Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert
Erfordert eine Authentifizierung
Distinctive collexeme analysis and diachrony: A comment
-
Anatol Stefanowitsch
Veröffentlicht/Copyright:
3. Januar 2007
Abstract
In his discussion note, Hilpert outlines an intriguing and very promising application of distinctive collexeme analysis to diachronic data. He tracks lexical associations of the English shall-future from Early Modern English to Present-Day English, showing how shifts in these associations can be related to the semantic development of the construction from ‘obligation’ to ‘intention’.
Published Online: 2007-01-03
Published in Print: 2006-December-01
© Walter de Gruyter
Sie haben derzeit keinen Zugang zu diesem Inhalt.
Sie haben derzeit keinen Zugang zu diesem Inhalt.
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Gapped coordinations in English: Form, usage, and implications for linguistic theory
- Corpora and introspection as corroborating evidence: The case of preposition placement in English relative clauses
- The internal structure of four-noun compounds in English and German
- A note on quantifying ‘good’ and ‘bad’ prosodies
- Distinctive collexeme analysis and diachrony
- Distinctive collexeme analysis and diachrony: A comment
- Contents Volume 2 (2006)
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Gapped coordinations in English: Form, usage, and implications for linguistic theory
- Corpora and introspection as corroborating evidence: The case of preposition placement in English relative clauses
- The internal structure of four-noun compounds in English and German
- A note on quantifying ‘good’ and ‘bad’ prosodies
- Distinctive collexeme analysis and diachrony
- Distinctive collexeme analysis and diachrony: A comment
- Contents Volume 2 (2006)
