Startseite Reformulations of agentless talk in psychotherapy
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Reformulations of agentless talk in psychotherapy

  • Katja Kurri

    Katja Kurri, Ph.D., works as a Researcher and a Psychotherapist at The Finnish Association for Mental Health, Education Center and Psychotherapy Clinic. She is interested especially in interaction in psychotherapy. Her doctoral thesis (2005) The Invisible Moral Order explored agency, accountability, and responsibility in therapy talk. She has published international articles on interaction in counseling and couples therapy.

    EMAIL logo
    und Jarl Wahlström

    Jarl Wahlström, Ph.D., is a Professor in clinical psychology at the Department of Psychology, University of Jyväskylä, Finland. He holds a diploma in family and systems therapy and is qualified as a trainer in psychotherapy. His main research interest is in psychotherapy discourse, a topic on which he has published in several international journals and books. He is a member of the DANASWAC group.

    EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 5. Juni 2007
Text & Talk
Aus der Zeitschrift Band 27 Heft 3

Abstract

In this paper we describe and analyze the development of a psychotherapist's reformulations of one client's initial agentless problem narration. The concept ‘agentless’ refers to the use of impersonal constructions—passive voice, nominalizations, zero-person construction, and iterative verbs— which all imply having no control over the described actions. ‘Agentless talk’ is viewed in this paper as a strategy to escape full personal responsibility and thus as a strategy to save one's moral face (Brown and Levinson 1978, 1987; Goffman 1955). In this case, the therapist approached the dilemma between protecting the client's face and fulfilling the institutional goal of helping the client by varying the footing in his reformulations of problem descriptions. Delicateness in the therapist's reformulations, as found in the data, can thus be seen as more than conversational etiquette; it is a necessary therapeutic tool. To account for the changes taking place in the therapeutic process, no reference to models of inner psychological structures or organization was needed, which poses a question of the quality of ‘therapeutic change’.


1Address for correspondence: Finnish Association for Mental Health, Education Center, Ratamestarinkatu 9, 00520 Helsinki, Finland
2Address for correspondence: Department of Psychology, University of Jyväskylä, 40100 Jyväskylä, Finland

About the authors

Katja Kurri

Katja Kurri, Ph.D., works as a Researcher and a Psychotherapist at The Finnish Association for Mental Health, Education Center and Psychotherapy Clinic. She is interested especially in interaction in psychotherapy. Her doctoral thesis (2005) The Invisible Moral Order explored agency, accountability, and responsibility in therapy talk. She has published international articles on interaction in counseling and couples therapy.

Jarl Wahlström

Jarl Wahlström, Ph.D., is a Professor in clinical psychology at the Department of Psychology, University of Jyväskylä, Finland. He holds a diploma in family and systems therapy and is qualified as a trainer in psychotherapy. His main research interest is in psychotherapy discourse, a topic on which he has published in several international journals and books. He is a member of the DANASWAC group.

Published Online: 2007-06-05
Published in Print: 2007-05-23

© Walter de Gruyter

Heruntergeladen am 2.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/TEXT.2007.013/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen