Startseite Different progestins in the treatment of endometriosis – are there relevant differences?
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Different progestins in the treatment of endometriosis – are there relevant differences?

  • Karl-Werner Schweppe EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 1. Dezember 2010
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Oral progestins without an estrogen component have been described to be effective in the treatment of endometriosis. Several different substances have been tested, which are on the one hand derivatives of the natural progesterone or of the C-17-OH-progesteron, or on the other hand derivatives of C-19-nortestosteron. Their common characteristic is the secretory transformation of estrogen primed uterine endometrium for which different dosages are necessary because of their different biological activities. They are different with regard to their profile and potency of action on hypothalamicpituitary axis, metabolic processes, breast tissue and genital organs. They are effectively similar with regard to endometriosis related complaints if sufficient doses are administered. No effects are noted on reduced fertility in endometriotic patients and the data are inconsistent concerning direct effects on the endometriotic cells.


Corresponding author: Prof. Dr. med. Dr. h.c. Karl-Werner Schweppe, Chairman of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ammerland Clinic GmbH, Academic Teaching Hospital of the University of Göttingen, Lange Strasse 28/D-26655 Westerstede, Germany Phone: +49-4488-503230, Fax: +49-4488-503999

Received: 2010-9-29
Accepted: 2010-9-30
Published Online: 2010-12-01
Published in Print: 2010-12-01

©2010 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin New York

Heruntergeladen am 26.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/HMBCI.2010.053/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen