91. Naples: Bibliopolis.Suche in Google Scholar

Frede, M. 1996. “Die Frage nach dem Seienden: Sophistes.” In Platon: Seine Dialoge in der Sicht neuer Forschungen, edited by T. Kobusch, and B. Mojsisch, 181–99. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Suche in Google Scholar

Friedländer, P. 1964–75. Platon [1928–30], 3 Vols. Berlin-New York: De Gruyter.Suche in Google Scholar

Fronterotta, F. 2001. METHEXIS. Pisa: Edizioni della Normale.Suche in Google Scholar

Fronterotta, F. 2007. (introd., Ital. transl. and notes). Platone. Sofista. Milan: Rizzoli.Suche in Google Scholar

Gerson, L. P. 2009. Ancient Epistemology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511801730Suche in Google Scholar

Gerson, L. P. 2020. Platonism and Naturalism. Ithaca (NY): Cornell University Press.10.7591/cornell/9781501747250.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Gill, M.-L. 2012. Philosophos. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199606184.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Günther, H.-C. 2000. “Briefe Martin Heideggers an Julius Stenzel (1928–1932).” Heidegger Studies 16: 11–33. https://doi.org/10.5840/heideggerstud2000161.Suche in Google Scholar

Heidegger, M. 1996–7. Nietzsche [1936–46] (Gesamtausgabe 6.1–2). Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.Suche in Google Scholar

Herrmann, F.-G. 2007. Words & Ideas. Swansea: The Classical Press of Wales.10.2307/j.ctvvn9wfSuche in Google Scholar

Horn, C. 1997. “Platons episteme-doxa Unterscheidung und die Ideentheorie.” In Platon. Politeia, edited by O. Höffe, 291–312. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.10.1524/9783050050263.291Suche in Google Scholar

Lernould, A. 2015. “Damascius, Olympiodore et Proclus sur les attributs «divin» (θεῖον) et «intelligible» (νοητόν) en Phédon 80a10–b1 dans l’argument dit «de la similitude.” In Ancient Readings of Plato’s Phaedo, edited by S. Delcomminette, P. d’Hoine and M.-A. Gavray, 212–39. Leiden-Boston: Brill.10.1163/9789004289543_011Suche in Google Scholar

Leszl, W. 2008. “On the Science of Being Qua Being and its Platonic Background.” In Aristote Métaphysique Gamma, edited by A. Stevens, and M. Hecquet-Devienne, 217–65. Louvain-la-Neuve-Paris-Dudley (MA): Peeters.Suche in Google Scholar

Mansfeld, J. 1992. Heresiography in Context. Leiden-New York-Köln: Brill.10.1163/9789004320765Suche in Google Scholar

Matthews, G. B. 1995. “Aristotle on Existence.” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 40: 233–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-5370.1995.tb00474.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Menn, S. 2021. “Aristotle on the Many Senses of Being.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 59: 187–263.10.1093/oso/9780198859000.003.0005Suche in Google Scholar

Moss, J. 2021. Plato’s Epistemology. New York: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

O’Meara, D. J. 1986. “Le problème de la métaphysique dans l’antiquité tardive.” Freiburger Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Théologie 33: 3–22.Suche in Google Scholar

Pellegrin, P. 1991. “Le Sophiste ou de la division. Platon-Aristote-Platon.” In Études sur le Sophiste de Platon, edited by P. Aubenque, 389–416. Naples: Bibliopolis.Suche in Google Scholar

Prior, W. J. 1985. Unity and Development in Plato’s Metaphysics. London-New York: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Saffrey, H.-D. 1990. “Origine, usage et signification du mot ἰδέα jusqu’à Platon.” In Idea, edited by M. Fattori, and M. L. Bianchi, 1–11. Florence: Olschki.Suche in Google Scholar

Seligman, P. 1974. Being and Not-Being. The Hague: Nijhoff.10.1007/978-94-010-2012-1Suche in Google Scholar

Shorey, P. 1903. The Unity of Plato’s Thought. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Shorey, P. 1925. “Note on Plato Philebus 64A.” Classical Philology 20: 347. https://doi.org/10.1086/360718.Suche in Google Scholar

Shorey, P. 1933. What Plato Said. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Shorey, P. 1935. (introd., ed., Eng. transl. and notes), Plato. Republic, 2 vols. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Steel, C. 2005. “Theology as First Philosophy: The Neoplatonic Concept of Metaphysics.” Quaestio 5: 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1484/j.quaestio.2.301820.Suche in Google Scholar

Stenzel, J. 1931. Studien zur Entwicklung der platonischen Dialektik von Sokrates zu Aristoteles [1917]. Leipzig-Berlin: Teubner.Suche in Google Scholar

Teisserenc, F. 2012. Le Sophiste de Platon. Paris: PUF.10.3917/puf.teiss.2012.01Suche in Google Scholar

Vegetti, M. 2003. Platone La Repubblica. V. Naples: Bibliopolis.Suche in Google Scholar

Van Camp, J., and P. Canart. (1956). Le sens du mot θεῖος chez Platon. Louvain: Publications Universitaires de Louvain.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2023-05-29
Accepted: 2023-07-07
Published Online: 2023-07-20
Published in Print: 2023-10-26

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 24.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/apeiron-2023-0045/pdf
Button zum nach oben scrollen