Abstract
We present comparative investigations on the formation of in-volume nanogratings in a porous glass with both conventionally and spatiotemporally focused femtosecond laser pulses. Our results show that despite the different spatiotemporal characteristics of the light fields produced at the foci with the two focusing schemes, nanogratings can be formed in both cases, whereas their structural features are different. We discuss the physical mechanism behind the experimental observations.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (grant no. 2014CB921300) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 61327902, 11134010, 61275205, and 11304330).
References
[1] R. R. Gattass and E. Mazur, Nat. Photon. 2, 219–225 (2008).10.1038/nphoton.2008.47Search in Google Scholar
[2] K. Sugioka and Y. Cheng, Light Sci. Appl. 3, e149 (2014).10.1038/lsa.2014.30Search in Google Scholar
[3] R. Osellame, H. J. Hoekstra, G. Cerullo and M. Pollnau, Laser Photon. Rev. 5, 442–463 (2011).10.1002/lpor.201000031Search in Google Scholar
[4] M. Beresna, M. Gecevičius, and P. G. Kazansky, Adv. Opt. Photon. 6, 293–339 (2014).10.1364/AOP.6.000293Search in Google Scholar
[5] M. Ams, G. D. Marshall, P. Dekker, J. A. Piper and M. J. Withford, Laser Photon. Rev. 3, 535–544 (2009).10.1002/lpor.200810050Search in Google Scholar
[6] F. Chen and J. R. Aldana, Laser Photon. Rev. 8, 251–275 (2014).10.1002/lpor.201300025Search in Google Scholar
[7] F. He, H. Xu, Y. Cheng, J. Ni, H. Xiong, et al., Opt. Lett. 35, 1106 (2010).10.1364/OL.35.001106Search in Google Scholar
[8] D. N. Vitek, E. Block, Y. Bellouard, D. E. Adams, S. Backus, et al., Opt. Express 18, 24673–24678 (2010).10.1364/OE.18.024673Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[9] Z. Wang, F. He, J. Ni, C. Jing, H. Xie, et al., Opt. Express 22, 26328–26337 (2014).10.1364/OE.22.026328Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[10] F. He, B. Zeng, W. Chu, J. Ni, K. Sugioka, et al., Opt. Express 22, 9734–9748 (2014).10.1364/OE.22.009734Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[11] P. G. Kazansky, H. Inouye, T. Mitsuyu, K. Miura, J. Qiu, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2199–2202 (1999).10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.2199Search in Google Scholar
[12] Y. Shimotsuma, P. G. Kazansky, J. Qiu and K. Hirao, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 247405 (2003).10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.247405Search in Google Scholar
[13] V. R. Bhardwaj, E. Simova, P. P. Rajeev, C. Hnatovsky, R. S. Taylor, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 057404 (2006).10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.057404Search in Google Scholar
[14] Y. Shimotsuma, M. Sakakura, P. G. Kazansky, M. Beresna, J. Qiu, et al., Adv. Mater. 22, 4039–4043 (2010).10.1002/adma.201000921Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[15] M. Beresna, M. Gecevicius, P. G. Kazansky and T. Gertus, Appl. Phys. Lett. 98, 201101 (2011).10.1063/1.3590716Search in Google Scholar
[16] Y. Liao, Y. Cheng, C. Liu, J. Song, F. He, et al., Lab Chip 13, 1626–1631 (2013).10.1039/c3lc41171kSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
[17] Y. Liao, J. Ni, L. Qiao, M. Huang, Y. Bellouard, et al., Optica 2, 329–334 (2015).10.1364/OPTICA.2.000329Search in Google Scholar
[18] Y. Liao, W. Pan, Y. Cui, L. Qiao, Y. Bellouard, et al., Opt. Lett. 40, 3623–3626 (2015).10.1364/OL.40.003623Search in Google Scholar
[19] T. H. Elmer, Porous and Reconstructed Glasses, Vol. 4 of Engineered Materials Handbook (ASM International, 1992), pp. 427–432.Search in Google Scholar
[20] Y. Liao, Y. Shen, L. Qiao, D. Chen, Y. Cheng, et al., Opt. Lett. 38, 187–189 (2013).10.1364/OL.38.000187Search in Google Scholar
[21] Y. Cheng, H. Xie, Z. Wang, G. Li, B. Zeng, et al., Phys. Rev. A 92, 023854 (2015).10.1103/PhysRevA.92.023854Search in Google Scholar
©2016 THOSS Media & De Gruyter
Articles in the same Issue
- Cover and Frontmatter
- Editorial
- Reviewer recognition and new plans for 2016
- Community
- News from the European Optical Society
- Conference Notes
- Conference Calendar
- Topical issue: Optics for material processing
- Editorial
- Optics for material processing
- Review Articles
- Near-field optics for nanoprocessing
- Interference laser processing
- Holographic femtosecond laser manipulation for advanced material processing
- Research Articles
- Theoretical and experimental analysis of scan angle-depending pulse front tilt in optical systems for laser scanners
- Transient beam oscillation with a highly dynamic scanner for laser beam fusion cutting
- Adaptive optical beam shaping for compensating projection-induced focus deformation
- Formation of in-volume nanogratings in glass induced by spatiotemporally focused femtosecond laser pulses
- Direct generation of superhydrophobic microstructures in metals by UV laser sources in the nanosecond regime
Articles in the same Issue
- Cover and Frontmatter
- Editorial
- Reviewer recognition and new plans for 2016
- Community
- News from the European Optical Society
- Conference Notes
- Conference Calendar
- Topical issue: Optics for material processing
- Editorial
- Optics for material processing
- Review Articles
- Near-field optics for nanoprocessing
- Interference laser processing
- Holographic femtosecond laser manipulation for advanced material processing
- Research Articles
- Theoretical and experimental analysis of scan angle-depending pulse front tilt in optical systems for laser scanners
- Transient beam oscillation with a highly dynamic scanner for laser beam fusion cutting
- Adaptive optical beam shaping for compensating projection-induced focus deformation
- Formation of in-volume nanogratings in glass induced by spatiotemporally focused femtosecond laser pulses
- Direct generation of superhydrophobic microstructures in metals by UV laser sources in the nanosecond regime