Home Integrated diagnostics: a conceptual framework with examples
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Integrated diagnostics: a conceptual framework with examples

  • Anant Madabhushi , Scott Doyle , George Lee , Ajay Basavanhally , James Monaco , Steve Masters , John Tomaszewski and Michael Feldman
Published/Copyright: May 23, 2010

Abstract

With the advent of digital pathology, imaging scientists have begun to develop computerized image analysis algorithms for making diagnostic (disease presence), prognostic (outcome prediction), and theragnostic (choice of therapy) predictions from high resolution images of digitized histopathology. One of the caveats to developing image analysis algorithms for digitized histopathology is the ability to deal with highly dense, information rich datasets; datasets that would overwhelm most computer vision and image processing algorithms. Over the last decade, manifold learning and non-linear dimensionality reduction schemes have emerged as popular and powerful machine learning tools for pattern recognition problems. However, these techniques have thus far been applied primarily to classification and analysis of computer vision problems (e.g., face detection). In this paper, we discuss recent work by a few groups in the application of manifold learning methods to problems in computer aided diagnosis, prognosis, and theragnosis of digitized histopathology. In addition, we discuss some exciting recent developments in the application of these methods for multi-modal data fusion and classification; specifically the building of meta-classifiers by fusion of histological image and proteomic signatures for prostate cancer outcome prediction.

Clin Chem Lab Med 2010;48:989–98.


Corresponding author: Michael Feldman, MD, PhD, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Founders Bldg, Rm 6.058, 3400 Spruce St Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA Phone: +215-662-6503, Fax: +215-349-5910,

Published Online: 2010-05-23
Published in Print: 2010-07-01

©2010 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin New York

Articles in the same Issue

  1. HIGHLIGHT: LABORATORY DIAGNOSTICS IN THE THIRD MILLENIUM: WHERE, HOW AND WHY
  2. Editorial
  3. Foreword
  4. Reviews
  5. Roots, development and future directions of laboratory medicine
  6. The “hospital central laboratory”: automation, integration and clinical usefulness
  7. Clinical pathology services: remapping our strategic itinerary
  8. Stat laboratory testing: integration or autonomy?
  9. Point-of-care testing in critical care: the clinician's point of view
  10. Reproductive-endocrine point-of-care testing: current status and limitations
  11. Laboratory testing in pharmacies
  12. Laboratory testing during critical care transport: point-of-care testing in air ambulances
  13. Self-monitoring of blood glucose with a focus on analytical quality: an overview
  14. Molecular diagnostics: between chips and customized medicine
  15. Evaluating laboratory diagnostic tests and translational research
  16. Integrated diagnostics: a conceptual framework with examples
  17. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  18. The European Register of Specialists in Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine: Guide to the Register, Version 3-2010
  19. The prevalence of preanalytical errors in a Croatian ISO 15189 accredited laboratory
  20. Indicators and quality specifications for strategic and support processes related to the clinical laboratory: four years' experience
  21. SKML-Quality Mark for point-of-care test (POCT) glucose meters and glucose meters for home-use
  22. PATHFAST™ NT-proBNP (N-terminal-pro B type natriuretic peptide): a multicenter evaluation of a new point-of-care assay
  23. Clinical implication of plasma neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) concentrations in patients with advanced carotid atherosclerosis
  24. Evaluation of the TEST 1 erythrocyte sedimentation rate system and intra- and inter-laboratory quality control using new latex control materials
  25. Letter to the Editor
  26. Phlebotomy site haemolysis rates vary inversely with workload
Downloaded on 14.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/CCLM.2010.193/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button