Article
Licensed
Unlicensed
Requires Authentication
Some thoughts on Phase Extension to a single interface
-
Franc Marušič
Published/Copyright:
August 27, 2007
Abstract
In this short note, I point out some potential problems of the way den Dikken (this volume) understands the mechanism and timing of spell-out. I then test the consequences of his understanding, but do not conclude anything on the basis of the presented English data. I then test the prediction on a case of NP internal predication in Slovenian and explain the problems they pose for the theory presented in den Dikken (this volume).
Published Online: 2007-08-27
Published in Print: 2007-06-19
© Walter de Gruyter
You are currently not able to access this content.
You are currently not able to access this content.
Articles in the same Issue
- Phase Extension Contours of a theory of the role of head movement in phrasal extraction
- Phases and Explanatory Adequacy: Contrasting two programs
- Notes on Phase Extension
- A critique of Phase Extension, with a comparison to Phase Sliding
- Extended phases & beheaded phrases Comments on Marcel den Dikken's ‘Phase Extension’
- Some thoughts on Phase Extension to a single interface
- Predication and escape hatches in Phase Extension Theory
- Property Delay (Remarks on “Phase Extension” by Marcel den Dikken)
- On Phase Extension and head movement
- Phase Extension: A reply
Articles in the same Issue
- Phase Extension Contours of a theory of the role of head movement in phrasal extraction
- Phases and Explanatory Adequacy: Contrasting two programs
- Notes on Phase Extension
- A critique of Phase Extension, with a comparison to Phase Sliding
- Extended phases & beheaded phrases Comments on Marcel den Dikken's ‘Phase Extension’
- Some thoughts on Phase Extension to a single interface
- Predication and escape hatches in Phase Extension Theory
- Property Delay (Remarks on “Phase Extension” by Marcel den Dikken)
- On Phase Extension and head movement
- Phase Extension: A reply
