Abstract
Late antique political Platonism was not unoriginal in its thought. The paper takes as an example the Justinianic dialogue On Political Science (ca. 550), which creatively engages with Plato’s political works. It shows that the dialogue tries – and manages, as I argue – to combine two apparently inconsistent Platonic models: what I call the “divine” model, in which a philosopher-king endowed with divine knowledge rules unhindered by civic laws; and the “human” model, characterized by the rule of law. The divine model comes mostly from Plato’s Republic and Statesman; the human one, from the Laws. On Political Science demonstrates that its (anonymous) author was acquainted with these three Platonic texts, in addition to other texts. That is philologically noteworthy, but also philosophically interesting: the dialogue manages to integrate the two models into a common framework. It puts forward an original political model, in which a philosopher-king, although endowed with divine knowledge, still has to be bound by civic laws because of his human frailty. The article concludes by discussing the polemical import the dialogue could have had in its Justinianic context.
Angelov, D. 2002. “Classifications of Political Philosophy and the Concept of Royal Science in Byzantium”. The Many Faces of Byzantine Philosophy. Ed. B. Börge/K. Ierodiakonou. Bergen, 23–50.Search in Google Scholar
Atkins, J. W. 2013. “Cicero on the Relationship between Plato’s Republic and Laws”. Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 117, 15–34.Search in Google Scholar
Bell, P. 2009. Three Political Voices from the Age of Justinian: Agapetus, Advice to the Emperor; Dialogue on Political Science; Paul the Silentiary, Description of Hagia Sophia. Liverpool.10.3828/978-1-84631-209-0Search in Google Scholar
Bobonich, C. Plato’s Utopia Recast: His Later Ethics and Politics. Oxford.Search in Google Scholar
Booth, P. “Shades of Blues and Greens in the Chronicle of John of Nikiou”. Byzantinische Zeitschrift 104, 555–601.10.1515/byzs.2011.013Search in Google Scholar
Bradley Lewis, V. 2017. “Eusebius of Caesarea’s Un-Platonic Platonic Political Theology”. Polis 34, 94–114.10.1163/20512996-12340119Search in Google Scholar
Brennan, J. 2016. Against Democracy. Princeton.10.1515/9781400882939Search in Google Scholar
Brisson, L. 2009. “Logos and Logoi in Plotinus. Their Nature and Function”. Schole 3(2), 433–44.Search in Google Scholar
Cameron, Al. 1976. Circus Factions: Blues and Greens at Rome and Byzantium. Oxford.Search in Google Scholar
Cameron, Av. 1985. Procopius and the Sixth Century. London.Search in Google Scholar
Des Places, E. 1967. “La tradition patristique de Platon (spécialement d’après les citations des “Lois” et de l’“Epinomis” dans la “Préparation évangélique” d’Eusèbe de Césarée)”. REG 80, 385–94.10.3406/reg.1967.3965Search in Google Scholar
Diefenbach, S. 1996. “Frömmigkeit und Kaiserakzeptanz im frühen Byzanz”. Saeculum 47, 35–66.10.7788/saeculum.1996.47.1.35Search in Google Scholar
Dillon, J. 2001. “The Neoplatonic Reception of Plato’s Laws”. Plato’s Laws and its Historical Significance. Ed. F. L. Lisi. Sankt Augustin, 243–54.Search in Google Scholar
Dunbabin, J. 1984. Review of Menas Patricius. Menae Patricii cum Thoma Referendario de Scientia Politica Dialogus Quae Exstant in Codice Vaticano Palimpsesto, by C. M. Mazzucchi. Journal of Roman Studies 74, 251 f.10.2307/299045Search in Google Scholar
Fögen, M. T. 1993. “Das politische Denken der Byzantiner”. Pipers Handbuch der politischen Ideen. Bd. 2: Mittelalter. Ed. I. Fetscher, 41–86.Search in Google Scholar
Fotiou, A. S. 1981. “Plato’s Philosopher King in the Political Thought of Sixth-Century Byzantium”. Florilegium 7, 17–29.10.3138/flor.7.002Search in Google Scholar
Fotiou, A. S. 1985. “Dicaearchus and the Mixed Constitution in 6th Byzantium: New Evidence from A Treatise on ‘Political Science’”. Byzantion 51, 533–47.Search in Google Scholar
Gastaldi, S. 2002. “Aristotele e le “Leggi” di Platone”. Gigantomachia. Convergenze e divergenze tra Platone e Aristotele. Ed. M. Migliori. Brescia, 221–48.Search in Google Scholar
Gill, C. 1979. “Plato and Politics: The Critias and the Politicus”. Phronesis 24, 148–67.10.1163/156852879X00090Search in Google Scholar
Greatrex, G. 1997. “The Nika Riot: A Reappraisal”. JHS 117, 60–86.10.2307/632550Search in Google Scholar
Gusso, M. 2001. “Utopia e ‘prove di scienza politica’ a Bisanzio. Per una lettura dell’anonimo dialogus de scientia politica (VI sec. d. C.)”. Atti dell’Istituto Veneto di Scienze, Lettere ed Arti 159, 177–23.Search in Google Scholar
Haldon, J. F. 2006. “Economy and Administration: How did the Empire Work?” The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Justinian. Ed. M. Maas. Cambridge, 28–59.10.1017/CCOL0521817463.002Search in Google Scholar
Hatlie, P. 2006. “Monks and Circus Factions in Early Byzantine Political Life.” Monastères, images, pouvoirs et société à Byzance. Ed. M. Kaplan, 13–25.10.4000/books.psorbonne.2079Search in Google Scholar
Johansen, T. 2021. “Crafting the Cosmos: Plato on the Limitations of Divine Craftsmanship”. Productive Knowledge in Ancient Philosophy: The Concept of Technê. Ed. T. Johansen. Cambridge, 86–108.10.1017/9781108641579.005Search in Google Scholar
Kahn, C. 2004. “From Republic to Laws: A Discussion of Christopher Bobonich, ‘Plato’s Utopia Recast’”. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 26, 337–62.10.1093/oso/9780199272495.003.0013Search in Google Scholar
Karamboula, D. 2000. “Der byzantinische Kaiser als Politiker, Philosoph und Gesetzgeber”. Jahrbuch der österreichischen Byzantinistik 50, 5–50.Search in Google Scholar
–. 2002. “Symphonia und politike asymphonia. Randgruppen im Rahmen der Gesellschaft der Spätantike”. Byzantinische Zeitschrift 95, 481–508.10.1515/BYZS.2002.481Search in Google Scholar
Laks, A. 1990. “Legislation and Demiurgy: On the Relationship between Plato’s ‘Republic’ and ‘Laws’”. Classical Antiquity 9(2), 209–29.10.2307/25010929Search in Google Scholar
–. 2005. Médiation et coercition. Pour une lecture des ‘Lois’ de Platon. Villeneuve d’Ascq.Search in Google Scholar
–. 2023. Plato’s Second Republic. An Essay on the Laws. Princeton.Search in Google Scholar
Lane, M. 2010. “Force et persuasion dans la politique platonicienne.” Aglaïa. Autour de Platon. Mélanges offerts à Monique Dixsaut. Ed. A. Brancacci/D. El Murr/D. P. Taormina. Paris, 165–98.Search in Google Scholar
–. 2020. “Politics as Architectonic Expertise? Against Taking the So-called ‘Architect’ (ἀρχιτέκτων) in Plato’s Statesman to Prefigure this Aristotelian View”. Polis 37(3), 449–67.10.1163/20512996-12340294Search in Google Scholar
–. 2023. Of Rule and Office: Plato’s Ideas of the Political. Princeton.Search in Google Scholar
Lévy, C. 1990. “Cicéron et le Moyen Platonisme; le problème du souverain bien selon Platon”. Revue des études latines 68, 50–65.Search in Google Scholar
Licandro, O. 2017. Cicerone alla corte di Giustiniano. “Dialogo sulla scienza politica” (Vat. Gr. 1298). Rome.Search in Google Scholar
Liebeschuetz, W. 1978. “Review of Alan Cameron, Circus Factions (1976)”. JRS 68, 198 f.10.2307/299645Search in Google Scholar
Lisi, F. L. 2004. “Héros, dieux et philosophes”. Revue des études anciennes 106, 5–22.10.3406/rea.2004.6410Search in Google Scholar
Mazzucchi, C. M. 1978. “Per una rilettura del palinsesto vaticano contenente il dialogo “Sulla scienza politica” del tempo di Giustiniano”. L’imperatore Giustiniano. Fra storia e mito. Ed. G. G. Archi. Milan, 237–47.Search in Google Scholar
–. 2002. Menae patricii cum Thoma referendario De scientia politica dialogus. Iteratis curis quae exstant ex codice Vaticano palimpsesto ed. Carolus Maria Mazzucchi. Milan.Search in Google Scholar
–. 2006. “DAMASCIO, AUTORE DEL CORPUS DIONYSIACUM, E IL DIALOGO ΠΕΡΙ ΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΗΣ ΕΠΙΣΤΗΜΗΣ.” Aevum 80(2), 299–334.Search in Google Scholar
Mazzucchi, C. M./Matelli, E. 1985. “La dottrina dello stato nel dialogue Sulla scienza politica e il suo autore”. Il mondo del diritto nell’epoca giustinianea. Caratteri e problematiche. Ed. G. G. Archi. Ravenna, 209–23.Search in Google Scholar
McCoull, L. S. B. 2006. “Menas and Thomas: Notes on the Dialogus de scientia politica.” Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 46, 301–13.Search in Google Scholar
Morrow. G. 1954. “The Demiurge in Politics: The Timaeus and the Laws”. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 27, 5–23.10.2307/3129499Search in Google Scholar
–. 1960. “Aristotle Comments on Plato’s Laws”. Plato and Aristotle in the Mid-Fourth Century. Ed. I. Düring/G. E. L. Owen. Göteborg, 147–62.Search in Google Scholar
Motta, A. 2018. “Demiurgy in Heavens. An Ancient Account in Plato’s Statesman”. Plato’s Statesman Revisited. Ed. T. M. Robinson/B. Bossi. Berlin, 141–56.10.1515/9783110605549-009Search in Google Scholar
O’Meara, D. 2002. “The Justinianic Dialogue On Political Science and its Neoplatonic Sources”. Byzantine Philosophy and Its Ancient Sources. Ed. K. Ierodiakonou. Oxford, 49–62.10.1093/oso/9780199246137.003.0004Search in Google Scholar
–. 2003. Platonopolis. Platonic Political Thought in Late Antiquity. Oxford.Search in Google Scholar
–. 2018a. “The Legislation of the World and Human Legislation in Late Antique Platonism”. Natur in politischen Ordnungsentwürfen der Vormoderne. Ed. A. Höffele/B. Kellner. Leiden, 39–50.Search in Google Scholar
–. 2018b. “Plato’s Political Dialogues in the Writings of Julian the Emperor”. Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Plato in Antiquity. Ed. H. Tarrant/F. Renaud, D. Baltzly/D. A. Layne. Leiden, 400–10.Search in Google Scholar
–. 2019. “How Military Science Relates to Political Science in the Anonymous Justinianic Dialogue On Political Science”. Philosophie für die Polis: Akten des 5. Kongresses der Gesellschaft für antike Philosophie 2016. Ed. Chr. Riedweg. Berlin/Boston, 493–506.Search in Google Scholar
Owen, G. E. L. 1953. “The Place of the Timaeus in Plato’s Dialogues”. CQ 3, 79–95.10.1017/S0009838800002652Search in Google Scholar
Pertusi, A. 1968. “I principi fondamentali della concezione del potere a Bisanzio. Per un commento al dialogo “Sulla scienza politica” attribuito a Pietro Patrizio (secolo VI)”. Bull. Instituto storico per il Medio Evo e Archivio Muratoriano 80, 1–23.Search in Google Scholar
Prächter, K. 1900. “Zum Maischen Anonymus περὶ πολιτικῆς ἐπιστήμης”. Byzantinische Zeitschrift 9, 621–32.10.1515/byzs.1900.9.3.621Search in Google Scholar
Rashed, M. 2000. “Ménas, préfet du prétoire (528/529) et philosophe : une épigramme inconnue”. Elenchos 21, 89–98.Search in Google Scholar
Reid. J. 2021. “Changing the Laws of the Laws.” Ancient Philosophy 41, 413–41.10.5840/ancientphil202141226Search in Google Scholar
Roueché, C. 1984. “Acclamations in the Later Roman Empire: New Evidence from Aphrodisias.” JRS 74, 181–99.10.2307/299014Search in Google Scholar
Rowe, C. J. 2001. “Killing Socrates: Plato’s Later Thoughts on Democracy.” Journal of Hellenic Studies 121, 63–76.10.2307/631828Search in Google Scholar
–. 2010. “The Relationship to Other Dialogues: A Proposal”. In Plato’s Laws: A Critical Guide. Ed. Chr. Bobonich. Cambridge/New York, 29–50.Search in Google Scholar
Schmidt-Hofner, S. 2019. “Plato and the Theodosian Code”. Early Medieval Europe 27(1), 35–60.10.1111/emed.12313Search in Google Scholar
Schofield, M. 1999. “The Disappearing Philosopher-King.” In Saving the City: Philosophers-Kings and Other Classical Paradigms. London/New York, 28–45.Search in Google Scholar
Schott, J. M. 2003. “Founding Platonopolis: The Platonic Πολιτεία in Eusebius, Porphyry and Iamblichus”. Journal of Early Christian Studies 11(4), 501–31.10.1353/earl.2003.0068Search in Google Scholar
Segonds, A. 1990. Prolégomènes à la philosophie de Platon. Paris.Search in Google Scholar
Simon, D. 1984. “Princeps legibus solutus. Die Stellung des byzantinischen Kaisers zum Gesetz”. Gedächtnisschrift für Wolfgang Kunkel. Ed. D. Nörr/D. Simon. Frankfurt/M., 449–92.Search in Google Scholar
Simpson, P. 2003. “Plato’s Laws in the Hands of Aristotle”. Plato’s Laws: From Theory into Practice. Ed. L. Brisson/S. Scolnicov. Sankt Augustin, 298–303.Search in Google Scholar
Valdenberg, V. 1925. “Les idées politiques dans les fragments attribués à Pierre le Patrice”. Byzantion 2, 55–76.Search in Google Scholar
Vegetti, M. 1999. “L’autocritica di Platone: il Timaeo e le Leggi”. La Repubblica di Platone nella tradizione antica. Ed. M. Vegetti/M. Abbate. Naples, 13–27.Search in Google Scholar
Vlastos, G. 1973. Platonic Studies. Princeton.10.1515/9780691226958Search in Google Scholar
Whitby, M. 1999. “The Violence of the Circus Factions”. Organised Crime in Antiquity. Ed. K. Hopwood. London, 229–53.10.2307/j.ctvvn934.11Search in Google Scholar
Wildberg. C. 2006. “Philosophy in the Age of Justinian”. The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Justinian. Ed. M. Maas. Cambridge, 316–40.10.1017/CCOL0521817463.013Search in Google Scholar
Zamora Calvo, J. M. 2018. “Plato’s Reign of Kronos: Proclus’ Interpretation of the Myth in the Politicus”. Plato’s Statesman Revisited. Ed. T. M. Robinson/B. Bossi. Berlin, 119–40.10.1515/9783110605549-008Search in Google Scholar
© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Titelseiten
- I. Articles
- The Stability of Knowledge
- On the Megarians of Metaphysics IX 3
- Philosopher-King on a Leash: Combining Plato’s Republic, Statesman and Laws in the Justinianic Dialogue On Political Science
- Between Starvation and Spoilage: Conceptual Foundations of Locke’s Theory of Original Appropriation
- The Quandary of Infanticide in Kant’s ‘Doctrine of Right’
- Transformativism and Expressivity in Hegel’s Philosophy of Mind
- The ‘Aristotle Experience’ Revisited: Thomas Kuhn Meets Ludwik Fleck on the Road to Structure
- Warding off the Evil Eye: Peer Envy in Rawls’s Just Society
- II. Book Reviews
- Vassallo, Christian. The Presocratics at Herculaneum: A Study of Early Greek Philosophy in the Epicurean Tradition. Berlin / Boston: De Gruyter 2021, xxi + 763 pp.
- Boldyrev, Ivan and Stein, Sebastian (eds.). Interpreting Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit: Expositions and Critique of Contemporary Readings. New York / Abingdon: Routledge 2022, ix + 277 pp.
Articles in the same Issue
- Titelseiten
- I. Articles
- The Stability of Knowledge
- On the Megarians of Metaphysics IX 3
- Philosopher-King on a Leash: Combining Plato’s Republic, Statesman and Laws in the Justinianic Dialogue On Political Science
- Between Starvation and Spoilage: Conceptual Foundations of Locke’s Theory of Original Appropriation
- The Quandary of Infanticide in Kant’s ‘Doctrine of Right’
- Transformativism and Expressivity in Hegel’s Philosophy of Mind
- The ‘Aristotle Experience’ Revisited: Thomas Kuhn Meets Ludwik Fleck on the Road to Structure
- Warding off the Evil Eye: Peer Envy in Rawls’s Just Society
- II. Book Reviews
- Vassallo, Christian. The Presocratics at Herculaneum: A Study of Early Greek Philosophy in the Epicurean Tradition. Berlin / Boston: De Gruyter 2021, xxi + 763 pp.
- Boldyrev, Ivan and Stein, Sebastian (eds.). Interpreting Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit: Expositions and Critique of Contemporary Readings. New York / Abingdon: Routledge 2022, ix + 277 pp.