Home Dichotomy of global capacity density in metric measure spaces
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Dichotomy of global capacity density in metric measure spaces

  • Hiroaki Aikawa , Anders Björn ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Jana Björn ORCID logo and Nageswari Shanmugalingam ORCID logo
Published/Copyright: May 16, 2017

Abstract

The variational capacity capp in Euclidean spaces is known to enjoy the density dichotomy at large scales, namely that for every En,

infxncapp(EB(x,r),B(x,2r))capp(B(x,r),B(x,2r))

is either zero or tends to 1 as r. We prove that this property still holds in unbounded complete geodesic metric spaces equipped with a doubling measure supporting a p-Poincaré inequality, but that it can fail in nongeodesic metric spaces and also for the Sobolev capacity in n. It turns out that the shape of balls impacts the validity of the density dichotomy. Even in more general metric spaces, we construct families of sets, such as John domains, for which the density dichotomy holds. Our arguments include an exact formula for the variational capacity of superlevel sets for capacitary potentials and a quantitative approximation from inside of the variational capacity.

MSC 2010: 31C15; 31C45; 31E05

Communicated by Frank Duzaar


Award Identifier / Grant number: JP25287015

Award Identifier / Grant number: JP25610017

Award Identifier / Grant number: JP17H01092

Funding source: Vetenskapsrådet

Award Identifier / Grant number: 621-2011-3139

Award Identifier / Grant number: 621-2014-3974

Award Identifier / Grant number: 2016-03424

Award Identifier / Grant number: DMS-1200915

Award Identifier / Grant number: DMS-1500440

Funding statement: The first author was partially supported by JSPS KAKENHI grants JP25287015, JP25610017 and JP17H01092. The second and third authors were partially supported by the Swedish Research Council grants 621-2011-3139, 621-2014-3974 and 2016-03424. The last author was partially supported by NSF grants DMS-1200915 and DMS-1500440. Part of this research was conducted during the last author’s visit to Linköping University; she wishes to thank that institution for its kind hospitality.

References

[1] H. Aikawa, Dichotomy of global density of Riesz capacity, Studia Math. 232 (2016), 267–278. 10.4064/sm8511-4-2016Search in Google Scholar

[2] H. Aikawa and T. Itoh, Dichotomy of global capacity density, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 143 (2015), no. 12, 5381–5393. 10.1090/proc/12672Search in Google Scholar

[3] H. Aikawa and N. Shanmugalingam, Carleson-type estimates for p-harmonic functions and the conformal Martin boundary of John domains in metric measure spaces, Michigan Math. J. 53 (2005), 165–188. 10.1307/mmj/1114021091Search in Google Scholar

[4] A. Björn and J. Björn, Approximations by regular sets and Wiener solutions in metric spaces, Comment. Math. Univ. Carolin. 48 (2007), no. 2, 343–355. Search in Google Scholar

[5] A. Björn and J. Björn, Nonlinear Potential Theory on Metric Spaces, EMS Tracts in Math. 17, European Mathematical Society, Zürich, 2011. 10.4171/099Search in Google Scholar

[6] J. Björn, Fine continuity on metric spaces, Manuscripta Math. 125 (2008), 369–381. 10.1007/s00229-007-0154-7Search in Google Scholar

[7] J. Björn, P. MacManus and N. Shanmugalingam, Fat sets and pointwise boundary estimates for p-harmonic functions in metrics spaces, J. Anal. Math. 85 (2001), 339–369. 10.1007/BF02788087Search in Google Scholar

[8] J. Björn and N. Shanmugalingam, Poincaré inequalities, uniform domains and extension properties for Newton–Sobolev functions in metric spaces, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 332 (2007), 190–208. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2006.09.064Search in Google Scholar

[9] W. K. Hayman and C. Pommerenke, On analytic functions of bounded mean oscillation, Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 10 (1978), 219–224. 10.1112/blms/10.2.219Search in Google Scholar

[10] J. Heinonen, T. Kilpeläinen and O. Martio, Nonlinear Potential Theory of Degenerate Elliptic Equations, 2nd ed., Dover, Mineola, 2006. Search in Google Scholar

[11] J. Heinonen and P. Koskela, Quasiconformal maps in metric spaces with controlled geometry, Acta Math. 181 (1998), 1–61. 10.1007/BF02392747Search in Google Scholar

[12] J. Heinonen, P. Koskela, N. Shanmugalingam and J. T. Tyson, Sobolev Spaces on Metric Measure Spaces, New Math. Monogr. 27, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2015. 10.1017/CBO9781316135914Search in Google Scholar

[13] P. Koskela and P. MacManus, Quasiconformal mappings and Sobolev spaces, Studia Math. 131 (1998), 1–17. Search in Google Scholar

[14] N. Shanmugalingam, Newtonian spaces: An extension of Sobolev spaces to metric measure spaces, Rev. Mat. Iberoam. 16 (2000), 243–279. 10.4171/RMI/275Search in Google Scholar

[15] N. Shanmugalingam, Harmonic functions on metric spaces, Illinois J. Math. 45 (2001), 1021–1050. 10.1215/ijm/1258138166Search in Google Scholar

[16] S. Stegenga, A geometric condition which implies BMOA, Michigan Math. J. 27 (1980), 247–252. 10.1307/mmj/1029002361Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2016-12-29
Revised: 2017-04-24
Accepted: 2017-04-27
Published Online: 2017-05-16
Published in Print: 2018-10-01

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 28.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/acv-2016-0066/html
Scroll to top button