Startseite Pronoun co-referencing errors: Challenges for generativist and usage-based accounts
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Pronoun co-referencing errors: Challenges for generativist and usage-based accounts

  • Danielle Matthews , Elena Lieven , Anna Theakston und Michael Tomasello
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 14. August 2009
Cognitive Linguistics
Aus der Zeitschrift Band 20 Heft 3

Abstract

This study tests accounts of co-reference errors whereby children allow “Mama Bear” and “her” to co-refer in sentences like “Mama Bear is washing her” (Chien and Wexler, Language Acquisition 1: 225–295, 1990). 63 children aged 4;6, 5;6 and 6;6 participated in a truth-value judgment task augmented with a sentence production component. There were three major finding: 1) contrary to predictions of most generativist accounts, children accepted co-reference even in cases of bound anaphora e.g., “Every girl is washing her” 2) contrary to Thornton and Wexler (Principle B, VP Ellipsis and Interpretation in Child Grammar, The MIT Press, 1999), errors did not appear to occur because children understood referring expressions to be denoting the same person in different guises 3) contrary to usage-based accounts, errors were less likely in sentences that contained lower as opposed to higher frequency verbs. Error rates also differed significantly according to pronoun type (“him”, “her”, “them”). These challenging results are discussed in terms of possible processing explanations.


Correspondence address: Danielle Matthews, Max Planck Child Study Centre, School of Psychological Sciences, University of Manchester, M13 9PL. UK. E-mail: 〈

Received: 2007-12-11
Revised: 2008-07-14
Published Online: 2009-08-14
Published in Print: 2009-August

© 2009 by Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, D-10785 Berlin

Heruntergeladen am 11.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/COGL.2009.026/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen