Zum Hauptinhalt springen
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

The Emergence of Marx’s Concept of Subsumption

  • ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 16. Januar 2024

Abstract

In Marx’s posthumously published manuscripts from 1857–1863, we find a systematic exposition of his concept of subsumption. Though much has been written about it, significant interpretative gaps persist. In this article, I begin filling these gaps by examining the emergence of Marx’s concept of subsumption. I will argue that in the Grundrisse Marx brings together distinct but complementary elements from Hegel’s theories of judgment and teleology to coin two new and well delineated concepts of subsumption that prefigure his later concepts of formal and real subsumption. These two concepts may be defined as: (a) the process of acquiring the social relational property of being a means to an end; (b) the process by which changes in non-relational properties occur in something due to this acquisition – and occur to better suit said end.

Bibliography

AA

Kant, I. 1968. Kants Werke. Ed. Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. Berlin: de Gruyter.

GW

Hegel, G. W. F. 1968. Gesammelte Werke. Ed. Rheinisch-Westfälischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. Hamburg: Meiner.

MECW

Marx, K. and Engels, F. 1975. Collected Works. Ed. Institute of Marxism–Leninism. New York: International Publishers.

MEGA

Marx, K. and Engels, F. 1958. Gesamtausgabe. Ed. Institut für Marxismus-Leninismus. Berlin: Dietz.

Allison, H. 1981. ‘Transcendental Schematism and The Problem of the Synthetic A Priori.’ Dialectica 35 (1/2), 57–83.10.1111/j.1746-8361.1981.tb01497.xSuche in Google Scholar

Althusser, L. and Balibar. É. 2009. Reading Capital. Trans. B. Brewster. London: Verso.Suche in Google Scholar

Arthur, C. J. 2009. ‘The Possessive Spirit of Capital: Subsumption/Inversion/Contradiction.’ In R. Bellofiore and R. Fineschi (eds.), Re-reading Marx: New Perspectives After the Critical Edition. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 148–162.10.1007/978-0-230-30514-4_9Suche in Google Scholar

Babbage, C. 1835. On the Economy of Machinery and Manufactures. London: Knight.Suche in Google Scholar

Bacon, R. 1986–1987, Summulae dialectices, Ed. A. de Libera. Archives d’Histoire Doctrinale et Littéraire du Moyen Age, 53: 139–289, 54: 171–278.Suche in Google Scholar

Balibar, É. 2019. ‘Towards a New Critique of Political Economy: from Generalized Surplus Value to Total Subsumption.’ In P. Osborne et al. (eds), Capitalism: Concept, Idea, Image: Aspects of Marx’s Capital Today. London: CRMEP Books, 36–57.Suche in Google Scholar

Baumgarten, A. 2020. Elements of First Practical Philosophy: A Critical Translation with Kant’s Reflections on Moral Philosophy. Ed. and trans. C. D. Fugate and J. Hymers. London: Bloomsbury.Suche in Google Scholar

de Boer, K. 2020. Kant’s Reform of Metaphysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Buridan, J. Quaestiones in duos libros Aristotelis Posteriorum Analyticorum. Ed. H. Hubien. Unpublished typescript.Suche in Google Scholar

Cohen, G. A. 2000. Karl Marx’s Theory of History. A Defence. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Doz, A. 1987. La logique de Hegel et les problèmes traditionnels de l’ontologie. Paris: Vrin.Suche in Google Scholar

Hardt, M. and Negri, A. 2000. Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674038325Suche in Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. 1979. System of Ethical Life (1802/3) and First Philosophy of Spirit. Ed. and trans. H. S. Haris and T. M. Knox. Albany: SUNY Press.Suche in Google Scholar

—. 1991. Elements of the Philosophy of Right. Trans. H. B. Nisbet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

—. 2008. Lectures on Logic. Trans. C. Butler. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

—. 2010a. Science of Logic. Trans. G. Di Giovanni, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

—. 2010b. Encyclopedia of the Philosophical Sciences in Basic Outline. Part I: Science of Logic. Trans. K. Brinkmann and D. O. Dahlstrom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Heil, J. 2009. ‘Relations.’ In R. Le Poidevin et al. (eds), Routledge Companion to Metaphysics. London: Routledge, 310–321.10.4324/9780203879306-34Suche in Google Scholar

Heinrich, M. 2013. ‘The ‘Fragment on Machines’: A Marxian Misconception in the Grundrisse and its Overcoming in Capital.’ In R. Bellofiore et al. (eds.), In Marx’s Laboratory: Critical Interpretations of the Grundrisse. Leiden: Brill, 197–212.10.1163/9789004252592_010Suche in Google Scholar

Horstmann, R-P. 1984. Ontologie und Relationen: Hegel, Bradley, Russell, und die Kontroverse über interne und externe Beziehungen. Königstein: Athenäum.Suche in Google Scholar

Kant, I. 1998. Critique of Pure Reason. Ed. and trans. P. Guyer and A. W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511804649Suche in Google Scholar

Leibniz, G. W. and Clarke, S. 2000. Correspondence. Ed. R. Ariew. Indianapolis: Hackett.Suche in Google Scholar

Longuenesse, B. 2001. Kant and the Capacity to Judge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

—. 2007. Hegel’s Critique of Metaphysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Martin, C. 2012. Ontologie der Selbstbestimmung: Eine operationale Rekonstruktion von Hegels “Wissenschaft der Logik.” Heidelberg: Mohr Siebeck.Suche in Google Scholar

Marx, K. 1976. Capital. A Critique of Political Economy. Trans. B. Fowkes. New York: Penguin.Suche in Google Scholar

—. 1992. Early Writings. Trans. R. Livingstone and G. Benton, New York: Penguin.Suche in Google Scholar

—. 1993. Grundrisse. Foundations of the Critique of Political Economy. Trans. M. Nicolaus, New York: Penguin.Suche in Google Scholar

McTaggart, J. M. E. 1910. A Commentary on Hegel’s Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Meaney, M. E. 2002. Capital as Organic Unity: The Role of Hegel’s Science of Logic in Marx’s Grundrisse. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-94-015-9854-5Suche in Google Scholar

Murray, P. 2016. The Mismeasure of Wealth: Essays on Marx and Social Form. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004326071Suche in Google Scholar

Negri, A. 2005. Books for Burning: Between Civil War and Democracy in 1970s Italy. Trans. A. Bove, E. Emery, and F. Novello. London: Verso.Suche in Google Scholar

Ockham, W. 1967–88, Opera philosophica et theologica. Ed. G. Gál et al. St. Bonaventure, NY: The Franciscan Institute.Suche in Google Scholar

Postone, M. 1993. Time, Labor, and Social Domination: A Reinterpretation of Marx’s Critical Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511570926Suche in Google Scholar

Quante, M. 2004. Hegel’s Concept of Action. Trans. D. Moyar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511498299Suche in Google Scholar

Read, J. 2003. The Micro-Politics of Capital: Marx and the Prehistory of the Present. Albany: SUNY Press.10.1353/book4722Suche in Google Scholar

Ricardo, D. 1821. On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. London: John Murray.Suche in Google Scholar

Russell, E-J. 2015. ‘The Logic of Subsumption: An Elective Affinity Between Hegel and Marx.’ Revista Opiniao Filosofica 6(2), 28–48.Suche in Google Scholar

de Sicilia, A. S. 2016. ‘The Problem of Subsumption in Kant, Hegel and Marx.’ PhD diss., Kingston University.Suche in Google Scholar

Tomba, M. and Bellofiore, R. 2013. ‘The “Fragment on Machines” and the Grundrisse: The Workerist Reading in Question.’ In M. van der Linden and K. H. Roth (eds.), Beyond Marx: Theorizing the Global Labour Relations of the Twenty-First Century. Leiden: Brill, 345–367.10.1163/9789004231351_017Suche in Google Scholar

Wolff, C. 1728. Philosophia rationalis sive Logica. Frankfurt: Libraria Rengeriana.Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2024-01-16
Published in Print: 2024-08-27

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 29.4.2026 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/agph-2022-0074/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen