Abstract
The object of the paper is non-canonical, non-final verb position within the clause in genuine Hittite texts. It is demonstrated that, contrary to current standard descriptions, two such positions can be delimited in a Hittite clause: clause internal position and clause leftmost position. Both positions are defined structurally: clause internal position is to the left of the immediately preverbal position and to the right of a direct object. Clause leftmost position is in the left periphery. The difference correlates with two other syntactic features. First, it is the position the verb moves around: when the verb moves into the left periphery, it moves around subject and object; when the verb moves into clause internal position, it moves around the immediately preverbal position. The verb may move into the left periphery around the immediately preverbal position, but only if the subject and object are not fully stressed in the clause. The second difference is in the information structure status: whereas verb fronting into the left periphery is information structure motivated (as contrastive focus etc.), verb movement into clause internal position is not homogeneous: it may be evacuational or unconditioned.
Acknowledgement
I wish to express my sincere gratitude to B. Alexandrov, P. Arkadiev, A. Bauer, O. Belyaev, J. Hazenbos, J. Miller, A. Rizza, Y. Testelets, and T. Yanko who read earlier drafts of the paper.
Bibliography
Baayen, R.H. (1997): The pragmatics of the ‘tenses’ in Biblical Hebrew, Studies in Language 21/2, 245–285.10.1075/sl.21.2.02baaSearch in Google Scholar
Bauer, A. (2011): Verberststellung im Hethitischen. In: Th. Krisch et al. (ed.), Indogermanistik und Linguistik im Dialog – Akten der XIII. Fachtagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft vom 21. bis 27. September 2008 in Salzburg, Wiesbaden, 39–48.Search in Google Scholar
Beal, R.H. (1992): The Organisation of the Hittite Military (THeth 20), Heidelberg.Search in Google Scholar
Beckman, G. (1996): Hittite Diplomatic Texts (SBL Writings from the Ancient World 7), Atlanta.Search in Google Scholar
Büring, D. (2009): Towards a Typology of Focus Realization. In: M. Zimmermann / C. Féry (eds.), Information Structure, Oxford, 177–205.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199570959.003.0008Search in Google Scholar
CHD – H.G. Güterbock / H. Hoffner / T. van den Hout (eds.) (1989–): The Hittite Dictionary of the Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago, Chicago.Search in Google Scholar
Dardano, P. (1997): L’aneddoto e il racconto in età antico-hittita: la cosiddetta “Cronaca di Palazzo” (Biblioteca di Ricerche Linguistiche e Filologiche 43), Rome.Search in Google Scholar
del Monte, G.F. (2008): Le gesta di Suppiluliuma. Traslitterazione, traduzione e commento. L’opera storiografica di Mursili II re di Hattusa, vol. I, Pisa.Search in Google Scholar
de Roos, J. (2005): Die Hethiter und das Ausland, in: D. Prechel (ed.), Motivation und Mechanismen des Kulturkontaktes in der späten Bronzezeit (Eothen 13), Florence, 39–58.Search in Google Scholar
Erschler, D. (2012): From Preverbal Focus to Preverbal “Left Periphery”: The Ossetic Clause Architecture in Areal and Diachronic Perspective, Lingua 122, 673–699.10.1016/j.lingua.2012.01.009Search in Google Scholar
Erteschik-Shir, N. (2007): Information Structure: The Syntax–Discourse Interface, Oxford.Search in Google Scholar
Féry, C. (2007): Information Structural Notions and the Fallacy of Invariant Correlates. In: C. Féry et al. (eds.), The Notions of Information Structure. Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure, Working Papers of the SFB 632, Potsdam, 161–184.Search in Google Scholar
Féry, C. / M. Krifka (2008): Information Structure. Notional Distinctions, Ways of Expression. In: P. van Sterkenburg (ed.), Unity and Diversity of Languages, Amsterdam, 123–136.Search in Google Scholar
Garrett, A.J. (1990): The Syntax of Anatolian Pronominal Clitics, Ph.D. Diss., Harvard University.Search in Google Scholar
Garrett, A.J. (1994): Relative Clause Syntax in Lycian and Hittite, Die Sprache 36, 29–69.Search in Google Scholar
Givón, T. (1983): Topic Continuity in Discourse: The Functional Domain of Switch Reference. In: J. Haiman / P. Munro (eds.), Switch Reference and Universal Grammar, Typological Studies in Language 2, Amsterdam, 51–82.10.1075/tsl.2.06givSearch in Google Scholar
Goedegebuure, P. (2003): Reference, Deixis and Focus in Hittite. The Demonstratives ka- “this”, apa- “that” and asi “yon”. Academisch proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Universiteit van Amsterdam.Search in Google Scholar
Goedegebuure, P. (2009): Focus Structure and Q-Word Questions in Hittite. Linguistics 47/4, 945–969.10.1515/LING.2009.033Search in Google Scholar
Goetze, A. (1925): Ḫattušiliš. Der Bericht über seine Thronbesteigung nebst den Paralleltexten (MVAeG 29.3), Leipzig.Search in Google Scholar
Güterbock, H.G. (1956): The Deeds of Suppiluliuma as Told by his Son, Mursili II, JCS 10, 41–68, 75–98, 107–130.10.2307/1359585Search in Google Scholar
Hagenbuchner, A. (1989): Die Korrespondenz der Hethiter. 2. Die Briefe mit Transkription, Übersetzung und Kommentar (THeth 16), Heidelberg.Search in Google Scholar
HED – J. Puhvel (1984–): Hittite Etymological Dictionary, Trends in Linguistics, Documentation 1, Berlin – New York.Search in Google Scholar
Held, W.H. Jr. (1957): The Hittite Relative Sentence (Language 33, No. 4/2 Suppl.), Baltimore.10.2307/522235Search in Google Scholar
Hoffmann, I. (1984): Der Erlaß Telipinus (THeth 11), Heidelberg.Search in Google Scholar
Hoffner, H.A. Jr. (1977): Studies in Hittite Vocabulary, Syntax, and Style, JCS 29, 151–156.10.2307/1359677Search in Google Scholar
Hoffner, H.A. Jr. (2009): Letters from the Hittite Kingdom (SBL Writings from the Ancient World 15). Atlanta.Search in Google Scholar
Hoffner, H.A. Jr. / H.C. Melchert (2008): A Grammar of the Hittite Language, Part 1: Reference Grammar, Winona Lake, Indiana.10.5325/j.ctv240djsfSearch in Google Scholar
Hopper, P. (1979): Aspect and Foregrounding in Discourse. In: T. Givón (ed.), Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 12, Discourse and Syntax, New York, 213–241.Search in Google Scholar
Huggard, M. (2011): On Wh-(Non)-Movement and Internal Structures of the Hittite Preposed Relative Clause. In: S.W. Jamison / H.C. Melchert / B. Vine (eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd Annual UCLA Indo-European Conference, Bremen, 83–104.Search in Google Scholar
Hyman, L. / M. Polinsky (2009): Focus in Aghem. In: M. Zimmermann / C. Féry (eds.), Information Structure: Theoretical, Typological, and Experimental Perspectives, Oxford, 206–233.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199570959.003.0009Search in Google Scholar
Kim, A.H.-O. (1988): Preverbal Focusing and Type XXIII Languages. In: M. Hammond et al. (eds.), Studies in Syntactic Typology, Amsterdam, 147–169.10.1075/tsl.17.12kimSearch in Google Scholar
Kiss, K.É. (1998): Identificational Focus and Information Focus. Language 74, 245–273.10.1353/lan.1998.0211Search in Google Scholar
Krifka, M. (2007): Basic Notions of Information Structure. In: C. Féry et al. (eds.), The Notions of Information Structure. Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure, Working Papers of the SFB 632, Potsdam, 13–56.Search in Google Scholar
Kümmel, H.M. (1967): Ersatzrituale für den hethitischen König (StBoT 3), Wiesbaden.Search in Google Scholar
Lambrecht, K. (1994): Information Structure and Sentence Form, Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511620607Search in Google Scholar
Luraghi, S. (1990): Old Hittite Sentence Structure, London – New York.Search in Google Scholar
McCone, K.R. (1979): The Diachronic Possibilities of the Indo-European ‘Amplified’ Sentence: A Case History from Anatolian. In: B. Brogyanyi (ed.), Studies in Diachronic, Synchronic, and Typological Linguistics. Festschrift for Oswald Szemerényi on the Occasion of his 65th Birthday, Amsterdam, 467–487.10.1075/cilt.11.37mccSearch in Google Scholar
Meacham, M.D. (2000): A Synchronic and Diachronic Functional Analysis of Hittite -ma. Ph.D. Diss., University of California, Berkeley.Search in Google Scholar
Melchert, H.C. (2009): Discourse Conditioned Use of Hittite -ma. In: E. Rieken / P. Widmer (eds.), Pragmatische Kategorien. Form, Funktion und Diachronie, Akten der Arbeitstagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft vom 24. bis 26. September 2007 in Marburg, Wiesbaden, 187–195.Search in Google Scholar
Miller, J. (2007): Muršili II’s Dictate to Tuppi-Teššub’s Syrian Antagonists, Kaskal 4, 121–152.Search in Google Scholar
Miller, J. (2010): Some Disputed Passages in the Tawagalawa Letter. In: I. Singer (ed.), Ipamati kistamati pari tumatimis. Luwian and Hittite Studies Presented to J. David Hawkins on the Occasion of his 70th Birthday, Tel Aviv (Monograph Series 28), 159–169.Search in Google Scholar
Neu, E. (1980): Althethitische Ritualtexte in Umschrift (StBoT 25), Wiesbaden.Search in Google Scholar
Parker, V. (1990): Reflexions on the Career of Hattušili III until the Time of his Coup d’État, AoF 26, 269–290.10.1524/aofo.1999.26.2.269Search in Google Scholar
Pecchioli Daddi, F. (2003): Il vincolo per i governatori di provincia (StMed 14; Series Hethitica 3), Pavia.Search in Google Scholar
Rieken, E. (2000): Die Partikeln -a, -ja, -ma im Althethitischen und das Akkadogramm Ù. In: M. Ofitsch / Ch. Zinko (eds.), 125 Jahre Indogermanistik in Graz, Graz, 411–419.Search in Google Scholar
Rieken, E. (2011): Verbanfangsstellung in den hethitischen Übersetzungstexten. In: Th. Krisch et al. (eds.), Indogermanistik und Linguistik im Dialog – Akten der XIII. Fachtagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft vom 21. bis 27. September 2008 in Salzburg, Wiesbaden, 498–507.Search in Google Scholar
Rieken, E. (forthcoming): Übersetzungsstrategien im Hethitischen: Die Relativsatz Konstruktion. In: J. L. García Ramón et al. (eds.), Akten des Workshops “Strategies of Translation: Language Contact and Poetic Language”, 17.–18. Dezember 2010 in Köln, in press.Search in Google Scholar
Rizza, A. (2007): I pronomi enclitici nei testi etei di traduzione dal hattico (StMed 20), Pavia.Search in Google Scholar
Rizza, A. (2011): The Ritual for the Royal Couple CTH 416. Syntax of Non Verbal Predicates and Numerals. In: Anatolistica, indoeuropeistica e oltre nelle memorie dei seminari offerti da Onofrio Carruba (anni 1997–2002) al Medesimo presentate (Antiqui Aevi Grammaticae Artis Studiorum Consensus, Series maior I), Milan, 13–37.Search in Google Scholar
Salisbury, D. (2005): Local Adverbs in Neo-Hittite. Ph.D. Diss., University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.Search in Google Scholar
Samek-Lodovici, V. (2006): When Right Dislocation Meets the Left-Periphery, Lingua 116, 836–873.10.1016/j.lingua.2005.04.001Search in Google Scholar
Sideltsev, A. (2002): Inverted Word Order in Middle Hittite. In: V.V. Shevoroshkin / P.J. Sidwell (eds.), Anatolian Languages (Association for the History of Language Studies in the Science & History of Language 6), Canberra, 137–188.Search in Google Scholar
Sideltsev, A. (2010): The Syntax of Middle Hittite Lists. In: Acts of the VIIth International Congress of Hittitology Çorum, August 25–31, Vol. II, Ankara, 709–723.Search in Google Scholar
Sideltsev, A. (2014): The Origin of Right Dislocations, in: Proceedings of the 8th International Congress of Hittitology, Warsaw.Search in Google Scholar
Sideltsev, A. (forthcoming): Inverted Word Order, NP Dislocations and Clitic Doubling in Hittite. MS.Search in Google Scholar
Singer, I. (1984): The Hittite KI.LAM Festival (StBoT 28), Wiesbaden.Search in Google Scholar
Singer, I. (2002): Hittite Prayers (SBL Writings from the Ancient World 11), Atlanta.Search in Google Scholar
Sürenhagen, D. (1981): Zwei Gebete Ḫattušilis und der Puduḫepa, AoF 8, 83–168.10.1524/aofo.1981.8.jg.83Search in Google Scholar
Testelets, Y.G. (2001): Введение в общий синтаксис, М.: РГГУ (Introduction to General Syntax, Moscow: RGGU).Search in Google Scholar
Ünal, A. (1974): Ḫattušili III. Teil 1. Ḫattušili bis zu seiner Thronbesteigung. Bd. 2: Quellen und Indexes (THeth 3–4), Heidelberg.Search in Google Scholar
Vai, M. (2011): Osservazioni sulla periferia sinistra della frase in ittita. In: Anatolistica, indoeuropeistica e oltre nelle memorie dei seminari offerti da Onofrio Carruba (anni 1997–2002) al Medesimo presentate (Antiqui Aevi Grammaticae Artis Studiorum Consensus, Series maior I), Milan, 39–56.Search in Google Scholar
van den Hout, Th.P.J. (1995): Der Ulmitešub-Vertrag (StBoT 38), Wiesbaden.Search in Google Scholar
von Schuler, E. (1957): Hethitische Dienstanweisungen für höhere Hof- und Staatsbeamte. Ein Beitrag zum antiken Recht Kleinasiens (AoF Beiheft 10), Graz.Search in Google Scholar
Wegener, C. (2008): A Grammar of Savosavo, a Papuan language of the Solomon Islands. Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen.Search in Google Scholar
Widmer, P. (2009): Hethitisch nu als Mittel der informationsstrukturellen und syntaktischen Verknüpfung. In: E. Rieken / P. Widmer (eds.), Pragmatische Kategorien. Form, Funktion und Diachronie. Akten der Arbeitstagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft vom 24. bis 26. September 2007 in Marburg, Wiesbaden, 323–335.Search in Google Scholar
Yanko, T.E. (2008): Интонационные стратегии русской речи в сопоставительном аспекте, М.: Языки славянских культур (Intonation Strategies of Russian Speech in the Comparative Aspect. Moscow: Languages of Slavonic Cultures).Search in Google Scholar
Note
The paper was supported by grant from RNF No 14-18-03270 “Typology of Word Order, Syntax-Semantics Interface and Information Structure in the Languages of the World”. Naturally, the author alone remains responsible for all possible errors. Abbreviations follow those of the Chicago Hittite Dictionary.
© 2014 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/München/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Frontmatter
- Vorbemerkungen der Herausgeber
- Artikel
- An Ur III Tablet Concerning Garden Plots and its ‘Sketch’: MVN 22, 31
- Eine Fāra-zeitliche Urkunde aus dem Völkerkundemuseum in Werl
- Three Nuzi Texts from the British Museum and a Middle Assyrian Letter from the Aftermath of the Conquest of the Kingdom of Arrapḫe
- Anmerkungen zu mittelassyrischen Texten.9
- Globalisierung im 3. Jahrtausend v. und n. Chr. – Interpretationen archäologisch sichtbarer Kontakte von der Ägäis bis zum Indus von der nordwestlichen Peripherie aus betrachtet
- A New Late Hittite Stone Workshop and Artifacts at Kuşçu-Boyacı
- Clause Internal and Clause Leftmost Verbs in Hittite
- Überlegungen zu den symbolischen Rollen der Steine in Mesopotamien
- Tabal und die Tibarener
- Neue Überlegungen zur Datierung der westlichen Befestigungsanlagen Aššurs
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Frontmatter
- Vorbemerkungen der Herausgeber
- Artikel
- An Ur III Tablet Concerning Garden Plots and its ‘Sketch’: MVN 22, 31
- Eine Fāra-zeitliche Urkunde aus dem Völkerkundemuseum in Werl
- Three Nuzi Texts from the British Museum and a Middle Assyrian Letter from the Aftermath of the Conquest of the Kingdom of Arrapḫe
- Anmerkungen zu mittelassyrischen Texten.9
- Globalisierung im 3. Jahrtausend v. und n. Chr. – Interpretationen archäologisch sichtbarer Kontakte von der Ägäis bis zum Indus von der nordwestlichen Peripherie aus betrachtet
- A New Late Hittite Stone Workshop and Artifacts at Kuşçu-Boyacı
- Clause Internal and Clause Leftmost Verbs in Hittite
- Überlegungen zu den symbolischen Rollen der Steine in Mesopotamien
- Tabal und die Tibarener
- Neue Überlegungen zur Datierung der westlichen Befestigungsanlagen Aššurs