Home The “hospital central laboratory”: automation, integration and clinical usefulness
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

The “hospital central laboratory”: automation, integration and clinical usefulness

  • Martina Zaninotto and Mario Plebani
Published/Copyright: May 12, 2010

Abstract

Recent technological developments in laboratory medicine have led to a major challenge, maintaining a close connection between the search of efficiency through automation and consolidation and the assurance of effectiveness. The adoption of systems that automate most of the manual tasks characterizing routine activities has significantly improved the quality of laboratory performance; total laboratory automation being the paradigm of the idea that “human-less” robotic laboratories may allow for better operation and insuring less human errors. Furthermore, even if ongoing technological developments have considerably improved the productivity of clinical laboratories as well as reducing the turnaround time of the entire process, the value of qualified personnel remains a significant issue. Recent evidence confirms that automation allows clinical laboratories to improve analytical performances only if trained staff operate in accordance with well-defined standard operative procedures, thus assuring continuous monitoring of the analytical quality. In addition, laboratory automation may improve the appropriateness of test requests through the use of algorithms and reflex testing. This should allow the adoption of clinical and biochemical guidelines. In conclusion, in laboratory medicine, technology represents a tool for improving clinical effectiveness and patient outcomes, but it has to be managed by qualified laboratory professionals.

Clin Chem Lab Med 2010;48:911–7.


Corresponding author: Martina Zaninotto, Department of Laboratory Medicine, University-Hospital, 35126 Padova, Italy Phone: +390498213230, Fax: +390498218489,

Published Online: 2010-05-12
Published in Print: 2010-07-01

©2010 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin New York

Articles in the same Issue

  1. HIGHLIGHT: LABORATORY DIAGNOSTICS IN THE THIRD MILLENIUM: WHERE, HOW AND WHY
  2. Editorial
  3. Foreword
  4. Reviews
  5. Roots, development and future directions of laboratory medicine
  6. The “hospital central laboratory”: automation, integration and clinical usefulness
  7. Clinical pathology services: remapping our strategic itinerary
  8. Stat laboratory testing: integration or autonomy?
  9. Point-of-care testing in critical care: the clinician's point of view
  10. Reproductive-endocrine point-of-care testing: current status and limitations
  11. Laboratory testing in pharmacies
  12. Laboratory testing during critical care transport: point-of-care testing in air ambulances
  13. Self-monitoring of blood glucose with a focus on analytical quality: an overview
  14. Molecular diagnostics: between chips and customized medicine
  15. Evaluating laboratory diagnostic tests and translational research
  16. Integrated diagnostics: a conceptual framework with examples
  17. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  18. The European Register of Specialists in Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine: Guide to the Register, Version 3-2010
  19. The prevalence of preanalytical errors in a Croatian ISO 15189 accredited laboratory
  20. Indicators and quality specifications for strategic and support processes related to the clinical laboratory: four years' experience
  21. SKML-Quality Mark for point-of-care test (POCT) glucose meters and glucose meters for home-use
  22. PATHFAST™ NT-proBNP (N-terminal-pro B type natriuretic peptide): a multicenter evaluation of a new point-of-care assay
  23. Clinical implication of plasma neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) concentrations in patients with advanced carotid atherosclerosis
  24. Evaluation of the TEST 1 erythrocyte sedimentation rate system and intra- and inter-laboratory quality control using new latex control materials
  25. Letter to the Editor
  26. Phlebotomy site haemolysis rates vary inversely with workload
Downloaded on 14.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/CCLM.2010.192/html
Scroll to top button