Home Learnability of Grammatical Sequencing: A Processability Perspective of Textbook Evaluation in EFL Settings
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Learnability of Grammatical Sequencing: A Processability Perspective of Textbook Evaluation in EFL Settings

  • Xiaofei Tang

    Xiaofei TANG is Lecturer of English at School of Foreign Languages, Wuhan University of Technology. She holds a Ph.D. in Linguistics from the Australian National University. Her research efforts have focused on textbook evaluation, TESOL, and second language acquisition and pedagogy.

    EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: August 16, 2019
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

This study conducts an acquisition-based evaluation of four primary-school English textbook series used in China. The evaluation aims to determine whether the sequencing of grammatical structures in the series is compatible with the L2 learning sequence stipulated in Processability Theory (PT). The results show a partial agreement between the sequencing of structures as teaching objectives in the series and the PT-based processability hierarchy. The sequencing of structures in the initial stages is consistent with the learning sequence of L2 English stated in PT. However, several structures in the intermediate or high stages are taught in a deviant way against their sequencing in PT. The deviant grading of those structures is possibly associated with the theme-based guidelines adopted in the textbooks. It appears that concerns with the utility of grammatical structures in a given context take precedence over concerns for L2 development. A number of suggestions are offered to textbook writers in terms of the role of input, the learners’ developmental readiness, and the issue of heterogeneity in L2 classrooms.


1 This research was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (WUT: 2018IVA078) and the Teaching Research Funds of Wuhan University of Technology (w2018130).


About the author

Xiaofei Tang

Xiaofei TANG is Lecturer of English at School of Foreign Languages, Wuhan University of Technology. She holds a Ph.D. in Linguistics from the Australian National University. Her research efforts have focused on textbook evaluation, TESOL, and second language acquisition and pedagogy.

References

Alptekin, C., Erçetin, G., & Bayyurt, Y. (2007). The effectiveness of a theme-based syllabus for young L2 learners. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 28(1), 1-17.10.2167/jmmd470.1Search in Google Scholar

Bettoni, C., & Di Biase, B. (Eds.). (2015). Grammatical development in second languages: Exploring the boundaries of processability theory European Second Language Association.Search in Google Scholar

Bresnan, J. (2001). Lexical-functional syntax (Vol. 16.). Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Cai, J. (2008). 中国学生英语过渡语研究 A study on Chinese students’ English interlanguage Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.Search in Google Scholar

Charters, H., Jansen L., & Dao, L. (2012). Think of a number: Learning to make nouns plural in second language acquisition. Association Francaise de Linguistique Cognitive, 8 1-26.10.4000/cognitextes.527Search in Google Scholar

Chen, L., & Ellis, P. (Eds.). (2012). New standard English (1st ed.). Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.Search in Google Scholar

Crookes, G., & Gass, S. M. (1993). Task in a pedagogical context: Integrating theory and practice Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Search in Google Scholar

Dai, M. (2011). Issues in the study of L2 syntax development process. Foreign Language Research, (5), 124131.Search in Google Scholar

Ding, X. (2006). Similarities and differences of order/sequence of first and second language acquisition and its causes of formation. Applied Linguistics (2), 81-88.Search in Google Scholar

Dyson, B. (2009). Processability theory and the role of morphology in ESL development: A longitudinal study. Second Language Research, 25 355-376.10.1177/0267658309104578Search in Google Scholar

Dyson, B., & Håkansson, G. (2017). Understanding second language processing: A focus on processability theory New York: John Benjamins.10.1075/bpa.4Search in Google Scholar

Ellis, R. (1989). Are classroom and naturalistic acquisition the same? A study of the classroom acquisition of German word order rules. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 11(3), 303-328.10.1017/S0272263100008159Search in Google Scholar

Ellis, R. (2001). Non-reciprocal tasks, comprehension and second language acquisition. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogical tasks: Second language learning, teaching, and testing (pp. 49-74). Harlow: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Guo, W., & Wang, Y. (2013). A research on sequential order of setting-subject construction and affecting factors. Foreign Language Research, (3), 104-108.Search in Google Scholar

Hu, J. (2010). 对大学生习得英语现在完成时的语料库研究 [A corpus-based study of the acquisition of English present perfective by Chinese university students]. Journal of PLA University of Foreign Languages 33(6), 55-60.Search in Google Scholar

Hutchinson, T., & Torres, E. (1994). The textbook as agent of change. ELT Journal 48(4), 315-328.10.1093/elt/48.4.315Search in Google Scholar

Jiang, P., & Cai, H. (2009). 中国学生英语关系从句的习得顺序及其认知启示 [The acquisitional order of English basic relative clauses by Chinese students]. Foreign Language Education 30(3), 47-51.Search in Google Scholar

Jin, H. (2011). Study on students’ English language mistakes from the angle of curriculum resources. Education Science 27(2), 35-38.Search in Google Scholar

Jin, X., & Zhao, L. (2014). Influence of language universals on L2 acquisition of English relative clauses. Modern Foreign Languages 37(3), 370-379.Search in Google Scholar

Johnson, K. (2003). Designing language teaching tasks Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.10.1057/9780230596672Search in Google Scholar

Kaplan, R., & Bresnan, J. (1982). Lexical-functional grammar: A formal system for grammatical representation. In J. Bresnan (Ed.), The mental representation of grammatical relations (pp. 173-281). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Keβler, J.-U. (2006). Englischerwerb im Anfangsunterricht diagnostizieren: Linguistische profilanalysen am Übergang von der Primarstufe in die Sekundarstufe IDiagnosing English acquisition in elementary education: linguistic profile analysis for the transition from primary education to junior secondary education Tübingen: Narr.Search in Google Scholar

Keβler, J.-U. (2007). Assessing EFL-development online: A feasibility study of Rapid Profile. In F. Mansouri (Ed.), Bilingualism and theory-driven second language acquisition research (pp. 119-143). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Press.Search in Google Scholar

Keβler, J.-U. (2008). Communicative tasks and second language profiling: Linguistic and pedagogical implications. In J. Eckerth & S. Siekmann (Eds.), Task-based language learning and teaching (pp. 291310). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Keβler, J.-U., Liebner, M., & Mansouri, F. (2011). Teaching. In M. Pienemann & J.-U. Keβler (Eds.), Studying processability theory: An introductory textbook (pp. 149-156). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Search in Google Scholar

Kempen, G., & Hoenkamp, E. (1987). An incremental procedural grammar for sentence formulation. Cognitive Science 11(2), 201-258.10.1207/s15516709cog1102_5Search in Google Scholar

Khranke, K. (1987). Approaches to syllabus design for foreign language teaching Washington, D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics.Search in Google Scholar

Lan, J., & Meng, H. (2009). Multidimensional approach to the evaluation of New College English. Journal of Kashgar Teachers College 30(4), 85-88.Search in Google Scholar

Lenzing, A. (2004). Textbooks and teachability: An analysis of primary school textbooks in terms of processability theory. MA thesis, Universität Paderborn.Search in Google Scholar

Lenzing, A. (2008). Teachability and learnability: An analysis of primary school textbooks. In J.-U. Keβler (Ed.), Processability approaches to second language development and second language learning (pp. 221-241). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lightbown, P. M. (1982). Classroom language as input to second language acquisition. Paper presented at the Second European-North American Workshop on Second Language Acquisition Research, Gohrde, West Germany, August.Search in Google Scholar

Lightbown, P. M. (1983). Exploring relationships between developmental and instructional sequences in L2 acquisition. In H. W. Seliger & M. H. Long (Eds.), Classroom-oriented research in language acquisition (pp. 217-243). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Search in Google Scholar

Lightbown, P. M. (1985). Great expectations: Second language acquisition research and classroom teaching. Applied Linguistics 6(2), 74-90.10.1093/applin/6.2.173Search in Google Scholar

Liu, S. (1998). 英语中介语句法范畴变异的动态研究 [A dynamic study of the variations in English interlanguage syntax]. Modern Foreign Languages 21(2), 68-83.Search in Google Scholar

Liu, S. (2000). A case study of acquisition errors of “be” and its dynamic patterns. Modern Foreign Languages 23(1), 77-88.Search in Google Scholar

Liu, D., Krause, A., & Cossu, G. (Eds.). (2012). Super kids (1st ed.). Beijing: People’s Education Press.Search in Google Scholar

McDonough, J., & Shaw, C. (1993). Materials and methods in ELT: A teacher’s guide Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Mansouri, F., & Duffy, L. (2005). The pedagogic effectiveness of developmental readiness in ESL grammar instruction. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 28(1), 81-99.10.1075/aral.28.1.06manSearch in Google Scholar

Met, M. (1999). Content-based instruction: Defining terms, making decisions (NFLC Reports). Washington, D.C.: The National Foreign Language Center.Search in Google Scholar

Mukundan, J., Hajimohammadi, R., & Nimehchisalem, V. (2011). Developing an English language textbook evaluation checklist: A focus group study. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science 1(12), 100-106.Search in Google Scholar

Ortega, L. (2009). Understanding second language acquisition London: Hodder Education.Search in Google Scholar

Petraki, E., & Bayes, S. (2013). Teaching oral requests: An evaluation of five English as a second language coursebooks. Pragmatics 23(3), 499-517.10.1075/prag.23.3.06petSearch in Google Scholar

Pienemann, M. (1984). Psychological constraints on the teachability of languages. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 6(2), 186-214.10.1017/S0272263100005015Search in Google Scholar

Pienemann, M. (1985). Learnability and syllabus construction. In K. Hyltenstam & M. Pienemann (Eds.), Modelling and assessing second language development (pp. 23-75). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Search in Google Scholar

Pienemann, M. (1986). The effect of instruction on learners’ orientation in L2 acquisition. In A. Ramat (Ed.), L’apprendimiento non guidato di una seconda lingua (pp. 307-326). Bologna: Mulino.Search in Google Scholar

Pienemann, M. (1989). Is language teachable? Psycholinguistic experiments and hypotheses. Applied Linguistics 10(1), 52-79.10.1093/applin/10.1.52Search in Google Scholar

Pienemann, M. (1998). Language processing and second language development: Processability theory (Vol. 15.). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/sibil.15Search in Google Scholar

Pienemann, M. (2005). Cross-linguistic aspects of processability theory Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/sibil.30Search in Google Scholar

Pienemann, M., Di Biase, B., & Kawaguchi, S. (2005). Extending processability theory. In M. Pienemann (Ed.), Cross-linguistic aspects of processability theory (pp. 199-251). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/sibil.30.09pieSearch in Google Scholar

Pienemann, M., & Keβler, J.-U. (2011). Studying processability theory: An introductory textbook (Vol. 1.). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/palart.1Search in Google Scholar

Richards, J. C. (2001). Curriculum development in language teaching New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511667220Search in Google Scholar

Seedhouse, P. (2005). “Task” as research construct. Language Learning 55(3), 533-570.10.1111/j.0023-8333.2005.00314.xSearch in Google Scholar

Shi, J., & Ji, R. (2011). 英语视听说教材评估体系的建构及应用 [The construction and application of evaluation system for English visual and verbal teaching materials]. Education Research Monthly, (05), 68-74.Search in Google Scholar

Tang, X. (2017). Learnability and pedagogical implication: An acquisition-based evaluation of English textbooks in China (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Australian National University, Canberra.Search in Google Scholar

Tang, C., & Xu, J. (2011). The acquisition order of English relative clauses by Chinese senior high school students: A mixed-design study. Foreign Language Teaching and Research (1), 96-108; 159-160.Search in Google Scholar

Wang, J. (2005). 中国学生英语定冠词非类指用法的习得 [A study of the acquisition of the non-generic use of English definite articles by Chinese students]. Foreign Language Education 26(3), 22-26.Search in Google Scholar

Wong, J. (2007). Answering my call: A look at telephone closings. In H. Bowles & P. Seedhouse (Eds.), Conversation analysis and language for specific purposes (pp. 271-304). Bern: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Wu, X. (Ed.). (2012). People’s Education Press English Beijing: People’s Education Press.Search in Google Scholar

Xu, J., & Zheng, C. (2005). 对情状体假说的检验——中国学生一般过去时的习得 [A test for aspect hypothesis: The acquisition of English simple past tense by Chinese students]. Modern Foreign Languages 28(2), 147-156.Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, B. (2013). 大学生英语现在完成时习得的语料库考察 [A corpus-based study of the acquisition of English present perfect tense by Chinese university students]. Foreign Languages and Their Teaching 271(4), 67-71.Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, B., & Xu, J. (2017). A longitudinal study of Chinese EFL learners’ use of English present perfect. Foreign Language Teaching and Research (2), 16-38.Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, J. (2005). The acquisition of English causative color verbs by Chinese university students. Foreign Language Teaching and Research 37(6), 446-452.Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, S. (Ed.). (2014). Join in Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.Search in Google Scholar

Zhong, S., & Huang, R. (2017). L2 acquisition of English fictive motion constructions by Chinese EFL learners. Foreign Language Teaching and Research (1), 10-21.Search in Google Scholar

Zipser, K. (2012). Processability theory and pedagogical progression in an Italian textbook. Linguistica 52(1), 55-68.10.4312/linguistica.52.1.55-68Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2019-08-16
Published in Print: 2019-06-26

© 2019 FLTRP, Walter de Gruyter, Cultural and Education Section British Embassy

Downloaded on 20.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/CJAL-2019-0014/html
Scroll to top button