Index 2004 Microform & Imaging Review

Home Index 2004 Microform & Imaging Review

Article

Licensed

Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Published/Copyright: November 28, 2007

Published by

Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Author Information

From the journal Volume 33 Issue 4

"Index 2004 Microform & Imaging Review" , vol. 33, no. 4, 2004, pp. 210-211. https://doi.org/10.1515/MFIR.2004.210

(2004). Index 2004 Microform & Imaging Review. , 33(4), 210-211. https://doi.org/10.1515/MFIR.2004.210

(2004) Index 2004 Microform & Imaging Review. Vol. 33 (Issue 4), pp. 210-211. https://doi.org/10.1515/MFIR.2004.210

"Index 2004 Microform & Imaging Review" 33, no. 4 (2004): 210-211. https://doi.org/10.1515/MFIR.2004.210

Index 2004 Microform & Imaging Review. 2004;33(4): 210-211. https://doi.org/10.1515/MFIR.2004.210

Copied to clipboard

Published Online: 2007-11-28

Published in Print: 2004-December

You are currently not able to access this content.

Articles in the same Issue

Impressum
From the Editor-in-Chief
Comment and News
Recognizing Digitization as a Preservation Reformatting Method
“Wouldn't Be Prudent”: Digitization as a Preservation Reformatting Method
A Critique of “Recognizing Digitization as a Preservation Reformatting Method”
Addressing a Risk Perspective when Considering Digitization as a Preservation Reformatting Method: A Response from “Down Under”
Digitization as a Preservation Method – A Comment from Singapore
Digitization as a Preservation Method – Comments from the Netherlands
Digital Preservation in the Context of Changing Reading Behaviors and Research Methods
It's Time to Recognize the Technologies That Are in Place
Digitization for Preservation: Far Too Many Benefits over Microfilming
Why the Preservation Community Should Support ARL's Call for Acceptance of Digitization as a Preservation Reformatting Method
Evans Digital Edition
TL-2 (Taxonomic Literature, 2^nd edition) Online
Index 2004 Microform & Imaging Review

Search journal Search the content of this journal

https://doi.org/10.1515/MFIR.2004.210

Impressum
From the Editor-in-Chief
Comment and News
Recognizing Digitization as a Preservation Reformatting Method
“Wouldn't Be Prudent”: Digitization as a Preservation Reformatting Method
A Critique of “Recognizing Digitization as a Preservation Reformatting Method”
Addressing a Risk Perspective when Considering Digitization as a Preservation Reformatting Method: A Response from “Down Under”
Digitization as a Preservation Method – A Comment from Singapore
Digitization as a Preservation Method – Comments from the Netherlands
Digital Preservation in the Context of Changing Reading Behaviors and Research Methods
It's Time to Recognize the Technologies That Are in Place
Digitization for Preservation: Far Too Many Benefits over Microfilming
Why the Preservation Community Should Support ARL's Call for Acceptance of Digitization as a Preservation Reformatting Method
Evans Digital Edition
TL-2 (Taxonomic Literature, 2^nd edition) Online
Index 2004 Microform & Imaging Review