On L2 English Learners’ Formulaic Language Use and Spoken English Fluency

References

Biber, D. (2009). A corpus-driven approach to formulaic language in English: Multi-word patterns in speech and writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 14(3), 275-311.10.1075/ijcl.14.3.08bibSearch in Google Scholar

Biber, D., Stig, J., Geoffrey, L., Susan, C., & Edward, F. (1999). Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bilić, M., & Gaspar, A. (2018). Extraction of Phrasal Verbs from the Comparable English Corpus of Legal Texts. International Journal of English Language & Translation Studies, 6(2), 184-194.Search in Google Scholar

Boers, F., Eyckmans, J., Kappel, J., Stengers, H., & Demecheleer, M. (2006). Formulaic sequences and perceived oral proficiency: Putting a lexical approach to the test. Language Teaching Research, 10(3), 245-261.10.1191/1362168806lr195oaSearch in Google Scholar

Buerki, A. (2016). Formulaic sequences: A drop in the ocean of constructions or something more significant? European Journal of English Studies, 20(1), 15-34.10.4324/9781315194295-2Search in Google Scholar

Christian, J. (2015). In defense of teaching and acquiring formulaic sequences, ELT, 69(3), 319-322.10.1093/elt/ccv013Search in Google Scholar

Coxhead, A. (2018). Replication research in pedagogical approaches to formulaic sequences: Jones & Haywood (2004) and Alali & Schmitt (2012). Language Teaching, 51(1), 113-12310.1017/S0261444815000221Search in Google Scholar

De Jong, N., & Wempe, T. (2009). Praat script to detect syllable nuclei and measure speech rate automatically. Behavior Research Methods, 41(2), 385-39. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.2.38510.3758/BRM.41.2.385Search in Google Scholar

De Jong, N., & Perfetti, C. A. (2011). Fluency training in the ESL classroom: An experimental study of fluency development and proceduralization. Language Learning, 61(2), 533-568.10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00620.xSearch in Google Scholar

Erman, B., Lundell, F. F., & Lewis, M. (2016). Formulaic language in advanced second language acquisition and use. In K. Hyltenstam (Ed.), Advanced proficiency and exceptional ability in second languages (pp.111-148). Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9781614515173-007Search in Google Scholar

Erman, B., & Warren, B. (2000). The idiom principle and the open choice principle. Text, 20(1), 29-62.10.1515/text.1.2000.20.1.29Search in Google Scholar

Gablasova, D., Brezina, V., & McEnery, T. (2017). Collocations in corpus-based language learning research: Identifying, comparing, and interpreting the evidence. Language Learning, 67, 155-179. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.1222510.1111/lang.12225Search in Google Scholar

Gardner, D., & Davies, M. (2007). Pointing out frequent phrasal verbs: A corpus-based analysis. TESOL Quarterly, 41(2), 339-359.10.1002/j.1545-7249.2007.tb00062.xSearch in Google Scholar

Garnier, M. (2016). English phrasal verbs: Usage, knowledge, acquisition (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Nottingham.Search in Google Scholar

Gheitasi, P. (2017). “Say It Fast, Fluent and Flawless”: Formulaicity in the oral language production of young foreign language learners (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Umeå University.Search in Google Scholar

Ginther, A., Dimova, S., & Yang, R. (2010). Conceptual and empirical relationships between temporal measures of fluency and oral English proficiency with implications for automated scoring. Language Testing, 27(3), 379-399.10.1177/0265532210364407Search in Google Scholar

Gyllstad, H., & Schmitt, N. (2018). Testing formulaic language. Chapter of Siyanova-Chanturia, A., & Pellicer-Sánchez, A. Understanding formulaic language: A second language acquisition perspective. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.10.4324/9781315206615-10Search in Google Scholar

Hatami, S. (2015). Teaching formulaic sequences in the ESL classroom. TESOL Journal, 6(1), 112-129.10.1002/tesj.143Search in Google Scholar

Huang, H. (2012). The effectiveness of formulaic sequence instruction on Taiwanese EFL learners’ oral fluency (Order No. 3542715). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (1152525941)Search in Google Scholar

Kecskes, I. (2016). Deliberate creativity and formulaic language use. In: Allan K., Capone A., (eds), Pragmemes and theories of language use. Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, vol 9. Springer, Cham.10.1007/978-3-319-43491-9_1Search in Google Scholar

Kormos, J., & Dénes, M. (2004). Exploring measures and perceptions of fluency in the speech of second language learners. System. 32(2). 145-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2004.01.001.10.1016/j.system.2004.01.001Search in Google Scholar

Lennon, P. (1990). Investigating fluency in EFL: A quantitative approach. Language Learning, 40(3), 387-417.10.1111/j.1467-1770.1990.tb00669.xSearch in Google Scholar

Liu, D. (2003). The most frequently used spoken American English idioms: A corpus analysis and its implications. TESOL Quarterly, 37(4), 671-700.10.2307/3588217Search in Google Scholar

Liu, D. (2011). The most frequently used English phrasal verbs in American and British English: A multicorpus examination. TESOL Quarterly, 45(4), 661-688.10.5054/tq.2011.247707Search in Google Scholar

Macis, M., & Schmitt, N. (2017). Not just small potatoes: Knowledge of the idiomatic meanings of collocations. Language Teaching Research,21(3), 321-340.10.1177/1362168816645957Search in Google Scholar

Mandel, S., Gockel, B. T., & Rollett, A. D. (2017). Application of canonical correlation analysis to a sensitivity study of constitutive model parameter fitting. Materials and Design, 132, 30-43.10.1016/j.matdes.2017.06.050Search in Google Scholar

Martinez, R., & Schmitt, N. (2012). A phrasal expressions list. Applied Linguistics, 33(3), 299-320.10.1093/applin/ams010Search in Google Scholar

McGuire, M., & Larson-Hall, J. (2017). Teaching formulaic sequences in the classroom: Effects on spoken fluency. TESL Canada Journal, 34(3), 1-25.10.18806/tesl.v34i3.1271Search in Google Scholar

Park, S. (2016). Measuring fluency: Temporal variables and pausing patterns in L2 English speech. OpenAccessDissertations.692. https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/open_access_dissertations/692Search in Google Scholar

Piirainen, E., Filatkina, N., Stumpf, S., & Pfeiffer, C. (Eds.). (2020). Formulaic language and new data. De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/978311066982410.1515/9783110669824Search in Google Scholar

Quan, T. (2016). Becoming fluent abroad: Examining the intersections of oral fluency, formulaic language, and learner investment in study abroad (Order No. 10182798). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global; Social Science Premium Collection. (1850915390)Search in Google Scholar

Russell, T. S. (2017). Finding the formula: Formulaic language use in Hong Kong primary school English textbooks. University of Birmingham.Search in Google Scholar

Schmitt, N. (2000). Key concepts in ELT: Lexical chunks. English Language Teaching Journal, 54(4), 400-401.10.1093/elt/54.4.400Search in Google Scholar

Segalowitz, N. (2010). The cognitive bases of second language fluency. Routledge10.4324/9780203851357Search in Google Scholar

Sherry, A., & Henson, R. K. (2005). Conducting and interpreting canonical correlation analysis in personality research: A user-friendly primer. Journal of Personality Assessment, 84(1), 37-48.10.1207/s15327752jpa8401_09Search in Google Scholar

Shin, D., & Nation, P. (2008). Beyond single words: The most frequent collocations in spoken English. ELT Journal, 62(4), 339-348.10.1093/elt/ccm091Search in Google Scholar

Siyanova-Chanturia, A. (2015). On the ‘holistic’ nature of formulaic language. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 11(2), 285-301. https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2014-001610.1515/cllt-2014-0016Search in Google Scholar

Siyanova-Chanturia, A., & Pellicer-Sánchez, A. (2018). Understanding formulaic language: A second language acquisition perspective. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.10.4324/9781315206615Search in Google Scholar

Stengers, H., Boers, F., Housen, A., & Eyckmans, J. (2011). Formulaic sequences and L2 oral proficiency: Does the type of target language influence the association? IRAL, International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 49(4), 321-339.10.1515/iral.2011.017Search in Google Scholar

Suzuki, S., & Kormos, J. (2020). Linguistic dimensions of comprehensibility and perceived fluency: An investigation of complexity, accuracy, and fluency in second language argumentative speech, Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 42(1), 143-167.10.1017/S0272263119000421Search in Google Scholar

Tavakoli, P., & Uchihara, T. (2020). To what extent are multi-word sequences associated with oral fluency? Language Learning, 70 (2), 506-547.10.1111/lang.12384Search in Google Scholar

Thomson, H. (2017). Building speaking fluency with multi-word expressions. TESL Canada Journal, 34 (3), 26-53.10.18806/tesl.v34i3.1272Search in Google Scholar

Towell, R., Hawkins, R., & Bzaergui, N. (1996). The development of fluency in advanced learners of French, Applied Linguistics, 17(1), 84-119.10.1093/applin/17.1.84Search in Google Scholar

Underhill, N. (1987). Testing spoken language a handbook of oral testing techniques. Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Van Lancker Sidtis, D., & Sidtis, J. J. (2018). Cortical-subcortical production of formulaic language: A review of linguistic, brain disorder, and functional imaging studies leading to a production model. Brain and Cognition, 126, 53-64.10.1016/j.bandc.2018.08.003Search in Google Scholar

Vilkaitė, L. (2016). Formulaic language is not all the same: Comparing the frequency of idiomatic phrases, collocations, lexical bundles, and phrasal verbs Taikomoji Kalbotyra, (8), 28-5410.15388/TK.2016.17505Search in Google Scholar

Weinert, R. (1995). The role of formulaic language in second language acquisition: A review, Applied Linguistics, 16(2), 180-205.10.1093/applin/16.2.180Search in Google Scholar

Wood, D. (2006). Uses and functions of formulaic sequences in second language speech: An exploration of the foundations of fluency. Canadian Modern Language Review, 63(1), 13-3310.3138/cmlr.63.1.13Search in Google Scholar

Wood, D. (2010). Formulaic language and second language speech fluency: Background, evidence, and classroom applications. Continuum.Search in Google Scholar

Wood, D. (2015). Fundamentals of formulaic language: An introduction. Bloomsbury.Search in Google Scholar

Wray, A. (2002). Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511519772Search in Google Scholar

Wray, A. (2008). Formulaic language: Pushing the boundaries. Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Wray, A. (2012). What do we (think we) know about formulaic language? An evaluation of the current state of play. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, 231-254.10.1017/S026719051200013XSearch in Google Scholar

Wray, A. (2013). Formulaic language. Language Teaching, 46(3), 316-334.10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/04777-5Search in Google Scholar

Wray, A., & Perkins, M. (2000). The functions of formulaic language: An integrated model. Language & Communication. 20(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(99)00015-410.1016/S0271-5309(99)00015-4Search in Google Scholar

Wright, C., & Tavakoli, P. (2016). New directions and developments in defining, analyzing and measuring L2 speech fluency. IRAL, International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 54(2), 73-77.10.1515/iral-2016-9990Search in Google Scholar

Xu, J. (2015). Predicting ESL learners’ oral proficiency by measuring the collocations in their spontaneous speech (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Iowa State University. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/14875Search in Google Scholar

Yan, X. (2015). The processing of formulaic language on elicited imitation tasks by second language speakers (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Purdue University. https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/open_access_dissertations/597Search in Google Scholar