Abstract
Analytic philosophy in the United States emerged parallel to the demise of idealism. During the second half of the nineteenth century, Josiah Royce had contributed importantly to the predominance of idealist systems and corresponding academic groups. With the rise of pragmatism and new realism, the situation changed dramatically: the idealist movement lost momentum and realism began to dominate the discourse. The present paper argues that the critiques of idealism put forward by the realists during the first two decades of the twentieth century were instrumental to the emergence of analytic philosophy in the United States. As I will explain, Ralph Barton Perry (1876–1957) was the key figure in the underinvestigated genesis of this movement.
Anderson, D. R. 2005. „Who’s a Pragmatist: Royce and Peirce at the Turn of the Century“. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 41, 467–81.Search in Google Scholar
Auxier, R. E. 2013. Time, Will, and Purpose: Living Ideas from the Philosophy of Josiah Royce. Chicago.Search in Google Scholar
Bailey, A. 1998. „The Strange Attraction of Sciousness: William James on Consciousness“. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 34, 414–434.Search in Google Scholar
Beaney, M. 2013 (Hg.). The Oxford Handbook of the History of Analytic Philosophy. Oxford.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199238842.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
—. 2014. „Analysis“. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Hg. E. N. Zalta. Spring 2021 Edition. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2021/entries/analysis/.Search in Google Scholar
Bell, D. 1999. „The Revolution of Moore and Russell: A Very British Coup?“ Hg. A. O’Hear, German Philosophy Since Kant. Cambridge, 193–208.10.1017/CBO9780511524110.011Search in Google Scholar
Bergson, H. 1907. L’Evolution créatice. Paris.Search in Google Scholar
Bloch, E. 1949. Subjekt-Objekt. Erläuterungen zu Hegel. Berlin.Search in Google Scholar
Bode, B. H. 1907. „Realism and Objectivity“. The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 4, 259–263.10.2307/2012071Search in Google Scholar
Boodin, J. E. 1907. „The New Realism“. The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 4, 533–542.10.2307/2011595Search in Google Scholar
Bowman, L. 1955. Criticism and Construction in the Philosophy of American New Realism. Stockholm.Search in Google Scholar
Bradley, F. H. 1893. Appearance and Reality: A Metaphysical Essay. London.Search in Google Scholar
Bush, W. T. 1911. „The Problem of the Ego-Centric Predicament“. The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 8, 438–439.10.2307/2013191Search in Google Scholar
Calkins, M. W. 1907. The Persistent Problems of Philosophy: An Introduction to Metaphysics. New York.10.1037/10947-000Search in Google Scholar
—. 1911. „The Idealist to the Realist“. The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 8, 449–458.10.2307/2012399Search in Google Scholar
Campbell, J. 2007. „One Hundred Years of Pragmatism“. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 43, 1–15.10.2979/TRA.2007.43.1.1Search in Google Scholar
Candlish, S. 2007. The Russell/Bradley Dispute and its Significance for Twentieth Century Philosophy. New York.10.1057/9780230800618Search in Google Scholar
Carnap, R. 1936. „Von der Erkenntnistheorie zur Wissenschaftslogik“. Actes du Congrès international de philosophie scientifique, Paris 1935, Fasc. 1, Philosophie scientifique et l’empiricisme logique. Paris, 36–41.Search in Google Scholar
Carnap, R.###/Hahn, H.###/Neurath, O.### 1929. Wissenschaftliche Weltauffassung. Der Wiener Kreis. Hg. Verein Ernst Mach. Wien.Search in Google Scholar
Cassirer, E. 1910. Substanzbegriff und Funktionsbegriff. Untersuchungen über die Grundfragen der Erkenntniskritik. Berlin.Search in Google Scholar
Charles, E. P. 2012. A New Look at New Realism: The Psychology and Philosophy of E. B. Holt. London/New York.Search in Google Scholar
—. 2013. „William James’s Personal and Professional Influence on Edwin Bissell Holt“. William James Studies 10, 1–12.Search in Google Scholar
Dewey, J. 1900. „Review: Josiah Royce, The World and the Individual, Vol. 1“. The Philosophical Review 9, 320–323.10.2307/2176386Search in Google Scholar
—. 1902. „Review: Josiah Royce, The World and the Individual, Vol. 2“. The Philosophical Review 11, 404–407.Search in Google Scholar
—. 1911. „Brief Studies in Realism. II“. The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 8, 546–554.10.2307/2013604Search in Google Scholar
Feigl, H.###/Sellars W.### 1949 (Hg.). Readings in Philosophical Analysis. New York.Search in Google Scholar
—. 1981. Inquiries and Provocations: Selected Writings, 1929–1974. Hg. R. S. Cohen. Dordrecht/Boston/London.Search in Google Scholar
Floyd, J. 2009. „Recent Themes in the History of Early Analytic Philosophy“. Journal of the History of Philosophy 47, 157–200.10.1353/hph.0.0106Search in Google Scholar
Føllesdal, D.###/Friedman, M.### 2006. „American Philosophy in the Twentieth Century“. Daedalus 135, 116–126.10.1162/daed.2006.135.2.116Search in Google Scholar
Glock, H.-J. 2008. What Is Analytic Philosophy? Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar
Griffin, N. 1992. The Selected Letters of Bertrand Russell. Volume One: The Private Years, 1884–1914. Boston/New York/London.Search in Google Scholar
Guyer, P.###/Horstmann, R.-P.### 2021. „Idealism“. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Hg. E. N. Zalta. Spring 2021 Edition. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2021/entries/idealism/Search in Google Scholar
Harlow V. E. 1931. A Bibliography and Genetic Study of American Realism. [Keine Ortsangabe]: Harlow Publishing Co.Search in Google Scholar
Hatfield, G. 2002. „Psychology, Philosophy, and Cognitive Science: Reflections on the History of Experimental Psychology“. Mind and Laguage 17, 207–232.10.1111/1468-0017.00196Search in Google Scholar
―. 2003. „Behaviorism and Psychology“. Hg. T. Baldwin, The Cambridge History of Philosophy, 1870–1945. Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar
―. 2015. „Radical Empiricism, Critical Realism, and American Functionalism: James and Sellars“. HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 5, 129–153.10.1086/680373Search in Google Scholar
Holt, E. B. 1912. „The Place of Illusory Experience in a Realistic World“. Hg. Holt, E. B./Marvin, W. T./Montague, W. P./Perry, R. B./Pitkin, W.B./Spaulding, E. G., The New Realism: Coöperative Studies in Philosophy. New York, 303–373.Search in Google Scholar
—. 1914. The Concept of Consciousness. New York.Search in Google Scholar
Holt, E. B.###/Marvin, W. T.###/Montague, W. P.###/Perry, R. B.###/Pitkin, W.B.###/Spaulding, E. G.### 1910. „The Program and First Platform of Six Realists“. The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 7, 393–401.10.2307/2010710Search in Google Scholar
―. 1912. The New Realism: Coöperative Studies in Philosophy. New York.Search in Google Scholar
Hookway, C. 1985. Peirce. London.Search in Google Scholar
Horstmann, R.-P. 1984. Ontologie und Relationen. Hegel, Bradley, Russell und die Kontroverse über interne und externe Beziehungen. Königstein/Ts.Search in Google Scholar
Hylton, P. 1990. Russell, Idealism and the Emergence of Analytic Philosophy. Oxford.Search in Google Scholar
James, W. 1904. „Does ‚Consciousness‘ Exist?“ The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 1, 477–491.10.2307/2011942Search in Google Scholar
—. 1912. Essays in Radical Empiricism. London.Search in Google Scholar
Klausner, N. 1947. „Three Decades of the Epistemological Dialectic 1900–1930“. Philosophy of Science 14, 20–43.10.1086/286912Search in Google Scholar
Klein, A. 2020. „The Death of Consciousness? William James’s Case Against Psychological Unobservables“. Journal of the History of Philosophy 58, 293–323.10.1353/hph.2020.0040Search in Google Scholar
Kuklick, B. 1977. The Rise of American Philosophy: Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1860–1930. New Haven, CT.Search in Google Scholar
—. 1985. Josiah Royce: An Intellectual Biography. Indianapolis.Search in Google Scholar
—. 2001. A History of Philosophy in America, 1720–2000. Oxford.Search in Google Scholar
—. 2019. „After Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature“. Analyse & Kritik 41, 3–21.Search in Google Scholar
Limbeck-Lilienau, C. 2010. „Rudolf Carnap und die Philosophie in Amerika. Logischer Empirismus, Pragmatismus, Realismus“. Hg. F. Stadler, Vertreibung, Transformation und Rückkehr der Wissenschaftstheorie. Am Beispiel von Rudolf Carnap und Wolfgang Stegmüller. Wien/Berlin, 85–166.Search in Google Scholar
Lovejoy, A. O. 1912. „Present Philosophical Tendencies“, The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 9, 679–683.10.2307/2013406Search in Google Scholar
Mander, W. J. 2000. Anglo-American Idealism, 1865–1927. Westport.Search in Google Scholar
Marcuse, H. 1932. Hegels Ontologie und die Theorie der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt a. M.Search in Google Scholar
Marsoobian, A. T.###/Ryder, J.### 2004. The Blackwell Guide to American Philosophy. Oxford.10.1002/9780470996843Search in Google Scholar
Marvin, W. T. 1912. „The Emancipation of Metaphysics from Epistemology“. Hg. Holt, E. B./Marvin, W. T./Montague, W. P./Perry, R. B./Pitkin, W.B./Spaulding, E. G., The New Realism: Coöperative Studies in Philosophy. New York, 45–95.Search in Google Scholar
McGilvary, E. B. 1912. „Realism and the Ego-Centric Predicament“. The Philosophical Review 21, 351–356.10.2307/2177716Search in Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. 1843. A System of Logic: Ratiocinative and Inductive. New York.Search in Google Scholar
Misak, C. 2008. The Oxford Handbook of American Philosophy. Oxford.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199219315.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
—. 2013. The American Pragmatists. Oxford.Search in Google Scholar
Montague, W. P. 1902. „Professor Royce’s Refutation of Idealism“. The Philosophical Review 11, 43–55.10.2307/2176930Search in Google Scholar
—. 1905. „The Relational Theory of Consciousness and Its Realistic Implications“. The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 2, 309–316.10.2307/2010859Search in Google Scholar
—. 1907. „Current Misconceptions of Realism“. The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 4, 100–105.10.2307/2011783Search in Google Scholar
—. 1937. „The Story of American Realism“. Philosophy 12, 140–161.10.1017/S0031819100010470Search in Google Scholar
Moore, G. E. 1899. „The Nature of Judgment“. Mind 8, 176–193.10.1093/mind/VIII.2.176Search in Google Scholar
—. 1903. „The Refutation of Idealism“. Mind 12, 433–453.Search in Google Scholar
—. 1925. „A Defence of Common Sense“. J. H. Muirhead, Contemporary British Philosophy (2nd series). London, 199–223.Search in Google Scholar
Natsoulas, T. 2012. „The Dislocation of Consciousness: The Psychology and Philosophy of E. B. Holt“. Hg. E. P. Charles, A New Look at New Realism: The Psychology and Philosophy of E. B. Holt. London/New York.Search in Google Scholar
Neuber, M. 2018. „Changing Places. Herbert Feigl über The Wiener Kreis in America“. M. Beck/ N. Coomann (Hg.), Historische Erfahrung und begriffliche Transformation. Deutschsprachige Philosophie im Exil in den USA 1933–1945. Wien, 100–114.Search in Google Scholar
—. 2020. „Two Forms of American Critical Realism: Perception and Reality in Santayana/Strong and Sellars“. HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 10, 76–105.10.1086/707651Search in Google Scholar
Newen, A. 2005. Analytische Philosophie zur Einführung. Hamburg.Search in Google Scholar
O’Shea, J. R. 2008. „American Philosophy in the Twentieth Century“. Hg. D. Moran, The Routledge Companion to Twentieth-Century Philosophy. London, 204–253.Search in Google Scholar
Papineau, D. 2020. „Naturalism“. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Hg. E. N. Zalta. Spring 2021 Edition.Search in Google Scholar
Parker, K. E.###/Bell, J.### 2014. The Relevance of Royce. New York.10.5422/fordham/9780823255283.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Peirce, C. S. 1877. „The Fixation of Belief“. Popular Science Monthly 12, 1–15.Search in Google Scholar
Perry, R. B. 1902. „Prof. Royce’s Refutation of Realism and Pluralism“. The Monist 12, 446–458.10.5840/monist19021234Search in Google Scholar
—. 1904. „Conceptions and Misconceptions of Consciousness“. Psychological Review 11, 282–296.10.1037/h0075223Search in Google Scholar
—. 1910a. „The Ego-Centric Predicament“. The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 7, 5–14.10.2307/2011576Search in Google Scholar
—. 1910b. „Realism as a Polemic and Program of Reform“. The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 7, 337–353 u. 365–379.Search in Google Scholar
—. 1912a. „A Realistic Theory of Independence“. Hg. Holt, E. B./Marvin, W. T./Montague, W. P./Perry, R. B./Pitkin, W.B./Spaulding, E. G., The New Realism: Coöperative Studies in Philosophy. New York, 99–151.Search in Google Scholar
—. 1912b. Present Philosophical Tendencies: A Critical Survey of Naturalism, Idealism, Pragmatism, and Realism Together With a Synopsis of the Philosophy of William James. New York.Search in Google Scholar
—. 1921. The Plattsburg Movement: A Chapter of America’s Participation in the World War. New York.Search in Google Scholar
—. 1935. The Thought and Character of William James. Boston.Search in Google Scholar
—. 1939. „American Philosophy in the First Decade of the Twentieth Century“. Revue Internationale de Philosophie 1, 423–443.Search in Google Scholar
—. 1954. „William Pepperell Montague and the New Realists“. The Journal of Philosophy 51, 604–608.10.2307/2020921Search in Google Scholar
Pfeifer, D. E. 2016. „Josiah Royce Influenced Charles Peirce“. European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 8 [keine Seitenzahlangaben].10.4000/ejpap.659Search in Google Scholar
Potter, M. 2020. The Rise of Scientific Philosophy, 1897–1930. From Frege to Ramysey. New York & London.10.4324/9781315776187Search in Google Scholar
Pratt, J. B. 1912. „Professor Perry’s Proofs of Realism“. The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 9, 573–580.10.2307/2013398Search in Google Scholar
Randall, J. H. 1969. „Josiah Royce and American Idealism“. The Journal of Philosophy 63, 57–83.10.2307/2023824Search in Google Scholar
Rickert, H. 1892. Der Gegenstand der Erkenntnis. Ein Beitrag zum Problem der philosophischen Transzendenz. Freiburg.Search in Google Scholar
Royce, J. 1892. The Spirit of Modern Philosophy: An Essay in the Form of Lectures. Boston/New York.10.1037/12371-000Search in Google Scholar
—. 1900. The World and the Individual: Gifford Lectures Delivered before the University of Aberdeen. First Series. The Four Historical Conceptions of Being. New York.Search in Google Scholar
—. 1913. The Problem of Christianity. Washington.Search in Google Scholar
Russell, B. 1903. The Principles of Mathematics. Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar
—. 1905. „On Denoting“. Mind 14, 479–493.Search in Google Scholar
—. 1911. „The Basis of Realism“. The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 8, 158–161.10.2307/2013237Search in Google Scholar
—. 1914a. Our Knowledge of the External World: As a Field for Scientific Method in Philosophy. Chicago.Search in Google Scholar
—. 1914b. On Scientific Method in Philosophy. Oxford.Search in Google Scholar
—. 1914c. „Mysticism and Logic“. Hibbert Journal 12, 780–803.Search in Google Scholar
—. [1959] 1993. My Philosophical Development. London.Search in Google Scholar
Schneider, H. 1964. Sources of Contemporary Philosophical Realism in America. Indianapolis/New York.Search in Google Scholar
Sellars. R. W. 1927. „Current Realism in Great Britain and United States“. The Monist 37, 503–520.10.5840/monist192737434Search in Google Scholar
—. 1969. Reflections on American Philosophy from Within. Notre Dame/London.Search in Google Scholar
Shook, J. R. 1995. „John Dewey’s Struggle with American Realism, 1904–1910“. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 31, 542–66.Search in Google Scholar
Sinclair, M. 1917. A Defence of Idealism: Some Questions & Conclusions. London.Search in Google Scholar
Soames, S. 2014. Analytic Philosophy in America, and Other Historical and Contemporary Essays. Princeton.10.23943/princeton/9780691160726.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Spaulding 1912. „A Defense of Analysis“. Hg. Holt, E. B./Marvin, W. T./Montague, W. P./Perry, R. B./Pitkin, W.B./Spaulding, E. G., The New Realism: Coöperative Studies in Philosophy. New York, 155–247.Search in Google Scholar
Sprigge, T. 1997. „The Absolute Idealism of Josiah Royce“. The Philosophers’ Magazine 1, 32–33.10.5840/tpm1997111Search in Google Scholar
Verhaegh, S. 2020. „The American Reception of Logical Positivism: First Encounters, 1929–1932“. HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 10,106–142.10.1086/707750Search in Google Scholar
Werkmeister 1949. A History of Philosophical Ideas in America. New York.Search in Google Scholar
Woodbridge, F. J. E. 1905. „The Nature of Consciousness“. The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 2, 119–125.10.2307/2012207Search in Google Scholar
Wright von, G. H. 1993. The Tree of Knowledge. Leiden.Search in Google Scholar
© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Titelseiten
- Articles
- The Analysis of False Judgement According to Being and Not-Being in Plato’s Theaetetus (188c10–189b9)
- Clotho’ Spindle: Xenocrates’ Doctrine of Indivisibles
- Kant’s Theory of Concept Formation and his Theory of Definitions
- If the I is a Point, How Can It have a Direction? Fichte’s Two-Stage Conceptualization of the Absolute I
- Idealismus, „neuer“ Realismus und die Anfänge der analytischen Philosophie in den Vereinigten Staaten
- Book Reviews
- Jones, Tom. George Berkeley: A Philosophical Life. Princeton / Oxford: Princeton University Press 2021, xxi + 622 pp.
Articles in the same Issue
- Titelseiten
- Articles
- The Analysis of False Judgement According to Being and Not-Being in Plato’s Theaetetus (188c10–189b9)
- Clotho’ Spindle: Xenocrates’ Doctrine of Indivisibles
- Kant’s Theory of Concept Formation and his Theory of Definitions
- If the I is a Point, How Can It have a Direction? Fichte’s Two-Stage Conceptualization of the Absolute I
- Idealismus, „neuer“ Realismus und die Anfänge der analytischen Philosophie in den Vereinigten Staaten
- Book Reviews
- Jones, Tom. George Berkeley: A Philosophical Life. Princeton / Oxford: Princeton University Press 2021, xxi + 622 pp.