Startseite Mathematik The sharp quantitative isocapacitary inequality (the case of p-capacity)
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

The sharp quantitative isocapacitary inequality (the case of p-capacity)

  • Ekaterina Mukoseeva ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 13. Mai 2021

Abstract

We prove a sharp quantitative form of isocapacitary inequality in the case of a general p. This work is a generalization of the author’s paper with Guido De Philippis and Michele Marini, where we treated the case of 2-capacity.

MSC 2010: 49R05; 49Q20; 35J92

Communicated by Frank Duzaar


Funding statement: The work of the author is supported by the INDAM-grant “Geometric Variational Problems” and by the H2020-MSCA-RISE-2017 PROJECT No. 778010 IPADEGAN.

A Appendix

Here we put some inequalities that are used throughout the paper.

Lemma A.1 ([14, Lemma 2.3]).

Let p > 1 . There exists c ( p ) 0 such that if κ 0 and ξ , η R n , then

( ( κ 2 + | ξ | 2 ) p - 2 2 ξ - ( κ 2 + | η | 2 ) p - 2 2 η ) ( ξ - η ) c ( κ 2 + | ξ | 2 + | η | 2 ) p - 2 2 | ξ - η | 2 .

Moreover, there exists another constant C ( p ) 0 such that if Ω R n is an open set and for u , v W 1 , p ( Ω ) and 0 s 1 , we set u s ( x ) = s u ( x ) + ( 1 - s ) v ( x ) , then the following two inequalities hold:

  1. for p 2 ,

    (A.1) Ω | u - v | p C 0 1 1 s 𝑑 s Ω ( | u s | p - 2 u s - | v | p - 2 v ) ( u s - v ) ,

  2. for 1 < p < 2 ,

    (A.2) Ω | u - v | p C ( 0 1 1 s 𝑑 s Ω ( | u s | p - 2 u s - | v | p - 2 v ) ( u s - v ) ) p 2 ( Ω ( | u | + | v | ) p ) 1 - p 2 .

Lemma A.2.

Let x , y R N , p ( 1 , ) . Then the following inequalities hold:

  1. if p 2 , then

    | y | p | x | p + p | x | p - 2 x ( y - x ) + c | y - x | p

    for some c = c ( p ) > 0 ,

  2. if 1 < p < 2 , then

    | y | p | x | p + p | x | p - 2 x ( y - x ) + c | y - x | 2 ( | x | 2 + | y - x | 2 ) p - 2 2

    for some c = c ( p ) > 0 .

Proof.

Consider a function f : N defined as f ( x ) = | x | p . Writing Taylor expansion for f, we get

| y | p = | x | p + p | x | p - 2 x ( y - x ) + 0 1 ( 1 - t ) D 2 f ( x + t ( y - x ) ) ( y - x ) ( y - x ) 𝑑 t .

Case p = 2 . We have

| y | 2 = | x | 2 + 2 x ( y - x ) + 1 2 | y - x | 2 ,

which gives us a desired inequality. We shall consider p 2 from now on.

Case p 2 . The Hessian D 2 f ( x ) looks as follows:

D 2 f ( x ) = p | x | p - 2 Id + p ( p - 2 ) | x | p - 4 A ,

where A i , j = x i x j . We notice that

0 A ξ ξ | x | 2 | ξ | 2 for any vector  ξ N ,

yielding

D 2 f ( x ) ξ ξ c | x | p - 2 | ξ | 2 for any vector  ξ N ,

where c = c ( p ) > 0 ( c = p for p > 2 , c = p ( p - 1 ) for 1 < p < 2 ). So, we have

| y | p | x | p + p | x | p - 2 x ( y - x ) + | y - x | 2 0 1 ( 1 - t ) | x + t ( y - x ) | p - 2 𝑑 t .

Let us consider the cases of different p separately.

First, we deal with 1 < p < 2 . In this case p - 2 < 0 and so

0 1 ( 1 - t ) | x + t ( y - x ) | p - 2 𝑑 t 1 4 1 4 3 4 ( | x | + t | y - x | ) p - 2 𝑑 t c ( | x | 2 + | y - x | 2 ) p - 2 2 ,

finishing the proof of lemma in this case.

To tackle the case p > 2 , we further consider two cases. If | y - x | < 2 | x | , then

0 1 ( 1 - t ) | x + t ( y - x ) | p - 2 𝑑 t c 0 1 4 | x | p - 2 𝑑 t c | y - x | p - 2 .

If instead | y - x | 2 | x | , then

0 1 ( 1 - t ) | x + t ( y - x ) | p - 2 𝑑 t c 4 7 6 7 | y - x | p - 2 𝑑 t c | y - x | p - 2 .

Acknowledgements

The author wishes to thank Guido De Philippis for many fruitful discussions.

References

[1] E. Acerbi, N. Fusco and M. Morini, Minimality via second variation for a nonlocal isoperimetric problem, Comm. Math. Phys. 322 (2013), no. 2, 515–557. 10.1007/s00220-013-1733-ySuche in Google Scholar

[2] N. Aguilera, H. W. Alt and L. A. Caffarelli, An optimization problem with volume constraint, SIAM J. Control Optim. 24 (1986), no. 2, 191–198. 10.1137/0324011Suche in Google Scholar

[3] F. Almgren, J. E. Taylor and L. Wang, Curvature-driven flows: A variational approach, SIAM J. Control Optim. 31 (1993), no. 2, 387–438. 10.1137/0331020Suche in Google Scholar

[4] H. W. Alt and L. A. Caffarelli, Existence and regularity for a minimum problem with free boundary, J. Reine Angew. Math. 325 (1981), 105–144. 10.1515/crll.1981.325.105Suche in Google Scholar

[5] H. W. Alt, L. A. Caffarelli and A. Friedman, A free boundary problem for quasilinear elliptic equations, Ann. Sc. Norm. Super. Pisa Cl. Sci. (4) 11 (1984), no. 1, 1–44. Suche in Google Scholar

[6] L. Brasco, G. De Philippis and B. Velichkov, Faber–Krahn inequalities in sharp quantitative form, Duke Math. J. 164 (2015), no. 9, 1777–1831. 10.1215/00127094-3120167Suche in Google Scholar

[7] J. E. Brothers and W. P. Ziemer, Minimal rearrangements of Sobolev functions, J. Reine Angew. Math. 384 (1988), 153–179. 10.1515/crll.1988.384.153Suche in Google Scholar

[8] M. Cicalese and G. P. Leonardi, A selection principle for the sharp quantitative isoperimetric inequality, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 206 (2012), no. 2, 617–643. 10.1007/s00205-012-0544-1Suche in Google Scholar

[9] D. Danielli and A. Petrosyan, A minimum problem with free boundary for a degenerate quasilinear operator, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 23 (2005), no. 1, 97–124. 10.1007/s00526-004-0294-5Suche in Google Scholar

[10] G. De Philippis, M. Marini and E. Mukoseeva, The sharp quantitative isocapacitary inequality, preprint (2019), https://arxiv.org/abs/1901.11309. 10.4171/rmi/1259Suche in Google Scholar

[11] B. Fuglede, Stability in the isoperimetric problem for convex or nearly spherical domains in 𝐑 n , Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 314 (1989), no. 2, 619–638. 10.1090/S0002-9947-1989-0942426-3Suche in Google Scholar

[12] N. Fusco, F. Maggi and A. Pratelli, The sharp quantitative isoperimetric inequality, Ann. of Math. (2) 168 (2008), no. 3, 941–980. 10.4007/annals.2008.168.941Suche in Google Scholar

[13] N. Fusco, F. Maggi and A. Pratelli, Stability estimates for certain Faber–Krahn, isocapacitary and Cheeger inequalities, Ann. Sc. Norm. Super. Pisa Cl. Sci. (5) 8 (2009), no. 1, 51–71. 10.2422/2036-2145.2009.1.03Suche in Google Scholar

[14] N. Fusco and Y. R. Y. Zhang, A quantitative form of the Faber–Krahn inequality, preprint (2016), https://cvgmt.sns.it/paper/3015/. 10.1007/s00526-017-1224-7Suche in Google Scholar

[15] N. Fusco and Y. R.-Y. Zhang, A quantitative form of Faber–Krahn inequality, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 56 (2017), no. 5, Paper No. 138. 10.1007/s00526-017-1224-7Suche in Google Scholar

[16] M. Giaquinta and L. Martinazzi, An Introduction to the Regularity Theory for Elliptic Systems, Harmonic Maps and Minimal Graphs, Appunti. Sc. Norm. Super. Pisa (N. S.) 11, Edizioni della Normale, Pisa, 2012. 10.1007/978-88-7642-443-4Suche in Google Scholar

[17] E. Giusti, Direct Methods in the Calculus of Variations, World Scientific, River Edge, 2003. 10.1142/5002Suche in Google Scholar

[18] P. Grisvard, Elliptic Problems in Nonsmooth Domains, Monogr. Stud. Math. 24, Pitman, Boston, 1985. Suche in Google Scholar

[19] R. R. Hall, W. K. Hayman and A. W. Weitsman, On asymmetry and capacity, J. Anal. Math. 56 (1991), 87–123. 10.1007/BF02820461Suche in Google Scholar

[20] W. Hansen and N. Nadirashvili, Isoperimetric inequalities for capacities, Harmonic Analysis and Discrete Potential Theory (Frascati 1991), Plenum, New York (1992), 193–206. 10.1007/978-1-4899-2323-3_15Suche in Google Scholar

[21] A. Henrot and M. Pierre, Variation et Optimisation de Formes: Une Analyse Géométrique, Math. Appl. (Berlin) 48, Springer, Berlin, 2005. 10.1007/3-540-37689-5Suche in Google Scholar

[22] G. M. Lieberman, Boundary regularity for solutions of degenerate elliptic equations, Nonlinear Anal. 12 (1988), no. 11, 1203–1219. 10.1016/0362-546X(88)90053-3Suche in Google Scholar

[23] P. Lindqvist, Notes on the p-Laplace equation, Report, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, 2006. Suche in Google Scholar

[24] J. Sokoł owski and J.-P. Zolésio, Introduction to Shape Optimization: Shape Sensitivity Analysis, Springer Ser. Comput. Math. 16, Springer, Berlin, 1992. 10.1007/978-3-642-58106-9Suche in Google Scholar

[25] N. S. Trudinger, On Harnack type inequalities and their application to quasilinear elliptic equations, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 20 (1967), 721–747. 10.1002/cpa.3160200406Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2020-11-05
Revised: 2021-03-04
Accepted: 2021-03-18
Published Online: 2021-05-13
Published in Print: 2023-01-01

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 4.2.2026 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/acv-2020-0106/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen