Home Laboratory testing for the antiphospholipid syndrome: making sense of antiphospholipid antibody assays
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Laboratory testing for the antiphospholipid syndrome: making sense of antiphospholipid antibody assays

  • Emmanuel J. Favaloro EMAIL logo and Richard C.W. Wong
Published/Copyright: January 31, 2011

Abstract

The antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune condition characterised by a wide range of clinical features (primarily thrombosis and/or obstetric related), associated with the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) as detected by a diverse range of laboratory tests. APS remains a significant diagnostic challenge for clinicians across a wide range of specialities, largely due to issues related to laboratory testing as well as the expanding range of reported clinical manifestations of APS. The laboratory issues include limitations in detailed knowledge by both clinical and laboratory personnel regarding the ‘complete’ range of available aPL tests, as well as ongoing problems with assay reproducibility and standardisation. aPL are identified using diverse laboratory procedures based on one of two distinct test processes, namely solid phase and liquid phase assays. The former includes anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL) and anti-β2-glycoprotein I antibodies (aβ2GPI). The latter are centred on clot-based tests that are used to identify the so-called lupus anticoagulant (LA). This article will discuss: (i) issues related to laboratory testing for APS in terms of the currently available solid-phase and liquid-phase assays, and identifiable biases resulting from these tests usually being performed in different laboratories; (ii) current problems with calibration, standardisation and reproducibility of these assays; (iii) pre-analytical, analytical and post-analytical considerations and ongoing initiatives for improvement; (iv) issues related to potential combinations/panels of available aPL tests; and (v) the entities of seropositive APS, seronegative APS and non-APS aPL-positivity. In doing so, this review will hopefully help bridge the two disciplines of haematology and immunology (‘representing’ liquid-phase and solid-phase aPL testing, respectively), by improving the understanding of those working in each of these disciplines of the merits and limitations of the assays performed in the other discipline, and encouraging inter-discipline cooperation in the reporting of aPL test results.


Corresponding author: Dr. Emmanuel J. Favaloro, Department of Haematology, Institute of Clinical Pathology and Medical Research (ICPMR), Westmead Hospital, WSAHS, Westmead, NSW, 2145, Australia Phone: +612 9845 6618, Fax: +612 9689 2331

Received: 2010-6-3
Accepted: 2010;-7-28
Published Online: 2011-01-31
Published in Print: 2011-03-01

©2011 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin New York

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Editorial
  2. Biomarkers of neurodegenerative diseases
  3. Reviews
  4. CSF biomarkers in neurodegenerative diseases
  5. Tau and p-tau as CSF biomarkers in dementia: a meta-analysis
  6. Amyloid β (Aβ) and phospho-tau (p-tau) as diagnostic biomarkers in Alzheimer's disease
  7. The effect of apolipoprotein E (ApoE) genotype on biomarkers of amyloidogenesis, tau pathology and neurodegeneration in Alzheimer's disease
  8. Advanced glycation endproducts as gerontotoxins and biomarkers for carbonyl-based degenerative processes in Alzheimer's disease
  9. Parkinson's disease – the continuing search for biomarkers
  10. α-Synuclein in Parkinson disease and other neurodegenerative disorders
  11. S100B protein in neurodegenerative disorders
  12. Inflammatory and structural biomarkers in acute traumatic spinal cord injury
  13. Homocysteine: a biomarker in neurodegenerative diseases
  14. Editorial
  15. ROMA or death: advances in epithelial ovarian cancer diagnosis
  16. Review
  17. Laboratory testing for the antiphospholipid syndrome: making sense of antiphospholipid antibody assays
  18. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  19. Quality indicators and specifications for key analytical-extranalytical processes in the clinical laboratory. Five years’ experience using the Six Sigma concept
  20. Determination of oxidative and occupational stress in palliative care workers
  21. Effect of cigarette smoking on plasma homocysteine concentrations
  22. Erythrocyte membrane protein analysis by sodium dodecyl sulphate-capillary gel electrophoresis in the diagnosis of hereditary spherocytosis
  23. Evaluation of hematological parameters on admission for the prediction of 7-day in-hospital mortality in a large trauma cohort
  24. Platelet function testing in hirudin and BAPA anticoagulated blood
  25. Evaluation of the iChem® Velocity™ Urine Chemistry Analyzer in a hospital routine laboratory
  26. Crystalluria: prevalence, different types of crystals and the role of infrared spectroscopy
  27. Cancer Diagnostics
  28. The ROMA (Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm) for estimating the risk of epithelial ovarian cancer in women presenting with pelvic mass: is it really useful?
  29. Evaluation of the accuracy of serum human epididymis protein 4 in combination with CA125 for detecting ovarian cancer: a prospective case-control study in a Korean population
  30. Cardiovascular Diseases
  31. APOA5 −1131T/C polymorphism is associated with coronary artery disease in a Chinese population: a meta-analysis
  32. Assessment of the nickel-albumin binding assay for diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome
  33. Letters to the Editor
  34. AGER gene -374T>A (rs1800624) polymorphism is not associated with the severity of non-diabetic coronary artery disease in Han Chinese
  35. Some lessons learned from using medium scale genotyping techniques in pharmacogenetic research
  36. Improved neopterin ELISA kit: a good compromise between HPLC results and clinical practice
  37. Cross-reactivity of 25-hydroxy vitamin D2 from different commercial immunoassays for 25-hydroxy vitamin D: an evaluation without spiked samples
  38. Modulated human maternal and premature neonatal erythrocyte membrane enzyme activities in relation to the mode of delivery: in vitro restoration with L-Carnitine
Downloaded on 16.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/CCLM.2011.064/pdf
Scroll to top button