Startseite Linguistik & Semiotik On L2 English Learners’ Formulaic Language Use and Spoken English Fluency
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

On L2 English Learners’ Formulaic Language Use and Spoken English Fluency

  • Junlei XUAN, PhD, is a lecturer at the School of Foreign Languages, Xinyang Normal University. His major research interests include formulaic language and spoken fluency development.

    ,

    Huifang YANG is a lecturer at the School of Foreign Languages, Xinyang Normal University. Her major research interests include Chinese formulaic language and English education.

    und

    Jaewoo SHIM, PhD, is a professor at the Department of English Education, Chonbuk National University. His major research interests include English education and statistics.

Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 9. Dezember 2021
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

This study explored the distribution of three types of English formulaic language, which involves four categories in L1 Chinese L2 English learners’ speaking performance. In addition, it investigated the relationship between the English learners’ use of formulaic language and their spoken English fluency. A CCA (canonical correlation analysis) was conducted to examine the correlations between two sets of fluency variables (dependent variables) and linguistic variables of English formulaic language use (independent variables). The fluency variable set consists of: (1) temporal indices such as SR (speech rate), AR (articulation rate), MLR (mean length of run), and PTR (phonation time ratio); (2) linguistic variables of English formulaic language like F2R (two-word formulaic sequences/run ratio, B3R (three-word lexical bundles/run ratio), and B4R (four-word lexical bundles/run ratio). These are calculated according to the frequency of the English formulaic language in the speech samples of the participants (n = 86) across three academic levels. The results indicate that the learners’ spoken English fluency is highly related to their use of English formulaic language. Its limitations and future research directions are also discussed.

About the authors

Junlei Xuan

Junlei XUAN, PhD, is a lecturer at the School of Foreign Languages, Xinyang Normal University. His major research interests include formulaic language and spoken fluency development.

Huifang Yang

Huifang YANG is a lecturer at the School of Foreign Languages, Xinyang Normal University. Her major research interests include Chinese formulaic language and English education.

Jaewoo Shim

Jaewoo SHIM, PhD, is a professor at the Department of English Education, Chonbuk National University. His major research interests include English education and statistics.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by NanHu Scholars’ Project for Young Scholars of XYNU.

References

Biber, D. (2009). A corpus-driven approach to formulaic language in English: Multi-word patterns in speech and writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 14(3), 275-311.10.1075/ijcl.14.3.08bibSuche in Google Scholar

Biber, D., Stig, J., Geoffrey, L., Susan, C., & Edward, F. (1999). Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Bilić, M., & Gaspar, A. (2018). Extraction of Phrasal Verbs from the Comparable English Corpus of Legal Texts. International Journal of English Language & Translation Studies, 6(2), 184-194.Suche in Google Scholar

Boers, F., Eyckmans, J., Kappel, J., Stengers, H., & Demecheleer, M. (2006). Formulaic sequences and perceived oral proficiency: Putting a lexical approach to the test. Language Teaching Research, 10(3), 245-261.10.1191/1362168806lr195oaSuche in Google Scholar

Buerki, A. (2016). Formulaic sequences: A drop in the ocean of constructions or something more significant? European Journal of English Studies, 20(1), 15-34.10.4324/9781315194295-2Suche in Google Scholar

Christian, J. (2015). In defense of teaching and acquiring formulaic sequences, ELT, 69(3), 319-322.10.1093/elt/ccv013Suche in Google Scholar

Coxhead, A. (2018). Replication research in pedagogical approaches to formulaic sequences: Jones & Haywood (2004) and Alali & Schmitt (2012). Language Teaching, 51(1), 113-12310.1017/S0261444815000221Suche in Google Scholar

De Jong, N., & Wempe, T. (2009). Praat script to detect syllable nuclei and measure speech rate automatically. Behavior Research Methods, 41(2), 385-39. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.2.38510.3758/BRM.41.2.385Suche in Google Scholar

De Jong, N., & Perfetti, C. A. (2011). Fluency training in the ESL classroom: An experimental study of fluency development and proceduralization. Language Learning, 61(2), 533-568.10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00620.xSuche in Google Scholar

Erman, B., Lundell, F. F., & Lewis, M. (2016). Formulaic language in advanced second language acquisition and use. In K. Hyltenstam (Ed.), Advanced proficiency and exceptional ability in second languages (pp.111-148). Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9781614515173-007Suche in Google Scholar

Erman, B., & Warren, B. (2000). The idiom principle and the open choice principle. Text, 20(1), 29-62.10.1515/text.1.2000.20.1.29Suche in Google Scholar

Gablasova, D., Brezina, V., & McEnery, T. (2017). Collocations in corpus-based language learning research: Identifying, comparing, and interpreting the evidence. Language Learning, 67, 155-179. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.1222510.1111/lang.12225Suche in Google Scholar

Gardner, D., & Davies, M. (2007). Pointing out frequent phrasal verbs: A corpus-based analysis. TESOL Quarterly, 41(2), 339-359.10.1002/j.1545-7249.2007.tb00062.xSuche in Google Scholar

Garnier, M. (2016). English phrasal verbs: Usage, knowledge, acquisition (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Nottingham.Suche in Google Scholar

Gheitasi, P. (2017). “Say It Fast, Fluent and Flawless”: Formulaicity in the oral language production of young foreign language learners (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Umeå University.Suche in Google Scholar

Ginther, A., Dimova, S., & Yang, R. (2010). Conceptual and empirical relationships between temporal measures of fluency and oral English proficiency with implications for automated scoring. Language Testing, 27(3), 379-399.10.1177/0265532210364407Suche in Google Scholar

Gyllstad, H., & Schmitt, N. (2018). Testing formulaic language. Chapter of Siyanova-Chanturia, A., & Pellicer-Sánchez, A. Understanding formulaic language: A second language acquisition perspective. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.10.4324/9781315206615-10Suche in Google Scholar

Hatami, S. (2015). Teaching formulaic sequences in the ESL classroom. TESOL Journal, 6(1), 112-129.10.1002/tesj.143Suche in Google Scholar

Huang, H. (2012). The effectiveness of formulaic sequence instruction on Taiwanese EFL learners’ oral fluency (Order No. 3542715). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (1152525941)Suche in Google Scholar

Kecskes, I. (2016). Deliberate creativity and formulaic language use. In: Allan K., Capone A., (eds), Pragmemes and theories of language use. Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, vol 9. Springer, Cham.10.1007/978-3-319-43491-9_1Suche in Google Scholar

Kormos, J., & Dénes, M. (2004). Exploring measures and perceptions of fluency in the speech of second language learners. System. 32(2). 145-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2004.01.001.10.1016/j.system.2004.01.001Suche in Google Scholar

Lennon, P. (1990). Investigating fluency in EFL: A quantitative approach. Language Learning, 40(3), 387-417.10.1111/j.1467-1770.1990.tb00669.xSuche in Google Scholar

Liu, D. (2003). The most frequently used spoken American English idioms: A corpus analysis and its implications. TESOL Quarterly, 37(4), 671-700.10.2307/3588217Suche in Google Scholar

Liu, D. (2011). The most frequently used English phrasal verbs in American and British English: A multicorpus examination. TESOL Quarterly, 45(4), 661-688.10.5054/tq.2011.247707Suche in Google Scholar

Macis, M., & Schmitt, N. (2017). Not just small potatoes: Knowledge of the idiomatic meanings of collocations. Language Teaching Research,21(3), 321-340.10.1177/1362168816645957Suche in Google Scholar

Mandel, S., Gockel, B. T., & Rollett, A. D. (2017). Application of canonical correlation analysis to a sensitivity study of constitutive model parameter fitting. Materials and Design, 132, 30-43.10.1016/j.matdes.2017.06.050Suche in Google Scholar

Martinez, R., & Schmitt, N. (2012). A phrasal expressions list. Applied Linguistics, 33(3), 299-320.10.1093/applin/ams010Suche in Google Scholar

McGuire, M., & Larson-Hall, J. (2017). Teaching formulaic sequences in the classroom: Effects on spoken fluency. TESL Canada Journal, 34(3), 1-25.10.18806/tesl.v34i3.1271Suche in Google Scholar

Park, S. (2016). Measuring fluency: Temporal variables and pausing patterns in L2 English speech. OpenAccessDissertations.692. https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/open_access_dissertations/692Suche in Google Scholar

Piirainen, E., Filatkina, N., Stumpf, S., & Pfeiffer, C. (Eds.). (2020). Formulaic language and new data. De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/978311066982410.1515/9783110669824Suche in Google Scholar

Quan, T. (2016). Becoming fluent abroad: Examining the intersections of oral fluency, formulaic language, and learner investment in study abroad (Order No. 10182798). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global; Social Science Premium Collection. (1850915390)Suche in Google Scholar

Russell, T. S. (2017). Finding the formula: Formulaic language use in Hong Kong primary school English textbooks. University of Birmingham.Suche in Google Scholar

Schmitt, N. (2000). Key concepts in ELT: Lexical chunks. English Language Teaching Journal, 54(4), 400-401.10.1093/elt/54.4.400Suche in Google Scholar

Segalowitz, N. (2010). The cognitive bases of second language fluency. Routledge10.4324/9780203851357Suche in Google Scholar

Sherry, A., & Henson, R. K. (2005). Conducting and interpreting canonical correlation analysis in personality research: A user-friendly primer. Journal of Personality Assessment, 84(1), 37-48.10.1207/s15327752jpa8401_09Suche in Google Scholar

Shin, D., & Nation, P. (2008). Beyond single words: The most frequent collocations in spoken English. ELT Journal, 62(4), 339-348.10.1093/elt/ccm091Suche in Google Scholar

Siyanova-Chanturia, A. (2015). On the ‘holistic’ nature of formulaic language. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 11(2), 285-301. https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2014-001610.1515/cllt-2014-0016Suche in Google Scholar

Siyanova-Chanturia, A., & Pellicer-Sánchez, A. (2018). Understanding formulaic language: A second language acquisition perspective. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.10.4324/9781315206615Suche in Google Scholar

Stengers, H., Boers, F., Housen, A., & Eyckmans, J. (2011). Formulaic sequences and L2 oral proficiency: Does the type of target language influence the association? IRAL, International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 49(4), 321-339.10.1515/iral.2011.017Suche in Google Scholar

Suzuki, S., & Kormos, J. (2020). Linguistic dimensions of comprehensibility and perceived fluency: An investigation of complexity, accuracy, and fluency in second language argumentative speech, Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 42(1), 143-167.10.1017/S0272263119000421Suche in Google Scholar

Tavakoli, P., & Uchihara, T. (2020). To what extent are multi-word sequences associated with oral fluency? Language Learning, 70 (2), 506-547.10.1111/lang.12384Suche in Google Scholar

Thomson, H. (2017). Building speaking fluency with multi-word expressions. TESL Canada Journal, 34 (3), 26-53.10.18806/tesl.v34i3.1272Suche in Google Scholar

Towell, R., Hawkins, R., & Bzaergui, N. (1996). The development of fluency in advanced learners of French, Applied Linguistics, 17(1), 84-119.10.1093/applin/17.1.84Suche in Google Scholar

Underhill, N. (1987). Testing spoken language a handbook of oral testing techniques. Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Van Lancker Sidtis, D., & Sidtis, J. J. (2018). Cortical-subcortical production of formulaic language: A review of linguistic, brain disorder, and functional imaging studies leading to a production model. Brain and Cognition, 126, 53-64.10.1016/j.bandc.2018.08.003Suche in Google Scholar

Vilkaitė, L. (2016). Formulaic language is not all the same: Comparing the frequency of idiomatic phrases, collocations, lexical bundles, and phrasal verbs Taikomoji Kalbotyra, (8), 28-5410.15388/TK.2016.17505Suche in Google Scholar

Weinert, R. (1995). The role of formulaic language in second language acquisition: A review, Applied Linguistics, 16(2), 180-205.10.1093/applin/16.2.180Suche in Google Scholar

Wood, D. (2006). Uses and functions of formulaic sequences in second language speech: An exploration of the foundations of fluency. Canadian Modern Language Review, 63(1), 13-3310.3138/cmlr.63.1.13Suche in Google Scholar

Wood, D. (2010). Formulaic language and second language speech fluency: Background, evidence, and classroom applications. Continuum.Suche in Google Scholar

Wood, D. (2015). Fundamentals of formulaic language: An introduction. Bloomsbury.Suche in Google Scholar

Wray, A. (2002). Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511519772Suche in Google Scholar

Wray, A. (2008). Formulaic language: Pushing the boundaries. Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Wray, A. (2012). What do we (think we) know about formulaic language? An evaluation of the current state of play. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, 231-254.10.1017/S026719051200013XSuche in Google Scholar

Wray, A. (2013). Formulaic language. Language Teaching, 46(3), 316-334.10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/04777-5Suche in Google Scholar

Wray, A., & Perkins, M. (2000). The functions of formulaic language: An integrated model. Language & Communication. 20(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(99)00015-410.1016/S0271-5309(99)00015-4Suche in Google Scholar

Wright, C., & Tavakoli, P. (2016). New directions and developments in defining, analyzing and measuring L2 speech fluency. IRAL, International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 54(2), 73-77.10.1515/iral-2016-9990Suche in Google Scholar

Xu, J. (2015). Predicting ESL learners’ oral proficiency by measuring the collocations in their spontaneous speech (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Iowa State University. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/14875Suche in Google Scholar

Yan, X. (2015). The processing of formulaic language on elicited imitation tasks by second language speakers (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Purdue University. https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/open_access_dissertations/597Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2021-12-09
Published in Print: 2021-12-20

© 2021 FLTRP, Walter de Gruyter, Cultural and Education Section British Embassy

Heruntergeladen am 25.3.2026 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/CJAL-2021-0034/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen