Home A Monistic Conclusion to Aristotle’s Ergon Argument: the Human Good as the Best Achievement of a Human
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

A Monistic Conclusion to Aristotle’s Ergon Argument: the Human Good as the Best Achievement of a Human

  • Samuel H. Baker EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: September 8, 2021

Abstract

Scholars have often thought that a monistic reading of Aristotle’s definition of the human good – in particular, one on which “best and most teleios virtue” (Nicomachean Ethics I 7, 1098a17–18) refers to theoretical wisdom – cannot follow from the premises of the ergon argument. I explain how a monistic reading can follow from the premises, and I argue that this interpretation gives the correct rationale for Aristotle’s definition. I then explain that even though the best and most teleios virtue must be a single virtue, that virtue could in principle be a whole virtue that arises from the combination of all the others (and this is what kalokagathia seems to be in the Eudemian Ethics). I also clarify that the definition of the human good aims at capturing the nature of human eudaimonia only in its primary case.

Achtenberg, D. 1989. “The Role of the Ergon Argument in Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics”. Ancient Philosophy 9(1), 37–47.10.5840/ancientphil19899124Search in Google Scholar

Ackrill, J. L. [1974]/1980. “Aristotle on Eudaimonia”. In Essays on Aristotle’s Ethics. Ed. A. O. Rorty. Berkeley, CA. (Originally in the Proceedings of the British Academy 60).10.1525/9780520340985-005Search in Google Scholar

Anagnostopoulos, A. 2017. “Change, Agency and the Incomplete in Aristotle”. Phronesis 6(2), 170–209.10.1163/15685284-12341323Search in Google Scholar

Aquinas, T. 1969. Sententia Libri Ethicorum. Rome. Vol. 47 of T. Aquinas. (1882–ongoing). Opera Omnia iussu Leonis XIII P. M. Edita. Rome/Paris.Search in Google Scholar

Aufderheide, J. 2015. “The Content of Happiness: A New Case for Theoria”. In The Highest Good in Aristotle and Kant. Ed. J. Aufderheide/R. Bader. Oxford, 36–59.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198714019.003.0003Search in Google Scholar

Baker, S. 2015. “The Concept of Ergon: Towards an Achievement Interpretation of Aristotle’s ‘Function Argument’”. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 48, 229–68.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198735540.003.0006Search in Google Scholar

–. 2017. “The Metaphysics of Goodness in the Ethics of Aristotle”. Philosophical Studies 174, 1839–56.10.1007/s11098-016-0824-ySearch in Google Scholar

–. 2019. “What is the ‘best and most perfect virtue’?” Analysis 79(3), 387–393.10.1093/analys/any064Search in Google Scholar

Barnes, J. (ed.) [1984]/1995. The Complete Works of Aristotle. 2 vols. Princeton. Sixth Printing, with Corrections.Search in Google Scholar

Barney, R. 2008. “Aristotle’s Argument for a Human Function”. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 34, 293–322.10.1093/oso/9780199544875.003.0009Search in Google Scholar

Broadie, S. 1991. Ethics with Aristotle. Oxford.10.1093/0195085604.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Broadie, S. (comm.)/Rowe, C. (trans.) 2002. Aristotle: Nicomachean Ethics: Translation, Introduction and Commentary. Oxford.10.1093/actrade/9780198752714.book.1Search in Google Scholar

Bush, S. 2008. “Divine and Human Happiness in Nicomachean Ethics”. The Philosophical Review 117(1), 49–75.10.1215/00318108-2007-024Search in Google Scholar

Charles, D. 1999. “Aristotle on Well-Being and Intellectual Contemplation”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 73, 205–23.10.1111/1467-8349.00055Search in Google Scholar

–. 2015. “Aristotle on the Highest Good: A New Approach”. In The Highest Good in Aristotle and Kant. Ed. J. Aufderheide/R. Bader. Oxford, 60–82.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198714019.003.0004Search in Google Scholar

Cleemput, G. 2006. “Aristotle on Eudaimonia in Nicomachean Ethics I”. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 30,127–57.10.1093/oseo/instance.00258591Search in Google Scholar

Cohoe, C. 2013. “Why the Intellect Cannot Have a Bodily Organ: De Anima 3.4”. Phronesis 58(4), 347–77.10.1163/15685284-12341253Search in Google Scholar

Cooper, J. [1987]/1999. “Contemplation and Happiness: A Reconsideration”. In his Reason and Emotion: Essays on Aristotle’s Moral Psychology and Ethical Theory. Princeton, 212–36. (Originally in Synthese 72.)10.2307/j.ctv182jt48.14Search in Google Scholar

–. [2003]/2004. “Plato and Aristotle on ‘Finality’ and ‘(Self-)Sufficiency’”. In his Knowledge, Nature and the Good. Princeton, 270–308. (Originally in Plato and Aristotle’s Ethics. Ed. R. Heinaman. London.)Search in Google Scholar

–. 2012. Pursuits of Wisdom: Six Ways of Life in Ancient Philosophy from Socrates to Plotinus. Princeton.10.23943/princeton/9780691138602.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Crisp, R. 1994. “Aristotle’s Inclusivism”. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 12, 111–36.10.1093/oso/9780198235279.003.0005Search in Google Scholar

Curzer, H. 1990. “Criteria for Happiness in Nicomachean Ethics I 7 and X 6–8”. Classical Quarterly 40(2), 421–432.10.1017/S0009838800042993Search in Google Scholar

Décarie, V. [1978]/2007. Aristote: Éthique à Eudème. Paris.Search in Google Scholar

Foot, P. 2001. Natural Goodness. Oxford.10.1093/0198235089.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Gauthier, R. A./Jolif, J. Y. [1970]/2002. L’Éthique à Nicomaque: Introduction, Traduction, et Commentaire. Vols. 1–4. Louvain.Search in Google Scholar

Glassen, P. 1957. “A Fallacy in Aristotle’s Argument about the Good”. The Philosophical Quarterly 7(29), 319–2210.2307/2217295Search in Google Scholar

Gomez-Lobo, A. 1989. “The Ergon Inference”. Phronesis 34(2), 170–84.10.1163/156852889X00116Search in Google Scholar

Gottlieb, P. 2009. The Virtue of Aristotle’s Ethics. Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511581526Search in Google Scholar

Hardie, W. F. R. 1965. “The Final Good in Aristotle’s Ethics” Philosophy 40(154), 277–95.10.1007/978-1-349-15267-4_14Search in Google Scholar

Heinaman, R. 1988. “Eudaimonia and Self-Sufficiency in the Nicomachean Ethics”. Phronesis 33, 31–53.10.1163/156852888X00027Search in Google Scholar

–. 2007. “Eudaimonia as an Activity in Nicomachean Ethics 1.8–12”. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 33, 221–53.Search in Google Scholar

Hutchinson, D. S. 1986. The Virtues of Aristotle. London.10.4324/9781315673189Search in Google Scholar

Irwin, T. H. (trans.) 21999. Aristotle: Nicomachean Ethics; translated with Introduction, Notes and Glossary. Indianapolis/Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar

–. 2012. “Conceptions of Happiness in Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics”. In C. Shields (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Aristotle. Oxford, 495–528.Search in Google Scholar

Joachim, H. H. [1951]/1962. Aristotle: The Nicomachean Ethics. Oxford.Search in Google Scholar

Johansen, T. J. 2012. The Powers of Aristotle’s Soul. Oxford.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199658435.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Kenny, A. 1992. Aristotle on the Perfect Life. Oxford.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198240174.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Keyt, D. 1983. “Intellectualism in Aristotle”. In Essays in Ancient Greek Philosophy. Ed. J. P. Anton/A. Preus. Vol. 2. Albany, 364–87.Search in Google Scholar

Kraut, R. 1979. “The Peculiar Function of Human Beings”. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 9(3), 467–78.10.1080/00455091.1979.10716263Search in Google Scholar

–. 1997. Aristotle: Politics Books VII and VIII: translation with commentary. Oxford.Search in Google Scholar

–. 2002. Aristotle: Political Philosophy. Oxford.Search in Google Scholar

–. 2009. What is Good and Why: The Ethics of Well-Being. Cambridge.10.4159/9780674027084Search in Google Scholar

–. 2011. Against Absolute Goodness. Oxford.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199844463.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Lawrence, G. 1993. “Aristotle on the Ideal Life”. Philosophical Review 102(1), 1–34.10.2307/2185651Search in Google Scholar

–. 2006. “Human Good and Human Function”. In The Blackwell Guide to the Nicomachean Ethics. Ed. R. Kraut. Malden, 37–75.10.1002/9780470776513.ch2Search in Google Scholar

–. 2009. “Is Aristotle’s Function Argument Fallacious? Part 1: Clarification of Objections”. Philosophical Inquiry 31(1/2), 191–224.10.5840/philinquiry2009311/221Search in Google Scholar

Leunissen, M. 2015. “Perfection and the Physiology of Habituation According to Physics VII.3”. In Aristotle’s Physics: A Critical Guide. Ed. M. Leunissen Cambridge, 225–44.10.1017/CBO9781139381741.013Search in Google Scholar

Lear, G. 2004. Happy Lives and the Highest Good: An Essay on Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics. Princeton.10.1515/9781400826087Search in Google Scholar

Long, A. 2013. “Aristotle on Eudaimonia, Nous, and Divinity”. In Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics: A Critical Guide. Ed. J. Miller. Cambridge, 92–113.10.1017/CBO9780511977626.006Search in Google Scholar

Lorenz, H. 2009. “NE VII 4: Plain and Qualified Akrasia”. In Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics Book VII (Symposium Aristotelicum). Ed. C. Natali. Oxford, 72–101.10.1093/oso/9780199558445.003.0004Search in Google Scholar

Louis, P. 1956. Aristote. Les parties des animaux. Paris.Search in Google Scholar

McDowell, J. [1980]/2002. “The Role of Eudaimonia in the Nicomachean Ethics”. In Essays on Aristotle’s Ethics. Ed. A. O. Rorty. Berkeley, 359–79 (Originally in the Proceedings of the African Classical Associations 15).Search in Google Scholar

Miller, F. D. 2012. “Aristotle on the Separability of Mind”. In The Oxford Handbook of Aristotle. Ed. C. Shields. Oxford, 306–39.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195187489.013.0013Search in Google Scholar

Minio-Palluello, L. (ed.) 1974. Aristoteles Latinus: Vol XXVI.1–3: Ethica Nicomachea. Leiden.Search in Google Scholar

Müller, J. 2003. “Ergon und Eudaimonia: Plädoyer für eine unifizierende Interpretation der ergon-Argumente in den aristotelischen Ethiken”. Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 57(4), 513–42.Search in Google Scholar

Moss, J. 2014. “Right Reason in Plato and Aristotle: On the Meaning of Logos”. Phronesis 59(3), 181–230.10.1163/15685284-12341266Search in Google Scholar

Natali, C. 2010. “Posterior Analytics and the Definition of Happiness in NE I”. Phronesis 55(4), 305–24.10.1163/156852810X523905Search in Google Scholar

Pakaluk, M. 2005. Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics: An Introduction. Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511802041.002Search in Google Scholar

Purinton, J. 1998. “Aristotle’s Definition of Happiness (NE 1.7 1098a16–18)”. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 16, 259–97.10.1093/oso/9780198238157.003.0008Search in Google Scholar

Reeve, C.D.C. (trans.) 2014. Aristotle: Nicomachean Ethics, translated with Introduction and Notes. Indianapolis/Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar

Roche, T. 1988. “Ergon and Eudaimonia in Nicomachean Ethics I: Reconsidering the Intellectualist Interpretation.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 26(2), 175–94.10.1353/hph.1988.0034Search in Google Scholar

–. 2014. “The Private Life of Aristotle’s Philosopher: A Defense of a Non-Intellectualist Interpretation of Nicomachean Ethics 10.7–8”. In Theoria: Studies on the Status and Meaning of Contemplation in Aristotle’s Ethics. Ed. P. Destrée/M. Zingano. Leuven, 207–39.Search in Google Scholar

Sedley, D. 2000. “The Ideal of Godlikeness”. In Plato 2: Ethics, Politics, Religion and the Soul. Ed. G. Fine. Oxford, 309–28.Search in Google Scholar

Scott, D. 1999. “Primary and Secondary Eudaimonia”. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 73, 225–42.10.1111/1467-8349.00056Search in Google Scholar

–. 2015. Levels of Argument: A Comparative Study of Plato’s Republic and Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics. Oxford.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199249640.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Walker, M. 2011. “Aristotle on Activity ‘According to the Best and Most Final’ Virtue”. Apeiron 44(1), 91–110.10.1515/apeiron.2011.007Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2021-09-08
Published in Print: 2021-09-08

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 14.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/agph-2018-0031/html?lang=en&srsltid=AfmBOoowryXu2jqa2ejP87HncD5p7YYfJyo0wigfw2k7hrZ6_aXttiRo
Scroll to top button