Abstract
The ‘ecological imperative’ (Hans Jonas) manifests in different ways according to the linguistic, generic, medial, and semiotic conditions in which it is communicated. This is also true of creative forms of cultural practice such as literature and the aesthetic. The ecological imperative in literature is conveyed not primarily through its discursive content but through the narrative, formal, and aesthetic procedures themselves that literary texts employ, that is, through the translation of the autopoietic complexities of the aesthetic into the co-creative responsiveness of its recipients. The paper starts with some comments on the underestimated relationship between literature and survival; looks at some of the ways in which the intrinsic eco-ethical dimension of literature has been described in ecocriticism, distinguishing three major directions of material, political, and cultural ecology in the field; and addresses the ecological imperative in transdisciplinary contexts that are significant for environmental studies in general, sustainability and the Anthropocene. The paper ends with a list of features of literature as a medium of the ecological imperative from a cultural-ecological perspective.
Works Cited
Adamson, Joni. 2001. American Indian Literature, Environmental Justice, and Ecocriticism: The Middle Place. Tucson, AZ: Arizona University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Atwood, Margaret. 2004. Survival: A Thematic Guide to Canadian Literature. Toronto: McClelland and Stewart.Suche in Google Scholar
Atwood, Margaret. 2003, 2009, 2013. MaddAddam Trilogy. Toronto: McClelland and Stewart.Suche in Google Scholar
Bartosch, Roman. 2019. Literature, Pedagogy, and Climate Change: Text Models for a Transcultural Ecology. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-3-030-33300-3Suche in Google Scholar
Bartosch, Roman. 2022. Cultivating Sustainability in Language and Literature Pedagogy: Steps to an Educational Ecology. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780429328985Suche in Google Scholar
Bateson, Gregory. 1973. Steps Towards an Ecology of Mind. London: Paladin.Suche in Google Scholar
Beck, Ulrich. 1999. World Risk Society. Cambridge: Polity.Suche in Google Scholar
Boyden, Michael (ed.). 2021. Climate and American Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Canavan, Gerry and Kim Stanley Robinson (eds.). 2014. Green Planets: Ecology and Science Fiction. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Clark, Timothy. 2015. Ecocriticism on the Edge: The Anthropocene as a Threshold Concept. New York: Bloomsbury.Suche in Google Scholar
Cohen, Jeffrey Jerome and Lawrence Duckert (eds.). 2015. Elemental Ecocriticism: Thinking with Earth, Air, Water, and Fire. Minneapolis, MN: Minnesota University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Damasio, Antonio. 2010. The Feeling of What Happens: Body and Emotion in the Making of Consciousness. New York: Mariner.Suche in Google Scholar
Dickinson, Adam. 2013. The Polymers. Toronto: House of Anansi.Suche in Google Scholar
Dieleman, Hans. 2008. “Sustainability, Art and Reflexivity: Why Artists and Designers May Become Key Change Agents in Sustainability”. In: Sacha Kagan and Volker Kirchberg (eds.). Sustainability as a New Frontier for the Arts and Cultures. Frankfurt: VAS. n.p.Suche in Google Scholar
Dungy, Camille D. 2009. Black Nature: Four Centuries of African American Nature Poetry. St. Athens, GA: Georgia University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Easterlin, Nancy. 2012. A Biocultural Approach to Literary Theory and Interpretation. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.10.1353/book.13863Suche in Google Scholar
Easterlin, Nancy. 2013. “The Functions of Literature and the Evolution of Extended Mind”. New Literary History 44.4: 661–682.10.1353/nlh.2013.0032Suche in Google Scholar
Ellis, R. J. 1990. “Frank Herbert’s Dune and the Discourse of Apocalyptic Ecologism in the United States”. In: Rhys Garnett and R. J. Ellis (eds.). Science Fiction Roots and Branches: Contemporary Critical Approaches. New York: St. Martin’s. 104–124.10.1007/978-1-349-20815-9_8Suche in Google Scholar
Emmett, Robert and Thomas Lekan (eds.). 2016. Whose Anthropocene? Revisiting Dipesh Chakrabarty’s “Four Theses”. Munich: RCC Perspectives: Transformations in Environment and Society.Suche in Google Scholar
Iovino, Serenella and Serpil Oppermann (eds.). 2014. Material Ecocriticism. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. 10.2307/j.ctt16gzq85Suche in Google Scholar
James, Erin and Morel, Eric (eds.). 2020. Environment and Narrative: New Directions in Econarratology. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.10.26818/9780814214206Suche in Google Scholar
Johns-Putra, Adeline, John Parham and Louise Squire (eds). 2017. Literature and Sustainability: Concept, Text and Culture. Manchester: Manchester University Press.10.7765/9781526107633Suche in Google Scholar
Jonas, Hans. 1979. Das Prinzip Verantwortung. Versuch einer Ethik für die technologische Zivilisation. Frankfurt: Insel.Suche in Google Scholar
Jonas, Hans. 1984. The Imperative of Responsibility: In Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Kagan, Sacha. 2011. Art and Sustainability. Connecting Patterns for a Culture of Complexity. Bielefeld: transcript.10.1515/transcript.9783839418031Suche in Google Scholar
Keller, Lynn. 2018. Recomposing Ecopoetics: North American Poetry of the Self-Conscious Anthropocene. Charlottesville, VA: Virginia University Press.10.2307/j.ctv6sj6qgSuche in Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199256044.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 2018. Down to Earth: Politics in the New Climatic Regime. London: Polity.Suche in Google Scholar
Lehner, Alexander. 2017. “Videogames as Cultural Ecology: Flower and Shadow of the Colossus”. Ecozon@: European Journal of Literature, Culture and Environment, 8.2: 56–71.10.37536/ECOZONA.2017.8.2.1349Suche in Google Scholar
LeMenager, Stephanie and Stephanie Foote. 2012. “The Sustainable Humanities”. PMLA 127.3: 572–578.10.1632/pmla.2012.127.3.572Suche in Google Scholar
Lorde, Audre. 1978. “A Litany for Survival”. The Collected Poems of Audre Lorde. New York: Norton.Suche in Google Scholar
Lovelock, James E. and Lynn Margulis. 1974. “Atmospheric Homeostasis by and for the Biosphere: The Gaia Hypothesis”. Tellus 26.1–2: 2–10.10.1111/j.2153-3490.1974.tb01946.xSuche in Google Scholar
Martin, Randall. 2015. Shakespeare and Ecology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199567027.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Mauch, Christof. 2019. “Slow Hope: Rethinking Ecologies of Crisis and Fear”. RCC Perspectives: Transformations in Environment and Society 1: 1–43.Suche in Google Scholar
Mbue, Imbolo. 2021. How Beautiful We Were. New York: Random House.Suche in Google Scholar
Meeker, Joseph. 1997 (1973]. The Comedy of Survival: Literary Ecology and a Play Ethic. Phoenix, AZ: Arizona University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Meireis, Torsten and Gabriele Rippl (eds). 2019. Cultural Sustainability: Perspectives from the Humanities and Social Sciences. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781351124300Suche in Google Scholar
Melville, Herman. 1956 (1851). Moby-Dick, or, The Whale. Boston, MA: Riverside.10.5962/bhl.title.62077Suche in Google Scholar
Meretoia, Hanna. 2017. The Ethics of Storytelling: Narrative Hermeneutics, History, and the Possible. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780190649364.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Middeke, Martin and Martin Riedelsheimer. 2022. “Co-Mutability, Nodes, and the Mesh: Critical Theatre Ecologies – An Introduction”. Journal of Contemporary Drama in English 10.1: 2–25.10.1515/jcde-2022-0002Suche in Google Scholar
Morrison, Toni. 1987. Beloved. New York: Knopf.Suche in Google Scholar
Morton, Timothy. 2021. All Art is Ecological. London: Penguin Classics.Suche in Google Scholar
Müller, Timo and Moritz Ingwersen (eds.). 2022. Elemental Approaches to Literary and Cultural Studies [Special Issue]. ZAA.Suche in Google Scholar
Murphy, Patrick D. 2001. “The Non-Alibi of Alien Scapes: SF and Ecocriticism”. In: Karla Armbruster and K. R. Wallace (eds.). Beyond Nature Writing: Expanding the Boundaries of Ecocriticism. Charlottesville, VA: Virginia University Press. 263–278.Suche in Google Scholar
Nixon, Rob. 2011. Slow Violence and the Environmentalism of the Poor. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674061194Suche in Google Scholar
Nutt, Amy Ellis. 2016. “The Best Reason for Reading? Book Lovers Live Longer, Scientists Say.” Washington Post, 09 August 2016. https://communications.yale.edu/sites/default/files/08.09.2016_the_best_reason_for_reading_book_lovers_live_longer_scientists_say._the_washington_post.pdfSuche in Google Scholar
Oppermann, Serpil and Serenella Iovino (eds.). 2017. Environmental Humanities: Voices from the Anthropocene. London: Rowman & Littlefield.Suche in Google Scholar
Ortiz, Simon J. 1992. Woven Stone. Tucson, AZ: Arizona University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Otto, E. C. 2012. Green Speculations: Science Fiction and Transformative Environmentalism. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Pak, Chris. 2016. Terraforming: Ecopolitical Transformations and Environmentalism in Science Fiction. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.10.5949/liverpool/9781781382844.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Parham, John. 2017. “Sustenance from the Past: Precedents to Sustainability in Nineteenth-Century Literature and Culture”. In: Adeline Johns-Putra, John Parham and Louise Squire (eds.). Literature and Sustainability: Concept, Text and Culture. Manchester: Manchester University Press. 33–51.10.2307/j.ctt1wn0s7q.9Suche in Google Scholar
Perez, Craig Santos. 2020. Habitat Threshold. Oakland, CA: Omnidawn.Suche in Google Scholar
Perez, Craig Santos. 2022. Navigating Chamoru Poetry: Indigeneity, Aesthetics, and Decolonization. Tucson, AZ: Arizona University Press.10.2307/j.ctv22pzxtzSuche in Google Scholar
Pyrhönen, Heta. 2020. “Literature as a Lifeline: The Value of Literature for a Cognitively Non-Typical Reader”. The Value of Literature: REAL 36: 361–370.Suche in Google Scholar
Reilly, Eveline. 2018. Echolocation. New York: Roof Books.Suche in Google Scholar
Robinson, Kim Stanley. 2020. The Ministry for the Future. London: Orbit.Suche in Google Scholar
Ruffin, Kimberley. 2010. Black on Earth: African American Ecoliterary Traditions. Athens, GA: Georgia University Press.10.1353/book11452Suche in Google Scholar
Rupp, Jan. 2020. “Telling Stories, Saving Lives: The Value of 21st-Century Refugee Writing”. REAL 36.1: 219–237.Suche in Google Scholar
Schneider-Mayerson, Matthew, A. W. v. Mossner and W. P. Małecki. 2020. “Empirical Ecocriticism” [Special Section]. Isle: Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment 27.2: 327–405.10.1093/isle/isaa022Suche in Google Scholar
Skinner, Jonathan. 2017. “Ecopoetics”. In: R. G. Smith (ed.). American Literature in Transition, 2000–2010. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 322–342.10.1017/9781316569290.022Suche in Google Scholar
Sullivan, Heather. 2017. “Goethe’s Concept of Nature: Proto-Ecological Model”. In: Gabriele Dürbeck, Urte Stobbe, Hubert Zapf and Evi Zemanek (eds.). Ecological Thought in German Literature and Culture. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books. 17–30.Suche in Google Scholar
Trexler, Adam. 2015. Anthropocene Fictions: The Novel in a Time of Climate Change. Charlottesville, VA: Virginia University Press.10.2307/j.ctt13x1r99Suche in Google Scholar
Tuckey, Melissa. 2018. Ghost Fishing: An Eco-Justice Poetry Anthology. Athens, GA: Georgia University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Vizenor, Gerald. 1999. Manifest Manners: Narratives on Postindian Survivance. Lincoln, NE: Nebraska University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Wellner, Galit F. 2019. “Social Happiness as a Cultural Value: An Analysis of Shared Values for Ecosystem Assessment”. In: Torsten Meireis and Gabriele Rippl (eds.). Cultural Sustainability: Perspectives from the Humanities and Social Sciences. London: Routledge. 87–97.Suche in Google Scholar
Zapf, Hubert (ed.) 2016a. Handbook of Ecocriticism and Cultural Ecology. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110314595Suche in Google Scholar
Zapf, Hubert. 2016 b. Literature as Cultural Ecology: Sustainable Texts. London: Bloomsbury.10.5040/9781474274685Suche in Google Scholar
Zapf, Hubert. 2019. “The Challenge of the Anthropocene and the Sustainability of Texts.” In: Gina Comos and Caroline Rosenthal (eds.). Anglophone Literature and Culture in the Anthropocene. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars. 2–22.Suche in Google Scholar
Zapf, Hubert. 2022. “Posthumanism or Ecohumanism? Environmental Studies in the Anthropocene”. Journal of Ecohumanism 1.1: 4–17.10.33182/joe.v1i1.1743Suche in Google Scholar
Zapf, Hubert and Timo Müller. 2022. “Ecology in American Literature”. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Environmental Science, 20 June 2022. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199389414.013.808.10.1093/acrefore/9780199389414.013.808Suche in Google Scholar
© 2023 by Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- Thomas D’Urfey’s Adaptation of Cervantes’s Quixote: The Comical History of Don Quixote
- The Maypole of Merry Vagabonds: Hawthorne’s “The Seven Vagabonds” and the Birth of Conservative Utopia
- Displaced Geographies and Uncomfortable Truths: Unveiling Anglo-Irish Silenced Past in Bram Stoker’s “The Judge’s House” (1891)
- The Cosmopolitan Stranger in Muriel Spark’s The Finishing School
- “Words, Words, Words”: Mourid Barghouti’s Appropriation of Shakespeare’s Hamlet in I Saw Ramallah
- Forms and Functions of Description in the (New) Weird
- “In the Dark, All the Shadows Disappear”: Remodelling the Poetics of Gripping Horror in Stephen King’s The Institute
- The “Ecological Imperative” in Literary Studies
- Reviews
- 10.1515/ang-2023-0030
- Atherton, Mark, Kazutomo Karasawa and Francis Leneghan (eds.). 2023. Ideas of the World in Early Medieval English Literature. Studies in Old English Literature 1. Turnhout: Brepols, 2023, 441 pp., 20 figures, € 115.00.
- Jean Lee Cole. 2020. How the Other Half Laughs: The Comic Sensibility in American Culture, 1895–1920. Jackson, MS: Mississippi University Press, 214 pp., 63 illustr., $ 112.00.
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- Thomas D’Urfey’s Adaptation of Cervantes’s Quixote: The Comical History of Don Quixote
- The Maypole of Merry Vagabonds: Hawthorne’s “The Seven Vagabonds” and the Birth of Conservative Utopia
- Displaced Geographies and Uncomfortable Truths: Unveiling Anglo-Irish Silenced Past in Bram Stoker’s “The Judge’s House” (1891)
- The Cosmopolitan Stranger in Muriel Spark’s The Finishing School
- “Words, Words, Words”: Mourid Barghouti’s Appropriation of Shakespeare’s Hamlet in I Saw Ramallah
- Forms and Functions of Description in the (New) Weird
- “In the Dark, All the Shadows Disappear”: Remodelling the Poetics of Gripping Horror in Stephen King’s The Institute
- The “Ecological Imperative” in Literary Studies
- Reviews
- 10.1515/ang-2023-0030
- Atherton, Mark, Kazutomo Karasawa and Francis Leneghan (eds.). 2023. Ideas of the World in Early Medieval English Literature. Studies in Old English Literature 1. Turnhout: Brepols, 2023, 441 pp., 20 figures, € 115.00.
- Jean Lee Cole. 2020. How the Other Half Laughs: The Comic Sensibility in American Culture, 1895–1920. Jackson, MS: Mississippi University Press, 214 pp., 63 illustr., $ 112.00.