Startseite The “Ecological Imperative” in Literary Studies
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

The “Ecological Imperative” in Literary Studies

  • Hubert Zapf EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 20. September 2023
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill
Anglia
Aus der Zeitschrift Anglia Band 141 Heft 3

Abstract

The ‘ecological imperative’ (Hans Jonas) manifests in different ways according to the linguistic, generic, medial, and semiotic conditions in which it is communicated. This is also true of creative forms of cultural practice such as literature and the aesthetic. The ecological imperative in literature is conveyed not primarily through its discursive content but through the narrative, formal, and aesthetic procedures themselves that literary texts employ, that is, through the translation of the autopoietic complexities of the aesthetic into the co-creative responsiveness of its recipients. The paper starts with some comments on the underestimated relationship between literature and survival; looks at some of the ways in which the intrinsic eco-ethical dimension of literature has been described in ecocriticism, distinguishing three major directions of material, political, and cultural ecology in the field; and addresses the ecological imperative in transdisciplinary contexts that are significant for environmental studies in general, sustainability and the Anthropocene. The paper ends with a list of features of literature as a medium of the ecological imperative from a cultural-ecological perspective.

Works Cited

Adamson, Joni. 2001. American Indian Literature, Environmental Justice, and Ecocriticism: The Middle Place. Tucson, AZ: Arizona University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Atwood, Margaret. 2004. Survival: A Thematic Guide to Canadian Literature. Toronto: McClelland and Stewart.Suche in Google Scholar

Atwood, Margaret. 2003, 2009, 2013. MaddAddam Trilogy. Toronto: McClelland and Stewart.Suche in Google Scholar

Bartosch, Roman. 2019. Literature, Pedagogy, and Climate Change: Text Models for a Transcultural Ecology. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-3-030-33300-3Suche in Google Scholar

Bartosch, Roman. 2022. Cultivating Sustainability in Language and Literature Pedagogy: Steps to an Educational Ecology. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780429328985Suche in Google Scholar

Bateson, Gregory. 1973. Steps Towards an Ecology of Mind. London: Paladin.Suche in Google Scholar

Beck, Ulrich. 1999. World Risk Society. Cambridge: Polity.Suche in Google Scholar

Boyden, Michael (ed.). 2021. Climate and American Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Canavan, Gerry and Kim Stanley Robinson (eds.). 2014. Green Planets: Ecology and Science Fiction. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Clark, Timothy. 2015. Ecocriticism on the Edge: The Anthropocene as a Threshold Concept. New York: Bloomsbury.Suche in Google Scholar

Cohen, Jeffrey Jerome and Lawrence Duckert (eds.). 2015. Elemental Ecocriticism: Thinking with Earth, Air, Water, and Fire. Minneapolis, MN: Minnesota University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Damasio, Antonio. 2010. The Feeling of What Happens: Body and Emotion in the Making of Consciousness. New York: Mariner.Suche in Google Scholar

Dickinson, Adam. 2013. The Polymers. Toronto: House of Anansi.Suche in Google Scholar

Dieleman, Hans. 2008. “Sustainability, Art and Reflexivity: Why Artists and Designers May Become Key Change Agents in Sustainability”. In: Sacha Kagan and Volker Kirchberg (eds.). Sustainability as a New Frontier for the Arts and Cultures. Frankfurt: VAS. n.p.Suche in Google Scholar

Dungy, Camille D. 2009. Black Nature: Four Centuries of African American Nature Poetry. St. Athens, GA: Georgia University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Easterlin, Nancy. 2012. A Biocultural Approach to Literary Theory and Interpretation. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.10.1353/book.13863Suche in Google Scholar

Easterlin, Nancy. 2013. “The Functions of Literature and the Evolution of Extended Mind”. New Literary History 44.4: 661–682.10.1353/nlh.2013.0032Suche in Google Scholar

Ellis, R. J. 1990. “Frank Herbert’s Dune and the Discourse of Apocalyptic Ecologism in the United States”. In: Rhys Garnett and R. J. Ellis (eds.). Science Fiction Roots and Branches: Contemporary Critical Approaches. New York: St. Martin’s. 104–124.10.1007/978-1-349-20815-9_8Suche in Google Scholar

Emmett, Robert and Thomas Lekan (eds.). 2016. Whose Anthropocene? Revisiting Dipesh Chakrabarty’s “Four Theses”. Munich: RCC Perspectives: Transformations in Environment and Society.Suche in Google Scholar

Iovino, Serenella and Serpil Oppermann (eds.). 2014. Material Ecocriticism. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. 10.2307/j.ctt16gzq85Suche in Google Scholar

James, Erin and Morel, Eric (eds.). 2020. Environment and Narrative: New Directions in Econarratology. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.10.26818/9780814214206Suche in Google Scholar

Johns-Putra, Adeline, John Parham and Louise Squire (eds). 2017. Literature and Sustainability: Concept, Text and Culture. Manchester: Manchester University Press.10.7765/9781526107633Suche in Google Scholar

Jonas, Hans. 1979. Das Prinzip Verantwortung. Versuch einer Ethik für die technologische Zivilisation. Frankfurt: Insel.Suche in Google Scholar

Jonas, Hans. 1984. The Imperative of Responsibility: In Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Kagan, Sacha. 2011. Art and Sustainability. Connecting Patterns for a Culture of Complexity. Bielefeld: transcript.10.1515/transcript.9783839418031Suche in Google Scholar

Keller, Lynn. 2018. Recomposing Ecopoetics: North American Poetry of the Self-Conscious Anthropocene. Charlottesville, VA: Virginia University Press.10.2307/j.ctv6sj6qgSuche in Google Scholar

Latour, Bruno. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199256044.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Latour, Bruno. 2018. Down to Earth: Politics in the New Climatic Regime. London: Polity.Suche in Google Scholar

Lehner, Alexander. 2017. “Videogames as Cultural Ecology: Flower and Shadow of the Colossus”. Ecozon@: European Journal of Literature, Culture and Environment, 8.2: 56–71.10.37536/ECOZONA.2017.8.2.1349Suche in Google Scholar

LeMenager, Stephanie and Stephanie Foote. 2012. “The Sustainable Humanities”. PMLA 127.3: 572–578.10.1632/pmla.2012.127.3.572Suche in Google Scholar

Lorde, Audre. 1978. “A Litany for Survival”. The Collected Poems of Audre Lorde. New York: Norton.Suche in Google Scholar

Lovelock, James E. and Lynn Margulis. 1974. “Atmospheric Homeostasis by and for the Biosphere: The Gaia Hypothesis”. Tellus 26.1–2: 2–10.10.1111/j.2153-3490.1974.tb01946.xSuche in Google Scholar

Martin, Randall. 2015. Shakespeare and Ecology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199567027.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Mauch, Christof. 2019. “Slow Hope: Rethinking Ecologies of Crisis and Fear”. RCC Perspectives: Transformations in Environment and Society 1: 1–43.Suche in Google Scholar

Mbue, Imbolo. 2021. How Beautiful We Were. New York: Random House.Suche in Google Scholar

Meeker, Joseph. 1997 (1973]. The Comedy of Survival: Literary Ecology and a Play Ethic. Phoenix, AZ: Arizona University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Meireis, Torsten and Gabriele Rippl (eds). 2019. Cultural Sustainability: Perspectives from the Humanities and Social Sciences. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781351124300Suche in Google Scholar

Melville, Herman. 1956 (1851). Moby-Dick, or, The Whale. Boston, MA: Riverside.10.5962/bhl.title.62077Suche in Google Scholar

Meretoia, Hanna. 2017. The Ethics of Storytelling: Narrative Hermeneutics, History, and the Possible. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780190649364.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Middeke, Martin and Martin Riedelsheimer. 2022. “Co-Mutability, Nodes, and the Mesh: Critical Theatre Ecologies – An Introduction”. Journal of Contemporary Drama in English 10.1: 2–25.10.1515/jcde-2022-0002Suche in Google Scholar

Morrison, Toni. 1987. Beloved. New York: Knopf.Suche in Google Scholar

Morton, Timothy. 2021. All Art is Ecological. London: Penguin Classics.Suche in Google Scholar

Müller, Timo and Moritz Ingwersen (eds.). 2022. Elemental Approaches to Literary and Cultural Studies [Special Issue]. ZAA.Suche in Google Scholar

Murphy, Patrick D. 2001. “The Non-Alibi of Alien Scapes: SF and Ecocriticism”. In: Karla Armbruster and K. R. Wallace (eds.). Beyond Nature Writing: Expanding the Boundaries of Ecocriticism. Charlottesville, VA: Virginia University Press. 263–278.Suche in Google Scholar

Nixon, Rob. 2011. Slow Violence and the Environmentalism of the Poor. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674061194Suche in Google Scholar

Nutt, Amy Ellis. 2016. “The Best Reason for Reading? Book Lovers Live Longer, Scientists Say.” Washington Post, 09 August 2016. https://communications.yale.edu/sites/default/files/08.09.2016_the_best_reason_for_reading_book_lovers_live_longer_scientists_say._the_washington_post.pdfSuche in Google Scholar

Oppermann, Serpil and Serenella Iovino (eds.). 2017. Environmental Humanities: Voices from the Anthropocene. London: Rowman & Littlefield.Suche in Google Scholar

Ortiz, Simon J. 1992. Woven Stone. Tucson, AZ: Arizona University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Otto, E. C. 2012. Green Speculations: Science Fiction and Transformative Environmentalism. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Pak, Chris. 2016. Terraforming: Ecopolitical Transformations and Environmentalism in Science Fiction. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.10.5949/liverpool/9781781382844.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Parham, John. 2017. “Sustenance from the Past: Precedents to Sustainability in Nineteenth-Century Literature and Culture”. In: Adeline Johns-Putra, John Parham and Louise Squire (eds.). Literature and Sustainability: Concept, Text and Culture. Manchester: Manchester University Press. 33–51.10.2307/j.ctt1wn0s7q.9Suche in Google Scholar

Perez, Craig Santos. 2020. Habitat Threshold. Oakland, CA: Omnidawn.Suche in Google Scholar

Perez, Craig Santos. 2022. Navigating Chamoru Poetry: Indigeneity, Aesthetics, and Decolonization. Tucson, AZ: Arizona University Press.10.2307/j.ctv22pzxtzSuche in Google Scholar

Pyrhönen, Heta. 2020. “Literature as a Lifeline: The Value of Literature for a Cognitively Non-Typical Reader”. The Value of Literature: REAL 36: 361–370.Suche in Google Scholar

Reilly, Eveline. 2018. Echolocation. New York: Roof Books.Suche in Google Scholar

Robinson, Kim Stanley. 2020. The Ministry for the Future. London: Orbit.Suche in Google Scholar

Ruffin, Kimberley. 2010. Black on Earth: African American Ecoliterary Traditions. Athens, GA: Georgia University Press.10.1353/book11452Suche in Google Scholar

Rupp, Jan. 2020. “Telling Stories, Saving Lives: The Value of 21st-Century Refugee Writing”. REAL 36.1: 219–237.Suche in Google Scholar

Schneider-Mayerson, Matthew, A. W. v. Mossner and W. P. Małecki. 2020. “Empirical Ecocriticism” [Special Section]. Isle: Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment 27.2: 327–405.10.1093/isle/isaa022Suche in Google Scholar

Skinner, Jonathan. 2017. “Ecopoetics”. In: R. G. Smith (ed.). American Literature in Transition, 2000–2010. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 322–342.10.1017/9781316569290.022Suche in Google Scholar

Sullivan, Heather. 2017. “Goethe’s Concept of Nature: Proto-Ecological Model”. In: Gabriele Dürbeck, Urte Stobbe, Hubert Zapf and Evi Zemanek (eds.). Ecological Thought in German Literature and Culture. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books. 17–30.Suche in Google Scholar

Trexler, Adam. 2015. Anthropocene Fictions: The Novel in a Time of Climate Change. Charlottesville, VA: Virginia University Press.10.2307/j.ctt13x1r99Suche in Google Scholar

Tuckey, Melissa. 2018. Ghost Fishing: An Eco-Justice Poetry Anthology. Athens, GA: Georgia University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Vizenor, Gerald. 1999. Manifest Manners: Narratives on Postindian Survivance. Lincoln, NE: Nebraska University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Wellner, Galit F. 2019. “Social Happiness as a Cultural Value: An Analysis of Shared Values for Ecosystem Assessment”. In: Torsten Meireis and Gabriele Rippl (eds.). Cultural Sustainability: Perspectives from the Humanities and Social Sciences. London: Routledge. 87–97.Suche in Google Scholar

Zapf, Hubert (ed.) 2016a. Handbook of Ecocriticism and Cultural Ecology. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110314595Suche in Google Scholar

Zapf, Hubert. 2016 b. Literature as Cultural Ecology: Sustainable Texts. London: Bloomsbury.10.5040/9781474274685Suche in Google Scholar

Zapf, Hubert. 2019. “The Challenge of the Anthropocene and the Sustainability of Texts.” In: Gina Comos and Caroline Rosenthal (eds.). Anglophone Literature and Culture in the Anthropocene. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars. 2–22.Suche in Google Scholar

Zapf, Hubert. 2022. “Posthumanism or Ecohumanism? Environmental Studies in the Anthropocene”. Journal of Ecohumanism 1.1: 4–17.10.33182/joe.v1i1.1743Suche in Google Scholar

Zapf, Hubert and Timo Müller. 2022. “Ecology in American Literature”. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Environmental Science, 20 June 2022. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199389414.013.808.10.1093/acrefore/9780199389414.013.808Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2023-09-20
Published in Print: 2023-09-05

© 2023 by Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 20.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ang-2023-0029/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen