Reappraising Plato’s Cratylus
-
David Meißner
Abstract
While the argument of Plato’s Cratylus supports both the claim that there is a natural correctness of names and the claim that correct names need not be descriptions or imitations of their referents, the protagonists of the Cratylus find it infeasible to reconcile these two claims. In my paper, I account for this puzzling observation by elaborating a novel interpretation of the Cratylus. I show that the protagonists of the Cratylus are unable to make sense of the results of their joined investigation because they rely on a mistaken preconception of what a correct name is. Based on this diagnosis, I contend that Plato wants his readers to comprehend and overcome the dialectical predicament of his protagonists. I thus illuminate both the internal logic of the Cratylus and the philosophical agenda Plato pursues in staging a dialogue with this particular internal logic.
Ackrill, J. L. 1994. “Language and Reality in Plato’s Cratylus”. In: Realtà e Ragione. Studi di filosofia antica. Ed. A. Alberti. Florence, 9–28.Search in Google Scholar
Ademollo, F. 2011. The Cratylus of Plato. A Commentary. Cambridge/New York.Search in Google Scholar
Anagnostopoulos, G. 1973/74. “The Significance of Plato’s Cratylus”. Review of Metaphysics 27, 318–45.Search in Google Scholar
Barney, R. 2001. Names and Nature in Plato’s Cratylus. New York/London.10.4324/9780203800645Search in Google Scholar
Baxter, T. M. S. 1992. The Cratylus: Plato’s Critique of Naming. Leiden/New York/Cologne.10.1163/9789004320796Search in Google Scholar
Benfey, T. 1866. “Über die Aufgabe des platonischen Dialogs Kratylos”. Abhandlungen der Königlichen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaft zu Göttingen, Phil. Hist. Kl. 12, 189–330.Search in Google Scholar
Bestor, T. W. 1980. “Plato’s Semantics and Plato’s ‘Cratylus’”. Phronesis 25, 306–30.10.1163/156852880X00179Search in Google Scholar
Buchheim, T. “Das philosophisch-argumentative Gerüst des Kratylos” (unpublished draft).Search in Google Scholar
Diehl, C. 2012. Platons Semantik. Die Theorie sprachlicher Bedeutung im Kratylos. Münster.10.30965/9783897859449Search in Google Scholar
Fine, G. 1977. “Plato on Naming”. Philosophical Quarterly 27, 289–301.10.2307/2218949Search in Google Scholar
Gaiser, K. 1974. Name und Sache in Platons Kratylos. Heidelberg.Search in Google Scholar
Gold, J. B. 1978. “The Ambiguity of ‘Name’ in Platoʼs ‘Cratylus’”. Philosophical Studies 34, 223–51.10.1007/BF00372890Search in Google Scholar
Grote, G. 21865. Plato and the Other Companions of Socrates. Vol. 2. London.Search in Google Scholar
Guzzo, A. 1956. “La problematica del ‘Cratilo’”. Filosofia 7, 609–66.Search in Google Scholar
Heitsch, E. 1984. Willkür und Problembewußtsein in Platons Kratylos. Stuttgart.Search in Google Scholar
Joseph, J. E. 2000. Limiting the Arbitrary: Linguistic Naturalism and its Opposites in Plato’s Cratylus and Modern Theories of Language. Amsterdam/Philadelphia.10.1075/sihols.96Search in Google Scholar
Kahn, C. 1973. “Language and Ontology in the Cratylus”. In: Exegesis and Argument. Ed. E. N. Lee/A. P. D. Mourelatos/R. M. Rorty. Assen, 152–76.Search in Google Scholar
Keller, S. 2000. “An Interpretation of Platoʼs ‘Cratylus’”. Phronesis 45, 284–305.10.1163/156852800510234Search in Google Scholar
Ketchum, R. 1979. “Names, Forms and Conventionalism: ‘Cratylus’, 383–95”. Phronesis 24, 133–47.10.1163/156852879X00081Search in Google Scholar
Kretzmann, N. 1971. “Plato on the Correctness of Names”. American Philosophical Quartely 8, 126–38.Search in Google Scholar
Lanzalaco, A. 1955. “Il convenzionalismo platonico del ‘Cratilo’”. Acme 8, 205–48.Search in Google Scholar
Levin, S. 1995. “What’s in a Name?: A Reconsideration of the Cratylus’ Historical Sources and Topics”. Ancient Philosophy 15, 91–115.10.5840/ancientphil199515137Search in Google Scholar
Meißner, D. 2019. Natur, Norm, Name. Sprache und Wirklichkeit in Platons Kratylos. Hamburg.Search in Google Scholar
–. “Conventionalism and Relativism in Plato’s Cratylus”. Forthcoming in History of Philosophy Quarterly.Search in Google Scholar
–. “Plato’s Cratylus”. In: The Platonic Mind. Ed. V. Politis/P. Larsen. London (forthcoming).Search in Google Scholar
Rehn, R. 1982. Der logos der Seele. Wesen, Aufgabe und Bestimmung der Sprache in der platonischen Philosophie. Hamburg.Search in Google Scholar
Schofield, M. 1982. “The Dénouement of the Cratylus”. In: Language and Logos. Ed. M. Nussbaum/M. Schofield. Cambridge, 61–81.10.1017/CBO9780511550874.005Search in Google Scholar
Sedley, D. 2003. Plato’s Cratylus. Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar
Smith, I. 2014. “Taking the Tool Analogy Seriously: Forms and Naming in the Cratylus”. The Cambridge Classical Journal 60, 75–99.10.1017/S1750270514000037Search in Google Scholar
Weingartner, R. H. 1970. “Making Sense of the ‘Cratylus’”. Phronesis 15, 5–25.10.1163/156852870X00026Search in Google Scholar
Wyller, E. A. 1970. Der späte Platon: Tübinger Vorlesungen 1965. Hamburg.Search in Google Scholar
© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Titelseiten
- Articles
- Reappraising Plato’s Cratylus
- Faḫr al-Dīn al-Rāzī on Animal Cognition and Immortality
- Questioning Authority: Anthony Collins’ Challenge to Orthodox Anglican Authority Figures and George Berkeley’s Reply
- The Importance of Kant’s Schematism for Schelling’s Project of a Philosophy of Nature
- Sellars’s Core Critique of C. I. Lewis: Against the Equation of Aboutness with Givenness
- Book Reviews
- Proops, Ian. The Fiery Test of Critique: A Reading of Kant's Dialectic. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2021, xiv + 486 pp.
- Textor, Mark. The Disappearance of the Soul and the Turn against Metaphysics: Austrian Philosophy 1874–1918. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2021, xv + 386 pp.
Articles in the same Issue
- Titelseiten
- Articles
- Reappraising Plato’s Cratylus
- Faḫr al-Dīn al-Rāzī on Animal Cognition and Immortality
- Questioning Authority: Anthony Collins’ Challenge to Orthodox Anglican Authority Figures and George Berkeley’s Reply
- The Importance of Kant’s Schematism for Schelling’s Project of a Philosophy of Nature
- Sellars’s Core Critique of C. I. Lewis: Against the Equation of Aboutness with Givenness
- Book Reviews
- Proops, Ian. The Fiery Test of Critique: A Reading of Kant's Dialectic. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2021, xiv + 486 pp.
- Textor, Mark. The Disappearance of the Soul and the Turn against Metaphysics: Austrian Philosophy 1874–1918. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2021, xv + 386 pp.
