Home Mathematics Edges versus circuits: a hierarchy of diameters in polyhedra
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Edges versus circuits: a hierarchy of diameters in polyhedra

  • S. Borgwardt , J. A. De Loera EMAIL logo and E. Finhold
Published/Copyright: October 13, 2016
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The study of the graph diameter of polytopes is a classical open problem in polyhedral geometry and the theory of linear optimization. In this paper we continue the investigation initiated in [5] by introducing a vast hierarchy of generalizations to the notion of graph diameter. This hierarchy provides some interesting lower bounds for the usual graph diameter. After explaining the structure of the hierarchy and discussing these bounds, we focus on clearly explaining the differences and similarities among the many diameter notions of our hierarchy. Finally, we fully characterize the hierarchy in dimension two. It collapses into fewer categories, for which we exhibit the ranges of values that can be realized as diameters.


Communicated by: M. Joswig


Acknowledgements

We are grateful for the comments we receive from Raymond Hemmecke, Jon Lee, and Edward Kim regarding some of these constructions. We are also grateful to Jake Miller for his help during the crafting of this paper.

Funding

The first author was supported by the Humboldt Foundation. The second author was supported by an NSA grant. The third author acknowledges the support from the graduate program TopMath of the Elite Network of Bavaria and the TopMath Graduate Center of TUM Graduate School at Technische Universität München.

References

[1] A. Bachem, W. Kern, Linear programming duality. Springer 1992. MR1230380 Zbl 0757.9005010.1007/978-3-642-58152-6Search in Google Scholar

[2] A. Björner, M. Las Vergnas, B. Sturmfels, N. White, G. M. Ziegler, Oriented matroids, volume 46 of Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications. Cambridge Univ. Press 1999. MR1744046 Zbl 0944.5200610.1017/CBO9780511586507Search in Google Scholar

[3] R. G. Bland, New finite pivoting rules for the simplex method. Math. Oper. Res. 2 (1977), 103–107. MR0459599 Zbl 0408.9005010.1287/moor.2.2.103Search in Google Scholar

[4] S. Borgwardt, J. A. De Loera, E. Finhold, J. Miller, The hierarchy of circuit diameters and transportation polytopes. Discrete Applied Mathematics (2015). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dam.2015.10.01710.1016/j.dam.2015.10.017Search in Google Scholar

[5] S. Borgwardt, E. Finhold, R. Hemmecke, On the circuit diameter of dual transportation polyhedra. SIAM J. Discrete Math. 29 (2015), 113–121. MR3300405 Zbl 0651445210.1137/140976868Search in Google Scholar

[6] K. Fukuda, T. Terlaky, Criss-cross methods: a fresh view on pivot algorithms. Math. Programming79 (1997), 369–395. MR1464775 Zbl 0887.9011310.1007/BF02614325Search in Google Scholar

[7] R. Hemmecke, S. Onn, R. Weismantel, A polynomial oracle-time algorithm for convex integer minimization. Math. Program. 126 (2011), 97–117. MR2764341 Zbl 1228.9005510.1007/s10107-009-0276-7Search in Google Scholar

[8] E. D. Kim, F. Santos, An update on the Hirsch conjecture. Jahresber. Dtsch. Math.-Ver. 112 (2010), 73–98. MR2681516 Zbl 1252.0505210.1365/s13291-010-0001-8Search in Google Scholar

[9] R. T. Rockafellar, The elementary vectors of a subspace of RN. In: Combinatorial Mathematics and its Applications (Proc. Conf., Univ. North Carolina, Chapel Hill, N.C., 1967), 104–127, Univ. North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, N.C. 1969.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2014-11-18
Revised: 2016-3-27
Published Online: 2016-10-13
Published in Print: 2016-10-1

© 2016 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 5.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/advgeom-2016-0020/html
Scroll to top button