Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert
Erfordert eine Authentifizierung
The Benefits of Bilateral Versus Unilateral Amplification for the Elderly: Are Two Always Better than One?
-
Y. Henkin,
Veröffentlicht/Copyright:
1. September 2007
Published Online: 2007-09
©2011 by Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co.
Sie haben derzeit keinen Zugang zu diesem Inhalt.
Sie haben derzeit keinen Zugang zu diesem Inhalt.
Artikel in diesem Heft
- CONTENTS
- The Cochlear Microphonic Potential Does Not Reflect the Passive Basilar Membrane Traveling Wave
- Salicylate Ototoxicity and its Implications for Cochlear Microphonic Potential Generation
- Bone Conduction in Otosclerosis - Operated Versus Non- Operated Ears
- The Benefits of Bilateral Versus Unilateral Amplification for the Elderly: Are Two Always Better than One?
- Abstracts Presented at the 2007 Meeting of the Israeli Society for Auditory Research
Artikel in diesem Heft
- CONTENTS
- The Cochlear Microphonic Potential Does Not Reflect the Passive Basilar Membrane Traveling Wave
- Salicylate Ototoxicity and its Implications for Cochlear Microphonic Potential Generation
- Bone Conduction in Otosclerosis - Operated Versus Non- Operated Ears
- The Benefits of Bilateral Versus Unilateral Amplification for the Elderly: Are Two Always Better than One?
- Abstracts Presented at the 2007 Meeting of the Israeli Society for Auditory Research
