Startseite Economic Reasoning in Adjudication of Commercial Contractual Disputes in India
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Economic Reasoning in Adjudication of Commercial Contractual Disputes in India

  • Niti Bhutani und Ram Singh EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 23. Mai 2025
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

This paper examines the key provisions of Indian contract law with special reference to commercial contracts. We evaluate how the Indian Contract Act and the Specific Relief Act fare on the efficiency criterion in the economic analysis of the law. Further, we discuss whether the Indian courts use economic reasoning while filling up gaps in commercial contracts and choosing a breach remedy. We argue that the law governing commercial contracts has several inbuilt features that are desirable from an efficiency point of view. However, several factors constrain the efficient adjudication of commercial contracts.


Corresponding author: Ram Singh, Delhi School of Economics, University of Delhi, Delhi, India, E-mail:

Funding source: Anusandhan National Research Foundation (ANRF) India

Award Identifier / Grant number: CRG/2021/007007

Acknowledgements

We have benefitted from the comments received from the participants at the conference on The Past, Present, and Future of Law and Economics in East Asia at Cornell University Law School. We thank the editors and referees for valuable inputs.

  1. Research funding: This work was supported by the Anusandhan National Research Foundation (ANRF) India (CRG/2021/007007).

References

CUTS. 2018. Economic Impact Of Select Decisions of the Supreme Court and National Green Tribunal of India. Jaipur, India.Suche in Google Scholar

Miceli, Thomas J. 1997. Economics of the Law: Torts, Contracts, Property, Litigation. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195103908.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Posner, Richard. 2004. “Law and Economics of Contract Interpretation.” Texas Law Review 83: 1596–608.10.2139/ssrn.610983Suche in Google Scholar

Rab, Ajar. 2021. “Comparing Specific Performance Under the Specific Relief (Amendment) Act 2018 with the CISG and the UNIDROIT Principles: The Problems of the “Un-common Law” in India.” National Law School Business Law Review 7 (1): Article 5.Suche in Google Scholar

Saha, Kaustav. 2024. “Rights, Remedies and Retrospectivity: The Curious Case of the Specific Relief (Amendment) Act, 2018.” NUJS Law Review 17 (3).Suche in Google Scholar

Singh, Ram. 2004a. “Economics of Judicial Decision Making, Indian Tort Law: Motor Accident Cases.” Economic & Political Weekly 39 (25): 2613–6.Suche in Google Scholar

Singh, Ram. 2004b. “‘Full’ Compensation Criteria: An Enquiry into Relative Merits.” European Journal of Law and Economics 18: 223–37. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:ejle.0000045083.39477.bc.10.1023/B:EJLE.0000045083.39477.bcSuche in Google Scholar

Singh, Ram. 2021. “The Law and Economics of Force Majeure Litigation.” GNLU Journal of Law and Economics III (1): 7–27.10.69893/gjle.2020.000033Suche in Google Scholar

Singh, Ram, and Utkarsh Leo. 2021. “Covid-19 and Contractual Disputes in India: A Law and Economics Perspective.” Economic and Political Weekly 56 (16): 37–43.Suche in Google Scholar

Srinivasan, Badrinath. 2019. “Hardship & Substituted Performance as Defences against Specific Performance: Critique of the Recent Developments.” National Law School of India Review 31 (1): Article 3.Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2025-05-23

© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 9.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ajle-2025-2006/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen