Home Philosopher-King on a Leash: Combining Plato’s Republic, Statesman and Laws in the Justinianic Dialogue On Political Science
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Philosopher-King on a Leash: Combining Plato’s Republic, Statesman and Laws in the Justinianic Dialogue On Political Science

  • René de Nicolay EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: October 20, 2022

Abstract

Late antique political Platonism was not unoriginal in its thought. The paper takes as an example the Justinianic dialogue On Political Science (ca. 550), which creatively engages with Plato’s political works. It shows that the dialogue tries – and manages, as I argue – to combine two apparently inconsistent Platonic models: what I call the “divine” model, in which a philosopher-king endowed with divine knowledge rules unhindered by civic laws; and the “human” model, characterized by the rule of law. The divine model comes mostly from Plato’s Republic and Statesman; the human one, from the Laws. On Political Science demonstrates that its (anonymous) author was acquainted with these three Platonic texts, in addition to other texts. That is philologically noteworthy, but also philosophically interesting: the dialogue manages to integrate the two models into a common framework. It puts forward an original political model, in which a philosopher-king, although endowed with divine knowledge, still has to be bound by civic laws because of his human frailty. The article concludes by discussing the polemical import the dialogue could have had in its Justinianic context.

Angelov, D. 2002. “Classifications of Political Philosophy and the Concept of Royal Science in Byzantium”. The Many Faces of Byzantine Philosophy. Ed. B. Börge/K. Ierodiakonou. Bergen, 23–50.Search in Google Scholar

Atkins, J. W. 2013. “Cicero on the Relationship between Plato’s Republic and Laws”. Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 117, 15–34.Search in Google Scholar

Bell, P. 2009. Three Political Voices from the Age of Justinian: Agapetus, Advice to the Emperor; Dialogue on Political Science; Paul the Silentiary, Description of Hagia Sophia. Liverpool.10.3828/978-1-84631-209-0Search in Google Scholar

Bobonich, C. Plato’s Utopia Recast: His Later Ethics and Politics. Oxford.Search in Google Scholar

Booth, P. “Shades of Blues and Greens in the Chronicle of John of Nikiou”. Byzantinische Zeitschrift 104, 555–601.10.1515/byzs.2011.013Search in Google Scholar

Bradley Lewis, V. 2017. “Eusebius of Caesarea’s Un-Platonic Platonic Political Theology”. Polis 34, 94–114.10.1163/20512996-12340119Search in Google Scholar

Brennan, J. 2016. Against Democracy. Princeton.10.1515/9781400882939Search in Google Scholar

Brisson, L. 2009. “Logos and Logoi in Plotinus. Their Nature and Function”. Schole 3(2), 433–44.Search in Google Scholar

Cameron, Al. 1976. Circus Factions: Blues and Greens at Rome and Byzantium. Oxford.Search in Google Scholar

Cameron, Av. 1985. Procopius and the Sixth Century. London.Search in Google Scholar

Des Places, E. 1967. “La tradition patristique de Platon (spécialement d’après les citations des “Lois” et de l’“Epinomis” dans la “Préparation évangélique” d’Eusèbe de Césarée)”. REG 80, 385–94.10.3406/reg.1967.3965Search in Google Scholar

Diefenbach, S. 1996. “Frömmigkeit und Kaiserakzeptanz im frühen Byzanz”. Saeculum 47, 35–66.10.7788/saeculum.1996.47.1.35Search in Google Scholar

Dillon, J. 2001. “The Neoplatonic Reception of Plato’s Laws”. Plato’s Laws and its Historical Significance. Ed. F. L. Lisi. Sankt Augustin, 243–54.Search in Google Scholar

Dunbabin, J. 1984. Review of Menas Patricius. Menae Patricii cum Thoma Referendario de Scientia Politica Dialogus Quae Exstant in Codice Vaticano Palimpsesto, by C. M. Mazzucchi. Journal of Roman Studies 74, 251 f.10.2307/299045Search in Google Scholar

Fögen, M. T. 1993. “Das politische Denken der Byzantiner”. Pipers Handbuch der politischen Ideen. Bd. 2: Mittelalter. Ed. I. Fetscher, 41–86.Search in Google Scholar

Fotiou, A. S. 1981. “Plato’s Philosopher King in the Political Thought of Sixth-Century Byzantium”. Florilegium 7, 17–29.10.3138/flor.7.002Search in Google Scholar

Fotiou, A. S. 1985. “Dicaearchus and the Mixed Constitution in 6th Byzantium: New Evidence from A Treatise on ‘Political Science’”. Byzantion 51, 533–47.Search in Google Scholar

Gastaldi, S. 2002. “Aristotele e le “Leggi” di Platone”. Gigantomachia. Convergenze e divergenze tra Platone e Aristotele. Ed. M. Migliori. Brescia, 221–48.Search in Google Scholar

Gill, C. 1979. “Plato and Politics: The Critias and the Politicus”. Phronesis 24, 148–67.10.1163/156852879X00090Search in Google Scholar

Greatrex, G. 1997. “The Nika Riot: A Reappraisal”. JHS 117, 60–86.10.2307/632550Search in Google Scholar

Gusso, M. 2001. “Utopia e ‘prove di scienza politica’ a Bisanzio. Per una lettura dell’anonimo dialogus de scientia politica (VI sec. d. C.)”. Atti dell’Istituto Veneto di Scienze, Lettere ed Arti 159, 177–23.Search in Google Scholar

Haldon, J. F. 2006. “Economy and Administration: How did the Empire Work?” The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Justinian. Ed. M. Maas. Cambridge, 28–59.10.1017/CCOL0521817463.002Search in Google Scholar

Hatlie, P. 2006. “Monks and Circus Factions in Early Byzantine Political Life.” Monastères, images, pouvoirs et société à Byzance. Ed. M. Kaplan, 13–25.10.4000/books.psorbonne.2079Search in Google Scholar

Johansen, T. 2021. “Crafting the Cosmos: Plato on the Limitations of Divine Craftsmanship”. Productive Knowledge in Ancient Philosophy: The Concept of Technê. Ed. T. Johansen. Cambridge, 86–108.10.1017/9781108641579.005Search in Google Scholar

Kahn, C. 2004. “From Republic to Laws: A Discussion of Christopher Bobonich, ‘Plato’s Utopia Recast’”. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 26, 337–62.10.1093/oso/9780199272495.003.0013Search in Google Scholar

Karamboula, D. 2000. “Der byzantinische Kaiser als Politiker, Philosoph und Gesetzgeber”. Jahrbuch der österreichischen Byzantinistik 50, 5–50.Search in Google Scholar

–. 2002. “Symphonia und politike asymphonia. Randgruppen im Rahmen der Gesellschaft der Spätantike”. Byzantinische Zeitschrift 95, 481–508.10.1515/BYZS.2002.481Search in Google Scholar

Laks, A. 1990. “Legislation and Demiurgy: On the Relationship between Plato’s ‘Republic’ and ‘Laws’”. Classical Antiquity 9(2), 209–29.10.2307/25010929Search in Google Scholar

–. 2005. Médiation et coercition. Pour une lecture des ‘Lois’ de Platon. Villeneuve d’Ascq.Search in Google Scholar

–. 2023. Plato’s Second Republic. An Essay on the Laws. Princeton.Search in Google Scholar

Lane, M. 2010. “Force et persuasion dans la politique platonicienne.” Aglaïa. Autour de Platon. Mélanges offerts à Monique Dixsaut. Ed. A. Brancacci/D. El Murr/D. P. Taormina. Paris, 165–98.Search in Google Scholar

–. 2020. “Politics as Architectonic Expertise? Against Taking the So-called ‘Architect’ (ἀρχιτέκτων) in Plato’s Statesman to Prefigure this Aristotelian View”. Polis 37(3), 449–67.10.1163/20512996-12340294Search in Google Scholar

–. 2023. Of Rule and Office: Plato’s Ideas of the Political. Princeton.Search in Google Scholar

Lévy, C. 1990. “Cicéron et le Moyen Platonisme; le problème du souverain bien selon Platon”. Revue des études latines 68, 50–65.Search in Google Scholar

Licandro, O. 2017. Cicerone alla corte di Giustiniano. “Dialogo sulla scienza politica” (Vat. Gr. 1298). Rome.Search in Google Scholar

Liebeschuetz, W. 1978. “Review of Alan Cameron, Circus Factions (1976)”. JRS 68, 198 f.10.2307/299645Search in Google Scholar

Lisi, F. L. 2004. “Héros, dieux et philosophes”. Revue des études anciennes 106, 5–22.10.3406/rea.2004.6410Search in Google Scholar

Mazzucchi, C. M. 1978. “Per una rilettura del palinsesto vaticano contenente il dialogo “Sulla scienza politica” del tempo di Giustiniano”. L’imperatore Giustiniano. Fra storia e mito. Ed. G. G. Archi. Milan, 237–47.Search in Google Scholar

–. 2002. Menae patricii cum Thoma referendario De scientia politica dialogus. Iteratis curis quae exstant ex codice Vaticano palimpsesto ed. Carolus Maria Mazzucchi. Milan.Search in Google Scholar

–. 2006. “DAMASCIO, AUTORE DEL CORPUS DIONYSIACUM, E IL DIALOGO ΠΕΡΙ ΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΗΣ ΕΠΙΣΤΗΜΗΣ.” Aevum 80(2), 299–334.Search in Google Scholar

Mazzucchi, C. M./Matelli, E. 1985. “La dottrina dello stato nel dialogue Sulla scienza politica e il suo autore”. Il mondo del diritto nell’epoca giustinianea. Caratteri e problematiche. Ed. G. G. Archi. Ravenna, 209–23.Search in Google Scholar

McCoull, L. S. B. 2006. “Menas and Thomas: Notes on the Dialogus de scientia politica.” Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 46, 301–13.Search in Google Scholar

Morrow. G. 1954. “The Demiurge in Politics: The Timaeus and the Laws”. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 27, 5–23.10.2307/3129499Search in Google Scholar

–. 1960. “Aristotle Comments on Plato’s Laws”. Plato and Aristotle in the Mid-Fourth Century. Ed. I. Düring/G. E. L. Owen. Göteborg, 147–62.Search in Google Scholar

Motta, A. 2018. “Demiurgy in Heavens. An Ancient Account in Plato’s Statesman”. Plato’s Statesman Revisited. Ed. T. M. Robinson/B. Bossi. Berlin, 141–56.10.1515/9783110605549-009Search in Google Scholar

O’Meara, D. 2002. “The Justinianic Dialogue On Political Science and its Neoplatonic Sources”. Byzantine Philosophy and Its Ancient Sources. Ed. K. Ierodiakonou. Oxford, 49–62.10.1093/oso/9780199246137.003.0004Search in Google Scholar

–. 2003. Platonopolis. Platonic Political Thought in Late Antiquity. Oxford.Search in Google Scholar

–. 2018a. “The Legislation of the World and Human Legislation in Late Antique Platonism”. Natur in politischen Ordnungsentwürfen der Vormoderne. Ed. A. Höffele/B. Kellner. Leiden, 39–50.Search in Google Scholar

–. 2018b. “Plato’s Political Dialogues in the Writings of Julian the Emperor”. Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Plato in Antiquity. Ed. H. Tarrant/F. Renaud, D. Baltzly/D. A. Layne. Leiden, 400–10.Search in Google Scholar

–. 2019. “How Military Science Relates to Political Science in the Anonymous Justinianic Dialogue On Political Science”. Philosophie für die Polis: Akten des 5. Kongresses der Gesellschaft für antike Philosophie 2016. Ed. Chr. Riedweg. Berlin/Boston, 493–506.Search in Google Scholar

Owen, G. E. L. 1953. “The Place of the Timaeus in Plato’s Dialogues”. CQ 3, 79–95.10.1017/S0009838800002652Search in Google Scholar

Pertusi, A. 1968. “I principi fondamentali della concezione del potere a Bisanzio. Per un commento al dialogo “Sulla scienza politica” attribuito a Pietro Patrizio (secolo VI)”. Bull. Instituto storico per il Medio Evo e Archivio Muratoriano 80, 1–23.Search in Google Scholar

Prächter, K. 1900. “Zum Maischen Anonymus περὶ πολιτικῆς ἐπιστήμης”. Byzantinische Zeitschrift 9, 621–32.10.1515/byzs.1900.9.3.621Search in Google Scholar

Rashed, M. 2000. “Ménas, préfet du prétoire (528/529) et philosophe : une épigramme inconnue”. Elenchos 21, 89–98.Search in Google Scholar

Reid. J. 2021. “Changing the Laws of the Laws.” Ancient Philosophy 41, 413–41.10.5840/ancientphil202141226Search in Google Scholar

Roueché, C. 1984. “Acclamations in the Later Roman Empire: New Evidence from Aphrodisias.” JRS 74, 181–99.10.2307/299014Search in Google Scholar

Rowe, C. J. 2001. “Killing Socrates: Plato’s Later Thoughts on Democracy.” Journal of Hellenic Studies 121, 63–76.10.2307/631828Search in Google Scholar

–. 2010. “The Relationship to Other Dialogues: A Proposal”. In Plato’s Laws: A Critical Guide. Ed. Chr. Bobonich. Cambridge/New York, 29–50.Search in Google Scholar

Schmidt-Hofner, S. 2019. “Plato and the Theodosian Code”. Early Medieval Europe 27(1), 35–60.10.1111/emed.12313Search in Google Scholar

Schofield, M. 1999. “The Disappearing Philosopher-King.” In Saving the City: Philosophers-Kings and Other Classical Paradigms. London/New York, 28–45.Search in Google Scholar

Schott, J. M. 2003. “Founding Platonopolis: The Platonic Πολιτεία in Eusebius, Porphyry and Iamblichus”. Journal of Early Christian Studies 11(4), 501–31.10.1353/earl.2003.0068Search in Google Scholar

Segonds, A. 1990. Prolégomènes à la philosophie de Platon. Paris.Search in Google Scholar

Simon, D. 1984. “Princeps legibus solutus. Die Stellung des byzantinischen Kaisers zum Gesetz”. Gedächtnisschrift für Wolfgang Kunkel. Ed. D. Nörr/D. Simon. Frankfurt/M., 449–92.Search in Google Scholar

Simpson, P. 2003. “Plato’s Laws in the Hands of Aristotle”. Plato’s Laws: From Theory into Practice. Ed. L. Brisson/S. Scolnicov. Sankt Augustin, 298–303.Search in Google Scholar

Valdenberg, V. 1925. “Les idées politiques dans les fragments attribués à Pierre le Patrice”. Byzantion 2, 55–76.Search in Google Scholar

Vegetti, M. 1999. “L’autocritica di Platone: il Timaeo e le Leggi”. La Repubblica di Platone nella tradizione antica. Ed. M. Vegetti/M. Abbate. Naples, 13–27.Search in Google Scholar

Vlastos, G. 1973. Platonic Studies. Princeton.10.1515/9780691226958Search in Google Scholar

Whitby, M. 1999. “The Violence of the Circus Factions”. Organised Crime in Antiquity. Ed. K. Hopwood. London, 229–53.10.2307/j.ctvvn934.11Search in Google Scholar

Wildberg. C. 2006. “Philosophy in the Age of Justinian”. The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Justinian. Ed. M. Maas. Cambridge, 316–40.10.1017/CCOL0521817463.013Search in Google Scholar

Zamora Calvo, J. M. 2018. “Plato’s Reign of Kronos: Proclus’ Interpretation of the Myth in the Politicus”. Plato’s Statesman Revisited. Ed. T. M. Robinson/B. Bossi. Berlin, 119–40.10.1515/9783110605549-008Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2022-10-20

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 14.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/agph-2021-0168/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button