Home Mathematics On nonexpansiveness of metric projection operators on Wasserstein spaces
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

On nonexpansiveness of metric projection operators on Wasserstein spaces

  • Anshul Adve EMAIL logo and Alpár R. Mészáros
Published/Copyright: September 16, 2025

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate properties of metric projections onto specific closed and geodesically convex proper subsets of Wasserstein spaces ( P p ( R d ) , W p ) . When d = 1 , as ( P 2 ( R ) , W 2 ) is isometrically isomorphic to a flat space with a Hilbertian structure, the corresponding projection operators are expected to be nonexpansive. We give a direct proof of this fact, relying on intrinsic analysis, which also implies nonexpansiveness in certain special cases in higher dimensions. When d > 1 , we show the failure of this property in two regimes: when p > 1 is either small enough or large enough. Finally, we prove some positive curvature properties of Wasserstein spaces ( P p ( R d ) , W p ) when d 2 and p ( 1 , + ) are arbitrary: we show that Wasserstein spaces are nowhere locally Busemann NPC spaces, and they nowhere locally satisfy the so-called projection criterion. As a corollary of the former, they have nonnegative upper Alexandrov curvature, in a precise sense that we define here. In our analysis, a particular subset of probability measures having densities uniformly bounded above by a given constant plays a special role.

MSC 2020: 49Q22

Award Identifier / Grant number: DGE-2039656

Award Identifier / Grant number: EP/X020320/1

Funding statement: The first author was partially supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) Graduate Research Fellowship Program (GRFP) under Grant No. DGE-2039656. The second author was partially supported by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) under Award No. EP/X020320/1.

A Some results from optimal transport

Some properties of the projection operator P Ω 2 onto the set K 2 ( Ω ) were studied in [6]. In particular, arguments verbatim to the ones presented there (see in particular [6, Proposition 5.2]) yield the following lemma.

Lemma A.1

Let p ( 1 , + ) and let Ω R d be closed and convex with L d ( Ω ) 1 . Then, for K = K p ( Ω ) and for any μ P p ( Ω ) , problem (1.1) has a unique solution P Ω p [ μ ] . Moreover, there exists B Ω (depending on μ , p , Ω ) Borel measurable such that P Ω p [ μ ] = μ ac 1 B + 1 Ω B , where μ ac stands for the absolutely continuous part of 𝜇 with respect to L d . Here we have used the notation 1 B for the indicator function of 𝐵. Furthermore, for a Borel set X R d , 1 X is interpreted as a Borel measure by 1 X ( A ) : = L d ( X A ) , for any Borel set 𝐴.

Remark A.2

In the case of p = 2 , the projection P Ω 2 behaves well with respect to interpolation along generalized geodesics. Let μ , ν 0 , ν 1 P 2 ( Ω ) with 𝜇 absolutely continuous. Then there are optimal maps T 0 , T 1 which send 𝜇 to ν 0 , ν 1 respectively. For t [ 0 , 1 ] , define the generalized geodesic connecting ν 0 and ν 1 with respect to 𝜇 by ν t = ( T t ) μ , where T t = ( 1 t ) T 0 + t T 1 . In [14], using the displacement 1-convexity of W 2 2 ( μ , ) along generalized geodesics, i.e. for all t [ 0 , 1 ] ,

W 2 2 ( μ , ν t ) ( 1 t ) W 2 2 ( μ , ν 0 ) + t W 2 2 ( μ , ν 1 ) t ( 1 t ) W 2 2 ( ν 0 , ν 1 ) ,

it was shown that P Ω 2 is locally 1 2 -Hölder continuous. Since this argument is relying on the “Hilbertian like” behavior of W 2 , it is unclear to us whether such reasoning could be carried through for p 2 .

The following result is well known to experts. However, for the convenience of the reader, we supply a sketch of its proof below.

Lemma A.3

Let Ω R d be closed and convex such that L d ( Ω ) 1 and p ( 1 , + ) . The subspace K p ( Ω ) defined in (1.2) is closed and geodesically convex in ( P p ( Ω ) , W p ) .

Proof

The closedness of K p ( Ω ) is straightforward. Let μ 0 , μ 1 K p ( Ω ) . To show that K p ( Ω ) is geodesically convex, we will show that the constant speed geodesic [ 0 , 1 ] t μ t connecting μ 0 to μ 1 is absolutely continuous with a density bounded above by 1. This is a consequence of [19, Theorem 7.28, Proposition 7.29] and [21, Corollary 19.5], but for completeness, we provide a sketch of this proof.

First, by [9, Lemma 3.14], we have that μ t L d Ω for all t [ 0 , 1 ] . To show the upper bound on μ t , we rely on the interpolation inequality for the Jacobian determinants of optimal transport maps provided in [9, Theorem 3.13] (see also [5] for p = 2 ). Let ϕ : Ω R be the unique 𝑐-concave Kantorovich potential in the optimal transport of μ 0 onto μ 1 , where c ( x , y ) = 1 p | x y | p . Then, by [9, Theorem 3.4], T ( x ) : = x | ϕ ( x ) | q 2 ϕ ( x ) (where 1 / p + 1 / q = 1 ) is the unique optimal transport map between μ 0 and μ 1 . Moreover, T t ( x ) : = x t | ϕ ( x ) | q 2 ϕ ( x ) is the unique optimal transport map between μ 0 and μ t .

Let us denote by Ω id Ω the set where 𝜙 is differentiable and ϕ = 0 . Then, reasoning as in [9], we know that there exists a set B Ω Ω id of full measure such that 𝜙 is twice differentiable on 𝐵 with det ( D T ( x ) ) > 0 if x B . Then, by [9, Theorem 3.13], we have

(A.1) det ( D T t ( x ) ) 1 d ( 1 t ) + t det ( D T ( x ) ) 1 d .

We remark that, because our underlying space Ω is flat, the volume distortion coefficients present in the previous inequality (stated in [9] for general Finslerian manifolds) become 1.

By (A.1), if det ( D T ( x ) ) 1 , we have det ( D T t ( x ) ) 1 , while if det ( D T ( x ) ) 1 , then det ( D T t ( x ) ) det ( D T ( x ) ) . In conclusion, det ( D T t ( x ) ) min { 1 , det ( D T ( x ) ) } .

Now, since μ t = ( T t ) μ 0 , when restricted to the set 𝐵, the change of variable formula yields

μ t ( T t ( x ) ) = μ 0 ( x ) det ( D T t ( x ) ) μ 0 ( x ) min { 1 , det ( D T ( x ) ) } max { μ 0 ( x ) , μ 1 ( T ( x ) ) } 1 .

When restricted to the relative complement of 𝐵, T t essentially is the identity map, where the upper bound is also clearly preserved. The result follows. ∎

Acknowledgements

We thank Hugo Lavenant for his feedback on an earlier version of the manuscript.

  1. Communicated by: Zoltan Balogh

References

[1] L. Ambrosio, N. Gigli and G. Savaré, Gradient Flows in Metric Spaces and in the Space of Probability Measures, 2nd ed., Lectures Math. ETH Zürich, Birkhäuser, Basel, 2008. Search in Google Scholar

[2] J. Bertrand and B. Kloeckner, A geometric study of Wasserstein spaces: Hadamard spaces, J. Topol. Anal. 4 (2012), no. 4, 515–542. 10.1142/S1793525312500227Search in Google Scholar

[3] M. R. Bridson and A. Haefliger, Metric Spaces of Non-Positive Curvature, Grundlehren Math. Wiss. 319, Springer, Berlin, 1999. 10.1007/978-3-662-12494-9Search in Google Scholar

[4] R. E. Bruck, Jr., Nonexpansive projections on subsets of Banach spaces, Pacific J. Math. 47 (1973), 341–355. 10.2140/pjm.1973.47.341Search in Google Scholar

[5] D. Cordero-Erausquin, R. J. McCann and M. Schmuckenschläger, A Riemannian interpolation inequality à la Borell, Brascamp and Lieb, Invent. Math. 146 (2001), no. 2, 219–257.10.1007/s002220100160Search in Google Scholar

[6] G. De Philippis, G. De Philippis, A. R. Mészáros, F. Santambrogio and B. Velichkov, BV estimates in optimal transportation and applications, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 219 (2016), no. 2, 829–860. 10.1007/s00205-015-0909-3Search in Google Scholar

[7] S. Di Marino and A. R. Mészáros, Uniqueness issues for evolution equations with density constraints, Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 26 (2016), no. 9, 1761–1783. 10.1142/S0218202516500445Search in Google Scholar

[8] J. Jost, Nonpositive Curvature: Geometric and Analytic Aspects, Lectures Math. ETH Zürich, Birkhäuser, Basel, 1997. 10.1007/978-3-0348-8918-6Search in Google Scholar

[9] M. Kell, On interpolation and curvature via Wasserstein geodesics, Adv. Calc. Var. 10 (2017), no. 2, 125–167. 10.1515/acv-2014-0040Search in Google Scholar

[10] B. Kloeckner, A geometric study of Wasserstein spaces: Euclidean spaces, Ann. Sc. Norm. Super. Pisa Cl. Sci. (5) 9 (2010), no. 2, 297–323. 10.2422/2036-2145.2010.2.03Search in Google Scholar

[11] A. Kristály and D. Repovš, Metric projections versus non-positive curvature, Differential Geom. Appl. 31 (2013), no. 5, 602–610. 10.1016/j.difgeo.2013.06.002Search in Google Scholar

[12] J. Lott, Some geometric calculations on Wasserstein space, Comm. Math. Phys. 277 (2008), no. 2, 423–437. 10.1007/s00220-007-0367-3Search in Google Scholar

[13] J. Lott and C. Villani, Ricci curvature for metric-measure spaces via optimal transport, Ann. of Math. (2) 169 (2009), no. 3, 903–991. 10.4007/annals.2009.169.903Search in Google Scholar

[14] B. Maury, A. Roudneff-Chupin and F. Santambrogio, A macroscopic crowd motion model of gradient flow type, Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 20 (2010), no. 10, 1787–1821. 10.1142/S0218202510004799Search in Google Scholar

[15] R. J. McCann, A convexity principle for interacting gases, Adv. Math. 128 (1997), no. 1, 153–179. 10.1006/aima.1997.1634Search in Google Scholar

[16] A. R. Mészáros, Density constraints in optimal transport, PDEs and mean field games, PhD thesis, Université Paris-Sud, 2015. Search in Google Scholar

[17] A. R. Mészáros and F. Santambrogio, Advection-diffusion equations with density constraints, Anal. PDE 9 (2016), no. 3, 615–644. 10.2140/apde.2016.9.615Search in Google Scholar

[18] F. Otto, The geometry of dissipative evolution equations: The porous medium equation, Comm. Partial Differential Equations 26 (2001), no. 1–2, 101–174. 10.1081/PDE-100002243Search in Google Scholar

[19] F. Santambrogio, Optimal Transport for Applied Mathematicians, Progr. Nonlinear Differential Equations Appl. 87, Birkhäuser/Springer, Cham, 2015. 10.1007/978-3-319-20828-2Search in Google Scholar

[20] K.-T. Sturm, On the geometry of metric measure spaces. I, Acta Math. 196 (2006), no. 1, 65–131. 10.1007/s11511-006-0002-8Search in Google Scholar

[21] C. Villani, Optimal Transport. Old and New, Grundlehren Math. Wiss. 338, Springer, Berlin, 2009. 10.1007/978-3-540-71050-9Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2024-11-01
Accepted: 2025-08-31
Published Online: 2025-09-16
Published in Print: 2025-10-01

© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 31.1.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/acv-2024-0112/html
Scroll to top button