Francisco de Vitoria on Prudence and the Nature of Practical Reasoning
-
Anselm Spindler
Abstract
The history of prudence is often depicted as a history of loss. According to one version, the scientification of moral knowledge in medieval philosophy calls into question the role of prudence in moral action (Nussbaum 1978). And while Thomas Aquinas (1225–1274) still tries to integrate prudence into a scientific framework of moral knowledge, the Salmantine theologian Francisco de Vitoria (1483–1546) eventually abandons this approach and excludes prudence from moral knowledge altogether (Fidora 2013). I would like to argue, however, that Vitoria plays a different role in this development: He does not exclude prudence from scientific moral knowledge but gives an integrated account that Aquinas lacks. But this integration comes at a price because he is eventually unable to explain how prudence allows an agent to deal with the problem of contingency in action.
- STh
Thomas Aquinas. Summa theologiae.
- ComSTh
Francisco de Vitoria. Comentarios a la Secunda secundae de Santo Tomás.
Alves, A./Moreira, J. 2013. The School of Salamanca. New York.Search in Google Scholar
Aubenque, P. 2007. Der Begriff der Klugheit bei Aristoteles. Hamburg.10.28937/978-3-7873-2006-6Search in Google Scholar
Bartlett, R./Collins, S. 2011. Aristotle: Nikomachean Ethics. Chicago.Search in Google Scholar
Brandt, R. 2005. “Klugheit bei Kant”. In Klugheit. Ed. W. Kersting. Weilerswist, 98–132.Search in Google Scholar
Brieskorn, N. 2010. “Einleitung”. In Francisco de Vitoria: De Lege. Über das Gesetz. Ed. J. Stüben. Stuttgart, xxiii–xxxiii.10.1007/978-3-322-80276-7_1Search in Google Scholar
Davidson, D. 2001. Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford.10.1093/0199246270.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
del Punta, F. 1998. “The Genre of Commentaries in the Middle Ages and its Relation to the Nature and Originality of Medieval Thought”. In Was ist Philosophie im Mittelalter? Ed. J. Aertsen/A. Speer. Berlin, 138–151.Search in Google Scholar
Doyle, J. 1997. Francisco de Vitoria, Reflection on Homicide and Commentary on Summa theologiae IIa–IIae Q. 64: Thomas Aquinas. Milwaukee.Search in Google Scholar
Fantl, J./McGrath, M. 2007, “On Pragmatic Encroachment in Epistemology”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75, 558–589.10.1111/j.1933-1592.2007.00093.xSearch in Google Scholar
Fidora, A. 2013, “Die prudentia im Prozess der Verwissenschaftlichung der Ethik im Mittelalter”. In Phronêsis – Prudentia – Klugheit. Das Wissen des Klugen in Mittelalter, Renaissance und Neuzeit. Ed. A. Fidora/A. Niederberger/M. Scattola. Porto, 63–76.10.1484/M.TEMA-EB.4.000288Search in Google Scholar
Finnis, J. 1998. Aquinas. Moral, Political, and Legal Theory. Oxford.Search in Google Scholar
Flannery, K. 2001. Acts Amid Precepts. The Aristotelian Logical Structure of Thomas Aquinas’s Moral Theory. Washington.Search in Google Scholar
Honnefelder, L. 2004. “Ansätze zu einer Theorie der praktischen Wahrheit bei Thomas von Aquin und Johannes Duns Scotus”. In Was ist das für den Menschen Gute?: menschliche Natur und Güterlehre. Ed. J. Szaif, M. Lutz-Bachmann. Berlin, 246–261.10.1515/9783110204865.2.246Search in Google Scholar
Horn, C. 2005. “Klugheit bei Thomas von Aquin”. In Klugheit. Ed. W. Kersting. Weilerswist, 42–67.Search in Google Scholar
Horst, U. 1995. “Leben und Werke Francisco de Vitorias”. In Francisco de Vitoria. Vorlesungen I. Ed. U. Horst/H.-G. Justenhoven/J. Stüben. Stuttgart, 13–99.Search in Google Scholar
Kersting, W. 2005. “Einleitung: Rehabilitierung der Klugheit”. In Klugheit. Ed. W. Kersting. Weilerswist, 7–14.Search in Google Scholar
Kluxen, W. 1980. Philosophische Ethik bei Thomas von Aquin. Hamburg.10.28937/978-3-7873-2350-0Search in Google Scholar
Langella, S. 2010. Francisco de Vitoria. De Legibus. Salamanca.Search in Google Scholar
Luckner, A. 2005. Klugheit, Berlin.10.1515/9783110898309Search in Google Scholar
Lutz-Bachmann, M. 2008. “Praktisches Wissen und “Praktische Wissenschaft”: Zur Epistemologie der Moralphilosophie bei Thomas von Aquin”. In Handlung und Wissenschaft. Die Epistemologie der praktischen Wissenschaften im 13. und 14. Jahrhundert. Ed. M. Lutz-Bachmann/A. Fidora. Berlin, 89–96.10.1524/9783050047904.89Search in Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. 1978. “Practical Syllogisms and Practical Science”. In Aristotle’s De Motu Animalium. Ed. M. Nussbaum. Princeton, 165–220.10.2307/j.ctv15r57hz.14Search in Google Scholar
Oliveira e Silva, P. 2024. “Facing the Ambiguities of Aquinas: The Sixtennth-Century Debate on the Origin of ius gentium”. In Das Gesetz – The Law – La Loi. Ed. A. Speer, G. Guldentops. Berlin, 489–508.Search in Google Scholar
Rhonheimer, M. 1994. Praktische Vernunft und Vernünftigkeit der Praxis: Handlungstheorie bei Thomas von Aquin in ihrer Entstehung aus dem Problemkontext der aristotelischen Ethik. Berlin.10.1524/9783050069937Search in Google Scholar
Schüßler, R. 2003. Moral im Zweifel. Band I: Die scholastische Theorie des Entscheidens unter moralischer Unsicherheit. Paderborn.10.30965/9783969756997Search in Google Scholar
Skinner, Q. 1978. The Foundations of Modern Political Thought. Volume two: The Age of Reformation. Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511817878Search in Google Scholar
Spindler, A. 2015. Die Theorie des natürlichen Gesetzes bei Francisco de Vitoria: Warum Autonomie der einzig mögliche Grund einer universellen Moral ist. Stuttgart.Search in Google Scholar
Thomas Aquinas. 1892. Summa theologiae I–II, q. 94–95. Quoted from Sancti Thomae Aquinatis Doctoris Angelici Opera Omnia, Vol. VII: Prima Secundae Summae Theologiae a Questione LXXI ad Questionem CXIV. Rome.Search in Google Scholar
–. 1895. Summa theologiae II–II, q. 47. Quoted from Sancti Thomae Aquinatis Doctoris Angelici Opera Omnia, Vol. VIII: Secunda Secundae Summae Theologiae a Questione I ad Questionem LVI. Rome.Search in Google Scholar
–. 1969. Sententia libri Ethicorum. Quoted from Sancti Thomae Aquinatis Doctoris Angelici Opera Omnia, Vol. XLVII: Sententia Libri Ethicorum. Rome.Search in Google Scholar
van Apeldoorn, L. 2012. “Reconsidering Hobbes’s Account of Practical Deliberation”. Hobbes Studies 25, 142–165.10.1163/18750257-02502002Search in Google Scholar
Vitoria, F. 1997. “Relectio de Indis”. In Francisco de Vitoria. Vorlesungen II. Ed. U. Horst/H.-G. Justenhoven/J. Stüben. Stuttgart, 370–541.Search in Google Scholar
–. 1995. “Relectio de homicidio”. In Francisco de Vitoria. Vorlesungen I. Ed. U. Horst/H.-G. Justenhoven/J. Stüben. Stuttgart, 436–501.Search in Google Scholar
–. 1952. “ComSTh II–II, q. 47–56 (De prudentia)”. In Francisco de Vitoria. Comentarios a la Secunda secundae de Santo Tomás. Ed. Vicente Beltrán de Heredia. Salamanca, 352–388.Search in Google Scholar
Westberg, D. 1994. Right Practical Reason. Aristotle, Action, and Prudence in Aquinas. Oxford.Search in Google Scholar
© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
