Home Shareholders’ Equity and Dividend Regulation in Japan: How Can Financial Reporting and Capital Maintenance Be Reconciled?
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Shareholders’ Equity and Dividend Regulation in Japan: How Can Financial Reporting and Capital Maintenance Be Reconciled?

  • Akio Hoshi , Mioko Takahashi and Clémence Garcia EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: February 12, 2025

Abstract

The concept of shareholders’ equity is fundamental in both company law and financial reporting standards. In continental European countries and Japan, these legislations have traditionally shared common principles by limiting the source of distribution to shareholders to the accumulated profits a company has earned. As the purposes of financial accounting have progressed towards decision usefulness for investors, however, the link between accounting and statutory distribution restriction has been undermined. Our research addresses the treatment of shareholders’ equity in Japan based on legal primary sources and related literature. Its purpose is to explain the divergence between financial reporting and dividend restrictions in light of their contrasting objectives. Our findings provide two main implications. First, reconciling financial reporting and dividend restriction requires a complex recalculation of distributable profits. The regulation has become too complex to ensure all the companies easily comply with dividend distribution restrictions. Second, the underlying definitions of equity items and their presentation in financial statements have remained consistent between the Companies Act provisions and the accounting standards even after converging with the IFRS. This has been achieved by splitting the concept of shareholders’ equity from net assets in financial accounting.

JEL Classification: K22; M41; M48; N25

Corresponding author: Clémence Garcia, Faculty of International Social Sciences, Gakushuin University, 1-5-1 Mejiro Toshima-ku 171-8588, Tokyo, Japan, E-mail:

Award Identifier / Grant number: 17K13827

Award Identifier / Grant number: 20K01373

Award Identifier / Grant number: 20K020020

Award Identifier / Grant number: 23H00755

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by JSPS Kakenhi grants No. 20K020020, No. 20K01373, No. 17K13827 and No. 23H00755.

Annex 1: Calculation of Distributable Amount

Calculation of the amount of surplus Legal grounds
1(+) Amount of surplus as of the closing date of a company’s accounts Amount of assets Act art 446, item 1(a)
2(+) Book value of treasury shares Act art 446, item 1(b)
3(−) Amount of liabilities Act art 446, item 1(c)
4(−) Total amount of stated capital and reserves Act art 446, item 1(d)
5(−) Amount of assets (item 1 above) Act art 446, item 1(e); regulation art 149, item 1
6(−) Book value of treasury shares (item 2 above) Act art 446, item 1(e); regulation art 149, item 1
7(+) Amount of liabilities (item 3 above) Act art 446, item 1(e); regulation art 149, item 2
8(+) Total amount of stated capital and reserves (item 4 above) Act art 446, item 1(e); regulation art 149, item 2
9(+) Other capital surplus Act art 446, item 1(e); regulation art 149, item 3
10(+) Other retained earnings surplus Act art 446, item 1(e); regulation art 149, item 4
11(+) Change in the amount of surplus after the closing date of a company’s accounts Gains or losses from the sales of treasury shares Act art 446, item 2
12(+) Amount of surplus reallocated from stated capital Act art 446, item 3
13(+) Amount of surplus reallocated from reserves Act art 446, item 4
14(−) Book value of cancelled treasury shares Act art 446, item 5
15(−) Amount of dividends of surplus Act art 446, item 6
16(−) Amount of stated capital and reserves reallocated from surplus Act art 446, item 7; regulation art 150, para 1, item 1
17(−) Increased amount of reserves accompanying with dividends of surplus Act art 446, item 7; regulation art 150, para 1, item 2
18(−) Book value of treasury shares delivered as consideration for corporate reorganisations Act art 446, item 7; regulation art 150, para 1, item 3
19(−) Reduced amount of surplus accompanying with spin-off Act art 446, item 7; regulation art 150, para 1, item 4
20(+) Increased amount of surplus accompanying with corporate reorganisations Act art 446, item 7; regulation art 150, para 1, item 5
21(+) Increased amount of other capital surplus as a result of the performance of compensation liabilities involving with unfair subscription or in-kind contribution Act art 446, item 7; regulation art 150, para 1, item 6
22(+) Increased amount of other capital surplus accompanying with the award of the pre-delivery type share compensation to directors and officers Act art 446, item 7; regulation art 150, para 1, item 7
23(+) Increased amount of other capital surplus accompanying with the return of shares delivered as share compensation Act art 446, item 7; regulation art 150, para 1, item 8

Calculation of the distributable amount

24(+) Amount of surplus (as calculated above) Act art 461, para 2, item 1
25(+) Periodic net profits and consideration for the sales of treasury shares recognised in provisional financial statements Act art 461, para 2, item 2 (a) and (b); regulation art 156
26(−) Book value of treasury shares Act art 461, para 2, item 3
27(−) Consideration for the sale of treasury shares after the closing date of a company’s accounts Act art 461, para 2, item 4
28(−) Periodic net losses recognised in provisional financial statements Act art 461, para 2, item 5; regulation art 157
29(−) Goodwill and deferred assets adjustment amount Act art 461, para 2, item 6; regulation art 158, item 1
30(−) Valuation losses in other securities valuation difference Act art 461, para 2, item 6; regulation art 158, item 2
31(−) Valuation losses in land revaluation differences Act art 461, para 2, item 6; regulation art 158, item 3
32(−) Adjustments for a company to which consolidated dividend restriction apply Act art 461, para 2, item 6; regulation art 158, item 4
33(−) Adjustments for a company which prepared provisional financial statements twice or more Act art 461, para 2, item 6; regulation art 158, item 5
34(−) 3 million yen less equity elements other than surplus Act art 461, para 2, item 6; regulation art 158, item 6
35(−) Amount of consideration for treasury shares delivered in accompany with corporate reorganisations after the closing date of a company’s accounts and recognised in provisional financial statements Act art 461, para 2, item 6; regulation art 158, item 7
36(−) Items 21 and 22 above Act art 461, para 2, item 6; regulation art 158, item 8
37(+) Book value of treasury shares a company acquired in exchange for its treasury shares in share-for-share swap that took place after the closing date of the company’s accounts Act art 461, para 2, item 6; regulation art 158, item 9
38(+) Amount of consideration for treasury shares delivered in accompany with corporate reorganisations after the closing date of a company’s accounts Act art 461, para 2, item 6; regulation art 158, item 10
  1. Source: adapted and translated by the authors from Tanaka (2023), p. 461.

Legal Sources

Accounting Standards Board of Japan. 2001. ASBJ Statement No. 10 Accounting Standards for Financial Instruments (Revised 2009). https://www.asb-j.jp/jp/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/rev_f_instr2.pdf (accessed July 18, 2024).Search in Google Scholar

Accounting Standards Board of Japan. 2005a. ASBJ Statement No. 5 Accounting Standard for Presentation of Net Assets in the Balance Sheet (Revised 2021). https://www.asb-j.jp/en/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/bs_e.pdf (accessed July 21, 2024).Search in Google Scholar

Accounting Standards Board of Japan. 2005b. ASBJ Guidance No. 8 Guidance on Accounting Standard for Presentation of Net Assets in the Balance Sheet (Revised 2021). https://www.asb-j.jp/en/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/bs_e.pdf (accessed July 21, 2024).Search in Google Scholar

Accounting Standards Board of Japan. 2006. Conceptual Framework of Financial Accounting. https://www.asb-j.jp/en/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/ConceptualFramework200612.pdf (accessed July 21, 2024).Search in Google Scholar

American Bar Association, Business Law Section, Corporate Laws Committee. Model Business Corporation Act: Official Text with Official Comment. https://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/administrative/business_law/corplaws/mbca-202404.pdf (accessed September 14, 2024).Search in Google Scholar

Business Accounting Council. 1949. Business Accounting Principles. Tokyo: BAC.Search in Google Scholar

California General Corporation Law. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displayexpandedbranch.xhtml?tocCode=CORP&division=&title=1.&part=&chapter=&article= (accessed September 14, 2024).Search in Google Scholar

Directive 2013/34/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on the Annual Financial Statements, Consolidated Financial Statements and Related Reports of Certain Types of Undertakings.Search in Google Scholar

Directive (EU) 2017/1132 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2017 Relating to Certain Aspects of Company Law.Search in Google Scholar

International Accounting Standards Board. 2018. The Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting. London: IASB.Search in Google Scholar

“Kaisha hō (Heisei 17 nen hōritsu dai 86 gō). [Companies Act (Act No 86 of 2005)].”Search in Google Scholar

“Kaisha hō sekō kisoku (Heisei 18 nen hōmushōrei dai 12 gō). [Enforcement Ordinance for the Companies Act (Ministry of Justice Ordinance No 12 of 2006)].”Search in Google Scholar

“Kaisha keisan kisoku (Heisei 18 nen hōmushōrei dai 13 gō). [Regulation on Corporate Accounting (Ministry of Justice Ordinance No 13 of 2006)].”Search in Google Scholar

“Kin’yū shōhin torihiki hō (Shōwa 23 nen hōritsu dai 25 gō). [Financial Instrument and Exchange Act (Act No. 25 of 1948)].”Search in Google Scholar

“Kokuritsu ginkō jōrei (Meiji 5 nen dajōkan fukoku dai 106 gō). [National Bank Ordinance (Grand Council of State Ordinance No 106 of 1872)].”Search in Google Scholar

“Renketsu zaimu shohyō kisoku (Shōwa 51 nen ōkurashōrei dai 28 gō). [Ordinance on Consolidated Financial Statements (Ministry of Finance Ordinance No 28 of 1976)].”Search in Google Scholar

“Shōhō (Meiji 32 nen hōritsu dai 48 gō). [Commercial Code (Act no 48 of 1899)].”Search in Google Scholar

“Shōhō tokurei hō (Shōwa 49 nen hōritsu dai 22 gō). [Special Rules on the Commercial Code (Act no 22 of 1974)].”Search in Google Scholar

“Urawa Chihō Saibansho [Urawa District Court]. Judgement on 20 November 1996.” Hanrei Taimuzu 936: 232–5.Search in Google Scholar

References

Aizawa, T., and T. Iwasaki. 2008. “Kaisha-hō sōsoku kabushiki kaisha no setsuritsu [General Provisions of the Companies Act and the Incorporation of Stock Companies].” In Ritsuan tantōsha niyoru shin kaisha-hō no kaisetsu [The Drafters’ Guide to the New Companies Act], edited by T. Aizawa, 11–21. Tokyo: Shoji Homu.Search in Google Scholar

Aizawa, T., and D. Koriya. 2008. “Bunpai kanō gaku [Distributable Amounts].” In Ritsuan tantosha niyoru shin kaisha-ho kankei homu shorei no kaisetsu [The Drafters’ guide to Ministry of Justice Ordinances under the New Companies Act], edited by T. Aizawa, 110–32. Tokyo: Shoji Homu.Search in Google Scholar

Ando, H., and M. Yanaga. 2023. “Toki wo koeru kigyō kaikei gensoku [Business Accounting Principles beyond the Eras].” Kigyo Kaikei 75 (1): 14–35.Search in Google Scholar

Armour, J. 2000. “Share Capital and Creditor Protection: Efficient Rules for a Modern Company Law.” The Modern Law Review 63 (3): 355–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.00268.Search in Google Scholar

Armour, J. 2006. “Legal Capital: An Outdated Concept?” European Business Organization Law Review 7 (1): 5–28. https://doi.org/10.1017/s156675290600005x.Search in Google Scholar

Biondi, Y. 2017. “Accounting for Europe’s Economy and Society: Considerations for Financial Stability, Economic Development and the Public Good.” Accounting, Economics, and Law: Convivium 7 (2): 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1515/ael-2017-0018.Search in Google Scholar

Committee on Corporate Laws. 1979. “Changes in the Model Business Corporation Act: Amendments to Financial Provisions.” Business Lawyer (ABA) 34 (5): 1867–90.Search in Google Scholar

Daigo, S. 1990. Nihon no kigyō kaikei [Business Accounting in Japan]. Tokyo: Tokyo University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Davies, P. L., S. Worthington, and C. Hare. 2021. Gower Principles of Modern Company Law, 11th ed. London: Sweet and Maxwell.Search in Google Scholar

Dreyfuss, G. 1976. “Distributions to Shareholders under the New California General Corporation Law.” Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 9 (4): 839–64.Search in Google Scholar

Egashira, K. 2024. Kabushiki kaisha-ho [Laws of Stock Corporations], 9th ed. Tokyo: Yuhikaku.Search in Google Scholar

Emura, M. 1979. Kigyō kaikei to shōhō [Business Accounting and Commercial Law]. Tokyo: Chuo Keizai-sha.Search in Google Scholar

Enriques, L., and J. R. Macy. 2001. “Creditor versus Capital Formation: The Case against the European Legal Capital Rules.” Cornell Law Review 86 (6): 1165–204.Search in Google Scholar

Ferran, E. 2006. “Place for Creditor Protection on the Agenda for Modernisation of Company Law in the European Union.” European Company and Financial Law Review 3 (2): 178–221. https://doi.org/10.1515/ecfr.2006.008.Search in Google Scholar

Ferran, E., E. Howell, and F. Steffek. 2023. Principles of Corporate Finance Law, 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198854074.003.0001Search in Google Scholar

Garcia, C. 2020. “Accounting and Law for Equity Capital and Corporate Sustainability.” European Company Law Journal 17 (5): 176–82. https://doi.org/10.54648/eucl2020025.Search in Google Scholar

Goto, G. 2016. “Legal Capital in Japan and the Influence of German Law.” In German and Asian Perspectives on Company Law: Law and Policy Perspectives, edited by H. Fleischer, H. Kanda, K. Kim, and P. Mülbert, 141–57: Mohr Siebeck.Search in Google Scholar

Hackney, W. P. 1963. “Financial Accounting for Parent and Subsidiaries: A New Approach to Consolidated Statements.” University of Pittsburgh Law Review 25 (1): 9–34.Search in Google Scholar

Harada, K., K. Yasuda, and D. Koriya. 2001. “Jiko kabushiki no shutoku kisei tō no minaoshi ni kakaru kaisei shōhō no kaisetsu (chū) [A Guide to the Amendments to the Commercial Code Regarding the Change in Regulation of a Share Buyback and Other Matters: Part 2].” Shoji Homu 1608: 89–105.Search in Google Scholar

Hiramatsu, A. 2002. “Jiko kabushiki no shobun tō ni kakaru zaimu shohyō tō kisoku tō no kaisei (ge) [The Amendments of the Ordinance on Financial Statements Concerning Disposal of Treasury Shares and Other Related Matters: Part 2].” Shoji Homu 1630: 4–11.Search in Google Scholar

Hisano, H. 1965. Zaimushohyōron [Theory of Financial Statements]. Tokyo: Dobunkan.Search in Google Scholar

Katano, I. 1968. Nihon zaimushohyō seido no tenkai [The Development of the Financial Statements in Japan]. Tokyo: Dobunkan.Search in Google Scholar

Kobayashi, R. 2003. “Shin kaisha-hō ni yoru shihon no hen’yō [The Transformation of Capital by the New Companies Act].” Kigyo kaikei 57 (9): 18–26.Search in Google Scholar

Koriya, D. 2010. “IFRS dōnyū tekiyō ni kansuru kaisha-hō jō no ronten [Company Law Issues Regarding the Introduction and Application of IFRS].” Shoji Homu 1905: 36–43.Search in Google Scholar

Koriya, D., Y. Waku, M. Hosokawa, and Y. Ishii. 2006. Kaisha-hō no keisan shōkai [A Detailed Guide to Accounting in Company Law]. Tokyo: Chuo Keizai-sha.Search in Google Scholar

Kubota, Y. 2015. Kigyō kin’yū to kaisha-hō/shihon shijō kisei [Law of Corporate Finance and Securities Regulation]. Tokyo: Yuhikaku.Search in Google Scholar

Kudo, E., and H. Okano. 2011. “Chapter 5 Part 1.” In A Global History of Accounting, Financial Reporting and Public Policy: Asia and Oceania, edited by G. Previts. Emerald Group Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Kuroda, Y. 2010. “Kokusai kaikei kijun (IFRS) no nin’i tekiyō ni kansuru kaisha keisan kisoku no ichibu wo kaisei suru shōrei no kaisetsu [A Guide to the Ministry Ordinance to Amend a Part of the Regulation on Corporate Accounting Relating to Voluntary Application of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS)].” Shoji Homu 1887: 88–95.Search in Google Scholar

Kuroda, M., and E. Okada. 2013. “The Accounting and Business Economics Traditions in Japan.” In Accounting and Business Economics: Insights from National Traditions, edited by Y. Biondi, and S. Zambon, 102–30. Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Le Manh, A. 2025. “Accounting Policies and Dividend Limitation: A European Comparison.” Accounting, Economics, and Law: Convivium. https://doi.org/10.1515/ael-2021-0041.Search in Google Scholar

Nakamura, S. 2010. “Kokusai kaikei kijun no tekiyō ni tomonau kaisha-hō kinshō-hō jō no mondaiten [Issues on the Companies Act and the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act Accompanying Voluntary Application of International Accounting Standards].” Shoji Homu 1890: 32–9.Search in Google Scholar

Otaka, S. 2024. “Rethinking the Concept of Equity in Accounting: Origin and Attribution of Business Profit.” Accounting, Economics, and Law: Convivium 14 (3): 373–94 https://doi.org/10.1515/ael-2019-0018.Search in Google Scholar

Rickford, J. 2006. “Legal Approaches to Restricting Distributions to Shareholders: Balance Sheet Tests and Solvency Tests.” European Business Organization Law Review 7 (1): 135–80. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1566752906001352.Search in Google Scholar

Sagami, M., and M. Shibuya. 2023. Kadai haito mondai: yamanu hamon [Excess Dividend Issues: Unstopped Controversies]. Nihon Keizai Shimbun, 21 August 2023.Search in Google Scholar

Saito, S. 2011. “Accounting Standard Reforms in Postwar Japan.” In Global Accounting History: Accounting, Financial Reporting and Public Policy, edited by G. Previts. Emerald Group Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Saito, S. 2013. “The International Politics of IFRS Harmonization: A Comment.” Accounting, Economics, and Law: Convivium 3 (2): 47–52. https://doi.org/10.1515/ael-2013-0001.Search in Google Scholar

Saito, S., and Y. Fukui. 2016. Convergent Evolution in Accounting Conceptual Framework: Barker and Penman (2016) and ASBJ (2006). Working Paper.10.2139/ssrn.2824845Search in Google Scholar

Sato, K. 1955. Jōyokinron [Theory of Reserves]. Tokyo: Chuo Keizai-sha.Search in Google Scholar

Shiseki, M. 2002. “Heisei 14-nen kaisei shōhō no kaisetsu (X) [A Guide to the 2002 Amendments to the Commercial Code: Part 10].” Shoji Homu 1649: 4–13.Search in Google Scholar

Someya, K. 1959. “Ryūho rieki kaikei [Accounting for Retained Earnings].” In Mochibun kaikei [Accounting for Equity], edited by K. Kurosawa, 210–53. Tokyo: Chuo Keizai-sha.Search in Google Scholar

Tanaka, W. 2023. Kaisha-ho [Company Law], 4th ed. Tokyo: Tokyo Daigaku Shuppankai.Search in Google Scholar

Tanba, Y. 1957. Shihon kaikei [Capital Accounting]. Tokyo: Chuo Keizai-sha.Search in Google Scholar

Tokyo Stock Exchange, Inc. 2021. Analysis of the Disclosure Content of “Basic Approach to the Selection of Accounting Standards”. https://www.jpx.co.jp/news/1020/nlsgeu000005s65j-att/nlsgeu000005s684.pdf (accessed September 5, 2021).Search in Google Scholar

Tsujiyama, E. 2014. “Institutional Issues Surrounding the Endorsement of IFRS.” Kigyo Kaikei 66 (1): 33–42.Search in Google Scholar

Tsumori, T. 1962. Haitō keisan gensoku no shiteki tenkai [Historical Development of the Principles for Dividend Computation]. Tokyo: Yamagawa Shuppan-sha.Search in Google Scholar

Tsunogaya, N., and P. Chand. 2012. “The Complex Equilibrium Paths towards International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and the Anglo-American Model: The Case of Japan.” The Japanese Accounting Review 2: 117–37. https://doi.org/10.11640/tjar.2.2012_117.Search in Google Scholar

Watanabe, S., Y. Imuta, K. Kaneko, and N. Wakabayashi. 2021. “Kaisha-hō sekō kisoku tō no ichibu wo kaisei suru shōrei no kaisetsu (V) [A Guide to the Ministry Ordinance to Amend a Part of the Enforcement Ordinance of the Companies Act, etc.: Part 5].” Shoji Homu 2254: 14–24.Search in Google Scholar

Yamada, J. 2012. Shihon kaikei no kiso gainen [Basic Concepts of Capital Accounting]. Tokyo: Chuokeizaisha.Search in Google Scholar

Yanaga, M. 2009. “Kaisha hōsei to IFRS [The Company Law System and IFRS].” In IFRS dōnyū no ronten [Issues in Introducing IFRS], edited by Chuo Keizai-sha. Tokyo: Chuo Keizai-sha.Search in Google Scholar

Yanaga, M. 2013. “Ren tan zaimu shohyō no ifrs tekiyō ni yoru bunpai kisei heno eikyō [The Influence of the IFRS Application to Consolidated and Non-consolidated Financial Statements on the Distribution Regulation].” Kigyo Kaikei 65 (5): 28–37.Search in Google Scholar

Yanaga, M. 2017. Konmentaaru kaisha keisan kisoku/shōhō sekō kisoku [Commentaries on the Regulation on Corporate Accounting and the Enforcement Ordinance of the Commercial Code], 3rd ed. Tokyo: Shoji Homu.Search in Google Scholar

Yasuoka, O. 1997. “Sutokku opushon seido tō ni kakaru shōhō kaisei no keii to igi [The Background and Significance of the Amendments to the Commercial Code Regarding the Stock Option System and Other Matters].” Shoji Humu 1458: 2–10.Search in Google Scholar

Yoshihara, K. 1985. “Kaisha no sekinin zaisan no iji to saikensha no rieki hogo (1) [The Maintenance of Assets by a Company and the Protection of Creditor Interests: Part 1].” Hogaku Kyokai Zasshi 102 (3): 423–91.Search in Google Scholar

Yoshikai, S. 1994. “Heisei 6 nen shōhō kaisei hō no kaisetsu (1) [A Guide to the 1994 Amendments to the Commercial Code: Part 1].” Shoji Homu 1361: 2–6.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2024-03-09
Accepted: 2024-10-30
Published Online: 2025-02-12

© 2024 CONVIVIUM, association loi de 1901

Downloaded on 18.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ael-2024-0040/html
Scroll to top button