Article
Licensed
Unlicensed
Requires Authentication
Extended phases & beheaded phrases Comments on Marcel den Dikken's ‘Phase Extension’
-
Hubert Haider
Published/Copyright:
August 27, 2007
Abstract
Phrases cease to be phases once the head raises out of the phrase. This is a clear claim. So, in the simplest case, one would expect a direct correlation between overt head-movement and phrasal transparency properties for extraction constructions in typical cases of head-movement, as for instance V movement.
Published Online: 2007-08-27
Published in Print: 2007-06-19
© Walter de Gruyter
You are currently not able to access this content.
You are currently not able to access this content.
Articles in the same Issue
- Phase Extension Contours of a theory of the role of head movement in phrasal extraction
- Phases and Explanatory Adequacy: Contrasting two programs
- Notes on Phase Extension
- A critique of Phase Extension, with a comparison to Phase Sliding
- Extended phases & beheaded phrases Comments on Marcel den Dikken's ‘Phase Extension’
- Some thoughts on Phase Extension to a single interface
- Predication and escape hatches in Phase Extension Theory
- Property Delay (Remarks on “Phase Extension” by Marcel den Dikken)
- On Phase Extension and head movement
- Phase Extension: A reply
Articles in the same Issue
- Phase Extension Contours of a theory of the role of head movement in phrasal extraction
- Phases and Explanatory Adequacy: Contrasting two programs
- Notes on Phase Extension
- A critique of Phase Extension, with a comparison to Phase Sliding
- Extended phases & beheaded phrases Comments on Marcel den Dikken's ‘Phase Extension’
- Some thoughts on Phase Extension to a single interface
- Predication and escape hatches in Phase Extension Theory
- Property Delay (Remarks on “Phase Extension” by Marcel den Dikken)
- On Phase Extension and head movement
- Phase Extension: A reply
